<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rapid Fire 01/03/06</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/01/03/rapid-fire-010306/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/03/rapid-fire-010306/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rutty</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/03/rapid-fire-010306/#comment-119792</link>
		<dc:creator>rutty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3008#comment-119792</guid>
		<description>Regarding the troop morale link: The name of the link as well as the article&#039;s title might be a little misleading.  The following is from the body of the linked article (caps are mine):
&quot;The MAIL SURVEY, conducted Nov. 14 through Dec. 23, is the third annual effort by the Military Times to measure the opinions of the active-duty military on political and morale issues. THE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE READ AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MILITARY AS A WHOLE.&quot;
Thus, it shoudln&#039;t be used to generalize.  Someone just glancing through and not reading the entire article will undoubtedly be given a different impression.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the troop morale link: The name of the link as well as the article’s title might be a little misleading.  The following is from the body of the linked article (caps are mine):<br />
“The MAIL SURVEY, conducted Nov. 14 through Dec. 23, is the third annual effort by the Military Times to measure the opinions of the active-duty military on political and morale issues. THE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE READ AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MILITARY AS A WHOLE.“<br />
Thus, it shoudln’t be used to generalize.  Someone just glancing through and not reading the entire article will undoubtedly be given a different impression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

