DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Armor » Darpa Armors Up

Darpa Armors Up

It worked for robot dri­ving. So maybe a lit­tle com­pe­ti­tion will scare up some new ideas on how to armor up Humvees, too.
Humvee_400x.jpgThat seems to be the think­ing over at Pentagon fringe sci­ence arm Darpa. Its Grand Challenge — the $25 mil­lion, all-​​robot race across the Mojave — inspired some very smart peo­ple to come up with some very smart new ways for machines to manuever on their own. Along the way, the race inspired reporters to give the agency the best press its had in years.
So, not sur­pris­ingly, Darpa is rolling out a sec­ond com­pe­ti­tion: the “Armor Challenge.” The agency is hop­ing that a series of “shoot-​​outs” will prompt some­one to fig­ure out how to cre­ate a defen­sive sys­tem that’s twice as light as rolled homo­ge­neous armor steel, but still just as good at stop­ping 7.62mm and .50 cal rounds.

Proposers should expect to deliver three (3) eigh­teen inch (18 in.) by eigh­teen inch (18 in.) pan­els for each threat to be addressed. It is accept­able to pro­pose a dif­fer­ent panel con­fig­u­ra­tion or weight to address each threat, but armor sys­tems that can pro­vide pro­tec­tion against the range of threats using a sin­gle con­fig­u­ra­tion will be eval­u­ated more favor­ably…
Armor Challenge shoot-​​outs will take place peri­od­i­cally (approx­i­mately quar­terly) through­out the pro­gram… After the shoot-​​out, the team’s per­for­mance will be eval­u­ated in two areas: 1) poten­tial for reduc­ing armor weight as deter­mined by appro­pri­ate met­rics, and 2) the expected cost of the armor in pro­duc­tion quantities. 

Maybe one day, the gov­ern­ment hopes, the soft­ware and engi­neer­ing behind the Grand Challenge can be used to cre­ate robotic trucks, so flesh-​​and-​​blood con­voy dri­vers can be kept out of harm’s way. The Armor Challenge, on the other hand, is meant for more press­ing needs. Insurgents are get­ting increas­ingly wise about tear­ing through American armor. That prob­lem could be com­punded in the com­ing years, as the Army moves to vehi­cles that are much, much lighter than the cur­rent crop. The replace­ment for the 70-​​ton Abrams tank, for exam­ple, is sup­posed to weigh in at only 24 tons. And a big chunk of that weight reduc­tion is sup­posed to come with lighter, tougher armor.

Share |

January 4th, 2006 | Armor | 301141 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/04/darpa-armors-up/Darpa+Armors+Up2006-01-04+15%3A08%3A01jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 01/​04/​06 | Biodefense: Big Bucks, Small Results » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Joe Katzman says:
    January 4, 2006 at 10:54 pm

    Anyone in the mil­i­tary who still thinks FCS will replace the M1 Abrams tank needsd to be cashiered yes­ter­day. After Thunder run and Objective Peach in OIF, there’s just no excuse.
    At best, its armored vehi­cles will replace the M2/​M3 Bradley, along with the Stryker fam­ily, M109 Paladin, and M113 com­mand variants.

    Reply
  2. Byron Skinner says:
    January 4, 2006 at 11:25 pm

    Good Evening Folks,
    It appears now in order to save the FCS, DARPA has been tasked with over throw­ing the laws of Physics.
    The only ques­tion here is how much will it cost to find out it can’t be done.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  3. TJS says:
    January 5, 2006 at 7:53 am

    What a con­cept to throw money at some­thing that was done by the unpop­u­lar Army unit the Rapid Equipping Force about two years ago when they proved that com­pos­ite armor was and is bet­ter than the cur­rent add-​​on armor steel kits being placed on the HWMMV in Iraq. But some old school offi­cer that did not trust the new techn ology dis­missed and here we are again.

    Reply
  4. SSG Dana Beausoleil says:
    January 5, 2006 at 10:13 am

    Once again the Army likes the semi-​​useless big-​​ticket items so often hawked by the D0D’s defense indus­try bud­dies… As a 25 year career sailor/​soldier and hav­ing been inside the kil­l­zone of an IED and sur­vived, I think I have some of the best first-​​hand knowl­edge in the land of the liv­ing of what you need to counter IED’s and RPG’s. First off, the armor we “Up-​​Armor” our HMMWV’s with is so heavy the engines fail, sus­pen­sions fail and trans­mis­sions lit­er­ally fall out of. –Not to men­tion they’re an oven you can’t shoot from or escape from with­out A/​C! Sure, save a few bucks by not design­ing a new sys­tem or field­ing the proper gear… Fact is, If we fought like we trained and every vehi­cle car­ried eas­ily fitted/​inexpensive cell phone jam­mers and real radio equip­ment instead of wal­mart walki­etalkies shipped from home most IED threats would evap­o­rate. How do you think our FOB gates stay safe? Travel at night (like we trained) w/​night vision and IR would eas­ily detect bad guys with RPG’s. But noooooo we’ll con­tinue to try to over­stuff a HMMWV like a Christmas turkey to REACT to the threats instead of PREVENT the threats. That’s the army way. That’s also why when my unit got it’s vital equip­ment upgrades in the­atre we didn’t get the new hel­mets or scopes because the money wasn’t there for them. I did, how­ever, get ther­mal under­wear in the desert. See you all back in the sand­pit in ’06!

    Reply
  5. Cyarger says:
    January 5, 2006 at 11:05 am

    Check out the lat­est Car and Driver. Csabe’s col­umn has the right con­cept with a clean sheet of paper. It uses a lot of off the shelf parts with new tech.

    Reply
  6. Travis says:
    January 5, 2006 at 7:44 pm

    Mr. Doe. You are an idiot. Not only do you have the vocab­u­lary of a third grader, it’s also very obvi­ous that you were either not in the mil­i­tary at all, or you were given a big chicken din­ner for smok­ing crack. (That’s Marine speak for get­ting kicked the hell out) I think that Ssgt Beausoleil has it the best. He has obvi­ously been in the sit­u­a­tions before, and I feel that idiots like you speak­ing your mind and claim­ing that you are mil­i­tary just makes us look like morons that can’t tell our hands from our feet. Please… Castrate yourself.

    Reply
  7. SGM Isbister says:
    January 6, 2006 at 12:09 am

    A marine named dana talk­ing smack about the army.….…priceless

    Reply
  8. LCpl O says:
    January 6, 2006 at 1:41 am

    SGM Isbister, I don’t believe SSG Dana Beausoleil is a Marine. First, Marines write it SSGT or SSgt not SSG thats an army abbre­vi­a­tion. Second he/​she said sailor/​soldier imply­ing army and navy, a Marine would have wrote Marine. But he/​she still makes a good point the DoD should put money into pre­ven­tive mea­sures, in addi­tion to bet­ter armor. In any case we just need bet­ter gear in gen­eral. But we are still the best mil­i­tary in the world with the world’s finest fight­ing force, that can still do more with less. Semper Fi

    Reply
  9. SFC Mike says:
    January 18, 2006 at 10:06 am

    I have been see­ing a lot of infor­ma­tion on the web about Diamond dust & nano dia­mond dust being used to coat var­i­ous sur­faces. This dia­mond dust is inex­pen­sive and seems to me would prob­a­bly make for some seri­ous Armor. Used with a lam­i­nate or even blended would make since. Has any­one been doing this?

    Reply
  10. SFC Mike says:
    January 18, 2006 at 10:24 am

    I hope every­one bitch­ing about this sub­ject will stop long enough to come up with some ideas that can actu­ally help. Remember, the only dumb ideas are the ones you don’t share. Lets put our col­lec­tive minds in gear and solve this prob­lem so every sol­dier can come home whole.

    Reply
  11. Big Red says:
    January 27, 2006 at 3:18 pm

    How about a car­bon nano tube cloth inpreg­nated onto a ceramic disc and cov­ered with a dia­mond dust lam­i­nate?
    They can come in sheets, or the famous “dragon scale” configuration.

    Reply
  12. Ruptured Duck says:
    January 31, 2006 at 2:51 am

    DARPA’s role is to inves­ti­gate and invest in the new tech­nolo­gies com­ing down the pike, that is a given. But all too often, the men and women wear­ing the stars, go for the gizmo’s with all the bells and whis­tles, tak­ing a per­fectly good weapon or sys­tem, and gold plat­ing it.
    DoD needs to swal­low its pride, and look at how other country’s have addressed sim­il­iar threats. They may have devel­oped low-​​tech inno­va­tions to pro­tect their troops in such high-​​risk envi­rons, because they do not have the bud­gets to throw money at the prob­lem, the way the Pentagon does.
    Israel and South Africa are known for com­ing up with some inno­v­a­tive solu­tions, for force pro­tec­tion. Whether those solu­tions are right for the United States’ troops, who go into harms way, is not for me to say. But there are inno­va­tions and tech­nolo­gies that should be con­sid­ered by the experts, whose pro­fes­sion it is to know.
    Perhaps a com­bi­na­tion of low-​​tech and high-​​tech solu­tions, will pro­vide the best pro­tec­tion for our forces. Whatever gets the job done. All too often, we are ham­pered by the “not invented here” syn­drome. If a good idea orig­i­nated in the pri­vate sec­tor, or God for­bid another coun­try, it would be dis­counted out of hand. Considered infe­rior and unwor­thy of con­sid­er­a­tion, merely due to its source or coun­try of origination.

    Reply
  13. fiesta Gold says:
    August 4, 2008 at 11:40 pm

    I have been of great suc­cess at finally, my rank already prac­ticed 43 lev­els and we have own a large of fiesta Gold.

    Reply
  14. cheap 2moons gold says:
    August 4, 2008 at 11:41 pm

    Therefore, I dili­gently prac­ticed the level to pro­mote, only then pro­mote only then can help me to save many cheap 2moons gold.

    Reply
  15. ??? says:
    August 7, 2008 at 9:16 am

    At best, its armored vehi­cles will replace the M2/​M3 Bradley, along with the Stryker fam­ily, M109 Paladin, and M113 com­mand variants.

    Reply
  16. Habbo gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    I know that you are not a sloppy per­son, you have your aspi­ra­tion, have your ideal. You will not care the game Habbo gold. Therefore you are doomed to leave Habbo, leave friends who these share some hard­ships, and leave me who am lonely apprentice.

    Reply
  17. buy LOTRO Gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:17 pm

    Your real­ity hus­band can buy LOTRO Gold for you, but I also can be.

    Reply
  18. Hellgate London Palladium says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:20 pm

    Now, you have Hellgate London Palladium and you might buy tens of bil­lions expe­ri­ence values.

    Reply
  19. last chaos gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    Remember we just met with each other by chance, we prac­ticed the level and made last chaos gold together.

    Reply
  20. cheap mabinogi says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:25 pm

    I was excited, orig­i­nally it was such sim­ple, and it also needs a lit­tle cheap mabinogi.

    Reply
  21. imvu credits says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:27 pm

    Every time, when I received the imvu cred­its, I always gave them to you.

    Reply
  22. Tibia coins says:
    August 16, 2008 at 7:16 pm

    One day, I read a arti­cle about Tibia Gold game. I was very dispir­ited and couldn’t help to give up Tibia coins.

    Reply
  23. buy sro gold says:
    August 16, 2008 at 7:19 pm

    If you’re won­der­ing how to look out for bots, how to avoid them and what to do buy sro gold, you have come to the right place.

    Reply
  24. Silkroad gold says:
    August 16, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    Thanks for read­ing and hope­fully there will be a lot more Silkroad gold where that came from!

    Reply
  25. The truth says:
    August 18, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    DANA is a joke, I worked with him on his first tour in Iraq and he was a win­dows admin. He lies about every­thing he claims he’s done. He has no firearm train­ing, he has no Marine train­ing or Army train­ing. He was a squid in the Navy. His favorite cd to lis­ten to at night in the NOC was Judy Garland. Come on Dana, just stop telling lies.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    Recent Comments
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part IV : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : But beam-riding isn't used by bombers...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      To the poster "Charles" : Part I :...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Good observations about drones. The real potential of laser...
      Will
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The most simple thing is have 2 basic issued uniforms....
      Big Daddy
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Valid observation, Charles. This is all so new that it's hard...
      Will
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : But, as I said in a previous comment, I...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : The Bushmaster's machine-cannon...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : Why doesn't this article, or even...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage