<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Desk Jockeys vs. Border Drones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:21:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2moons dil</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/#comment-118676</link>
		<dc:creator>2moons dil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2945#comment-118676</guid>
		<description>Every day I was early to get up then sit in front of the computer, started to the upgrade or earn the 2moons dil, I was practicing shaman, the shaman can good upgrade, quickly I up to the 80 level, than I enter to the P upgrade, in there I understand a QS.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every day I was early to get up then sit in front of the computer, started to the upgrade or earn the 2moons dil, I was practicing shaman, the shaman can good upgrade, quickly I up to the 80 level, than I enter to the P upgrade, in there I understand a QS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fiesta Gold</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/#comment-118675</link>
		<dc:creator>fiesta Gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 03:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2945#comment-118675</guid>
		<description>In fact I think in the game the most important was not the fiesta Gold or the upgrade, in my mind play with friends and get more friendship were the most important.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact I think in the game the most important was not the fiesta Gold or the upgrade, in my mind play with friends and get more friendship were the most important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaiya money</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/#comment-118671</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaiya money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 07:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2945#comment-118671</guid>
		<description>You can use Shaiya money all items in the game, including the devastating Goddess weapons. However, this power comes at a cost: if your character dies, you have only 3 minutes to be resurrected or your character is deleted and you must start all over.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can use Shaiya money all items in the game, including the devastating Goddess weapons. However, this power comes at a cost: if your character dies, you have only 3 minutes to be resurrected or your character is deleted and you must start all over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheap rs gold</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/#comment-118667</link>
		<dc:creator>cheap rs gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2945#comment-118667</guid>
		<description>I also give my account to her, she want to play my number, she also can play. But one day, I found she had another husband, and she have no longer to play with me. And I found my number is empty, she took my things changed the cheap RS gold. I was very sad; I did not believe she is the girl that I know.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also give my account to her, she want to play my number, she also can play. But one day, I found she had another husband, and she have no longer to play with me. And I found my number is empty, she took my things changed the cheap RS gold. I was very sad; I did not believe she is the girl that I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Pembroke</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/#comment-42213</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Pembroke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2945#comment-42213</guid>
		<description>My son is currently in the air force...and works with the maintaince as a satcomm tech....and is getting out this july....and will be looking for a job.....is this a job within the border patrol
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My son is currently in the air force…and works with the maintaince as a satcomm tech.…and is getting out this july.…and will be looking for a job.….is this a job within the border patrol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy McCleary</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/#comment-118665</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy McCleary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 15:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2945#comment-118665</guid>
		<description>Unlike a military battlefield, drones have to coexist with licensed, piloted aircraft that can be talking with a controller or may choose to not to be under positive control.  Pilots have defined rules for aircraft avoidance, frequencies for notification and alerts, transponder codes to feed TCAS (traffic Collision Avoidance Systems) and the Mark-1 Eyeball.  Drones lack the oversight and rules needed to safely navigate in congested airspace alongside real flesh/blood pilots.
For those who opt for carving out airspace for drones-only, that is where they are now, in military airspace.  However, even in military airspace, civilian aircraft in the US can traverse with FAA clearance or without.  Also why should a pilot-less drone be afforded more rights to airspace than piloted aircraft?  The FAA and many pilots agree.
No more would I want a ROV roaming around my neighborhood than similarly want a ROV flying around me in the much more dangerous airspace.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike a military battlefield, drones have to coexist with licensed, piloted aircraft that can be talking with a controller or may choose to not to be under positive control.  Pilots have defined rules for aircraft avoidance, frequencies for notification and alerts, transponder codes to feed TCAS (traffic Collision Avoidance Systems) and the Mark-1 Eyeball.  Drones lack the oversight and rules needed to safely navigate in congested airspace alongside real flesh/blood pilots.<br />
For those who opt for carving out airspace for drones-only, that is where they are now, in military airspace.  However, even in military airspace, civilian aircraft in the US can traverse with FAA clearance or without.  Also why should a pilot-less drone be afforded more rights to airspace than piloted aircraft?  The FAA and many pilots agree.<br />
No more would I want a ROV roaming around my neighborhood than similarly want a ROV flying around me in the much more dangerous airspace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Duckworth</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/#comment-118663</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Duckworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2945#comment-118663</guid>
		<description>I think that with thhe FAA vs DHS/Fed Gov&#039;t on the UAV issue, the FAA needs to be beaten with a stick and told how it&#039;s going to be.
I for one would love to see more use of UAVs domestically to help augment that human assets in all gov&#039;t agencies.
Guess I&#039;m one of the weirdos who aren&#039;t afraid of my government.
Eric the Dread0395
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that with thhe FAA vs DHS/Fed Gov’t on the UAV issue, the FAA needs to be beaten with a stick and told how it’s going to be.<br />
I for one would love to see more use of UAVs domestically to help augment that human assets in all gov’t agencies.<br />
Guess I’m one of the weirdos who aren’t afraid of my government.<br />
Eric the Dread0395</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Katzman</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/#comment-118662</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Katzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 01:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2945#comment-118662</guid>
		<description>This bit about UAVs needing advance clearance, etc.? Not just a US issue. It&#039;s also an issue in Iraq:
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2005/11/field-report-on-raven-shadow-uavs-from-the-101st/index.php
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bit about UAVs needing advance clearance, etc.? Not just a US issue. It’s also an issue in Iraq:<br />
<a href="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2005/11/field-report-on-raven-shadow-uavs-from-the-101st/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2005/11/field-report-on-raven-shadow-uavs-from-the-101st/index.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Warnock</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/#comment-118661</link>
		<dc:creator>David Warnock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2945#comment-118661</guid>
		<description>The problem that the FAA has has thre facets.
1. The FAA does not have the equipment and personnel to monitor unmanned flights along the borders. Their authorized workforce and equipment is barely able to handle the traffic load they currently handle.
2. Training and communications with the operators of the drones. FAA can reasonably demand a level of training of the operators and the ability to make immediate contact with the operator of any given drone. FAA orders about flight path must take precedence over all other orders, since they are always given for flight safety reasons.
3. Ability to track and identify the unmanned air vehicles requires onboard radar beacons on the UAV to respond with flight identification and altitude. FAA cannot meet its air safety separation requirements without being able to locate the drones on radar and know their altitude at all times. UAVs are very small radar targets, very difficult to detect and track. That is an advantage on the battlefield, but a serious problem in civilian airspace.
These requirements are not mere bureaucratic mumbo-jumbo. They affect the safety of flight of all commercial and military flights in the vicinity of the U. S. borders, particularly international flights. The FAA is correct to require that these problems be solved before the UAVs operate along the border. Their job is flight safety.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem that the FAA has has thre facets.<br />
1. The FAA does not have the equipment and personnel to monitor unmanned flights along the borders. Their authorized workforce and equipment is barely able to handle the traffic load they currently handle.<br />
2. Training and communications with the operators of the drones. FAA can reasonably demand a level of training of the operators and the ability to make immediate contact with the operator of any given drone. FAA orders about flight path must take precedence over all other orders, since they are always given for flight safety reasons.<br />
3. Ability to track and identify the unmanned air vehicles requires onboard radar beacons on the UAV to respond with flight identification and altitude. FAA cannot meet its air safety separation requirements without being able to locate the drones on radar and know their altitude at all times. UAVs are very small radar targets, very difficult to detect and track. That is an advantage on the battlefield, but a serious problem in civilian airspace.<br />
These requirements are not mere bureaucratic mumbo-jumbo. They affect the safety of flight of all commercial and military flights in the vicinity of the U. S. borders, particularly international flights. The FAA is correct to require that these problems be solved before the UAVs operate along the border. Their job is flight safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/02/desk-jockeys-vs-border-drones/#comment-118659</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 03:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2945#comment-118659</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Mr. Skinner. Clearly the government should know how many blackholes someone might have in their yard, becouse even one blackhole in the hands of terrorists would be too much.
It could swallow the whole panet!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Mr. Skinner. Clearly the government should know how many blackholes someone might have in their yard, becouse even one blackhole in the hands of terrorists would be too much.<br />
It could swallow the whole panet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

