Comments on: Navy Wants Insurgent-Predicting Program

By: Archlord money

Archlord money — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:15:58 +0000

The first time played game, the first time made friends, first time chatted with MM, and the first time earned Archlord money, communicated from the language he started to like her.

By: cronous cro

cronous cro — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:15:10 +0000

At that time, I often saw wearing black with a particularly enviable, and hope that they can pay attention to me, give me some small things or a little cronous cro.

By: Scions Of Fate money

Scions Of Fate money — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 07:57:43 +0000

The game is the only hobby of him. He would like to give up, in all of us comfort and encouragement. He decided to join us to play the new mountain, he was still playing knife, I also playing a doctor, and we all give him a little Scions of Fate money.

By: Mike flynn

Mike flynn — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:28:30 +0000

Predicting by looking at the past? Following trends? Sounds seductive and intuitive, but is practical nonsense.
Take this test. Blank out your vehicle windscreen — drive using the view from the rear view mirror — follow the “trend”.
Won’t work you say? Then spend a lot of money and come up with a computer program, using a lot of “fuzzy logic” and “sophisticated algorithms”.
Still doesn’t work? Don’t blame me. Anybody who claims to be able to “predict” the future is either a fool or a charlatan.

By: PacRim Jim

PacRim Jim — Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:46:03 +0000

Thanks for working for the Clinton campaign. You helped damage military preparedness and the reputations of all service personnel. Reminder: Hillary probably will run soon, so set aside more time.

By: tomeck

tomeck — Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:20:26 +0000

Haven’t they figured out that every time there’s a large gathering of Iraqis to apply for jobs with the police a bomb goes off? You don’t need a computer program to predict that.

By: Steven A. Wells

Steven A. Wells — Sat, 07 Jan 2006 07:54:36 +0000

Sounds like a screenwriter’s pitch: Minority Report meets Numb3ers. The “tricoder?” Well, let’s not go there.
Suffice to say someone’s getting too many ideas from TV and the movies. Tip for government types: don’t confuse Hollywood and reality. Remember Dan Quayle and Murphy Brown?

By: George

George — Sat, 07 Jan 2006 07:21:36 +0000

Your tax dollars at work.
That project assumes that people are unable to adapt.
It fails to address the fact that people are the most adaptable organism on the planet.
I may not be a rocket scientist, but even I can figure out that if we followed the advice of a computer program, we would become extremely predictable, and sitting ducks for the bad guys.
I say we utilize those quacks to find and defuse the IED’s, instead of injuring and killing useful troops.

By: FuzzFlash

FuzzFlash — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 22:12:36 +0000

What a swell idea. Positively Gumpian. Smoke ‘em out with Fauxtown Americana and waste ‘em as they mount a mass stampede for the freedom fries franchise adjacent to the best little whorehouse in Baghdad. Transparancy dictates that Diebold must receive the bidless contract to program the insugent-predicting computers, in order to eliminate any uncertainties from outcomes. In thus fashion may God’s gift of Democracy be bestowed upon an ever so grateful Iraq.

By: pedestrian

pedestrian — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:11:39 +0000

dan, if you think the terrorists are in the advantage with an upper hand, you are wrong. Yes, terrorists in Iraq do their own research before attacks, but that does not guarantee success. Meanwhile, only few of the total IEDs in Iraq make success. I can tell alot, but I’m going to keep my mouth shut for that. However, I still can say you know not much nor did much research what is going on in the dark.