DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ships and Subs » Gunboats Back in Style

Gunboats Back in Style

After years of trying to give away its 14 Cyclone-class patrol boats, the Navy is reversing course, according to Navy Times. Now the Cyclones will form the backbone of a revitalized coastal gunboat community based in Little Creek, Virginia.
The 60-meter Cyclones were commissioned in the early ‘90s with the intention of using them to transport SEALs and other special forces in litorral waters. But the special operators never liked the Cyclones: they were too big and drew too deep for many waterways. So in the late ‘90s, the Navy offered them to foreign navies. There was only one taker — the Phillipines navy, which acquired the first of the class — before events intervened.
Cyclones.jpgThe towers fell, the U.S. invaded Iraq and the Navy found itself with a lot of foreign littorals to police but with few suitable platforms. So four Cyclones were based in Bahrain, from where they sortied to guard Iraq’s only two oil terminals off Basra.
Despite their sudden utility, the Navy still wasn’t comfortable with the tiny Cyclones. They were simple, cramped and lightly armed (cannons and machine guns only) in a fleet dominated by supercarriers and large multi-mission destroyers. The Navy exiled two boats to the Pacific and convinced the Coast Guard to take five of the ships. Coasties didn’t know what to do with the boats and weren’t afraid to say so.
Against the backdrop of all this fumbling, the Navy was starting to think hard about its future fleet. The consensus was that it needed more hulls suitable to the litorrals. Grand plans were drawn up for a large force of corvettes (LCS) and catamarans (JHSV). Then somebody realized the Navy already had coastal vessels at its disposal. Last week, the commander at Little Creek announced that the Coast Guard Cyclones would be returned to the Navy, the two Pacific boats would make their way to Virginia and new doctrine would be developed to employ the Cyclones as coastal gunboats and mobile training units for small navies.
To quote Navy Times: “Hueber said the idea is to train up foreign navies so they can patrol their own maritime borders. The [Cyclone], because of its size, crew and mission, relates best to what smaller navies actually do.“
That’s right, it’s gunboat diplomacy for the 21st century.
–David Axe

Share |

December 3rd, 2005 | Ships and Subs | 29465 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/12/03/gunboats-back-in-style/Gunboats+Back+in+Style2005-12-03+19%3A26%3A56noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Desk Jockeys vs. Border Drones | Pirate-Fighters’ Curious Past » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Byron Skinner says:
    December 3, 2005 at 6:31 pm

    Good Afternoon David,
    I will try this again. In today’s San Diego Union Tribune there is a story on page A10 titled; “Navy’s new command to distance it more from the Cold War” by Otto Kreisher. The story ndeal with the formation with the Navy’s new “Navy Expeditionary Combat Command”. This new command will be in addition to the Navy Expeditionary Battalions.
    The most interesting thing is units not included in this new command which are the Marines and SEALS. Both these units traditionaly have served as the Navy’s entry into into land warfare.
    It is noted that the SEALS hot button project the SEAL Delivery Vehicle has been put on hold at Lockheed its prime contractor.
    Scuttlebutt among Naval Officers both retired and active is that the Navy would be better without the burden of these to semi Independent groups under the Navy. Maybe we are starting to see a “Divorce” with in the Navy and it’s siblings.
    The Marines are now more then ever Army like to the point that a Marine Major General could soon again Command an Army Division. The SEALS are in disaray after being pulled from Afghanistan after the desaster this summer that casued the deaths of sixteen men. The SEALS may be a better fit with the Spec. Ops. Command then with in the Navy.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  2. David Axe says:
    December 3, 2005 at 7:34 pm

    Actually, Byron, the SEALS are with SOCOM, which is a inter-service command, not a branch. As it stands, there aren’t really any military units that fall outside one of the three major branches (four if you count the Marines as separate from the Navy). Now, if you’re proposing that SOCOM be its own branch … well, that’s an interesting proposal.

    Reply
  3. Pedestrian says:
    December 4, 2005 at 4:52 am

    Maybe the new Iraq Navy would be happy to take some, other than Phillipines.

    Reply
  4. Riku says:
    April 18, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    Hi
    How many men do you need handle a gunboat?
    Riku

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I will concede timeliness will never be satisfied;...
      TMB
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      RE: Mac, has the Air Force ever asked the Army...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Question…with modern equipment like laser...
      gmanaz
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      why don't we go to the boneyards and museums and...
      Jim
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Why take American when the foreign one is better? Enough of...
      american1776
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      Invade Mexico?
      kim
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      Why is that the angriest...
      kim
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Buy American!!!!
      kim
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      One approach to spotting road mines is an old...
      Max Friedman
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      Gentlemen,from a...
      Roy M Brown
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage