<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: “Aerial IED,” Part Three</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/01/22/aerial-ied-part-three/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/22/aerial-ied-part-three/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:49:23 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Anonamus (spelling)</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/22/aerial-ied-part-three/comment-page-1/#comment-121243</link> <dc:creator>Anonamus (spelling)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:17:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1788#comment-121243</guid> <description>BS.  I am a Blackhawk Pilot in the Army and deployed here in Iraq.  The AIED IS A FACT . I know because I was hit by 3 on one single incident in the last 2 weeks.  It is all classified so I will NOT get into the details here but let me say this, the naysayers are full of crap.  we were hit by shrapnel and were very lucky we were not taken down.  That is all I have 2 say thank you </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BS.  I am a Blackhawk Pilot in the Army and deployed here in Iraq.  The AIED IS A FACT . I know because I was hit by 3 on one single incident in the last 2 weeks.  It is all classified so I will NOT get into the details here but let me say this, the naysayers are full of crap.  we were hit by shrapnel and were very lucky we were not taken down.  That is all I have 2 say thank you</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DC Loser</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/22/aerial-ied-part-three/comment-page-1/#comment-121242</link> <dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:57:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1788#comment-121242</guid> <description>For a similar concept against aircraft, look at Oerlikon&#039;s 35 mm AHEAD anti-aircraft submunition for use on its AAA systems.  It&#039;s very good against aircraft, cruise missiles, and PGMs.  Basically puts a wall of tungsten in front of the target and shreds it to pieces. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a similar concept against aircraft, look at Oerlikon’s 35 mm AHEAD anti-aircraft submunition for use on its AAA systems.  It’s very good against aircraft, cruise missiles, and PGMs.  Basically puts a wall of tungsten in front of the target and shreds it to pieces.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lazygeorge</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/22/aerial-ied-part-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14040</link> <dc:creator>lazygeorge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:06:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1788#comment-14040</guid> <description>Would a mine of this type be effective against fixed wing aircraft if place on the edge of an airfield runway? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would a mine of this type be effective against fixed wing aircraft if place on the edge of an airfield runway?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DC loser</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/22/aerial-ied-part-three/comment-page-1/#comment-14039</link> <dc:creator>DC loser</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:02:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1788#comment-14039</guid> <description>Anti-helicopter mines are old news.  The Russians have marketed one over the  years as have the Austrians.   I saw examples of both during the Eurosatory show I attended in 98.  I&#039;m just surprised nobody has snapped them up and actually used them because they scare the living daylights out of helicopter pilots. They are passive so you don&#039;t know they are there until you are sitting right on top of one and the charge goes off in front of you. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anti-helicopter mines are old news.  The Russians have marketed one over the  years as have the Austrians.   I saw examples of both during the Eurosatory show I attended in 98.  I’m just surprised nobody has snapped them up and actually used them because they scare the living daylights out of helicopter pilots. They are passive so you don’t know they are there until you are sitting right on top of one and the charge goes off in front of you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/19 queries in 0.091 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-19 13:54:56 -->