<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Vietnam Flak Vests: Soooo Light</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:16:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Archlord money</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/comment-page-1/#comment-120846</link> <dc:creator>Archlord money</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:56:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3030#comment-120846</guid> <description>how to do will be aroused the girl</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how to do will be aroused the girl</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 2moons gold</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/comment-page-1/#comment-120845</link> <dc:creator>2moons gold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:53:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3030#comment-120845</guid> <description>People often said the boyfriend in order to the girlfriend can spend much money to let the girlfriend happy, so now in the game many players spend much money to bought the 2moons gold then send them to their game girlfriend. So in the game I was very admire my friends, they can did many things for their girlfriend, some time they let me affect. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People often said the boyfriend in order to the girlfriend can spend much money to let the girlfriend happy, so now in the game many players spend much money to bought the 2moons gold then send them to their game girlfriend. So in the game I was very admire my friends, they can did many things for their girlfriend, some time they let me affect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 2moons dil</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/comment-page-1/#comment-120844</link> <dc:creator>2moons dil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:48:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3030#comment-120844</guid> <description>I was a sad loss of the same things will be long, so I order to commemorate the my 17 days of the 2moons. I only know that in the game the 2moons dil is very important. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a sad loss of the same things will be long, so I order to commemorate the my 17 days of the 2moons. I only know that in the game the 2moons dil is very important.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tibia coins</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/comment-page-1/#comment-44394</link> <dc:creator>Tibia coins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 05:35:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3030#comment-44394</guid> <description>When I discovered Tibia coins as a player there was little more around than Thais and the lighthouse. There were no vocations and the hardest monster was the Cyclops. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I discovered Tibia coins as a player there was little more around than Thais and the lighthouse. There were no vocations and the hardest monster was the Cyclops.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: www.buy-gw-gold.com</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/comment-page-1/#comment-120843</link> <dc:creator>www.buy-gw-gold.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:52:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3030#comment-120843</guid> <description>Many guildwars money is here. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many guildwars money is here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rappelz gold</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/comment-page-1/#comment-120838</link> <dc:creator>rappelz gold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:18:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3030#comment-120838</guid> <description>Now I have been working. Rappelz unwittingly with the growth of the past few years, Rappelz has been updating, I also busy, but I have not forgotten the game. Work and is inseparable from the game, I like Rappelz, even if the equipment is not good, even if I have no much rappelz gold. I also very happy, because I have many friends in the game, so what can be said, does not, as long as you said to. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I have been working. Rappelz unwittingly with the growth of the past few years, Rappelz has been updating, I also busy, but I have not forgotten the game. Work and is inseparable from the game, I like Rappelz, even if the equipment is not good, even if I have no much rappelz gold. I also very happy, because I have many friends in the game, so what can be said, does not, as long as you said to.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rook</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/comment-page-1/#comment-120834</link> <dc:creator>Rook</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:20:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3030#comment-120834</guid> <description>An article I read last year said it best. &quot;The modern US soldier goes into combat carrying 120lbs of light weight equipment. The problem is that 120lbs of lightweight equipment still weighs 120lbs!&quot;
The current interceptor system is flawed in the same way that the up-armored Humvee is. rather than fixing a design they simply add more armor and weight to an existing frame. Soldiers need to be able to move effectively and keep the momentum and  &quot;violence of action&quot; going in a firefight or they risk becoming easy targets. Systems such as dragon skin have been proven more effective for personal armor and offer better protection to weight ratio. It&#039;s time to realize this and drop the weight.
-Rook, US Army Combat Engineer </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article I read last year said it best. “The modern US soldier goes into combat carrying 120lbs of light weight equipment. The problem is that 120lbs of lightweight equipment still weighs 120lbs!“<br
/> The current interceptor system is flawed in the same way that the up-armored Humvee is. rather than fixing a design they simply add more armor and weight to an existing frame. Soldiers need to be able to move effectively and keep the momentum and  “violence of action” going in a firefight or they risk becoming easy targets. Systems such as dragon skin have been proven more effective for personal armor and offer better protection to weight ratio. It’s time to realize this and drop the weight.<br
/> –Rook, US Army Combat Engineer</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: me</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/comment-page-1/#comment-44383</link> <dc:creator>me</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 03:53:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3030#comment-44383</guid> <description>Ranger armor weighs 24 lbs with both plates. Te very first had one front plate so that&#039;s probably where the 16 lb&#039;s came from. There is lighter versions available now. the old heavy plates were better than interceoptor plates as far as taking a  hit </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ranger armor weighs 24 lbs with both plates. Te very first had one front plate so that’s probably where the 16 lb’s came from. There is lighter versions available now. the old heavy plates were better than interceoptor plates as far as taking a  hit</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/comment-page-1/#comment-44382</link> <dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:14:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3030#comment-44382</guid> <description>What helps is that globalsecurity.org perpetuates the myth of 25 pds.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/interceptor.htm
What you see on globalsec is not what you get in real life. :) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What helps is that globalsecurity.org perpetuates the myth of 25 pds.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/interceptor.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/interceptor.htm</a><br
/> What you see on globalsec is not what you get in real life. <img
src='http://defensetech.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Quinn</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/12/vietnam-flak-vests-soooo-light/comment-page-1/#comment-120832</link> <dc:creator>Quinn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:02:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3030#comment-120832</guid> <description>Body armour has pluses and minuses. The body armour today is more effective than the VietNam era equipment I used in the 70&#039;s &amp; 80&#039;s. The K-pot offers better head protection and a SAP plate was unheard of then. The problem as I see it, isn&#039;t as much about the effectiveness of body armour although it has room for vast improvement. It is about weight and bulk.
Yes the 9 pounds of armour along with the combat load was bulky, uncomfortable, and interfered with mobility; But not any more so than the armour I was issued in the Balkans in the 90&#039;s.
For those whose duties are to operate vehicles the Army&#039;s Tank and Automotive Command has done a terrible disservice. The vehicles are not designed to allow a driver wearing body armour to do his/her job.
I am 6&#039;2&quot; tall, while wearing the vest with the humvee seat at its rearmost position I could not exit the vehicle quickly let along position myself in the drivers seat to operate the vehicle controls in the most efficent manner. As for what troops in armoured vehicles need to contend with, I can bearly imagine. Flack vests took up room in the M113s also.
As for the previous comment about placing Misters Chenny, Rumsfeld and Rowe and others in Iraq for evolution of body armour to get a jump start. Maybe a nice idea but the wrong people. Get the miltary and civilian leaders who sign off on equipment into a position to have to use it and interface with it as the Soldier or Marine does and we&#039;ll see faster evolution of more effective armour.
Maybe the next generation of vehicle will accomodate the 6&#039;6&quot; Soldier who is driving the hummer while wearing body armour.
As for arguments over the Soldiers load and mobility. It may never end. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Body armour has pluses and minuses. The body armour today is more effective than the VietNam era equipment I used in the 70’s &amp; 80’s. The K-pot offers better head protection and a SAP plate was unheard of then. The problem as I see it, isn’t as much about the effectiveness of body armour although it has room for vast improvement. It is about weight and bulk.<br
/> Yes the 9 pounds of armour along with the combat load was bulky, uncomfortable, and interfered with mobility; But not any more so than the armour I was issued in the Balkans in the 90’s.<br
/> For those whose duties are to operate vehicles the Army’s Tank and Automotive Command has done a terrible disservice. The vehicles are not designed to allow a driver wearing body armour to do his/her job.<br
/> I am 6’2″ tall, while wearing the vest with the humvee seat at its rearmost position I could not exit the vehicle quickly let along position myself in the drivers seat to operate the vehicle controls in the most efficent manner. As for what troops in armoured vehicles need to contend with, I can bearly imagine. Flack vests took up room in the M113s also.<br
/> As for the previous comment about placing Misters Chenny, Rumsfeld and Rowe and others in Iraq for evolution of body armour to get a jump start. Maybe a nice idea but the wrong people. Get the miltary and civilian leaders who sign off on equipment into a position to have to use it and interface with it as the Soldier or Marine does and we’ll see faster evolution of more effective armour.<br
/> Maybe the next generation of vehicle will accomodate the 6’6″ Soldier who is driving the hummer while wearing body armour.<br
/> As for arguments over the Soldiers load and mobility. It may never end.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/25 queries in 0.118 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-22 13:33:00 -->