DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere) » Laugh Off Those Bombs

Laugh Off Those Bombs

I con­voyed to Ramadi with the Army’s 46th Engineer Battalion. My dri­ver was a young sol­dier who’d fought the Mahdi Army in Al Kut two years ago and was back for his sec­ond tour. Before SP-​​ing (“Start Point”), a lieu­tenant briefed every­one on the lat­est Improvised Explosive Device threat.
hole_ramadi.jpgIt seems an insur­gent cell out here in Al Anbar has been build­ing sophis­ti­cated IR tripwire-​​activated IEDs dis­guised as rocks and appar­ently employ­ing shaped-​​charge war­heads — hardly impro­vised at all, if you ask me. Three or four of these things have gone off in the last month, inflict­ing a num­ber of casu­al­ties. Normally in a brief­ing like this the pre­sen­ter would detail any coun­ter­mea­sures, but this time he just went, “Umm … ” since there are no coun­ter­mea­sures to an IED like that. You can’t tell it from another rock and you can’t jam it.
This wasn’t my first con­voy. Nor was it the first time I’ve heard scary brief­ings on insur­gent super-​​weapons. Still, I admit I was a lit­tle unnerved. But the 46th troop­ers just gri­maced and shrugged. What are you gonna do?
We rolled out two hours late due to a broken-​​down Humvee. It was a two-​​hour drive to Ramadi, and my dri­ver and his crew passed the time munch­ing Chips Ahoy cook­ies and jok­ing on the inter­com. They run these mis­sions almost every day against an evolv­ing range of threats. There are only so many pre­cau­tions they can take; after that’s it’s up to God. “Inshalla,” my Arab friends would say: “God will­ing.” The non-​​believers in the crowd can take com­fort in the knowl­edge that, sta­tis­ti­cally, they’re highly likely to sur­vive any given mis­sion.
Still shaped-​​charge IEDs dis­guised as rocks?!
–David Axe

Share |

January 26th, 2006 | Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere), Bomb Squad | 180135 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/26/laugh-off-those-bombs/Laugh+Off+Those+Bombs2006-01-26+18%3A13%3A32murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « SEAL Ship: Silent But Deadly | DTRA’s New Digs » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Enchi says:
    January 26, 2006 at 2:18 pm

    If tv news reports and pic­tures i’ve seen on these types of IED’s are to be believed, these are capa­ble of mak­ing an armored HUMVEE look like swiss cheese. They are even said to be capa­ble off defeat­ing the armor in many APC’s.
    Very scary stuff.
    We need a wheeled armored patrol vehi­cle to replace the HUMVEE in Iraq now. All of them. They are just not made for this type of con­flict.
    Enchi–

    Reply
  2. Stefan Moluf says:
    January 26, 2006 at 2:34 pm

    What we need is a Sunni/​al-​​Qaeda split, a con­tin­u­ally improv­ing Iraqi Army and police force, and an American pub­lic with a lit­tle more stom­ach for hard sacrifice.

    Reply
  3. me says:
    January 26, 2006 at 2:53 pm

    It’s easy to talk about hard sac­ri­fice when you’re butt’s not on the line everyday.

    Reply
  4. FirstCav says:
    January 26, 2006 at 4:10 pm

    > .…And an American pub­lic with a lit­tle more stom­ach for hard sac­ri­fice.
    So what’s your excuse, Bucky? Too old? Too fat? Too scared? Put the Cheetos away, get up off the d*mned couch and wad­dle down to your local recruit­ing office to sign up.
    They’re always look­ing for a few good peo­ple to (make the ulti­mate) sacrifice.

    Reply
  5. George says:
    January 26, 2006 at 4:15 pm

    Wouldn’t a 360 degreee IR light or lights be a coun­ter­mea­sure for an IR trip­wire trigger?

    Reply
  6. FirstCav says:
    January 26, 2006 at 4:36 pm

    >…We need a wheeled armored patrol vehi­cle to replace the HUMVEE in Iraq now. All of them. They are just not made for this type of con­flict.
    And just how likely do you think that’s going to hap­pen with idiots like Rumsfeld in charge? They didn’t even have enough bul­lets and had to run to Israel to get more.
    When you get down to it, los­ing one or two troops a day because their trucks didn’t have enough armor isn’t a big deal to the mil­i­tary. Besides, you put more armor on a truck, they’ll just build big­ger IEDs till they defeat the extra armor. Then you start adding more armor and they build big­ger IEDs… You see the pat­tern?
    The only solu­tion is to bring in peo­ple who actu­ally know what they’re doing and get rid of incom­pe­tents like Rumsfeld. Send in the extra 3-​​400K troops Gen Shinseki warned us it’d take to do the job right or get every­body the hell out. Get them out and learn to deal with the fact that thanks to GWB the most pow­er­ful mil­i­tary in the his­tory of the planet has just been defeated by a bunch of ama­teurs…
    …Wait, I think I’ve seen this movie before.

    Reply
  7. Enchi says:
    January 26, 2006 at 5:51 pm

    > The only solu­tion is to bring in peo­ple who actu­ally know what they’re doing and get rid of incom­pe­tents like Rumsfeld. Send in the extra 3-​​400K troops Gen Shinseki warned us it’d take to do the job right or get every­body the hell out. Get them out and learn to deal with the fact that thanks to GWB the most pow­er­ful mil­i­tary in the his­tory of the planet has just been defeated by a bunch of ama­teurs…
    > No, what we need is cut­ting defense spend­ing on use­less stuff.
    > For 500+ bil­lion a year we cant detect buried explo­sives.
    Ok since we already know that nei­ther of those is ever going to hap­pen, why don’t we focus on some­thing that is admit­tedly only slightly more likely to hap­pen…
    Let’s influ­ence our Congressmen and Senators to make the Pentagon acquire one of the sev­eral off the shelf armored patrol vehi­cles that are more sur­viv­able then a armored HUMVEE.
    Baby steps…

    Reply
  8. James says:
    January 26, 2006 at 7:17 pm

    Didn’t Hezbollah use mines dis­guised as rocks in South Lebanon against the Israelis? I think the IR trip­wire is a new wrin­kle, though. I had this dis­cus­sion back in December with my dad, stand­ing in his garage. He’s got an auto­matic garage door opener and all of them are now equipped with a sen­sor that pre­vents the door from clos­ing if there’s some­thing in the path of the door (a child or a bicy­cle or some­thing). I pointed to it and called it “a poten­tial weapons pro­lif­er­a­tion issue.” He thought I was crazy. I wish I was.
    FirstCav is cor­rect in that the response to more armor is more fire­power. In gen­eral, it’s eas­ier to increase the punch of the pen­e­tra­tion than increase the armor because the armor has to cover every­thing while the pen­e­tra­tor only has to be strong on a very nar­row frontage. This was the vicious cir­cle that sank the bat­tle­ship and put plate armor into muse­ums. It’s not as if more armor isn’t bet­ter, but there’s a prac­ti­cal weight limit to any land vehi­cle and it is, at best, a par­tial solu­tion.
    The fact is that this remains a polit­i­cal prob­lem, not a mil­i­tary one. The insur­gents are reject­ing the new gov­ern­ment because they see it as a Quisling gov­ern­ment. Vague promises from the US to leave “even­tu­ally” are not reas­sur­ing them. The insur­gents have suf­fi­cient sup­port in the pop­u­la­tion to keep this thing going. Their losses are being replaced by the envi­ron­ment. More armor is not going to stop this. More troops prob­a­bly won’t help much, either.

    Reply
  9. PMB says:
    January 26, 2006 at 8:19 pm

    Are these IR trig­gers on IEDs like an interupted light beam? If so you might be able to see the IR with a night scope and a IR fil­ter to block the vis­able light. I have used ordi­nary dig­i­tal cam­eras to see if IR leds are work­ing. Try http://​www​.max​max​.com/​a​X​N​i​t​e​F​i​l​t​e​r​s​.​htm for fil­ters.
    Good Luck

    Reply
  10. Stuart says:
    January 26, 2006 at 9:16 pm

    This may sound odd, but would not some sort of remote con­trol vehi­cle out in front of a con­voy trip an IR beam?

    Reply
  11. pedestrian says:
    January 27, 2006 at 8:52 am

    Thanks for the dis­in­for­ma­tion…
    >We need a wheeled armored patrol vehi­cle to replace the HUMVEE in Iraq now.
    Tell Pentagon to replace HMMWVs with Guardians.
    >For 500+ bil­lion a year we cant detect buried explo­sives.
    Oh yeah?
    >Wouldn’t a 360 degreee IR light or lights be a coun­ter­mea­sure for an IR trip­wire trig­ger?
    If you got ideas, don’t post them here. E-​​mail to Pentagon.
    >Didn’t Hezbollah use mines dis­guised as rocks in South Lebanon against the Israelis?
    I don’t know about the imi­ta­tion rocks, but the con­cept of IR trip wire is thought to be exported to Iraq from Iran by the assis­tance of Hizbollah.
    >If so you might be able to see the IR with a night scope and a IR fil­ter to block the vis­able light.
    One idiot from the mil­i­tary men­tioned about that tech­nique that pub­lic on AP. That was really irri­tat­ing and risk­ing lives. If you got ideas, don’t post them here. E-​​mail them to Pentagon.
    >This may sound odd, but would not some sort of remote con­trol vehi­cle out in front of a con­voy trip an IR beam?
    If you are men­tion­ing the “Remote Controlled”, then you might also have to con­sider the delays of response via wire­less com­mu­ni­ca­tion. There are also risks of jam­ming to interfere.

    Reply
  12. MUTT says:
    January 31, 2006 at 5:14 pm

    fas­ci­nat­ing to learn infra red trip­wire HAS to come from Iran, via Hizbolla.…..is that where my garage door safety inter­rup­tor came from?
    Ah, yes, the Iranians MUST be behind it! Only Perle, Wolfowitz, & the C-​​in-​​C (!) can save us.….….

    Reply
  13. Mel says:
    January 31, 2006 at 5:20 pm

    IR means it is heat acti­vated no? Therefore you can set it off with heat. How about a mod­i­fied flame thrower with a hot but low vol­ume out­put.
    A large propane tourch on a long bam­boo rod reach­ing out from the lead vehi­cle maybe.
    A laser that can be humvee mounted and directed at rocks along the road side in advance of the lead car.
    A wide cheap radio con­trolled go cart with propane heaters mounted. $1,200 bucks maybe. Much cheaper than death ben­e­fits. Insane to trip these bombs with a Humvee filled with troops.

    Reply
  14. Joe Belle-Isle says:
    January 31, 2006 at 5:41 pm

    Films from WWII show heav­ily armored for the time tanks with spin­ning devices with chains attached dig­ging up the mine­fields. In Vietnam besides Agent Orange the Engineers had GIANT pieces of heavy equip­ment that worked sim­i­larly with the dri­ver he was so high in the air he was out of dan­ger but every­time he heard a boom he had his hairs stand on end. I’ll bet I could take a radio con­trol pack out of a toy car and rig it to a mil­i­tary vehi­cle with min­i­mal hydraulic con­trols (Basic mis­sile launcher tech­nol­ogy of the 50’s) The answers in their hands MI just still hasn’t learned it takes 2 hands to clap. IT HAS TO COST MONEY OR THE GENERALS WON’T GET A GOOD JOB AT RETIREMENT. Joe

    Reply
  15. Chuck Holton says:
    January 31, 2006 at 6:47 pm

    As with most arm­chair gen­er­als, your com­ments, sir, are clue­less. Thank you for not join­ing the military.

    Reply
  16. Robert L Birt says:
    January 31, 2006 at 7:16 pm

    I dont buy shape charges shaped like rocks. The shape charge is called that because it has explo­sive shaped like an inverted cone. The explo­sive energy is focused into a nar­row beam like a torch cut­ting through metal. I dont know where you are get­ting your reporters from but shaped charges dont look like rocks.
    In addi­tion the posi­tion of the charge aginst the armor is impor­tant so you dont just prop the charge along side the road.
    The rock shape charge is like the Clip name some reporters give to mag­a­zines for mag­a­zine fed weapons. The M1 Grand was the last clip fed shoul­der held weapon we issued.

    Reply
  17. ed says:
    January 31, 2006 at 9:53 pm

    bombs shaped as rocks were used by the afgani’s against the sovi­ets dur­ing their occu­pa­tion of afgan­istan, so that part is prob­a­bly true. shaped charges can be made to have a cer­tain stand­off to be most effec­tive. instead of shaped charges it is prob­a­bly directed explo­sions ( clay­mores anyone?)or “plat­ter charges” like we’ve been using in anti tank mines since ww2.

    Reply
  18. Recon3 says:
    January 31, 2006 at 9:58 pm

    I am a ten year 100 % Service con­nected dis­abled Veteran. I was appalled and the state­ments about shape charges that were only used for mak­ing craters in roads. I guar­an­tee you that I can make a shape charge explode in any direc­tion I want, to include plac­ing one in the mid­dle of a road upside down, and blow a holle in the bot­tom of a humvee, that you could drive an 18 wheeler through. That’s exactly why they are called shape charges. I took my EOD tran­ing in Vilseck, GY. I grad­u­ated 5th in a class of 85 peo­ple.
    One thing you have to remem­ber here is that infra red trip­pers, must have a begin­ning at one end, and a reciever at the other end. In order for that device to explode, some­thing has to cross through the beam and break it, before you can have an explosian to occurr. Any fool with com­mon sense can fig­ure out how to start a fire with a laser, but it won’t make a bomb go off unlees like I said ear­lier some­thing must break that beam of light.

    Reply
  19. ed says:
    January 31, 2006 at 10:13 pm

    just in case any­one out there is won­der­ing i’ve already been there done that in ’91, if some of you can sec­ond guess every­thing going on and think you would have seen it com­ing, then by all means share your crys­tal ball with the rest of us. these ” peo­ple” we are fight­ing right now are TERRORISTS, not insur­gents, they are attempt­ing to achieve polit­i­cal ends through ter­ror. if every­one here ( poli­ti­tions, media, ect.) would shut up and stop help­ing our ENEMIES achieve their polit­i­cal goals, and ren­der­ing them aid and com­fort. this war would already be OVER! if they think that we do not have the resolve and for­ti­tude to see this through, they will try to out­last us. if our ene­mies saw us actu­ally united and not sqab­bling and try­ing to make polit­i­cal hash on tv, they would have folded their tents up and tried some­where else, at another time. and i did go down to the recruiter’s office, they want a med­ical waiver for me to come back. any­body else wanna put their money where their mouth is?

    Reply
  20. Squidly says:
    February 1, 2006 at 10:21 am

    Shaped charges can be cov­ered by inert mate­r­ial that makes them look like rocks. The whole func­tion of the shaped charge how­ever, is depen­dant on the stream of fire pro­duced by the Monro effect of the cone shape. Critical to that is the open space in the cone which both focuses the force of the blast and gives it direc­tion. That’s why the stand­off dis­tance is crit­i­cal. The cone can be lined with sup­port­ing mate­r­ial, cop­per works well, but the cone must be hol­low to make the charge work. Something shaped on the out­side like a rock must be made of stuff that will not deflect the blast of the charge or that will defeat its pur­pose.
    So.
    Predetonating C4 plas­tic shaped charges that are fused for com­mand or trip­wire is real tough. The best method is to go after the prim­ing cap itself, as C4 is about as sta­ble as any explo­sive out there to shock or con­cus­sion. A phys­i­cal flail device mounted as in WWII Sherman “Funnies” will prob­a­bly only work on mines and other pres­sure sen­si­tive bombs. I would think an EMP device that throws mas­sive energy waves ahead of a con­voy will serve to pre­ma­turely det­o­nate elec­tronic primers and caps.
    Food for thought.

    Reply
  21. cellblock131 says:
    February 1, 2006 at 2:26 pm

    The IR acti­vated IEDs are a big threat since they are not easy to detect and are now becom­ing shape-​​charged. I have not seen these up front, but wouldn’t radar detec­tors used in vehi­cles be able to pick up or sense these beams from a mile or so? Its like when you drive downtown…your radar goes off like crazy unless you put it in city mode. Maybe they use a dif­fer­ent band­width, I don’t know. During the day, Night Vision Goggles (NVG) wouldn’t do much good in pick­ing up the sensors.

    Reply
  22. Max says:
    February 2, 2006 at 9:50 am

    IR detec­tors use light in the IR range — it doesn’t REQUIRE heat. Also, “IR trip­pers” can be of the motion detec­tor type bought for a few bucks — these don’t have a reflec­tor (such as ‘Shack Catalog #:49–426 ” http://​www​.radioshack​.com/​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​j​s​p​?​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​I​d​=​2​1​0​2​5​8​4​&​a​m​p​;cp ” Imagine how cheap the required parts are in bulk!
    As for shaped charges — Of course they’re real and real easy! I’ve expe­ri­enced them going off encased in lime/​concrete and still be effec­tive! To be most effec­tive a shell is used like the aero­dy­namic nosecone on an RPG. The “shape” is actu­ally inverted the “blast” how­ever resem­bles the pro­tec­tive cone con­cen­trat­ing at the point. The home­made IEDs with the cop­per pro­jec­tiles in the plasma are the worst that I’ve seen. They con­cen­trate the blast and cut hole all the way through what­ever is in front of them. Imagine a slug of molten cop­per mov­ing at hyper­sonic speeds .… Not being in front of it or redi­rect­ing the blast works bet­ter than any armor.
    For the arm­chair gen­er­als: the procurement/​supply sys­tem of ANY mid­dle to large sized entity takes time. Even for some­thing as sim­ple as body armor. By the time enough is ordered and before it is made a bet­ter kind is avail­able. This is why we don’t all deploy with the top of the line. The line keeps mov­ing!
    Must rest now …

    Reply
  23. tobiascore says:
    February 17, 2006 at 3:08 pm

    I have run into a few EFP’s here in Baghdad. We have a few coun­ter­mea­sures against them…but we are always look­ing to find out new info.
    The are put in sty­ro­foam con­tain­ers, painted up like blocks of con­crete, and usu­ally laid near bar­ri­ers here. They are always trig­gered by PIR sen­sors. They are com­ing in from Iran, and Iranians are pay­ing locals ROYALLY to set them out.
    The thing we have on our side, is they can only hit us is there isnt any civil­ian traf­fic around us. They dont want to waste them on hit­ting civilians…because they only get paid if they hit us.
    Anyway, any extra info in PIR would be awesome…

    Reply
  24. Carni says:
    February 18, 2006 at 3:33 am

    Aright peo­ple, just so there isn’t any con­fu­sion PASSIVE Infrared, you do not need two sen­sors. Think of a motion detec­tor in a house for a secu­rity alarm, or motion acti­vated out­side lights. That’s pas­sive infrared. It doesn’t put out any light, instead it has two or more sen­sors inside that mea­sure infrared light. When there is a change in incom­ing light, it acti­vates. Depending on the sen­sor, the change has to be dra­matic enough to close the cir­cut. But there is no beam cross­ing the road or any­thing like that. Just try­ing to clar­ify what we’re actu­ally deal­ing out here, and we’re still look­ing for a way to com­bat these. Peace, from Baghdad

    Reply
  25. Top Cat says:
    March 17, 2006 at 1:40 pm

    If IR detec­tors on the IEDs,
    Then pow­er­ful infrared emit­ters on the lead vehi­cle of vary­ing fre­quen­cies.
    Can it be that simple?

    Reply
  26. Fighting4U says:
    November 11, 2006 at 3:14 am

    I can’t believe the igno­rant com­ments some of you have made. Armchair Generals as well as current/​past sol­diers. It’s one thing to try and help our sol­diers out, but another to sit back like a cow­ard and ridicule the way things are being run. Most of you read too much into some of the things being said. Yes, there are EFP’s that are dis­guised as rocks…by say­ing this, it means that they are painted and or plas­tered around the shape charge as to hide it’s usual cylin­dri­cal shape. That doesn’t have any­thing to do with hin­der­ing it’s abil­ity. TRUST ME! I deal with these things every day as a part of a Route Clearance team in Iraq. We have coun­ter­mea­sures for the IR, but what you have to under­stand is that the sen­sors used are pas­sive. Just like men­tioned before, sim­i­lar to the ones in your home. It’s basi­cally a motion detec­tor. If you lazy fatass arm­chair gen­er­als would like to play out your lit­tle star wars fan­tasies as a mer­ce­nary over here, then please feel free to con­tact me, as I would be more than happy to arrange it. Until then, sit back and be happy that there are peo­ple in the great U.S. of A. that are will­ing to fight for a cause much greater than your free­dom of speech, or rather nagging.

    Reply
  27. Robert L Bass says:
    November 24, 2006 at 6:40 pm

    A prior poster men­tioned using an IR emit­ter on the lead vehi­cle to trig­ger the IED before troops or vehi­cles enter its kill zone. This is in fact a pos­si­ble solu­tion.
    You are cor­rect that pas­sive infrared (PIR) detec­tors don’t require a sep­a­rate IR source to trig­ger. However, they can eas­ily be trig­gered by a mov­ing IR source such as an IR LASER or even a very bright vis­i­ble light (vehi­cle head­lamps emit quite a lot of IR energy along with the white light).
    I’ve worked with PIR detec­tors in the secu­rity indus­try for nearly 30 years and I can assure you that most of them will trip if a bright IR beam strikes them.

    Reply
  28. rick says:
    March 20, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    Has the US army heard of hav­ing check­points at ALL entry roads into Baghdad. No other forces necessary-​​just block ALL access to Baghdad. Isnt that what you would do in the States. It would free up all kinds of manpower-​​wasting schemes such as are used now. And why are the high­ways able to ferry ter­ror­ists around like they owned the place.How bout a high­way patrol used in America. And use mines where too hairy to put your best.Forget bout opinion,u are at WAR-​​get it.Time to get heavy & win this before your ousted boys. Do the right thing and kill your ene­mies. Forget col­lat­er­all damage-​​in long run less will die from mines & more enemy die=VICTORY. Then leave in time. Use your best tools-​​forget all else. VICTORYto U all.

    Reply
  29. rick says:
    March 20, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    Has the US army heard of hav­ing check­points at ALL entry roads into Baghdad. No other forces necessary-​​just block ALL access to Baghdad. Isnt that what you would do in the States. It would free up all kinds of manpower-​​wasting schemes such as are used now. And why are the high­ways able to ferry ter­ror­ists around like they owned the place.How bout a high­way patrol used in America. And use mines where too hairy to put your best.Forget bout opinion,u are at WAR-​​get it.Time to get heavy & win this before your ousted boys. Do the right thing and kill your ene­mies. Forget col­lat­er­all damage-​​in long run less will die from mines & more enemy die=VICTORY. Then leave in time. Use your best tools-​​forget all else. VICTORYto U all.

    Reply
  30. grndpndr says:
    January 22, 2008 at 9:15 am

    defla­grat­ing explo­sives dis­guised as coal go back to the civil war when these ‘rock’s were filled with black pow­der and a threaded cap and painted black.The Idea was to mix the pipe bombs essen­tially in the coal bin of a steam boat rail­road engine.few sec­onds in that intense heat of the fire box and boom there goes the boiler with its tremen­dous steam pres­sure destroy­ing much of the tar­get, the fires result­ing did the rest.Nothings new in war.The shaped xcharge i inter­pret as a HEAT chrge the imp plat­ter charge with a stel plat­ter is a kinetic
    energy weapon use­ful offroad against inf and armor depend­ing on size/​placement of the device.We made a small evice in the mil­i­tary from mate­ri­als avail­ble on most US garages an 1/​2 lb of a med vel exp 6250MPS approx.The tar­get plate of armore stel 1 in thickn was pen­e­tratd like it had ben hit by a high veloc­ity
    tank round 1/​2 the size of the orig­i­nal plat­ter and it wasnt a pen­e­tra­tion from a heat type charge not with obvi­ous spalling present id judge the plate was struck at aprox­i­mately 1200MPS and the 50lb pen­e­tratd tar­get plate was thrown in the air some 75 ft.Just for what its worth these sup­posed tech­ni­cal won­ders are eas­ily made in any met­al­shop worth the name.Iran in no way needs sup­ply the cop­per plat­ters for the EFPs.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage