<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Rapid Fire 12/17/05</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2005/12/17/rapid-fire-121705/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/17/rapid-fire-121705/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Dfens</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/17/rapid-fire-121705/#comment-119255</link> <dc:creator>Dfens</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:53:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2979#comment-119255</guid> <description>In general I do not support this blog&#039;s liberal defeatist political bent.  Putting politics before country in time of war is conteptable.  If, however, you&#039;re interested in a thoughtful perspective on the retirement of the F-14 you might find this useful:  http://www.flightjournal.com/fj/articles/f14f18/f14f18_1.asp </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general I do not support this blog’s liberal defeatist political bent.  Putting politics before country in time of war is conteptable.  If, however, you’re interested in a thoughtful perspective on the retirement of the F-14 you might find this useful: <a href="http://www.flightjournal.com/fj/articles/f14f18/f14f18_1.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.flightjournal.com/fj/articles/f14f18/f14f18_1.asp</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rutty</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/17/rapid-fire-121705/#comment-119254</link> <dc:creator>rutty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:04:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2979#comment-119254</guid> <description>If I&#039;m not mistaken, NASA has been releasing two-line element sets for the SGP4 proagator for all of these satellites for a long time.  What&#039;s the big deal about some lovey-dovey scientists putting it into a spreadshhet?  I&#039;ll bet thousands of amatuer astronomers have already made their own and some prbobaly post them on the web. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I’m not mistaken, NASA has been releasing two-line element sets for the SGP4 proagator for all of these satellites for a long time.  What’s the big deal about some lovey-dovey scientists putting it into a spreadshhet?  I’ll bet thousands of amatuer astronomers have already made their own and some prbobaly post them on the web.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 655/659 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 01:53:11 -->
