DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Armor » Dissing the Dragon?

Dissing the Dragon?

sov-2-front.jpgWhen the lat­est body armor flap broke ten days ago, sev­eral com­menters here talked up the Dragon Skin pro­tec­tive sys­tem as a bet­ter alter­na­tive. Now, Soldiers for the Truth — the group which ignited the cur­rent armor debate — is pass­ing on reports from two deploy­ing GIs that “their com­man­der told them if they were wear­ing Pinnacle Dragon Skin and were killed their ben­e­fi­cia­ries might not receive the death ben­e­fits from their $400,000 SGLI life insur­ance poli­cies.“
According to Defense Review — which has been track­ing Pinnacle’s gear for a while — the Skin is basi­cally your stan­dard body armor, laced with silver-​​dollar sized ceramic discs. These are con­fig­ured over the vest like scales (hence the “Dragon” sobri­quet).
Some folks say the Skin is at least as tough as standard-​​issue armor, and it’s flex­i­ble, too — which should make it more com­fort­able. But, if I’m read­ing right, the basic Dragon Skin vest weighs about 8 lbs. more than the Interceptor OTV armor that sol­diers gen­er­ally wear now. That extra weight, I’m guess­ing, is the rea­son why one com­man­der tried to spook his men out of their Skin. And I have a feel­ing this is just one commander’s words — not some Pentagon-​​wide direc­tive, as SFTT implies. We’ll see.

Share |

January 17th, 2006 | Armor | 478036 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/17/dissing-the-dragon/Dissing+the+Dragon%3F2006-01-17+17%3A23%3A02jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « David and the Inflatable Goliath | Rapid Fire 01/​17/​06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Stefan Moluf says:
    January 17, 2006 at 2:09 pm

    I don’t think so. The Interceptor weights 16.4 lbs last time I checked, and the SOV weighs a max­i­mum of 18.5 lbs. A small weight increase (prob­a­bly because there are sec­tions of the scales that over­lap and are thus dou­ble thick­ness, whereas a SAPI plate has even thick­ness every­where), but I would imag­ine the flex­i­bil­ity would make up for it.

    Reply
  2. J.C. says:
    January 17, 2006 at 3:39 pm

    The Interceptor weights ~8.4 lbs with­out the ceramic plates in the front and back. Each plate weights ~4 lbs.

    Reply
  3. Chris Wo says:
    January 17, 2006 at 10:48 pm

    Also ignored is the fact that Dragon Scale armor pro­vides much bet­ter cov­er­age than the plates used. Everyone com­plains now about the poor side and shoul­der pro­tec­tion, while pin­na­cle armor has been sell­ing full torso Class III armor, not lim­ited area inserts. More likely some­one that is not get­ting rich enough off of DOD con­tracts and inter­cep­tor amror is prob­a­bly behind this.

    Reply
  4. Mike says:
    April 2, 2006 at 12:22 am

    SGLI pays REGARDLESS OF CAUSE OF DEATH. Suicide, mur­der, war, motor­cy­cle rac­ing…
    Any com­man­der who says oth­er­wise is a liar or an incompetent.

    Reply
  5. Robert Altrich says:
    May 24, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    A stan­dard IBA with two plates weighs 16.4 lbs, but with the shoul­der cov­er­age, side plates, and the “new” sapi plates that go in front and back weighs about 32 pounds. So I think the that with full cov­er­age besides the shoul­der pads that the SOV Dragon Skin will be well worth it. And as far as the price goes I would think that the gov­er­ment would rather spend the 4+ grand on a vest that will save lives, then spend the 400,000 on the life insur­ance for each sol­dier that dies.

    Reply
  6. SPC.Brooks says:
    October 9, 2006 at 7:05 pm

    I shot a sapi plate 8 times at 20 meters with a smith and wes­son 500. It’s a 50 cal. Not a singe round pen­e­trated the Plate even on glanc­ing shots to the side of it. At most it would pen­e­trate the car­bon like layer. Then peirce through 2 very thin weav­ings of either kevlar or nylon. The plate is a good sys­tem but it needs to get thin­ner and lighter.

    Reply
  7. jesse says:
    January 21, 2007 at 11:22 pm

    give me a split screen demo of inter­septer & dragon skin in action then well talk, i dont know about you but my life is worth a $5000 investment

    Reply
  8. Mario says:
    January 23, 2007 at 1:20 am

    Say you’re dri­ving along on Active duty but you are assign light treat duty but a you are dri­ving a bomb or a group of inser­gents ambush you. Do you have time to add your extra plat­ing no! I put my money on dragon skin

    Reply
  9. Jake says:
    February 1, 2007 at 2:06 pm

    What no one is talk­ing a about is Dragon Scale’s ablity to reduce blunt force for rounds take don’t get through. My father was a police-​​man when light body armor was invented. He was shot twice, vest worked both times, but blunt force wounds the size of din­ner plates where he was shot. Dragon Scale’s design trans­fers blunt shock across the whole vest, mak­ing it more pos­si­ble to get back in the fight.

    Reply
  10. b.h. says:
    February 4, 2007 at 11:27 pm

    I heard a rumor that there is drag­on­skin boots. Can any­one con­firm this? Can you bring your own body armour to Iraq? I have heard yes and no.

    Reply
  11. Ranba Ral says:
    February 17, 2007 at 3:12 pm

    I’ve heard mixed things about Dragon Skin from the guys that I know who’ve tried it out. About half think the flex­i­bil­ity and side pro­tec­tion is great. The other half hates how it lim­its their mobil­ity through tight spaces. I don’t know how this opin­ion would be affected now that they’re being forced to wear the side-​​plates when going out… They also say “[the extra flex­i­bil­ity] doesn’t mat­ter either when there’s 20 pouches attached to it”.
    My buddy in 10th Mountain found about the same thing as SPC.Brooks with the lat­est Interceptor sys­tem plates they had. The only dif­fer­ence was a sin­gle plate took 5 direct hits from an M82/​M107 before being use­less.
    Also, how much weight dif­fer­ence would there be between the full Interceptor sys­tem we use now (body, side plates, neck, throat, shoul­der pads, crotch, under­arm) and a Dragon Skin sys­tem cov­er­ing all those areas? I’ve only ever seen stats for just the Dragon Skin vest.

    Reply
  12. SPC Holmes says:
    April 10, 2007 at 10:22 pm

    Alright, let’s cut the crap. An IBA (Interceptor Ballistic Armor) vest may have weighed 16.4lbs when this whole thing started, but that’s not the case any­more. I wear a medium-​​size vest, and with ESAPI plates, side plates, the neck/​throat pro­tec­tors, and the groin pro­tec­tor, it weighs 31lbs.
    Of course, only pussies and pogues wear the neck and groin pro­tec­tors; and the only rea­son my unit had to put side plates on, after a year of doing just fine with­out them, was that some gen­eral saw those nasty Stryker Infantry guys run­ning around with­out them, and ordered our brigade com­man­der to make us wear them. Battlefield pol­i­tics only hurt one demo­graphic: us grunts.

    Reply
  13. Yvette says:
    May 14, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    We sup­plied 16 troops with Dragon Skin armor vests who are cur­rently serv­ing in Iraq. Recently we received a call that the com­man­der of this team won’t let them wear the pro­tec­tion. I’ve been doing alot of research and don’t under­stand why this com­man­der won’t let them wear over $90,000 worth of life pro­tect­ing armor. I’ve con­tacted General Conways’ office 3 times and keep being put on “hold”

    Reply
  14. Trey D. says:
    May 17, 2007 at 12:27 pm

    ATTENTION EVERYONE
    WATCH NBC NIGHTLY NEWS TONIGHT!!!!!!!
    THE WILL DISCUSS THE BODY ARMOR CONTROVERSY.
    VISIT http://​WWW​.SFTT​.ORG FOR THE SPECIFICS

    Reply
  15. thisguy says:
    June 16, 2007 at 8:36 pm

    what I think is funny and fright­ing at the same time is on the front of the sapi plates it says in big white let­ters “HANDLE WITH CARE”

    Reply
  16. tj says:
    July 22, 2007 at 5:16 am

    Maybe they should bet­ter print “han­dle with care” on Dragon Skin than false NIJ cer­ti­fi­ca­tions. lol

    Reply
  17. Matt says:
    April 3, 2008 at 2:51 pm

    I have done sev­eral tours in iraq both as a civ and US Army. I have not used Dragon Scale in coun­try, but after watch­ing a live demo a few days ago, I was extreamly Impressed. Two full Mags of haji AK 47 from 15–20 yrds away. Not one round go through, they pulled every slug out. I usu­ally dont buy the sales pitch for items, there is a lot of BS, that goes along with non issued mil­i­tary items, non specwar troops always seem to want equip­met that makes them appear dif­fer­ent and are quick to speak poorly about issued items.
    on this item, I think the mes­sage is clear, the extra pro­tec­tion is worth it, I have wit­nessed to many deaths caused by the small­est of wounds. when the man should have made it home, any extra pro­tec­tion is worth the extra money!

    Reply
  18. Stefan Meyers says:
    April 5, 2008 at 10:11 am

    I am cur­rently in Afghanistan right now and I can not stand the cur­rent IBA. For one thing I am 6’6″ and weigh 200lbs. I wear a medium because the length does not change at all. Pecker pro­tec­tor doesn’t pro­tect shit, I don’t wear that… I can’t drive HMV’s or sit in the TC posi­tion if I am wear­ing my side plates. I would glady pay 4-​​5K for an armor sys­tem that incor­po­rates the side pro­tec­tion seam­lessly into the rest of the sys­tem.
    I doubt they will ever make any­thing that will com­pli­ment my height but it would still be nice to have some­thing that con­forms to my upper body a lit­tle bet­ter.
    On top of it all, our cur­rent armor has lim­ited pro­tec­tion, there are still large gaps in the armor. Why aren’t we get­ting the best pro­tec­tion there is?

    Reply
  19. kisssmyass says:
    April 6, 2008 at 12:47 am

    i think to sum it all we could not resolve this isue just by argue our asses on it… for me it bet­ter if all of us could get together and at one­time test the both armor… but even if the the best armor would be found best, but there is still the pol­i­tics, most of as knows about it, that some of the big asses there wont lit the best be the besest arnor just because of the cuts the he would be get­ting frome the companies…

    Reply
  20. john hanson says:
    April 15, 2008 at 12:17 pm

    dragon skin is amaz­ing and could save lives but the gov­ern­ment doesn’t like the price tag is all.

    Reply
  21. Dirka Blaze says:
    April 23, 2008 at 2:12 am

    The Government takes care of the sol­diers and high rank­ing offi­cials. With how they upgrade guns. NEW 6.8 FOR the really good shots with the best train­ing and years out in ser­vice. AND for all the youn­gins that are com­ming in lets give you.… this shitty ass inter­cepter vest.… and this shitty m16. m16 sux… take a AK from a dead sand ass cav­ing bitches. Main Fact. US new about the break­throughs with drag­on­skin. THE level 5 is CLASSIFIED!!!! look at pin​na​clear​mor​.com top left go to bal­lis­tics you’ll see level 3–4 stop 7.62 NATO rounds REPETIVLY over and over again get­ting hit. AND noth­ing… The army won’t give 900$ more to get level 3 drag­on­skin to every per­son.
    IBA’s are as usless as alu­minum foil. At least u’d get to blaze before you get shot threw your armor.
    God be with you all. Pray for our sol­diers.
    watch out for juba, drag­on­skin would wipe him out!!!

    Reply
  22. Vince says:
    June 11, 2008 at 4:28 am

    i was won­der­ing if dragon skin can stop a .50 from any gun in the world today?? since it can stop alomst every other bullet.….

    Reply
  23. David says:
    July 1, 2008 at 7:59 am

    I have been to Iraq and seen the SAPI plates work. Is there some­thing bet­ter ?. The bot­tom line is, SAPI plates work and they work very well. I know many peo­ple who are above ground because of these plates; wear them and you’ll be fine. Theres a lot of opin­ions out there based on no expe­ri­ence and a lot of cheap talk.

    Reply
  24. Dave says:
    December 10, 2008 at 4:43 pm

    a large inter­cep­tor OTV with 2 side ena­hanced sapi and two large enhanced sapi (front and rear) and the neck pro­tec­tor will weigh a tad bit over 42lbs last time i weighed it. The Dragonskin SOV2000 offer­ing slightly greater pro­tec­tive cov­er­age and offer­ing the same threat level pro­tec­tion but over a larger area will weigh 28lbs. The SOV3000 series weighs around 40lbs but offers even greater pro­tec­tion. Id gladly set­tle for the SOV2000, espe­cially as pin­na­cle offer long and short lengths unlike the Interceptor. I am infantry. I fully under­stand the sit­u­a­tions we face and believe the armor deba­cle to be pro­moted mainly by the peo­ple who have never and will never serve on the front lines.

    Reply
  25. Bulletproof Vests says:
    October 11, 2009 at 9:08 pm

    Yeah 18.5 pounds is heavy when that doesnt include other bat­tle dress…we need to develop lighter armor.

    Reply
  26. Scott says:
    October 19, 2009 at 8:30 am

    The Dragon Skin is a nice con­cept although not perfect.

    Reply
  27. Scott says:
    October 19, 2009 at 8:31 am

    The Dragon Skin is a nice con­cept although not perfect.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • The Osprey has Landed
    Recent Comments
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Time to bring military clothing into the 21st century. I...
      bobbymike
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage