DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere) » The Kirkuk Question

The Kirkuk Question

When the Kurds drove Saddam’s army out of their home­land in the early nineties, they didn’t quite make it as far as Kirkuk, the south­ern­most city that’s pre­dom­i­nantly Kurdish. Which for the Kurds was a shame.
kirkuk_oil.jpgKirkuk sits atop 25% of Iraq’s oil and pumps out a mil­lion bar­rels a day. So valu­able is Kirkuk that Saddam launched a pro­gram in the 1980s called Enfal to shift the city’s demo­graph­ics in favor of the regime by forcibly remov­ing the city’s Kurds and pay­ing Arabs to set­tle in their places.
Now, with Kirkuk just out­side the de facto bor­der of Kurdistan, and with the Kurdish region richer and more pow­er­ful than the rest of the coun­try, the Kurdistan Regional Government and its lack­eys in Baghdad are plot­ting to redraw Kurdistan’s unof­fi­cial but very real bor­ders to incor­po­rate Kirkuk.
It’s a two-​​pronged cam­paign. One effort encour­ages Kurds to move back to Kirkuk and file suit to reclaim their old prop­er­ties from Arabs. The other, recently real­ized, revolves around Article 136 of the new Iraqi con­sti­tu­tion. That arti­cle, which was pushed hard by President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd, requires a ref­er­en­dum in Kirkuk in 2007 ask­ing res­i­dents if they want to be part of autonomous Kurdistan.
If the KRG can per­suade enough Kurds to move back to the city (which is cur­rently only 40% Kurdish), then the ref­er­en­dum should pass in favor of join­ing Kurdistan, and Kirkuk’s mil­lion bar­rels a day will fund Kurdish schools, roads and secu­rity forces instead of Arab schools, roads and secu­rity forces.
KRG assem­bly speaker Adnan Mufti told me the other day that the Kirkuk ques­tion is his num­ber one con­cern. What he didn’t say is that it’s just step one in the KRG’s long-​​term plan to offi­cially break away from Iraq, a move that Kurds in Iraq, Iran, Turkey and Syria antic­i­pate and that the rest of the world dreads, as it could mean war on many fronts.

Share |

January 6th, 2006 | Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere) | 30177 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/06/the-kirkuk-question/The+Kirkuk+Question2006-01-06+15%3A30%3A15jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Real-​​Life Hyperspace Drive? | Rapid Fire 1/​06/​06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C-Low says:
    January 6, 2006 at 3:12 pm

    The Kurds have proven them­selves allies and I think we should be happy to see them get Kircuk. It is long over due for our for­eign pol­icy trade rela­tions and espe­cially foriegn aid to be based upon loy­alty rather than what­ever other PC rea­sons. I think the old days pol­icy of reward­ing our allies while pun­ish­ment of those who are agianst US is long over due.
    But then I guess in some people’s eyes the fact that they are allies of the US makes them guilty by association.

    Reply
  2. E.Rodriguez says:
    January 6, 2006 at 7:19 pm

    A ref­er­en­dum in Kirkuk next year to join Kurdistan might just save a few lives here, then again it may not. Ask a kurd here in Kirkuk what will hap­pen to the Arabs as soon as the coali­tion leaves. Let me sum it up, “mur­der”. There’s a lot of resent­ment towards Arabs here for the last 25 years of oppres­sion and manip­u­la­tion from Saddams’s regime. Whether Kirkuk joins Kurdistan or not there’s likely to be some really intense fight­ing here when the coali­tion troops even­tu­ally pull out.

    Reply
  3. Ned Marchant says:
    January 6, 2006 at 11:46 pm

    I have spent the bet­ter part of 2005 in and arround kirkuk. I have per­son­ally spo­ken to many kurds and arabs and I believe the sit­u­a­tion to be irres­olu­able in as much as kur­dish nation­al­ism can­not be replaced by “iraqi” nation­al­ism. Thanks to the British in times past, when they drew the bor­ders of Iraq, like so many other places, gave lit­tle con­cern for ethinc and tribal con­sid­er­a­tions. I per­son­ally believe that as soon as the United States pulls its forces, we will see the du jure real­ity of an inde­pen­dant kur­dis­tan and you will see the city of kirkuk enveloped in eth­nic war sim­mi­lar to that of the for­mer yugoslavia.

    Reply
  4. louielouie says:
    January 7, 2006 at 6:03 pm

    with friends like the brits, these peo­ple, the kurds, don’t need ene­mies.
    don’t ask them to go to france to sign any piece of paper.
    they’ve heard that all before.
    http://www.lib.byu.edu/~rdh/wwi/versa/sevres1.html

    Reply
  5. april lee says:
    February 14, 2007 at 5:55 pm

    Wait a minute why isnt the oil rev­enue being shared by all of iraq, I will tell you why because it would be more expen­sive to the US to pur­chase.
    The US before entry, entered into an entire coun­try and they want to seper­ate it now. Sorry International law pro­hibits it unless they want to dis­re­gard that to. The US for­gets one major obsta­cle and that is the arabs, the turks the entire nation will not pre­mit this and Iraq will have blood shed for hun­dred of years to come. If the region doesnt go into an all out nuke tur­moil first. America keep dreaming

    Reply
  6. april lee says:
    February 14, 2007 at 5:57 pm

    http://​ca​.360​.yahoo​.com/​a​n​t​i​w​a​r​_​g​irl

    Reply
  7. rock says:
    October 8, 2009 at 10:01 pm

    Buy Women’s Lacoste
    Lacoste Shua Strap Shoes
    Lacoste Shua Strap Shoes on sale
    Discount Lacoste Shua Strap Shoes

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage