Comments on: Troops Get New Jammers

By: george

george — Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:39:13 +0000

stop posting this shit.…you are only hurting your fellow soldiers when you talk about stuff that should be (and probably is) classified. We all know what works and doesn’t work…why share that info with the enemy?!!?!?!?!?!?

By: Dr.Soehring

Dr.Soehring — Sat, 20 May 2006 18:11:47 +0000

Why construct such senseless things like “Love robots” when it is possible to change humans into robots themselves by operate conditioning and brainstorming at it has been done in the past by some spy organisations with what the russians called “Telephone” ?
The conveniant may be to hinder this, but one never knows, wether the robot will turn against his inventor, when to “off” button is missing in the construction in case of emergency.
In the history of robots there not only one case a robot killed his inventor who failed this emergency facility.
The story of Heel 2000 in the movie “2001” is not a fiction, i do believe, since mankind seems to be endangered to be ruled by machines made by his own invention creating “cyber-worlds” like “SIM-Life” an others …
Even the internet is not free of this, since i had the experience, that some enterprises were capable to copy and falsify any WEB-side, just to make one believe you are in the real one.
For instance my wife, from whom i was devorced, i can admire as a cyberwoman in official sites of german government and our child to seems to have become a “Data corpse, whose real existance is still not proved.
Think also to the real “Diana Spencer” story : What will prove, that is was not a dummy killed in that car or a double that was elected in a multimaedia beauty-competition to save the life of the real one.
Windsor are cable of that, thinking anyone in England to be a simple subject and not a free human beeing.
Thus as the story of doubles in history is not new, it has become more finer in its apearance :
Bin Laden for instance may be a press invention as there had been about fifty Hitlers during WW II or fife Schrders, making their appearance in more then one place simultanesly !
Even the person of George W.Bush may be a double, or a speaking dummy, when making its statements
on presidents briefings.
Scince medicine evoqued a pope as cybernatic man-machine one never nows if, what ever You meet in the neighbourhood is a real human beeing or a conditioned Zombie.
So better take care of what Yoiu believe from media presentation an cybernatic virtual reality …
The Aliens are amongst us !

By: Smitty

Smitty — Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:59:13 +0000

Duct tape, duct tape the local mullah to the front of the patrol vehicle, that should diminish the IED activity.

By: j

Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:23:11 +0000

thanks to who ever wrote this for informing the enemy of our latest technology. DOD just had a class on not posting information to the net that might help terrorists. please think about what you post and how it may help the enemy before you post it.
many thanks for your help in this
j

By: comstock

comstock — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:30:49 +0000

My friend has a valentine v1 radar detector, you know, the one with the indicator arrows. Well, the thing regularly gives false positives whenever you drive by a store with a lot of automatic doors, i.e. walmart. If the IR sensors that the terrorists/insurgents are using are that similar to the ones used in domestic stores, surely DARPA or some research wing of the pentagon or contractor has looked into this?

By: Greg

Greg — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:52:42 +0000

Or we could just nuke Iran, which is where all of these devices are coming from.

By: Person

Person — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:25:06 +0000

“>And how long until the insurgents have bombs which detect a jammer’s signal strength and blow
>up just when it starts attenuating slightly?
Thanks for feeding terrorists with ideas, risking people’s lives, idiot.“
Yeah…don’t debate it because terrorists could use that idea. /That/ makes sense.
As to the idea of “IR” jammers, it wouldn’t be necessarily a jammer.
A wideband IR transmitter could preemptively trigger such a device, or soldiers could wear IR absorbing camo paint.

By: Pedestrian

Pedestrian — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:18:02 +0000

>The human debris that are producing these bombs don’t NEED to counter our technology with higher
>technology…precisely the opposite.
I have to disagree half way with that. While there is still use for traditional cables to activate an IED when jammers are in use to counter RF activated IEDs, the time and risk increases for the limited range. Just imagine how expensive and time costing it would be for setting up a cable connected to an IED from several hundred meters away to avoid being spotted and to escape? There are advantage but at the same time disadvantage going for the low tech.
>And how long until the insurgents have bombs which detect a jammer’s signal strength and blow
>up just when it starts attenuating slightly?
Thanks for feeding terrorists with ideas, risking people’s lives, idiot.

By: Byron Skinner

Byron Skinner — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:22:45 +0000

Good Morning Folks,
Just a lttle twist on this Jammer Story, an article that appears in this mornings San Diego Union Tribune connect(s) the firm(s) making these devices to the recently desgraced Congressman Cunningham. This is the basis for the House Intelligence Committee getting involved in an insestigation as to the who, what and why of those who paid off Cunningham.
Since this is going to court there was little information given in the story but is does add a little interest to the question of why these devices have been compromised almost before they got to the troops.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

By: pete

pete — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:55:27 +0000

Nicholas.
These bombs are by no means sophisticated. They are using low tech to defeat our systems not high tech. The bombs that use “infra-red” sensors are basically the same sensors used on grocery store doors and garage doors the world over. To produce a counter jammer of that level of sophistication would be next to impossible in large quantities. The human debris that are producing these bombs don’t NEED to counter our technology with higher technology…precisely the opposite.