Comments on: David and the Inflatable Goliath

By: Matt

Matt — Mon, 24 May 2010 20:50:34 +0000

How do u exept a GIANT blimp to remain save while providing close air support. one SAM or other rocket could rip the entire thing wide open… like the zeplins in WWI…

By: Stephen

Stephen — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:06:00 +0000

Check out the StratoComm Corporation @ http://www.stratocommcorporation.com. They have patents in this area of technology and have recently gone public.

By: Strabo the Lesser

Strabo the Lesser — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:45:39 +0000

I can’t see that it would be any bigger on radar than a C-5. After all, the gasbag probably wouldn’t show up on radar.
Probably we should be comparing this with Cargo ships and C-5 rather than a tactical transport.

By: John J

John J — Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:15:56 +0000

Sorry to pour very cold water on you pessimist’s but the British Millitary has been using an airship on counter insurgency operations for many years, having the ability to move silently above a battle field, be it Urban or Rural, equiped with a number of hightec survalance devises, day or night it can track possible targets and relay that info to ground troops.
If you cant hear it & you cant see it why would you think you can shoot it down? But then America dident invent it so it probably dosent even exist does it! best we keep it that way.

By: Mark Million

Mark Million — Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:56:12 +0000

I’m sure that some of you must know about Nikola Tesla and his ideas regarding Zepplins, as well as Particle Beam Weapons. I guess his ideas were not as eccentric as once thought..or perportedly thought. In 1990, I was walking home and I thought I heard the faint sound of a jet engine of some type. I looked up and to my suprise I saw the Infamous Cigar Shaped UFO! It was on an easterly track towards Omaha. I was in the Ralston/La Vista area, not too far from the Air Base there (SAC HQ). It had the bright firey tail eminating from the back…it also had at least 2 fighter escorts. Must have either have been the actuall Tesla invention reported to have touched down several times in the 1890’s in Iowa and places or it was a prototype for the refueling platform we saw in the movie Stealth. Interesting to say the least. I’m guessing Tesla had a lighter than air drive of some sort. Maybe not true Anti-Gravity but something no doubt.

By: Brian

Brian — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:59:37 +0000

Actually, Roger, that’s not a bad idea. You could park over a city and scan troublespot areas with your cameras. Any explosion would trigger the camera to “zoom in” and record the area.

By: Roger

Roger — Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:37:53 +0000

Would it be possible to have a strato-cam, a high res video camera mounted on a High Altitude Platform, cabable of recording the goings on of a city using many recording cells with the purpose of watching the tape "backwards" when situations such as car bombs, IED's, or what ever should happen? Every time something happens, somebody did it, but know body seems to know where "they" came from. Now the "eye-in-the-sky" so to speak has recorded the whole thing and all that is needed is for intel to watch the tape backwards and track the bad guys to their holes. This idea won't stop an IED but it can place where the folks that did it came from and that could stop others. Real quick, has any one heard of Skystation International? They were working on a HAP for communications and I haven't heard from them for a while. Their founder is Gen Alex Haig.

By: Paul

Paul — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:45:50 +0000

First and formost let us assume that our military arm isn’t a bunch of idiots. They have technology, manpower, and brains enough to determine whether or not it is safe to fly a blimp in. I doubt the goliath would be used in an aggressive stance unless in a well guarded corridor. Most likely beyond the transport of humanitarian aid and resupply to established stronghold locations, its primary mission would be to move vehicles, ammunition and artilary. Which most people who have read a history book around here would agree is far from the nitty gritty and would be relatively safe travel, especially with gunships running interferance with any ground retaliation. I say ground because the airforce is second to none and would be responsible for keeping the air passage clear. But if you want to say that our military hierarchy is going to put an expensive and highly useful piece of hardware in to harms way, I believe the only appropriate response would be to say, sit down, be quiet, and read a book.

By: Gambino

Gambino — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:03:19 +0000

A cheaper more effective machine of war whether it’s weapons systems or blimps is critical for our evolving military. Military Sealift Command can then free up a vast majority of its cargo ships for profit transport and help offset the costs of research and development. Yes that’s right, the US Navy does make money too. Ever see a pirate ship go after a US Naval vessel? N O P E This is why companies pay the higher transport prices of MSC ships… instant insurance. ;-)Hope you learned something today.

By: ALong

ALong — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 04:00:21 +0000

I suggest some of you take a look at the Feb. issue of Pop Sci. It explains that this craft is not a “big balloon” like a blimp or derigible. It is a composit-based solid structure craft which uses small wings, six jet engines, three turbo props, and its own body’s shape to creat lift. It will more likely carry 400 tons of payload and travel at a speed of 174 mph with a range of 6,000 miles. Also, its naturally bouyant so it can land on water also.