DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Blog Bidness » Not a Deal Maker, or an Arms Broker

Not a Deal Maker, or an Arms Broker

I feel ridicu­lous even typ­ing this. But enough com­pa­nies have writ­ten in, ask­ing me to help them mar­ket their prod­ucts to the Defense Department, that I feel obliged to respond. Here’s my answer, in a nut­shell: no.
I received the lat­est come-​​on just a few days ago, from a com­pany that claims to make radio fre­quency jammers.

…COMPANY is able to quickly pro­duce most pro­fes­sional [cus­tomized] solu­tions for Every require­ment of jam­mers, the best in the world, and most com­pet­i­tive in terms of price. The only issue is that cur­rently we don’t have yet con­nec­tions with the US Military.
Can you help us make the US Army imme­di­ately aware of our supe­rior capa­bil­i­ties ? because we under­stand that there’s an imme­di­ate top-​​urgent require­ment of Professional IED Jammers for the US Army troops in Iraq. Needless to say that if you help us in this mat­ter you (or your orga­ni­za­tion) will be highly com­pen­sated for the same.
Your prompt response will be very appre­ci­ated. Thank you very much in advance…

Look, I’m a jour­nal­ist. Not a deal maker. And not an arms bro­ker. I’m happy to con­sider writ­ing about your prod­uct, what­ever it is. But I’m not about to start lob­by­ing the gov­ern­ment to take the tech­nolo­gies I cover. That would pretty much shred what­ever last lit­tle bit of cred­i­bil­ity I still have. How could I appear to be an objec­tive observer if I’m pimp­ing gear behind the scenes? So, please, do every­one a favor — no mat­ter how rev­o­lu­tion­ary and awe­some your new doo­dad is: back off.

Share |

December 30th, 2005 | Blog Bidness | 300315 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/12/30/not-a-deal-maker-or-an-arms-broker/Not+a+Deal+Maker%2C+or+an+Arms+Broker2005-12-30+14%3A21%3A14jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Sub’s Unmanned Buddy | Four Star Blogger » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. pedestrian says:
    December 30, 2005 at 10:09 am

    Tell them to write to “Defense Review”. “Maybe” they would be happy to do it. :D

    Reply
  2. pedestrian says:
    December 30, 2005 at 10:19 am

    By the way, (well, maybe I won’t get my answer but any­ways) is it E***** that sent the e-​​mail about it’s E*** jam­mers? I have a feel­ing that it could be them, try­ing to pen­e­trate the mar­ket. It was dis­played at ******** exhi­bi­tion, and recently sold to ******.

    Reply
  3. Byron Skinner says:
    December 30, 2005 at 2:17 pm

    Good Morning Noah,
    Good for you Noah. With 537 will­ing agents avail­able to “Cunningham” for a pen­i­tence to carry their water they don’t need any­more hands in the pub­lic till.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  4. josh says:
    December 30, 2005 at 4:51 pm

    If it’s good enough they should write DARPA. They are inter­ested in those things. Contact info is on their website.

    Reply
  5. beau says:
    December 30, 2005 at 6:07 pm

    Are these NIGERIAN radio jam­mers that will make you 10 mil­lion dol­lars if only you send them $1000 as a show of trust?

    Reply
  6. Noah Shachtman says:
    December 31, 2005 at 10:27 am

    P:
    Nope, it was a dif­fer­ent com­pany.
    nms

    Reply
  7. Flash says:
    December 31, 2005 at 11:14 am

    I agree there is no rea­son to use a neu­tral source to ped­dle or lobby prod­ucts. If the prod­uct is as good as it is pur­ported to be and they have some mar­ket­ing skills, there should be no prob­lem in rais­ing some eye­brows at the appro­pri­ate agen­cies and/​or depart­ments respon­si­ble for acqui­si­tions.
    Journalism and report­ing is just that and should never be used to prop­a­gate or endorse ANY prod­uct or cause. All sense of cred­i­bil­ity evap­o­rates imme­di­ately once that line has been crossed.

    Reply
  8. pedestrian says:
    January 1, 2006 at 8:03 am

    >Nope, it was a dif­fer­ent com­pany.
    Hmm, if it isn’t E*****, I only could imag­ine ventures/​small firms. Anyway’s, I think there is not much they could do with W****** and I** already being used (and E** by cer­tain coun­tries) while feed­back should have make those two pretty reli­able… unless… Instead of wast­ing time here also hop­ing Pentagon to buy them, I think they should have gone sell there prod­ucts to for­eign firms.

    Reply
  9. pedestrian says:
    January 1, 2006 at 8:11 am

    >Journalism and report­ing is just that and should never be used to prop­a­gate or endorse ANY prod­uct
    >or cause.
    Well, would you be sur­prised to hear about var­i­ous num­bers of jour­nal­ists and writ­ers reciev­ing money from for­eign coun­tries for their pur­pose? Even jour­nal­ists are not all clean. There are peo­ple who do it for money instead of jus­tice. That is real­ism. There were even bribed jour­nal­ists back in WWII (China brib­ing west­ern jour­nal­ists to cre­ate anti-​​Japan tide), and far back in his­tory a dif­fer­ent form about a story of Dracula. There is prob­a­bly no orga­ni­za­tion and group of peo­ple that will remain clean for ever, not even the jour­nal­ists. If you go search, you might find a jour­nailst availi­ble to be bribed, writ­ing arti­cles on a major source for your own purpose.

    Reply
  10. Staff Monkey says:
    January 1, 2006 at 4:05 pm

    That’s just sad. How the hell are you sup­posed to “make the Army aware” of their supe­rior capa­bil­i­ties?? If they’re that supe­rior, the Army should know about them by now. And if they’re not, beg­ging a jour­nal­ist to risk their own rep to pro­mote them sure won’t help, or mat­ter.
    You’re a lot more polite than I could be, Noah, and I have to deal with them at the other end.
    Keep up the good and impar­tial work.

    Reply
  11. Staff Monkey says:
    January 2, 2006 at 2:58 pm

    And no sooner do I post this, but I get an email from some sales­man ask­ing if I’m in “the pro­cure­ment depart­ment”.
    Noah: Feel free to erase this. I’d have sent you the email I got but didn’t feel it mer­ited the effort to delete it.

    Reply
  12. epr194 says:
    January 3, 2006 at 8:58 am

    I lurk here to read about all the new and cool stuff hap­pen­ing in the mil­i­tary world. I also have a cou­ple of friends in Iraq, so the news is inter­est­ing.
    Having said that, I think that if [insert com­pany name here] has a cool product/​idea and they are will­ing to fly you out to demo it, go for it. Report on the prod­uct. What could be cooler ( time per­mit­ting ) then watch­ing some­thing get blown up on a test range?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No, I am not a muslim. And no, the Koran does not say anything about...
      DualityOfMan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage