<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rapid Fire 12/17/05</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2005/12/17/rapid-fire-121705/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/17/rapid-fire-121705/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dfens</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/17/rapid-fire-121705/#comment-119255</link>
		<dc:creator>Dfens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2979#comment-119255</guid>
		<description>In general I do not support this blog&#039;s liberal defeatist political bent.  Putting politics before country in time of war is conteptable.  If, however, you&#039;re interested in a thoughtful perspective on the retirement of the F-14 you might find this useful:  http://www.flightjournal.com/fj/articles/f14f18/f14f18_1.asp
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general I do not support this blog’s liberal defeatist political bent.  Putting politics before country in time of war is conteptable.  If, however, you’re interested in a thoughtful perspective on the retirement of the F-14 you might find this useful:  <a href="http://www.flightjournal.com/fj/articles/f14f18/f14f18_1.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.flightjournal.com/fj/articles/f14f18/f14f18_1.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rutty</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/17/rapid-fire-121705/#comment-119254</link>
		<dc:creator>rutty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2979#comment-119254</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m not mistaken, NASA has been releasing two-line element sets for the SGP4 proagator for all of these satellites for a long time.  What&#039;s the big deal about some lovey-dovey scientists putting it into a spreadshhet?  I&#039;ll bet thousands of amatuer astronomers have already made their own and some prbobaly post them on the web.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I’m not mistaken, NASA has been releasing two-line element sets for the SGP4 proagator for all of these satellites for a long time.  What’s the big deal about some lovey-dovey scientists putting it into a spreadshhet?  I’ll bet thousands of amatuer astronomers have already made their own and some prbobaly post them on the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

