DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Blog Bidness » Gunshot Detector and Other “Ideas”

Gunshot Detector and Other “Ideas”

The New York Times Magazine’s “Year in Ideas” issue is out today. And I wrote up three of the ideas inside:

* “The Crawl” Makes You Stupid
* Microblindness
* Sonic Gunman Locator, The

Unfortunately, the online ver­sions of these arti­cles all cut off the last para­graphs of what are already short sto­ries. The sto­ries have been fixed. So I’ll paste the full text of the “Sonic Gunman Locator” below. (And yeah, I know the thing came out in 2004. But the Times didn’t feel like quib­bling over details.) Let me know if you guys want to see the full texts of the other ones.
11sonic.650.jpgThe bombs get all the head­lines, but gun­fire is also a con­stant threat to American troops in Iraq. Between the shat­tered build­ings, the rub­ble piles, the swirling dust storms and the roar­ing Humvees, shoot­ers can be very hard to find. The Pentagon’s response: start equip­ping Humvees with tech­nol­ogy that can auto­mat­i­cally pin­point where the shots are com­ing from.
One sys­tem, known as Boomerang, uses a bun­dle of seven micro­phones, each fac­ing a dif­fer­ent direc­tion, mounted on top of an 18-​​inch pole. (Imagine a giant bou­quet, with all the flower petals gone.) When a bul­let flies by, cre­at­ing a shock wave, each micro­phone picks up the sound at a slightly dif­fer­ent time. Those tiny dif­fer­ences allow the sys­tem to cal­cu­late where the shooter is. (Boomerang also lis­tens for the blast from the gun’s muz­zle, which reaches the sys­tem just after the bullet’s faster-​​than-​​sound flight.) Inside the Humvee, a recorded voice buzzes through a dash­board speaker, announc­ing the shooter’s posi­tion — “Shot 10 o’clock! Shot 10 o’clock!” — and an ana­log clock­like dis­play indi­cates the direc­tion. Other infor­ma­tion, like the shooter’s G.P.S. coor­di­nates, range and ele­va­tion, are also pro­vided. “We’re now accu­rate way beyond 500 meters,” says Dave Schmitt, Boomerang’s pro­gram man­ager at BBN Technologies in Cambridge, Mass.
The Army has 25 Boomerangs in Iraq right now, and the Marines are ready­ing an equal num­ber for their next rota­tion of troops. Schmitt sees a domes­tic mar­ket for the devices, as well. Already, Chicago is cou­pling gun­shot detec­tors to secu­rity cam­eras, which are hung in some of the citys tough­est neigh­bor­hoods. The idea is that when shots are heard, the cam­era will auto­mat­i­cally turn in the direc­tion of the gun­fire — giv­ing police and ambu­lance dis­patch­ers a glimpse of the scene before cops or EMTs are sent out. G.I.s wont get that kind of advance warn­ing, of course. But theyll set­tle for a lit­tle infor­ma­tion, just after the fact. 

Share |

December 11th, 2005 | Blog Bidness | 296329 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/12/11/gunshot-detector-and-other-ideas/Gunshot+Detector+and+Other+%22Ideas%222005-12-11+15%3A47%3A49jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Air Force, Cyberspace Defenders | Name This Thing » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. pedestrian says:
    December 11, 2005 at 11:57 am

    Answer to the “Name this thing”: The Rock

    Reply
  2. Aziz says:
    December 11, 2005 at 12:40 pm

    Hahaha, I liked the Microblindness one:
    “But what psy­chol­ogy researchers at Yale and Vanderbilt Universities have dis­cov­ered is that erotic — and vio­lent — images are so dis­tract­ing that they make peo­ple tem­porar­ily blind.“
    That sucks, as I’m con­stantly watch­ing viloent movies (e.g. Saving Private Ryan), and even if it is for half a sec­ond, it even­tu­ally adds up.

    Reply
  3. James says:
    December 11, 2005 at 1:03 pm

    The gun­shot locater will be effec­tive for about 24 hours. The gun­shot detec­tor pre­sum­ably detects gun­shots that miss as well, no? Gunshots pointed at other vehi­cles in the con­voy? Gunshots pointed straight up in the air? Gunshots from sub­sonic rounds (like the .45)? Obviously, then, a blank round or a squib will gen­er­ate an alarm.
    A cir­cle of squibs around the tar­get vehi­cle can be used to induce panic in the crew or sim­ply to con­ceal the true loca­tion of the weapon. Similarly, Chicago’s finest crim­i­nals will pop off a squib to get the cam­eras to turn away from their intended crime. If I can fig­ure this out within thirty sec­onds of read­ing the arti­cle, imag­ine what the insur­gents could do with all day to think about it.

    Reply
  4. rutty says:
    December 11, 2005 at 2:57 pm

    James, it works off of the time delays of the sound, so it does not mat­ter in what direc­tion the shot was fired as long as the sound reaches the micro­phone array. As for cir­cling the con­voy and let­ting off blanks, untill the stuff hits the fan (i.e. hun­dreds of rounds start fly­ing from all direc­tions) the loca­tors will give the loca­tions of all shoot­ers and that will be a hell of a lot bet­ter than using just one’s ear. (Besides, ask your­self if you would like to face off with marines armed with blanks.) And some spec­u­la­tion on my part, wouldn;t that sug­gest that the shoot­ers will be work­ing in groups instead of as a lone wolf, which should make it eas­ier to catch some­one even if the per­son you get was the one fir­ing the blanks.

    Reply
  5. The Cenobyte says:
    December 12, 2005 at 11:34 am

    A squib or blanks don’t work against these sys­tems. They are look­ing for not only the sound of the shot itself but the sound of the round mov­ing through the air. If there is no round mov­ing though the air then the sys­tem will assume that it was only a sound that sounded like a gun shot.
    And even if this did work, you might be able to make the sys­tem in Chicago look away (Although accord­ing to some peo­ple I have talked to it works great and they don’t ever get false alarms) in Iraq I think the bad-​​guys are going to be hard pressed to come up with a good sys­tem for fool­ing them with­out wast­ing huge amounts of time and energy (I mean if you can make squips go off all around the truck why not just set off a few bombs?)
    Now hav­ing said all that, I am not sure the effect on sub-​​sonic rounds. I just haven’t seen any­thing on that.

    Reply
  6. Jeff Mazurek says:
    February 9, 2006 at 9:03 pm

    Boomerang detects super­sonic shock waves gen­er­ated by the bul­let, there­fore, it is not sus­cep­ti­ble to ‘spoof­ing’ from ‘blanks’, fire­crack­ers, car back­fire or other sim­i­lar ‘noises’. It will NOT detect sub­sonic rounds which gen­er­ate a muz­zle blast (i.e. loud noise). This was inten­tional in order to develop a sys­tem that did not false alert when oper­at­ing in the high noise envi­ron­ment of a HMMWV dri­ving at tac­ti­cal speeds through urban areas. It is also designed to ignore ‘return fire’ . It is the low­est cost sys­tem of it’s type on the mar­ket. It will save lives.

    Reply
  7. Dennis Garcia says:
    March 17, 2006 at 11:36 am

    How would a clay­more like weapon, with mul­ti­ple rounds sent from the blast loca­tion be detected by the boomerang? For exam­ple, a clay­more or sim­i­lar weapon is det­o­nated any­where around a con­voy, when the sol­diers react, pos­si­bly exit­ing the vehi­cles they will be sub­juect to sniper fire. I am not say­ing this will or could hap­pen, I am just look­ing into the possibilities.

    Reply
  8. chainw says:
    February 9, 2007 at 3:46 pm

    Is thiis sys­tem able to cal­cu­late posi­tion from the sound of the bul­let alone? If a sniper were inside a build­ing, where the muz­zle blast would be more dif­fu­cult to pick up, would it still be able to tell where the shooter is?

    Reply
  9. iro zeny says:
    August 12, 2008 at 1:12 am

    95 lev­els, to me this had been a friend of the peo­ple around, the new ser­vice first hand the hand of a per­son to man­u­ally 95, it is really dif­fi­cult for my them­selves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny.

    Reply
  10. buy rupees says:
    August 12, 2008 at 1:23 am

    Leave for three years, I have quite repeat­edly returned to the Rappelz game. I con­tinue for good equip­ment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the orig­i­nal is the lack of a per­son accom­pa­ny­ing me.

    Reply
  11. rf money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 1:30 am

    And I rec­og­nized the beier­tuo broth­er­hood. As the help of this friends and will help in grow­ing, and this time sheikhs left the group B, the new pres­i­dent rose, lead us to defend the B group. We Society of Friends also actively par­tic­i­pated in the mine war­fare, win­ning glory for the fam­ily. Later, because a num­ber of rea­sons I left the RF. And I took my all RF money send my friends.

    Reply
  12. cheap gaia gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 1:32 am

    Later, we often played together, we always upgrade and earned cheap Gaia gold together. We are very happy in the Gaia game. I really fell in love with the girl, and I also like the Gaia game.

    Reply
  13. buy goonzu gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 1:36 am

    It is wind out­side the win­dow, and I numb­ness under the key­board, watch­ing the com­puter screen in a daze, rem­i­nis­cent of the past acid sweet, think of all peo­ple cry. In this long Goonzu road, who join me through? The game the same as real­ity, it also need friends, need a pater­nity can go with own peo­ple. I spent some money to buy goonzu gold, so I can find to find together with in the other half Goonzu down and even­tu­ally found noth­ing, I despair, I gave up, I sad, and I cry.

    Reply
  14. Guild Wars Gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 1:38 am

    One day, I was killed by other peo­ple, I told my brother, and I was dead. My brother said he come to help me. I said that peo­ple were very ter­ri­ble, he had a lot of equip­ment, and I think he must be hav­ing much Guild Wars Gold. Mt brother said, no mat­ter, he find friends come to help me. In this way, I rec­og­nized him.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Dear Designer; It is somewhat strange that the German Armed forces...
      Zandor
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I've seen them to. Believe me, I hate those 19 just as much as...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You are funny.
      Zandor
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Wow after reading these varied comments, I am surprised and educated. I...
      John
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage