DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Lasers and Ray Guns » Laser Weapons “Almost Ready?” Not!

Laser Weapons “Almost Ready?” Not!

If youre into mil­i­tary tech­nol­ogy at all, some­where in the back of your mind, you want laser guns to hap­pen. Because theyre cool. Han Solo cool. Starbuck cool. James T. Kirk cool.
THEL_sunset.jpgBut want­ing some­thing to hap­pen is very dif­fer­ent from hav­ing it hap­pen. And we are still a ways off like a decade, at the very least, and prob­a­bly more from deploy­able laser weapons.
Which is not the impres­sion youd get from this Space​.com arti­cle, or the book which it cov­ers, Doug Beasons The E-​​Bomb: How Americas New Directed Energy Weapons Will Change the Way Wars Will Be Fought in the Future.
The U.S. “is on the verge of deploy­ing a new gen­er­a­tion of weapons that dis­charge beams of energy, such as the Airborne Laser and the Active Denial System, as well as the Tactical High Energy Laser, Space​.com says.
Um, not exactly. The Active Denial System thats the microwave-​​esque pain ray weve dis­cussed before is get­ting closer to be fielded, yeah. But the laser sys­tems? No way. The Airborne Laser is bil­lions over bud­get and years past its ini­tial dead­line. The Tactical High Energy Laser, it was can­celled last year. The rea­son is basi­cally the same in both cases: each weapon relies on giant vats of toxic chem­i­cals to pro­duce its laser light. And very few peo­ple in the mil­i­tary feel like haul­ing all that goop off to war.
But Beason I met him last year, and read a gal­ley of his book months before it came out says money can fix many of those woes.

At present, directed-​​energy sys­tems “are barely limp­ing along with enough money just to prove that they can work,” Beason pointed out. Meanwhile, huge slugs of money are being put into legacy-​​type sys­tems to keep them going.
“Its a mat­ter of pri­or­ity,” Beason said. The time is now to iden­tify high-​​payoff, directed-​​energy projects for the small­est amounts of money, he said.
In Beasons view, Active Denial Technology, the Airborne Laser pro­gram and the THEL project, as well as sup­port­ing tech­nolo­gies such as relay mir­rors, are all works in progress that give rea­son for added sup­port and pri­or­ity funding.

Ive inter­viewed hun­dreds of mil­i­tary sci­en­tists over the past four years. And nearly all of them have told me the same thing, no mat­ter how far-​​out their research is: if the gov­ern­ment would just give me a cou­ple of hun­dred mil­lion dol­lars, then if I would have some seri­ously whiz-​​bang shit ready to go, pronto.
Energy weapon guys often give the same rap. But these chemical-​​based lasers — no amount of money is going to solve the logis­ti­cal headaches of cart­ing around and han­dling the toxic mate­ri­als they require.
The only alter­na­tive, in the (rel­a­tively) short term: solid state lasers, which get their energy from excited crys­tals. The prob­lem is that the power you get from such beams, about 25 kilo­watts, is a tiny frac­tion — about two per­cent — of what the megawatt that chem­i­cal lasers pro­duce.
There are devel­op­ment efforts under­way to boost that power. I just got back from Northrop Grumman’s solid state laser lab, which, within three years, could very well have the first solid state laser that the mil­i­tary could con­ceiv­ably think of as weapons grade. But even if that 100 kilo­watt laser comes off with­out a hitch, we’re still look­ing at a long time before we hit Han Solo ter­ri­tory. Which is too bad, really.

Share |

January 12th, 2006 | Lasers and Ray Guns | 302929 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/laser-weapons-almost-ready-not/Laser+Weapons+%22Almost+Ready%3F%22++Not%212006-01-12+16%3A58%3A42jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « New Plates for Army Armor | Vietnam Flak Vests: Soooo Light » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. DS says:
    January 12, 2006 at 2:31 pm

    Here’s a pos­si­ble ‘fix’ for boost­ing solid state laser per­for­mance:
    “SHOCK-​​PRODUCED COHERENT LIGHT. Physicists at MIT and Livermore
    National Lab have dis­cov­ered a new source of coher­ent radi­a­tion
    dis­tinct from tra­di­tional lasers and free-​​electron lasers; they
    pro­pose to build a device in which coher­ent pho­tons are pro­duced by
    send­ing shock waves through a crys­tal. The result would be coher­ent
    light resem­bling the radi­a­tion issu­ing from a laser; but the
    mech­a­nism of light pro­duc­tion would not be stim­u­lated emis­sion, as
    it is in a laser, but rather the con­certed motion of row after row
    of atoms in the tar­get crys­tal. The pass­ing shock front, set in
    motion by a pro­jec­tile or laser blast, suc­ces­sively excites a huge
    den­sity wave in the crys­tal; the atoms, return­ing to their orig­i­nal
    places in the matrix, emit light coher­ently, mostly in the THz
    wave­length band. Although sources of coher­ent light in this part of
    the elec­tro­mag­netic spec­trum have devel­oped in recent years, it is
    still a dif­fi­cult task. The next step will be to carry out an
    exper­i­men­tal test of the shock-​​wave light pro­duc­tion. This work
    will be per­formed at two national labs—Livermore and Los Alamos.
    According to Evan Reed (who moved from MIT to Livermore,
    reed2​3​@​llnl.​gov) the first likely appli­ca­tion of coher­ent radi­a­tion
    will be as a diag­nos­tic for under­stand­ing shock waves. The
    radi­a­tion should pro­vide infor­ma­tion about shock speed and the
    degree of crys­tallinity (Reed et al., Physical Review Letters, 13
    January 2006)“
    –AIP Physics News Update.

    Reply
  2. pedestrian says:
    January 13, 2006 at 4:24 am

    This reminds me about the tilt rotor projects that began decades ago (X-​​22, XV-​​3, XV-​​15, and XC-​​142). It sure took decades to get V-​​22 Osprey into ser­vice (and for a tilt rotor after almost half a cen­tury since XV-​​3!). Directed Energy weapons also seems to be some­thing to be exper­i­mented for decades before it “finally” reaches the point to be in service.

    Reply
  3. GL says:
    January 13, 2006 at 9:52 am

    An effec­tive ver­sion of laser weaponry is ready for use today. The Chinese have installed it on the tur­ret of the Type 98 MBT
    http://​sin​ode​fence​.com/​a​r​m​y​/​t​a​n​k​/​t​y​p​e​9​8​.​asp
    “The pro­ce­dure of the laser weapon would first use a low-​​powered beam to locate the optics of the enemy weapon. Once the enemy weapon was located, the power level of the laser would be imme­di­ately and dra­mat­i­cally increased. Such an attack would dis­able the guid­ance optics of the enemy weapon and/​or dam­age the eye­sight of the enemy gun­ner.“
    Using lasers as blind­ing weapons would be a most effi­cient way of ren­der­ing your enemy “com­bat inef­fec­tive” and is avail­able today. Apparently the Chinese have no qualms about using them in this manner.

    Reply
  4. Big D says:
    January 13, 2006 at 7:57 pm

    Err, if 100kw is enough to take out incom­ing artillery shells, then it’s enough to take out infantry, light vehi­cles, com­bat sup­port vehi­cles (fuel trucks go boom), and quite pos­si­bly armored vehi­cles includ­ing tanks by tar­get­ing the engine deck. Oh, and planes and SAMs, too.
    Folks, that sounds pretty rev­o­lu­tion­ary to me. You don’t *need* megawatt-​​class lasers to be effec­tive in a tac­ti­cal environment.

    Reply
  5. Noah Shachtman says:
    January 14, 2006 at 11:34 am

    Big D:
    You’re right, “you don’t *need* megawatt-​​class lasers to be effec­tive in a tac­ti­cal envi­ron­ment.” But get­ting the appro­pri­ate power lev­els in just the start. Packaging, cool­ing, get­ting the proper power *inputs,* you need all that too before you can have some­thing that works as a weapon. It’s gonna take a lit­tle while.
    nms

    Reply
  6. Noah Shachtman says:
    January 15, 2006 at 2:31 pm

    Franklin:
    Actually, the Israelis quit on the THEL before the Americans. And once that Israeli fund­ing was gone, the project started look­ing a lot less attrac­tive to the Pentagon.
    nms

    Reply
  7. Drew says:
    January 16, 2006 at 6:47 am

    That is really unpro­fes­sional to say shit in the article.

    Reply
  8. Jack says:
    January 16, 2006 at 10:17 am

    I agree with Drew. And the gram­mar is poor, too.

    Reply
  9. Bill says:
    January 16, 2006 at 11:46 am

    Information/​Disinformation What’s the real truth?
    Nov 10, 2002 arti­cle appeared in the Sunday News Journal, Wilmington, Delaware, writ­ten by Andrew Bridges, Associated Press. “Pentagon devel­ops fast laser weapons”.
    In this arti­cle it says that defense offi­cials used a laser to shoot an artillery shell out of the sky!
    I’ve seen films of lasers drop­ping drones back in the 1970’s. We have the tech­nol­ogy and we wouldn’t be spend­ing $3.7 bil­lion on the mount­ing of a laser in the nose of a 747 unless they worked and worked well. Well enough to elim­i­nate the need for Patriot missles and maybe even anti-​​ballistic missles.
    One of the lager lasers is in Bagdad since last year. I’ve only seen that on the news once. Why not tout what we have in our arse­nal. It may deter our ene­mies from spend­ing their money on scud missles etc.
    We just need Jack Bauer of the CTU to pro­tect our tech­nol­ogy from trai­tors in our gov­ern­ment that will do any­thing for a buck or for their own coun­try that they came from like the Cuban born woman who work for the Defense Intelligence Agency(DIA) and was using a short wave radio to send troop deploy­ment loca­tions to the Cuban gov­ern­ment. Funny thing, I haven’t heard a word about what they did with her. I Wonder if Jack interi­gated her?

    Reply
  10. InTheLoop says:
    January 16, 2006 at 7:38 pm

    “The Airborne Laser is bil­lions over bud­get and years past its ini­tial dead­line.“
    With no results?
    Billions over bud­get but accom­plish­ing noth­ing?
    Sure — I believe it.….

    Reply
  11. craig says:
    January 16, 2006 at 8:40 pm

    this artl­cle came from a new school reporter who pathet­icly tried to make the story cool & hip. If you are going to report some­thing new to the pub­lic, orga­nize your facts, present them in an orderly man­ner and leave the street talk for the Micky D crowd. He must think his read­ers are 16 years old. Give me a break and put him on the teen beat. Leave the intel­le­gent report­ing to some­one qual­i­fied. This guy must be some­ones nephew.

    Reply
  12. Arkiv X says:
    January 17, 2006 at 12:33 am

    Whiz bang shit, huh the writer of this arti­cle prob­a­bly thinks the money spent to increase our tech­ni­cal knowl­edge is bet­ter spent on food stamps or social­ized health care. In my opin­ion if the atom bomb was a top secret super weapon in the 1940’s the things the gov­ern­ment has today must be at least as amaz­ing as the atom bomb was then.

    Reply
  13. Peter says:
    January 17, 2006 at 4:11 am

    Boeing has Airborn Laser Platform for shoot­ing down Balistic Missiles. On Board a Military Varient of 747.

    Reply
  14. Josh says:
    January 17, 2006 at 5:02 am

    If I “inter­viewed hun­dreds of mil­i­tary sci­en­tists” who believed they could “have some seri­ously whiz-​​bang shit ready to go, pronto” if given the proper financ­ing I wouldn’t be near as pes­simistic as the anony­mous author of this arti­cle. His con­clu­sion of relent­less pes­simism leads me to doubt the claimed research. How could you pos­si­bly not be excited about tech­nol­ogy after talk­ing to hun­dreds of mil­i­tary scientists?

    Reply
  15. Moty G says:
    August 5, 2006 at 10:50 am

    In view of the recent fight­ing between Israel and the Hezbolla, I see no no option for Israel but to renew the THEL pro­gram. While the cur­rent design makes the sys­tem a sit­ting duck for arracks by Katyusha or mor­tar fire, it will be pos­si­ble to make it more com­pact in size, mov­able and armored. This, off course, will require large addi­tional fund­ing, but it is still much cheaper than the eco­nomic dam­age inflicted on the north­ern part of Israel dur­ing the sec­ond Lebanese war.

    Reply
  16. Big D #2 says:
    October 2, 2006 at 9:16 am

    Just remem­ber folks, there are NO com­ments on this board by any­body who is actively work­ing in this field, because it is CLASSIFIED INFORMATION. I was involved in this project in the 1970’s, and WE WERE SHOOTING DOWN MISSILES WHEN EVERYBODY SAID IT CAN’T BE DONE, so take every­thing peo­ple say on this board with a huge grain of Sodium Chloride. You have NO IDEA what the air force is actu­ally doing right now with lasers. None.

    Reply
  17. Mike says:
    November 13, 2006 at 8:48 pm

    For all of you who are won­der­ing why the US can­celled THEL, check out HELLADS (High Energy Liquid Laser Area Defense System).
    It is small and pow­er­ful. It will be small enough to fit on the next Predator drones. This is the “3rd gen­er­a­tion” that some­one already men­tioned. The laser sys­tems work. We just aren’t going to waste bil­lions of dol­lars on a mas­sive dinosaur sys­tem when there is a pint-​​sized ver­sion that does the same thing avail­able now. Thank God for the HUGE break­through: metamaterials!

    Reply
  18. JB says:
    December 9, 2006 at 4:27 am

    So, the next stage in an arms race would be reflec­tive paint then?
    Let

    Reply
  19. Foton says:
    January 14, 2007 at 4:35 pm

    Wrong dip stick. Once you get cer­tain quan­ti­ties of pho­tons in one spot non-​​linear effects take over. Things which are nor­mally trans­par­ent or reflec­tive become highly absorbant to any pho­tons which impinge on the mate­r­ial. Lasers are pretty neat, but I find dif­fer­en­tial Absorption LIDAR more intrigu­ing. It will allow for a bal­loon­ing of fire and for­get technology.

    Reply
  20. TheFrin says:
    July 5, 2007 at 9:50 pm

    dont realy know what to say but i saw a USAF gen­eral about 3years ago on the TV get­ting caught talk­ing a lit­tle too loud and basi­cally what he said was
    “think of the air­craft and weapon sys­tems we “would” have in 50 years.……now think another 50 years and thats where we are up to, Star Trek BAH been there done that got the T-​​shirt“
    belive me if you want or ignore me if you dont either way thats cool WAY cool
    to be fair all this tech we are see­ing now has been white for over a decade (if only in con­cept) but think the grey is prob­a­bly 20–30 years from being found out so the black is at least 50years away. and now try fac­tor­ing in what the Black projects will be in another 50 using tech­no­log­i­cal pro­gres­sion and expi­den­tial increase in com­put­ing power.
    The Future is already over just think of the BANG you could make in 50 years time

    Reply
  21. Kherubin says:
    July 21, 2007 at 9:03 am

    That seems rel­a­tively implau­si­ble.
    Don’t get me wrong, I am not flat-​​out deny­ing what you’re say­ing and, in fact, it would be fan­tas­tic if bleeding-​​edge laser tech­nol­ogy were as far advanced as you claim it to be.
    However, if it were the case, would we not, at least in part, have seen evi­dence of its exis­tance.
    If we gen­uinely have that tech­nol­ogy avail­able, why is it not seen atop every HUMVEE?
    If you have the tech­nol­ogy why not use it?
    If they are using it, is it really pos­si­ble to com­pletely cover it up?
    If I’m just being naive, please tell me.

    Reply
  22. Dave says:
    September 27, 2007 at 2:55 am

    Time to have a really good think.
    I can buy a laser for weld­ing that is lethal as a weapon. Burn a hole in your head quite eas­ily. Stick it on a truck, get some big bat­ter­ies, sim­ple. Not much range but who cares. As if there isn’t totally lethal laser weaponry in exis­tence. As if mas­sive lasers are a prob­lem. As if tar­get­ing is a prob­lem. As if the mil­i­tary gives a shit about the tox­i­c­ity of chem­i­cals. Heard of plu­to­nium? As if the mil­i­tary is going to tell us what they’re really doing…unbelievable naivety to think oth­er­wise.
    It’s all about money. It’s all about dom­i­na­tion of the globe with space based weapons. They are not going to tell us any­thing what­so­ever about the real­ity of advanced weapons systems.

    Reply
  23. Will says:
    December 17, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    Ok all you nay-​​sayers.
    Have you ever heared of the Laser Avenger that Boeing devel­oped and tested and is about ready to fielded. http://​www​.pop​u​larme​chan​ics​.com/​t​e​c​h​n​o​l​o​g​y​/​m​i​l​i​t​a​r​y​_​l​a​w​/​4​2​3​1​1​1​6​.​h​tml
    Mainly as a demon­stra­tor to show the world that we have the tech­nol­ogy and we can deve­l­ope and field it in a short time.
    War time is won­der­ful for weapon devel­op­ment. If it weren’t for WW2 our coun­try wouldn’t have got­ten out of the Depretion, devel­oped the Atomic bomb or became the great­est Power the world has ever known.
    We have this “war” in the mid­dle east that is con­stantly active yet tame enough to let us refine old equip­ment and deve­l­ope and deploy new stuff too.
    I have been in the Army National Guard (Cavalry Scout and Infantry) for only 3 years and I have been issued, turned-​​in, and issued new gear and bat­tle uni­forms 4 times since I enlisted.
    I also Work for Boeing so I get updates on all the new projects daily, and they are all on their way to on sched­ual deploy­ment.
    The Air Force has orders for 12 of the Airborn Lasers.
    My point is, We are the great­est in the world with no real per­ti­nant need for Laser weapons. The tech­nol­ogy is slow in being devel­oped because it can be. Like the F-​​22 I remem­ber when it was a con­sept back in 1992, and only now is it being acti­vated. All the debate was not if it was do-​​able (of course it was, it was noth­ing out­ra­gious) the debate is if it was nesesary.
    The same thing applies to the Laser Weapons. Can we do it? Definatly! Do we NEED them? Probably not right now. But we could and that is the point.
    Right now the United States needs to be the expert of the tech­nol­ogy and be able to have the upper hand if the threat ever came about.
    I guess that’s all I have to say about that.

    Reply
  24. dude on net says:
    April 14, 2008 at 6:45 pm

    Sure these laser weapons are plau­si­ble. Anything is pos­si­ble, but at a cost. People doubted the aspect of the air­plane and the light­bulb. Now these are things used every­day. But if the cost of effec­tive lasers is harm­ful waste prod­ucts, then peo­ple need to find another way or just five up.

    Reply
  25. cm says:
    April 27, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    I can gar­en­tie lazzer weopens by 2050. if there in’t i’l eat my com­puter oh and y hasent any­buddy pos­tited siense 04

    Reply
  26. cheap zeny says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:44 pm

    I always adhere to and keep a dis­tance from every­one. Until now, I did not have a true friend, although I was a lonely, although I did not like the other play­ers that they have many friends send them cheap zeny, I must be rely on myself, at least I will not hurt any­body, and per­haps this is kind of happiness.

    Reply
  27. rappelz money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:47 pm

    Looking back at the past, in those days, we played together; we have no much rap­pelz money, we have no need equip­ment and no senior friends too us, but I am still play­ing very happy. Rappelz left every­where in our laugh­ter. There is only one rea­son is that I have her around, I would meet, every­thing becomes unim­por­tant. One thing I feel very sorry, that is when I mar­ried her, mo gor­geous fire­works, mo friends of bless­ing. Now I have heart, I feel wronged her, I am sorry to her.

    Reply
  28. GuildWars money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 9:03 pm

    Virtual net works, vir­tual role of the game, I did not as him what peo­ple. It is only a game; happy is the pur­pose of the game. I chat with him happy. I have an on line he will not be alone to upgrade and earn GuildWars money, but rather for the first time chat with me, in this way we often sit together.

    Reply
  29. lol says:
    November 6, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    Looks like Obama didn’t feel the air­borne laser was worth it :(

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • The Osprey has Landed
    Recent Comments
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage