DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ground Vehicles » Hummer Limos Enter War Games

Hummer Limos Enter War Games

hummer_limo.jpgThe next wave of Army fight­ing vehi­cles are still on the draw­ing board. So, in the mean­time, “Boeing is out­fit­ting 34 com­mer­cially pro­duced limousine-​​style Hummers with radios and com­puter net­work­ing equip­ment to stand in for the… vehi­cles dur­ing tests and exer­cises,” accord­ing to Inside Defense.

In early January, seven of the vehi­cles will drive up Californias Interstate 15 to Nellis Air Force Base, NV, located near Las Vegas, to be used in the Air Force-​​led Joint Expeditionary Force Experiment 2006…
To find the actual vehi­cles, Boeing con­ducted two sep­a­rate com­pe­ti­tions — one among Hummer deal­er­ships near Huntington Beach, CA, and another among com­pa­nies that make vehi­cles into lim­ou­sines by cut­ting them in half and adding length to the mid­dle as needed. Hummer of West Covina, CA, and LA Custom Coach Inc. won out.
The Hummers were deliv­ered to the Huntington Beach SOSIL [System of Systems Integration Laboratory] facil­ity with an added alter­na­tor, dual oil fil­ters and run-​​flat tires. Then they were handed over to the lim­ou­sine com­pany, where their length was increased by 65 inches…
After the expan­sion to a six-​​door vehi­cle was com­plete, the Army added air con­di­tion­ing because the vehi­cles will be run­ning with com­put­ers and radios in the heat of the desert. They also were painted with the ser­vices sig­na­ture cam­ou­flage print.

Share |

December 27th, 2005 | Ground Vehicles | 299957 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/12/27/hummer-limos-enter-war-games/Hummer+Limos+Enter+War+Games2005-12-27+12%3A55%3A55jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « On Growing Old (and Being Young) in Kurdistan | Free Press in Kurdistan, Take Two » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. James says:
    December 27, 2005 at 1:02 pm

    Do they have a mini-​​bar? Because that would really be a nice fea­ture on those long con­voy escort missions.

    Reply
  2. anonymous says:
    December 27, 2005 at 2:03 pm

    No mini-​​bar, but they do have leather seats and drink-​​holders, which has gen­er­ated some amuse­ment. One gen­eral saw the chrome wheels and pitched a minor fit. There’s also some con­cern that these com­mer­cial (rather than mil­i­tary) vehi­cles won’t hold up well when they get to Nellis.
    But they’ll look great on I-​​15!

    Reply
  3. Sierra Mike Mike says:
    December 27, 2005 at 11:32 pm

    Practically, I imag­ine they’d make a some­what more com­fort­able mobile com­mand post than a com­mand APC, which tend to be cramped. If there’s no need for the C3 crew to be sur­rounded by 5cm of armour plat­ing, they’d just as soon not be. That said, it may just be gen­er­als with Napoleon com­plexes, if you catch my drift.

    Reply
  4. anonymous says:
    December 27, 2005 at 11:58 pm

    Another dog and pony show back here in the states,.….….…and in other news, sol­diers are still being shot and blown up in the mid­dle east.
    OIF vet

    Reply
  5. OIF & OEF VET says:
    December 28, 2005 at 12:41 am

    You would think that bet­ter armor and over­all gear for troops would be more impor­tant then some dumb shit like this that they could just as eas­ily con­vert exist­ing vehi­cles for. But then again, if you dont spend it this year, you wont get more next year..flat out dumb…

    Reply
  6. OIF & OEF VET says:
    December 28, 2005 at 12:41 am

    You would think that bet­ter armor and over­all gear for troops would be more impor­tant then some dumb shit like this that they could just as eas­ily con­vert exist­ing vehi­cles for. But then again, if you dont spend it this year, you wont get more next year..flat out dumb…

    Reply
  7. OIF & OEF VET says:
    December 28, 2005 at 12:41 am

    You would think that bet­ter armor and over­all gear for troops would be more impor­tant then some dumb shit like this that they could just as eas­ily con­vert exist­ing vehi­cles for. But then again, if you dont spend it this year, you wont get more next year..flat out dumb…

    Reply
  8. kelty says:
    December 28, 2005 at 5:26 am

    Why not, One would have to look at what the next vehi­cle is suposed to be for and how it is to be used to acom­plish it. The talk­ing watch was sure a laugh­ing mat­ter once. Do you hve a cell phone? Don’t just look at the clothes and for­get aobut who is wear­ing them. It does seem a lit­tle dumb though.

    Reply
  9. mrBill says:
    December 28, 2005 at 6:01 am

    Seriously, you weren’t seri­ous, were you?
    I’m sure this has to be a spoof. I mean, what else could it be.

    Reply
  10. Herb says:
    December 28, 2005 at 6:16 am

    It’s the Air Force. Did you expect them to use an ordi­nary Hummer?

    Reply
  11. Herb says:
    December 28, 2005 at 6:18 am

    Valley Girl, she’s a Valley Girl. Whatever!!!

    Reply
  12. Toejam says:
    December 28, 2005 at 7:37 am

    “It’s the Air Force. Did you expect them to use an ordi­nary Hummer?“
    Posted by: Herb
    Herb, if it’s the Airforce why didn’t they install wings on the Hummers?

    Reply
  13. CW2 says:
    December 28, 2005 at 7:44 am

    Stretched Hummers? Well of course.….but you did say Nellis AFB.….. Maybe they’ll go to that place that doesn’t exist!!.….hmmmm Yep, that’s it, the same men­tal­ity and waste of money! Gee once we become a total “con­sumer nation” who’ll be man­u­fac­tur­ing this crap for us? .…Oh, yeah, sorry CHINA!!!

    Reply
  14. HootLTC says:
    December 28, 2005 at 8:22 am

    The first time that thing goes over a 14″ curb it is mired.Maybe they are going to Nellis to get some lift­ing bod­ies attatched to the under car­riage to get it out of those “ruts“
    Hoot

    Reply
  15. Enlisted says:
    December 28, 2005 at 8:32 am

    Now we can ride in true style no more cat­tle trucks… hoorah!!!

    Reply
  16. Josh says:
    December 28, 2005 at 9:38 am

    Yes once again a waste of money just like a CSM dri­ving around a Dodge Durango with a Hemi in it over in Kuwait as well as some of the rest of the offi­cers dri­ving around those nice lux­ery SUVs. Far as I am con­cerened all they need is a HUMV just like the rest of us that were there just like it used to be back in the 60s where the Generals would ride is the old jeeps. This is noth­ing more than another DOG and Pony show and for who Im sure not impressed and actu­ally I have never been impressed with a Humv and sure as the hell am not impressed with it being a limo.
    STOP WASTING THE AMERICANS TAX MONEY
    LETS WAKE UP AMERICA

    Reply
  17. Terry says:
    December 28, 2005 at 10:00 am

    Instead of wast­ing valu­able time and money on lux­ury fight­ing vehi­cles, wouldn’t it make more sense to invest tax pay­ers dol­lars on cre­at­ing bet­ter armor pro­tec­tion that pre­serves the lives and limbs of our troops in the field.
    As a for­mer 91B20 Army Medic, if the lead­er­ship in Washington D.C. would place their hands directly on an sev­ered artery of an injured sol­dier, they might have a dif­fer­ent per­spec­tive. However, I under­stand that would be incon­ve­nient as they are a bit too busy plan­ning their next din­ner engagement.

    Reply
  18. Mike says:
    December 28, 2005 at 10:28 am

    Incredible. I’m not sure what the intended appli­ca­tion is, but it’s a heck of a hack job.
    Mike
    http://​www​.quick​trivia​.com

    Reply
  19. max says:
    December 28, 2005 at 10:35 am

    The “lux­ury” SUVs in Kuwait are cheaper than a hummv, in almost every case-​​they should be in low end pick­ups however.

    Reply
  20. Kim says:
    December 28, 2005 at 1:05 pm

    Once again a waste of money big time. No con­cern for our troops pro­tec­tion. Anyone notice that 3 tril­lion dol­lars of tax payer monies has been mis­used by our gov­er­ment this year. Here’s another prime example.

    Reply
  21. yme369 says:
    December 28, 2005 at 2:00 pm

    Personally I think it just makes for a big­ger tar­get –_​– Com. vehi­cle or not, a limo just makes a big­ger tar­get with far less abil­ity to move around the field. Secondly, one well-​​placed explo­sion in the mid­sec­tion of the body and the thing is in two halves (free com­put­ers any­one?). Dumb idea.

    Reply
  22. Andy says:
    December 28, 2005 at 2:05 pm

    I agree with Tim, did you read the arti­cle? These are stand in Command and Control vehi­cles for exer­cises to sup­port the Future Combat Systems devel­op­ment for the Army. Boeing had then stretched to fit more com­put­ers and comm gear for the exer­cise, not for a hot tub and mini-​​bar (although a mini-​​bar would be very handy in Nevada in August!)
    I am just glad Boeing used local com­pa­nies in Southern Calif. near their inte­gra­tion facil­ity and did not ask GM to make a cus­tom ver­sion of the HMMWV at a prob­a­bly astro­nom­i­cal cost. Ask your­self what even a stripped down Bradley fight­ing vehi­cle or a Stryker would cost.
    You may not agree with the FCS approach or the need for FCS, but this acqui­si­tion makes sense to me. At least they are adding air con­di­tion­ing for the comm guys.
    See http://​www​.army​.mil/​f​cs/ for what FCS is doing if you are fol­low­ing it and http://​www​.army​.mil/​f​c​s​/​f​a​c​t​f​i​l​e​s​/​c​2​v​.​h​tml for the C2 vehi­cle the HMMWV is stand­ing in for.

    Reply
  23. dave says:
    December 28, 2005 at 6:21 pm

    Unbelievable. Life imi­tat­ing art. Our mil­i­tary can’t sup­ply “com­bat” vehi­cles, so the Air Force buys crappy civil­ian car­i­ca­tures of *old* mil­i­tary vehi­cles, at stratos­pheric prices, then stretches them some more.
    Most of the world’s armies are using Toyota pick­ups in place of “jeeps” (at 1/​4 the price of a so-​​called “hum­mer.” It’s no sur­prise that the US Air Force didn’t get the memo…

    Reply
  24. Michael P. Robbins II says:
    December 28, 2005 at 9:56 pm

    For those that are dis­agree­ing with this report, you must not be in the mil­i­tary. I have spent my time in Afghanistan with a humvee; they are great vehi­cles and have bet­ter han­dling and func­tion in those sit­u­a­tions over­seas then a Pick-​​up truck does. The pick-​​up is cheap, but more com­plex to repair and cost a lot more money to repair then the humvee will in a life time.
    A sec­ond point, the stretched out Humvee is bet­ter for com­put­ers and comms. due to the fact that the humvee will have bet­ter han­dling, stibil­ity “on-​​the-​​go”, as well as manuev­er­abil­ity due to the fact that the 5 ton trucks that Comms peo­ple use now are no were near any of that then the humvee.
    If you are not in the mil­i­tary, do your home­work first before you make a com­ment about the humvee or any other vehi­cle in the mil­i­tary; that is why the U.S. is one of the great­est mil­i­taries in the world. We actu­ally spend the money in order to be on the ball with our game.

    Reply
  25. flameout_291 says:
    December 28, 2005 at 10:20 pm

    Good idea bad exe­cu­tion. I think the first thought should be on troop safety not cost. Lets face it, Things are still not docile by any means. The abil­ity to pro­vide an even larger tar­get, paired with the fact the appear­ance is about as sut­tle as a chain­saw leads me to believe the camoflage paint should be replaced with floures­cent let­ters say­ing “PICK ME, PICK ME!“
    Lets take the time to get this right. Our men and women are stak­ing their lives on it.

    Reply
  26. anion says:
    December 28, 2005 at 11:33 pm

    LAN PARTY(in a hummer)!

    Reply
  27. Floyd D. Burgoz says:
    December 28, 2005 at 11:58 pm

    I am Not at all impressed with this limo ver­sion. First of all i am an Army Vet sec­ond Im a con­trac­tor that repairs mil­i­tary vehi­cles of all types wheel and fully tracked. Last i do strongly believe that this new ver­sion is wrong for today and the future of com­bat unless you want to put some VIPs in it to view com­bat from a safe distance.

    Reply
  28. j.pickens says:
    December 29, 2005 at 12:56 am

    Did any­one actu­ally READ the arti­cle?
    The stretched Hummers are stand-​​ins for a future design of com­mu­ni­ca­tions vehi­cle. As such, they are to be wargamed to find strengths and weak­nesses BEFORE com­mit­ting funds to build the newer designs.
    Seems like a rel­a­tively low-​​cost solu­tion to pro­to­typ­ing a future vehi­cle by using a com­mer­cially avail­able prod­uct rather than a one-​​off cus­tom built pro­to­type to me.

    Reply
  29. Silvija says:
    December 29, 2005 at 2:36 am

    Really? Come on.…. This type of vehi­cle is in Las Vegas, and should stay in Las Vegas. The pub­lic pays over $75 an hour to ride in one of these. What is the Military think­ing of. War is not to bling like Las Vegas. I can see it now, troops hang­ing out of the sun­roof. Party!!!!!!
    STUPID.…..

    Reply
  30. robert walton says:
    December 29, 2005 at 9:38 am

    One hopes their stand-​​in sta­tus will take into account that the basic civil­ian Hummer is NOT the struc­turally tough, tac­ti­cally equipped equiv­a­lent of our HUMMV.
    I only hope the com­pleted “limosines” are tough enough to with­stand their intended use.

    Reply
  31. Kevin Paulus says:
    December 29, 2005 at 10:44 am

    Its about time we got on the track toward what we all really need… an up-​​armored Winnebago on a half-​​track chassis.

    Reply
  32. Will says:
    December 29, 2005 at 5:19 pm

    For those of you how are agree­ing with this report, the main issue you need to be think­ing about is how are you going to take care of the comm. gear and more impor­tant the men/​women inside. I have just got back from Iraq, where I up armored the HUMVEE’s. The armor that we where putting on gave a 360 pro­tec­tion for the men inside. We put armor on comm. vech. of all kind, which is now keep­ing Marines alive. What is killing the men on the bat­tle field today. It is not the shorlder fire weapon but the IED’s on the side of the road that is killing them. With a big­ger tar­get as a stretch HUMVEE, the bad guys will have a bet­ter chance of sit­ting off the IED on tar­get. You also say that VIP’s would ride in them they we need to make sure that thier SGLI is up to date. This is a very bad Idea. Keep the pretty stuff at home and send over the gear that can get the job done.

    Reply
  33. sgtkymee says:
    December 29, 2005 at 5:29 pm

    So how about Boeing out­fit­ting a stronger Humvee that our guys are already using in Iraq (my son included?) Last word was that the I.E.D.‘s are now capa­ble of priec­ing the armor that is presently applied to them. Sounds a whole lot more eco­nom­i­cally feasable to me. They don’t need a big show­boat tar­get there by any means.

    Reply
  34. Gregory Mangrum says:
    December 29, 2005 at 7:14 pm

    Well I will say i dont have all the Tech data but upon intial review I have say “ARE YOU SERIOUS”. My thoughts are you might want to call it the “Body Bag”. I mean if you intend to use it way behind the rear with gear or for dig­nataries fine have fun, But this is ubsurd lets see it is incred­i­ble sub­supi­tal to IED attack, crap for mobil­ity com­pletely impract­cle for com­bat enviroment.Did you plan on paint­ing a tar­get on this vehi­cle because just by its eas­ily iden­ti­fied con­struc­tion it makes a tar­get thats hard to miss.I am con­fused I have great faith in boe­ing and over the years thay pro­duced exe­lence in tech­no­ligy. This is why I am amazed that cru­cial Research and Devolpement dol­lars have been alla­cated for this. I have no prob­lems even with a way out never been tried before unknown ideas that is what is what research and devolpe­ment is for but give me a break. Might I sug­est an Armored Car desighn with next gen­er­a­tion armor­ing and advanced elec­tron­ics that will enhane abil­lity and main­tain accept­able com­bat survi­bil­ity. I as a nobody but still for what its worth. This one mans opin­nion with noth­ing in mind but the ser­vice­mem­bers who will serve with this equip­ment would like to state we all have a duty to pro­vide are forces with the best equip­ment and traing the world has to offer. Lets not put them in a rolling “body bag”.Just a word of advise when you desighn a new sys­tem every day remem­ber why and what it is for and imag­ine your loved ones such as your father,mother,son,daughter being tasked with the oper­a­tion of this equip­ment you have desighned. Because it is the the Mothers,Fathers,Sons,and daugh­ters of America that will be oper­at­ing these pieces of equip­ment. Thank You GOD Bless and good luck.
    Sincerly
    Gregory A Mangrum

    Reply
  35. r. parker says:
    December 29, 2005 at 9:04 pm

    it may not be as bad as it seems,we trust our lives to them every day “even though it sounds stu­pid” but they may­bey used for con­voy tans­porta­tion which intern would make alot of sense

    Reply
  36. MAJ_Jim says:
    December 29, 2005 at 11:28 pm

    Might be nice to take me to the officer’s club on a CONUS post. It would be bet­ter with cham­pagne and a hot tub. In a com­bat zone, I am not inter­ested in rid­ing this ele­phant. Frankly, I doubt this will get past the test phase. Everyone knows we need the Rhino armored vehicles.

    Reply
  37. anon says:
    December 30, 2005 at 6:55 am

    I work on the pro­gram and I would like to make it clear that these vehi­cles are intended to be used as a mobile C4 test plat­form only. We will be test­ing C4 only and not actual vehi­cle plat­forms. Hummers were cho­sen because of the huge space require­ments for the cur­rent COTS based soft­ware devel­op­ment plat­form as well as mul­ti­ple develp­men­tal comms sys­tems. The deci­sion was made to strech them to acco­mi­date two extra seats. These extra seats allow for four oper­a­tor sta­tions so we can test the soft­ware in a future C2V configuration.

    Reply
  38. z0mbi says:
    December 30, 2005 at 3:46 pm

    It’s pretty sad the sheer num­ber of peo­ple in the com­ments sec­tion who appar­ently have lit­tle to no read­ing com­pre­hen­sion skills. It doesn’t make the rest of us look any bet­ter when fel­low Americans open their igno­rant mouths before absorb­ing the full details of the situation.

    Reply
  39. PFC says:
    December 30, 2005 at 10:13 pm

    Read more thouroughly and maybe you’ll under­stand.
    PFC-​​USMC

    Reply
  40. Tim says:
    December 31, 2005 at 1:31 pm

    I am amazed at the per­cent­age of read­ers who actu­ally thought this vehi­cle was intended as a com­bat vehi­cle. The arti­cle VERY CLEARLY says that it is to be used to test COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT at NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE. It was very clear to me that the VEHICLE is NOT intended to do any­thing other than carry the equip­ment around while the EQUIPMENT is being tested. Please peo­ple, read before you post. This is way bet­ter than pulling an armored vehi­cle out of the fight just to some equip­ment that may, some­day, be put inside another vehicle.

    Reply
  41. BigMike says:
    January 2, 2006 at 8:24 am

    It is unbliev­able how igno­rant you peo­ple are. Do you really have so lit­tle faith in God and coun­try that you would actu­ally think some­one put a “stretch limo” into a com­bat sit­u­a­tion. Of course it is a “huge tar­get” and “rolling body bag”, who would be so dumb as to want to put our fight­ing forces in such a sit­u­a­tion. Read a lit­tle more thouroughly first, get out a some ref­er­ences, and do some home­work the next time prior to spout­ing off at the mouth and mak­ing your­selves look so stu­pid in front of all the World. (remem­ber these arti­cles are read by more than just us here in the good ole USA.) And by the way stop telling every­thing; “when I was in Iraq we had…”, “What’s killing our pepole is…” We need pro­tec­tion from…” Duh, who else do you think is read­ing this stuff,(insurrgents, ter­ror­ists maybe). You all are bunch of igno­rant, arro­gant morons, who need to learn to use spell check and a dic­tio­nary. Hopefully you check back peri­od­i­cally and get the oppor­tu­nity to read this. What more can I say, email me if you want more hate tossed your way. Happy New Year.

    Reply
  42. Chuck says:
    January 3, 2006 at 8:13 am

    Looks like a Cougar 6x6 will fill this role in the field. Just my opin­ion. http://​www​.for​ce​pro​tec​tion​.net

    Reply
  43. SPC Missick says:
    January 3, 2006 at 8:52 pm

    Hey,
    it sure beats march­ing every­where like us infantry troops!

    Reply
  44. JAYMAC says:
    January 4, 2006 at 2:54 pm

    Big Mike, the opin­ion­ated chap who is so quick to admon­ish every­one other than a sup­porter of the trai­tor, George W. Bush, regard­ing their civil liberites and inabil­ity to use a ‘spell checker’ (What’s the point?), might be well served if he prac­ticed what he preached, learned a bit about ‘basic gram­mar and punc­tu­a­tion’ and spend more time ‘lis­ten­ing’ and ‘read­ing’ to improve his frame of knowl­edge in gen­eral; and in par­tic­u­lar, about the sub­ject he addressed. Big Mike is obvi­ously one of those blind sheep who can­not rec­og­nize the dif­fer­ence between patri­o­tism and treason.

    Reply
  45. Don says:
    January 4, 2006 at 7:14 pm

    BigM…
    You wrote:
    Duh, who else do you think is read­ing this stuff,(insurrgents, ter­ror­ists maybe). You all are bunch of igno­rant, arro­gant morons, who need to learn to use spell check and a dic­tio­nary.
    You wrote: “What’s killing our pepole is.…
    What the hell is “pepole?”.…!!!!
    I believe the word you are look­ing for is “PEOPLE“
    Terorist has one r.
    Well.…The insur­gents can read all they want. That is why it is called the inter­net. People post and reply.These post­ing are not a threat to our National Security!!!!
    1) Duh…defined ..Used to express actual or feigned igno­rance or stu­pid­ity. 2. used to indi­cate that some­thing just stated is obvi­ous or self evi­dent.
    Nothing writ­ten by any of these writ­ers is stu­pid or arro­gant except your spelling of “pepole” and you hate spew. These pas­sages are merely opin­ions.
    2) I sup­pose it is obvi­ous that you under­stood all that was written.….Therefore spell-​​check is not required or nec­es­sary. It is merely help­ful.
    On 2nd thought, you are the only one rant­ing about spell check. Where there many words that you could not under­stand?
    Do your­self and us a favor.….!!!Go back to the year 2005 and spew all your hate..!!!!!Better yet, Buy your­self a one way ticket to Iraq and spew all you want every day in the mid­dle of any street out there!!!
    We know that the vehi­cle is intended as a com­mu­ni­ca­tion test.…Even so com­mu­ni­ca­tion is one of the life lines for com­bat­ants. There should be no TEST for com­mu­ni­ca­tion in a Hummmer. We must under­stand that in order for one to see if a TEST really works one must use it in a “live sce­nario.” On the day that the gov­ern­ments actu­ally test this vehi­cle in a real life sit­u­a­tion, it will “prob­a­bly” put the lives of the sol­diers and equip­ment in harms way.
    Let us leave the hate for the ter­ror­ist!!
    Don

    Reply
  46. Walt Mace says:
    January 7, 2006 at 1:07 am

    If you want to sneak around, be a mouse and work your way up from there, In Vietnam, The VC ran around every­where in tun­nels, only a fool would get in An Over-​​Size Vehicle AND TRAVEL AROUND THE STREETS OF IRAQ!!! Stupid, Ignorant,A Congressman, the lists goes on. Like, put The pres­i­dent at the Wheel,What a joke and waste of money

    Reply
  47. Walt Mace says:
    January 7, 2006 at 1:14 am

    If you want to sneak around, be a mouse and work your way up from there, In Vietnam, The VC ran around every­where in tun­nels, only a fool would get in An Over-​​Size Vehicle AND TRAVEL AROUND THE STREETS OF IRAQ!!! Stupid, Ignorant,A Congressman, the lists goes on. Like, put The pres­i­dent at the Wheel,What a joke and waste of money

    Reply
  48. yochay says:
    November 14, 2006 at 7:23 am

    gdh

    Reply
  49. Disgruntled US Vet says:
    September 28, 2007 at 2:10 pm

    Ok…it is appar­ent that no one in America reads the fine print any­more. Everything is slanted and opin­ion­ated and few see the facts any­more.
    Ok, lets get some­thing straight. Numerous oth­ers have alluded to this and peo­ple still haven’t caught on. So here goes.
    THE LIMO HUMMER IS A STAND IN. They chose it for the space to have all the comm suite, air­con­di­tion­ing, test equip­ment, data recorders, devel­op­ers, pro­gramers, engi­neers, and design­ers. They are NOT going to baja it around the desert of Nevada. It will be used to test com­mu­ni­ca­tions with air, space, land, and UAV type tech­nolo­gies is my guessti­mate. Why not choose some other vehi­cle? Because there would not be enough room in any other. They are test­ing radio and comm equip­ment, not tryin to mock up or pro­to­type any kind of new vehi­cle.
    When and IF a new vehi­cle is made they will take the knowl­edge gained from the tests, design new comm gear around it, and put it in the new cha­sis.
    I hate almost any forum because it becomes a place for fools to flame fools rather than exchange knowl­edge. People, please learn to read and com­pre­hend. This is why politi­cians sway so many igno­rant peo­ple into fol­low­ing them like sheep…because peo­ple became fat, dumb, and lazy as a whole.

    Reply
  50. brandon says:
    May 12, 2009 at 11:49 pm

    hello im try­ing to find my bio-​​father his name is gre­gory a man­grum he was once in the army please if you can help me please e-​​mail me back asap at country_​child1​6​9​1​@​yahoo.​com

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      News reports have said that this guy has openly stated his...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      Headphones and earplugs are effective, but...
      JustAGuy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage