Comments on: Japan’s Robo-Copter Bust

By: tonde

tonde — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 16:11:40 +0000

BRIAN SHERIFF PLIZ GET IN TOUCH WITH ME, NDUNA A MATE OF YOURS FROM SUPPORT UNIT WANTS TO GET IN TOUCH WITH YOU. MY EMAIL IS tonderaimsonza@hotmail.com.

By: tonde

tonde — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 16:10:46 +0000

BRIAN SHERIFF PLIZ GET IN TOUCH WITH ME, NDUNA A MATE OF YOURS FROM SUPPORT UNIT WANTS TO GET IN TOUCH WITH YOU. MY EMAIL IS tonderaimsonza@hotmail.com.

By: brian sheriff

brian sheriff — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 04:53:30 +0000

Let me clear the mystery once and for all — I am the inventor of that heli Yamaha was exporting. And the developer of my ‘invention’ is not Yamaha but Hirobo. Yamaha provided the engine and body. Yes the chopper is crop duster derived but is now a 100% military application capable device now — at least 15 unique remote flying machines make up the invention list I did a presentation on to Hirobo’s president (Mr. Matsuzaka) and 27 engineers — including one Yamaha gentleman, about six years ago.
Yamaha intentionally exported military application drones to the Chinese. They lied about it and covered up (for over a year). When I presented my ideas to them they told me that they already exported crop dusters to China. Under that pretext they marketed my inventions. I should know what exactly those choppers were for because I drew the entire plans and figured out the controlling system, crippling system and application.
I’m available for discussion with anyone that wishes to learn more about me or the products.

By: HARRY hOEPOEDIO

HARRY hOEPOEDIO — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 23:41:37 +0000

Why being paranoid?

By: Ray

Ray — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:15:43 +0000

Correct me if I am wrong.… Didn’t some companys in the United States Continue to trade with Germany all throughout then Second World War and OUR GOVERNMENT LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT ? At least in this instance the JAPANESE GOVERNMENT stopped the Shipnent of these items…

By: WTT

WTT — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 12:26:49 +0000

There are plenty of reasons China doesn’t want to build their own. The first is that it is much cheaper to buy technology already developed than develop their own. Secondly, they may not have the technology to make it work as well as they required. Finally, if they have the ability to make it for peaceful means, why are they spending the money abroad? Besides, who wouldn’t use something for military advantage that they bought for peaceful means? The Russians did the same, so why not the Chinese?May God bless the Chinese but, I think they are dirty up to there eyeballs.
I love Japan, in fact I call Japan my second home, business there is like most everywhere else, all about profit, clean or dirty. Can’t say there is much diffence in American companies. So, I’m not shocked that they were caught again. I wonder how much illegal technology has passed hand through Japan that wasn’t caught.

By: Rod

Rod — Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:07:45 +0000

Japan? The evil exporter? Please… the US has a much worse track record of doing the same… we shouldn’t go THERE

By: jtw

jtw — Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:08:57 +0000

I agree with b. I have a hard time beleiving a country like China cant make their own UAV helicopters.
[humor]They make all the off the shelf components the rest of the world uses, im sure they have plenty of resource to get started making a UAV.[/humor]

By: jtw

jtw — Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:05:49 +0000

I agree with b. I have a hard time beleiving a country like China cant make their own UAV helicopters.

By: Byron Skinner

Byron Skinner — Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:24:36 +0000

Good Morning Folks,
This is another example of Japan selling technology to whom ever has the money, regardles of how it affects it’s “friend” and protector. Does anyone recall in the 1970’s when Toshiba sold to the Soviets CNC Mills that could and were used to manufacture the propellers for nuclear submarines (the software sent with the machines gave the Soviets the ability to make quieter subnarines, which they did) via Finland about the same time the Walker family was doing their thing?
It has alway been a wonder that the Japanese who present themselves as above board and very proper in all things can routine practice treachery and deception as a matter of policy.
Toshiba skated because to make an issue of this the U.S. would have to have reveled to much “classified” material.
For the U.S., why don’t we buy the Yamaha and scrap the Grumman “Fire Scout” which neither the Marines or the Navy really wants.
If we are going to blow bucks on unwanted weapons system the least we could do is buy the cheapest.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner