DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bomb Squad » “Aerial IED” Denied… Kinda, Sorta

“Aerial IED” Denied… Kinda, Sorta

It’s not every day that the Defense Department goes out of its way to say publicly that a general is full of it. But that’s what appears to be going on now.
bh_small.jpgOn Monday, Defense News ran a story by Greg Grant which said that “insurgents are attacking U.S. helicopters in Iraq with improvised explosive devices (IEDs) that leap into the air and detonate when an aircraft passes nearby.“
The source: Brig. Gen. Edward Sinclair, commander of the Armys Aviation Center at Fort Rucker, Ala.
Almost immediately, there was pushback to Grant’s piece. But not to the substance of what he — and, by extension, Gen. Sinclair — said. To the fact that such sensitive info was being disclosed. (That kind of thing tends to happen when you’re writing about IEDs. I was accused of being an agent of the Iraqi insurgency for this Wired News article on bomb-stopping technologies.)
Now, however, the military is saying those “aerial IEDs” don’t exist. That Grant and Gen. Sinclair were basically wrong.
At this time, we do not know of any incidences of insurgents employing aerial IEDs against U.S. helicopters. No aircraft have been lost to this type of device, a spokeswoman for the Defense Department task force working to defeat IEDs told Stars and Stripes.
But that attempt to clarify things was almost instantly muddied by Army Secretary Francis Harvey, in an interview with Voice of America.

To my knowledge we, we have not, I don’t know if we’ve seen, we may have seen one of those. But to my knowledge we have not seen a lot of those so far, jumping IEDs.

(Big ups: Haninah Levine)

Share |

January 20th, 2006 | Bomb Squad | 17844 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/20/aerial-ied-denied-kinda-sorta/%22Aerial+IED%22+Denied...+Kinda%2C+Sorta2006-01-20+13%3A39%3A47murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Combat vs. Construction | Iran’s Bomb: How Close? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Charles says:
    January 20, 2006 at 12:12 pm

    To borrow a quote from a Star Trek movie:
    “Mister President, I don’t know what to believe.“
    The Army Secretary is pushing pap. First he says he’s not sure, then he says probably not, then he says maybe airborne IEDs have been used.
    Oh well.

    Reply
  2. James says:
    January 20, 2006 at 11:18 pm

    Well…why would he deny it? Certainly the enemy knows what kind of bombs he’s planted. It’s certainly not implausible. As other posters pointed out, the NVA used treetop mines against US helicopters and I heard of an even wilier one: a dud 500-pound bomb recovered and modified with a fuse that reacted to the magnetic field created by the rotor.
    The use of anti-air mines wasn’t really widespread in Vietnam but they might have been if the war had gone on longer. Incidentally, I heard tell the Soviets were working on an anti-helicopter mine deployed by artillery into rear areas, but I never saw a second source and I don’t know if the project was continued after 1990.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      135,000,000 $ each for a fighter aircraft that's...
      Joseph
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Dumb and dumber………. The F35 is a...
      blackbull
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Why not bring in dirgibles( the original...
      mike rose
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Just give Burt Rutaan a Million bucks and he will...
      Dale
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      One means of defeating an enemy is to cripple...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      No–but is it necessary for the projected cost per...
      BILL D
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      One fighter for everyone failed once before. However, it may be...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Iagree that the stealth capabilities of the F22&F35...
      Chops
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Why would the Marines buy A-10s? They are a great...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I agree-I noted in other comments that the f16 &f15...
      BILL D
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage