DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Armor » Dissing the Dragon?

Dissing the Dragon?

sov-2-front.jpgWhen the latest body armor flap broke ten days ago, several commenters here talked up the Dragon Skin protective system as a better alternative. Now, Soldiers for the Truth — the group which ignited the current armor debate — is passing on reports from two deploying GIs that “their commander told them if they were wearing Pinnacle Dragon Skin and were killed their beneficiaries might not receive the death benefits from their $400,000 SGLI life insurance policies.“
According to Defense Review — which has been tracking Pinnacle’s gear for a while — the Skin is basically your standard body armor, laced with silver-dollar sized ceramic discs. These are configured over the vest like scales (hence the “Dragon” sobriquet).
Some folks say the Skin is at least as tough as standard-issue armor, and it’s flexible, too — which should make it more comfortable. But, if I’m reading right, the basic Dragon Skin vest weighs about 8 lbs. more than the Interceptor OTV armor that soldiers generally wear now. That extra weight, I’m guessing, is the reason why one commander tried to spook his men out of their Skin. And I have a feeling this is just one commander’s words — not some Pentagon-wide directive, as SFTT implies. We’ll see.

Share |

January 17th, 2006 | Armor | 478028 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/17/dissing-the-dragon/Dissing+the+Dragon%3F2006-01-17+17%3A23%3A02jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « David and the Inflatable Goliath | Rapid Fire 01/17/06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Stefan Moluf says:
    January 17, 2006 at 2:09 pm

    I don’t think so. The Interceptor weights 16.4 lbs last time I checked, and the SOV weighs a maximum of 18.5 lbs. A small weight increase (probably because there are sections of the scales that overlap and are thus double thickness, whereas a SAPI plate has even thickness everywhere), but I would imagine the flexibility would make up for it.

    Reply
  2. J.C. says:
    January 17, 2006 at 3:39 pm

    The Interceptor weights ~8.4 lbs without the ceramic plates in the front and back. Each plate weights ~4 lbs.

    Reply
  3. Chris Wo says:
    January 17, 2006 at 10:48 pm

    Also ignored is the fact that Dragon Scale armor provides much better coverage than the plates used. Everyone complains now about the poor side and shoulder protection, while pinnacle armor has been selling full torso Class III armor, not limited area inserts. More likely someone that is not getting rich enough off of DOD contracts and interceptor amror is probably behind this.

    Reply
  4. Mike says:
    April 2, 2006 at 12:22 am

    SGLI pays REGARDLESS OF CAUSE OF DEATH. Suicide, murder, war, motorcycle racing…
    Any commander who says otherwise is a liar or an incompetent.

    Reply
  5. Robert Altrich says:
    May 24, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    A standard IBA with two plates weighs 16.4 lbs, but with the shoulder coverage, side plates, and the “new” sapi plates that go in front and back weighs about 32 pounds. So I think the that with full coverage besides the shoulder pads that the SOV Dragon Skin will be well worth it. And as far as the price goes I would think that the goverment would rather spend the 4+ grand on a vest that will save lives, then spend the 400,000 on the life insurance for each soldier that dies.

    Reply
  6. SPC.Brooks says:
    October 9, 2006 at 7:05 pm

    I shot a sapi plate 8 times at 20 meters with a smith and wesson 500. It’s a 50 cal. Not a singe round penetrated the Plate even on glancing shots to the side of it. At most it would penetrate the carbon like layer. Then peirce through 2 very thin weavings of either kevlar or nylon. The plate is a good system but it needs to get thinner and lighter.

    Reply
  7. jesse says:
    January 21, 2007 at 11:22 pm

    give me a split screen demo of intersepter & dragon skin in action then well talk, i dont know about you but my life is worth a $5000 investment

    Reply
  8. Mario says:
    January 23, 2007 at 1:20 am

    Say you’re driving along on Active duty but you are assign light treat duty but a you are driving a bomb or a group of insergents ambush you. Do you have time to add your extra plating no! I put my money on dragon skin

    Reply
  9. Jake says:
    February 1, 2007 at 2:06 pm

    What no one is talking a about is Dragon Scale’s ablity to reduce blunt force for rounds take don’t get through. My father was a police-man when light body armor was invented. He was shot twice, vest worked both times, but blunt force wounds the size of dinner plates where he was shot. Dragon Scale’s design transfers blunt shock across the whole vest, making it more possible to get back in the fight.

    Reply
  10. b.h. says:
    February 4, 2007 at 11:27 pm

    I heard a rumor that there is dragonskin boots. Can anyone confirm this? Can you bring your own body armour to Iraq? I have heard yes and no.

    Reply
  11. Ranba Ral says:
    February 17, 2007 at 3:12 pm

    I’ve heard mixed things about Dragon Skin from the guys that I know who’ve tried it out. About half think the flexibility and side protection is great. The other half hates how it limits their mobility through tight spaces. I don’t know how this opinion would be affected now that they’re being forced to wear the side-plates when going out… They also say “[the extra flexibility] doesn’t matter either when there’s 20 pouches attached to it”.
    My buddy in 10th Mountain found about the same thing as SPC.Brooks with the latest Interceptor system plates they had. The only difference was a single plate took 5 direct hits from an M82/M107 before being useless.
    Also, how much weight difference would there be between the full Interceptor system we use now (body, side plates, neck, throat, shoulder pads, crotch, underarm) and a Dragon Skin system covering all those areas? I’ve only ever seen stats for just the Dragon Skin vest.

    Reply
  12. SPC Holmes says:
    April 10, 2007 at 10:22 pm

    Alright, let’s cut the crap. An IBA (Interceptor Ballistic Armor) vest may have weighed 16.4lbs when this whole thing started, but that’s not the case anymore. I wear a medium-size vest, and with ESAPI plates, side plates, the neck/throat protectors, and the groin protector, it weighs 31lbs.
    Of course, only pussies and pogues wear the neck and groin protectors; and the only reason my unit had to put side plates on, after a year of doing just fine without them, was that some general saw those nasty Stryker Infantry guys running around without them, and ordered our brigade commander to make us wear them. Battlefield politics only hurt one demographic: us grunts.

    Reply
  13. Yvette says:
    May 14, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    We supplied 16 troops with Dragon Skin armor vests who are currently serving in Iraq. Recently we received a call that the commander of this team won’t let them wear the protection. I’ve been doing alot of research and don’t understand why this commander won’t let them wear over $90,000 worth of life protecting armor. I’ve contacted General Conways’ office 3 times and keep being put on “hold”

    Reply
  14. Trey D. says:
    May 17, 2007 at 12:27 pm

    ATTENTION EVERYONE
    WATCH NBC NIGHTLY NEWS TONIGHT!!!!!!!
    THE WILL DISCUSS THE BODY ARMOR CONTROVERSY.
    VISIT http://​WWW​.SFTT​.ORG FOR THE SPECIFICS

    Reply
  15. thisguy says:
    June 16, 2007 at 8:36 pm

    what I think is funny and frighting at the same time is on the front of the sapi plates it says in big white letters “HANDLE WITH CARE”

    Reply
  16. tj says:
    July 22, 2007 at 5:16 am

    Maybe they should better print “handle with care” on Dragon Skin than false NIJ certifications. lol

    Reply
  17. Matt says:
    April 3, 2008 at 2:51 pm

    I have done several tours in iraq both as a civ and US Army. I have not used Dragon Scale in country, but after watching a live demo a few days ago, I was extreamly Impressed. Two full Mags of haji AK 47 from 15–20 yrds away. Not one round go through, they pulled every slug out. I usually dont buy the sales pitch for items, there is a lot of BS, that goes along with non issued military items, non specwar troops always seem to want equipmet that makes them appear different and are quick to speak poorly about issued items.
    on this item, I think the message is clear, the extra protection is worth it, I have witnessed to many deaths caused by the smallest of wounds. when the man should have made it home, any extra protection is worth the extra money!

    Reply
  18. Stefan Meyers says:
    April 5, 2008 at 10:11 am

    I am currently in Afghanistan right now and I can not stand the current IBA. For one thing I am 6’6″ and weigh 200lbs. I wear a medium because the length does not change at all. Pecker protector doesn’t protect shit, I don’t wear that… I can’t drive HMV’s or sit in the TC position if I am wearing my side plates. I would glady pay 4-5K for an armor system that incorporates the side protection seamlessly into the rest of the system.
    I doubt they will ever make anything that will compliment my height but it would still be nice to have something that conforms to my upper body a little better.
    On top of it all, our current armor has limited protection, there are still large gaps in the armor. Why aren’t we getting the best protection there is?

    Reply
  19. kisssmyass says:
    April 6, 2008 at 12:47 am

    i think to sum it all we could not resolve this isue just by argue our asses on it… for me it better if all of us could get together and at onetime test the both armor… but even if the the best armor would be found best, but there is still the politics, most of as knows about it, that some of the big asses there wont lit the best be the besest arnor just because of the cuts the he would be getting frome the companies…

    Reply
  20. john hanson says:
    April 15, 2008 at 12:17 pm

    dragon skin is amazing and could save lives but the government doesn’t like the price tag is all.

    Reply
  21. Dirka Blaze says:
    April 23, 2008 at 2:12 am

    The Government takes care of the soldiers and high ranking officials. With how they upgrade guns. NEW 6.8 FOR the really good shots with the best training and years out in service. AND for all the youngins that are comming in lets give you.… this shitty ass intercepter vest.… and this shitty m16. m16 sux… take a AK from a dead sand ass caving bitches. Main Fact. US new about the breakthroughs with dragonskin. THE level 5 is CLASSIFIED!!!! look at pinnaclearmor​.com top left go to ballistics you’ll see level 3–4 stop 7.62 NATO rounds REPETIVLY over and over again getting hit. AND nothing… The army won’t give 900$ more to get level 3 dragonskin to every person.
    IBA’s are as usless as aluminum foil. At least u’d get to blaze before you get shot threw your armor.
    God be with you all. Pray for our soldiers.
    watch out for juba, dragonskin would wipe him out!!!

    Reply
  22. Vince says:
    June 11, 2008 at 4:28 am

    i was wondering if dragon skin can stop a .50 from any gun in the world today?? since it can stop alomst every other bullet.….

    Reply
  23. David says:
    July 1, 2008 at 7:59 am

    I have been to Iraq and seen the SAPI plates work. Is there something better ?. The bottom line is, SAPI plates work and they work very well. I know many people who are above ground because of these plates; wear them and you’ll be fine. Theres a lot of opinions out there based on no experience and a lot of cheap talk.

    Reply
  24. Dave says:
    December 10, 2008 at 4:43 pm

    a large interceptor OTV with 2 side enahanced sapi and two large enhanced sapi (front and rear) and the neck protector will weigh a tad bit over 42lbs last time i weighed it. The Dragonskin SOV2000 offering slightly greater protective coverage and offering the same threat level protection but over a larger area will weigh 28lbs. The SOV3000 series weighs around 40lbs but offers even greater protection. Id gladly settle for the SOV2000, especially as pinnacle offer long and short lengths unlike the Interceptor. I am infantry. I fully understand the situations we face and believe the armor debacle to be promoted mainly by the people who have never and will never serve on the front lines.

    Reply
  25. Bulletproof Vests says:
    October 11, 2009 at 9:08 pm

    Yeah 18.5 pounds is heavy when that doesnt include other battle dress…we need to develop lighter armor.

    Reply
  26. Scott says:
    October 19, 2009 at 8:30 am

    The Dragon Skin is a nice concept although not perfect.

    Reply
  27. Scott says:
    October 19, 2009 at 8:31 am

    The Dragon Skin is a nice concept although not perfect.

    Reply
  28. PFC xxxxxxxxx says:
    February 1, 2010 at 1:51 pm

    I’ve been doing a research project for the Army on this. I ship June 28th to ft Benning for basic, infantry school, and airborne school then I will hopefully get deployed. What Im worried about is this armor that we are using right now. So much that I probably will wear Dragon Skin under everything else.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      And who exactly are you...
      Jack Frost
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Use Google to look for Harrier or VAAC Harrier – by comparison...
      Hx2
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      RE: "The JOE discusses at length perilous...
      SMSgt Mac
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      I'm sure they will solve...
      STemplar
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      So there is your Affordable Weapon....
      drm
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just found out that Taiwan's...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just keep in mind that the current...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      For once I have to agree with Byron Skinner....
      pfcem
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      f-22 article by bill sweetMan (page no. 102):...
      popular science
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Thunder350, There is no 'out of control' cost increase....
      pfcem
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage