DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Armor » Darpa Armors Up

Darpa Armors Up

It worked for robot driving. So maybe a little competition will scare up some new ideas on how to armor up Humvees, too.
Humvee_400x.jpgThat seems to be the thinking over at Pentagon fringe science arm Darpa. Its Grand Challenge — the $25 million, all-robot race across the Mojave — inspired some very smart people to come up with some very smart new ways for machines to manuever on their own. Along the way, the race inspired reporters to give the agency the best press its had in years.
So, not surprisingly, Darpa is rolling out a second competition: the “Armor Challenge.” The agency is hoping that a series of “shoot-outs” will prompt someone to figure out how to create a defensive system that’s twice as light as rolled homogeneous armor steel, but still just as good at stopping 7.62mm and .50 cal rounds.

Proposers should expect to deliver three (3) eighteen inch (18 in.) by eighteen inch (18 in.) panels for each threat to be addressed. It is acceptable to propose a different panel configuration or weight to address each threat, but armor systems that can provide protection against the range of threats using a single configuration will be evaluated more favorably…
Armor Challenge shoot-outs will take place periodically (approximately quarterly) throughout the program… After the shoot-out, the team’s performance will be evaluated in two areas: 1) potential for reducing armor weight as determined by appropriate metrics, and 2) the expected cost of the armor in production quantities.

Maybe one day, the government hopes, the software and engineering behind the Grand Challenge can be used to create robotic trucks, so flesh-and-blood convoy drivers can be kept out of harm’s way. The Armor Challenge, on the other hand, is meant for more pressing needs. Insurgents are getting increasingly wise about tearing through American armor. That problem could be compunded in the coming years, as the Army moves to vehicles that are much, much lighter than the current crop. The replacement for the 70-ton Abrams tank, for example, is supposed to weigh in at only 24 tons. And a big chunk of that weight reduction is supposed to come with lighter, tougher armor.

Share |

January 4th, 2006 | Armor | 301141 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/04/darpa-armors-up/Darpa+Armors+Up2006-01-04+15%3A08%3A01jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 01/04/06 | Biodefense: Big Bucks, Small Results » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Joe Katzman says:
    January 4, 2006 at 10:54 pm

    Anyone in the military who still thinks FCS will replace the M1 Abrams tank needsd to be cashiered yesterday. After Thunder run and Objective Peach in OIF, there’s just no excuse.
    At best, its armored vehicles will replace the M2/M3 Bradley, along with the Stryker family, M109 Paladin, and M113 command variants.

    Reply
  2. Byron Skinner says:
    January 4, 2006 at 11:25 pm

    Good Evening Folks,
    It appears now in order to save the FCS, DARPA has been tasked with over throwing the laws of Physics.
    The only question here is how much will it cost to find out it can’t be done.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  3. TJS says:
    January 5, 2006 at 7:53 am

    What a concept to throw money at something that was done by the unpopular Army unit the Rapid Equipping Force about two years ago when they proved that composite armor was and is better than the current add-on armor steel kits being placed on the HWMMV in Iraq. But some old school officer that did not trust the new techn ology dismissed and here we are again.

    Reply
  4. SSG Dana Beausoleil says:
    January 5, 2006 at 10:13 am

    Once again the Army likes the semi-useless big-ticket items so often hawked by the D0D’s defense industry buddies… As a 25 year career sailor/soldier and having been inside the killzone of an IED and survived, I think I have some of the best first-hand knowledge in the land of the living of what you need to counter IED’s and RPG’s. First off, the armor we “Up-Armor” our HMMWV’s with is so heavy the engines fail, suspensions fail and transmissions literally fall out of. –Not to mention they’re an oven you can’t shoot from or escape from without A/C! Sure, save a few bucks by not designing a new system or fielding the proper gear… Fact is, If we fought like we trained and every vehicle carried easily fitted/inexpensive cell phone jammers and real radio equipment instead of walmart walkietalkies shipped from home most IED threats would evaporate. How do you think our FOB gates stay safe? Travel at night (like we trained) w/night vision and IR would easily detect bad guys with RPG’s. But noooooo we’ll continue to try to overstuff a HMMWV like a Christmas turkey to REACT to the threats instead of PREVENT the threats. That’s the army way. That’s also why when my unit got it’s vital equipment upgrades in theatre we didn’t get the new helmets or scopes because the money wasn’t there for them. I did, however, get thermal underwear in the desert. See you all back in the sandpit in ’06!

    Reply
  5. Cyarger says:
    January 5, 2006 at 11:05 am

    Check out the latest Car and Driver. Csabe’s column has the right concept with a clean sheet of paper. It uses a lot of off the shelf parts with new tech.

    Reply
  6. Travis says:
    January 5, 2006 at 7:44 pm

    Mr. Doe. You are an idiot. Not only do you have the vocabulary of a third grader, it’s also very obvious that you were either not in the military at all, or you were given a big chicken dinner for smoking crack. (That’s Marine speak for getting kicked the hell out) I think that Ssgt Beausoleil has it the best. He has obviously been in the situations before, and I feel that idiots like you speaking your mind and claiming that you are military just makes us look like morons that can’t tell our hands from our feet. Please… Castrate yourself.

    Reply
  7. SGM Isbister says:
    January 6, 2006 at 12:09 am

    A marine named dana talking smack about the army.….…priceless

    Reply
  8. LCpl O says:
    January 6, 2006 at 1:41 am

    SGM Isbister, I don’t believe SSG Dana Beausoleil is a Marine. First, Marines write it SSGT or SSgt not SSG thats an army abbreviation. Second he/she said sailor/soldier implying army and navy, a Marine would have wrote Marine. But he/she still makes a good point the DoD should put money into preventive measures, in addition to better armor. In any case we just need better gear in general. But we are still the best military in the world with the world’s finest fighting force, that can still do more with less. Semper Fi

    Reply
  9. SFC Mike says:
    January 18, 2006 at 10:06 am

    I have been seeing a lot of information on the web about Diamond dust & nano diamond dust being used to coat various surfaces. This diamond dust is inexpensive and seems to me would probably make for some serious Armor. Used with a laminate or even blended would make since. Has anyone been doing this?

    Reply
  10. SFC Mike says:
    January 18, 2006 at 10:24 am

    I hope everyone bitching about this subject will stop long enough to come up with some ideas that can actually help. Remember, the only dumb ideas are the ones you don’t share. Lets put our collective minds in gear and solve this problem so every soldier can come home whole.

    Reply
  11. Big Red says:
    January 27, 2006 at 3:18 pm

    How about a carbon nano tube cloth inpregnated onto a ceramic disc and covered with a diamond dust laminate?
    They can come in sheets, or the famous “dragon scale” configuration.

    Reply
  12. Ruptured Duck says:
    January 31, 2006 at 2:51 am

    DARPA’s role is to investigate and invest in the new technologies coming down the pike, that is a given. But all too often, the men and women wearing the stars, go for the gizmo’s with all the bells and whistles, taking a perfectly good weapon or system, and gold plating it.
    DoD needs to swallow its pride, and look at how other country’s have addressed similiar threats. They may have developed low-tech innovations to protect their troops in such high-risk environs, because they do not have the budgets to throw money at the problem, the way the Pentagon does.
    Israel and South Africa are known for coming up with some innovative solutions, for force protection. Whether those solutions are right for the United States’ troops, who go into harms way, is not for me to say. But there are innovations and technologies that should be considered by the experts, whose profession it is to know.
    Perhaps a combination of low-tech and high-tech solutions, will provide the best protection for our forces. Whatever gets the job done. All too often, we are hampered by the “not invented here” syndrome. If a good idea originated in the private sector, or God forbid another country, it would be discounted out of hand. Considered inferior and unworthy of consideration, merely due to its source or country of origination.

    Reply
  13. fiesta Gold says:
    August 4, 2008 at 11:40 pm

    I have been of great success at finally, my rank already practiced 43 levels and we have own a large of fiesta Gold.

    Reply
  14. cheap 2moons gold says:
    August 4, 2008 at 11:41 pm

    Therefore, I diligently practiced the level to promote, only then promote only then can help me to save many cheap 2moons gold.

    Reply
  15. ??? says:
    August 7, 2008 at 9:16 am

    At best, its armored vehicles will replace the M2/M3 Bradley, along with the Stryker family, M109 Paladin, and M113 command variants.

    Reply
  16. Habbo gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    I know that you are not a sloppy person, you have your aspiration, have your ideal. You will not care the game Habbo gold. Therefore you are doomed to leave Habbo, leave friends who these share some hardships, and leave me who am lonely apprentice.

    Reply
  17. buy LOTRO Gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:17 pm

    Your reality husband can buy LOTRO Gold for you, but I also can be.

    Reply
  18. Hellgate London Palladium says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:20 pm

    Now, you have Hellgate London Palladium and you might buy tens of billions experience values.

    Reply
  19. last chaos gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    Remember we just met with each other by chance, we practiced the level and made last chaos gold together.

    Reply
  20. cheap mabinogi says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:25 pm

    I was excited, originally it was such simple, and it also needs a little cheap mabinogi.

    Reply
  21. imvu credits says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:27 pm

    Every time, when I received the imvu credits, I always gave them to you.

    Reply
  22. Tibia coins says:
    August 16, 2008 at 7:16 pm

    One day, I read a article about Tibia Gold game. I was very dispirited and couldn’t help to give up Tibia coins.

    Reply
  23. buy sro gold says:
    August 16, 2008 at 7:19 pm

    If you’re wondering how to look out for bots, how to avoid them and what to do buy sro gold, you have come to the right place.

    Reply
  24. Silkroad gold says:
    August 16, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    Thanks for reading and hopefully there will be a lot more Silkroad gold where that came from!

    Reply
  25. The truth says:
    August 18, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    DANA is a joke, I worked with him on his first tour in Iraq and he was a windows admin. He lies about everything he claims he’s done. He has no firearm training, he has no Marine training or Army training. He was a squid in the Navy. His favorite cd to listen to at night in the NOC was Judy Garland. Come on Dana, just stop telling lies.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
    • More Vehicle Digital Camouflage
    • Chinese Digi-Camo
    • Defense Spending Headed Down
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
    • Cancel Cyber Command
    Recent Comments
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      This has been a long time coming. Personally, I'd like...
      jkt
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Any word on what they cost per round?
      gmanaz
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
      The F-22 is not going to be flying off...
      DennisBuller
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
      I like chinese food.
      Armchair Ninja
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
      Aside from the price jump of the F35 take into...
      CHOPS
    • Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer (Part 2)
      It looks like the navy gunclub got recycled to...
      bob
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
      The fly away cost of the F-22 was 127 million...
      Mark
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      What ever happened to the idea of cheap mesh networked...
      nraddin
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
      I wonder if they could reengine the...
      Benjamin
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
      Scrap it all and make Lockheed pay us back...
      Brandon
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage