DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere) » Laugh Off Those Bombs

Laugh Off Those Bombs

I convoyed to Ramadi with the Army’s 46th Engineer Battalion. My driver was a young soldier who’d fought the Mahdi Army in Al Kut two years ago and was back for his second tour. Before SP-ing (“Start Point”), a lieutenant briefed everyone on the latest Improvised Explosive Device threat.
hole_ramadi.jpgIt seems an insurgent cell out here in Al Anbar has been building sophisticated IR tripwire-activated IEDs disguised as rocks and apparently employing shaped-charge warheads — hardly improvised at all, if you ask me. Three or four of these things have gone off in the last month, inflicting a number of casualties. Normally in a briefing like this the presenter would detail any countermeasures, but this time he just went, “Umm … ” since there are no countermeasures to an IED like that. You can’t tell it from another rock and you can’t jam it.
This wasn’t my first convoy. Nor was it the first time I’ve heard scary briefings on insurgent super-weapons. Still, I admit I was a little unnerved. But the 46th troopers just grimaced and shrugged. What are you gonna do?
We rolled out two hours late due to a broken-down Humvee. It was a two-hour drive to Ramadi, and my driver and his crew passed the time munching Chips Ahoy cookies and joking on the intercom. They run these missions almost every day against an evolving range of threats. There are only so many precautions they can take; after that’s it’s up to God. “Inshalla,” my Arab friends would say: “God willing.” The non-believers in the crowd can take comfort in the knowledge that, statistically, they’re highly likely to survive any given mission.
Still shaped-charge IEDs disguised as rocks?!
–David Axe

Share |

January 26th, 2006 | Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere), Bomb Squad | 180135 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/26/laugh-off-those-bombs/Laugh+Off+Those+Bombs2006-01-26+18%3A13%3A32murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « SEAL Ship: Silent But Deadly | DTRA’s New Digs » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Enchi says:
    January 26, 2006 at 2:18 pm

    If tv news reports and pictures i’ve seen on these types of IED’s are to be believed, these are capable of making an armored HUMVEE look like swiss cheese. They are even said to be capable off defeating the armor in many APC’s.
    Very scary stuff.
    We need a wheeled armored patrol vehicle to replace the HUMVEE in Iraq now. All of them. They are just not made for this type of conflict.
    Enchi–

    Reply
  2. Stefan Moluf says:
    January 26, 2006 at 2:34 pm

    What we need is a Sunni/al-Qaeda split, a continually improving Iraqi Army and police force, and an American public with a little more stomach for hard sacrifice.

    Reply
  3. me says:
    January 26, 2006 at 2:53 pm

    It’s easy to talk about hard sacrifice when you’re butt’s not on the line everyday.

    Reply
  4. FirstCav says:
    January 26, 2006 at 4:10 pm

    > .…And an American public with a little more stomach for hard sacrifice.
    So what’s your excuse, Bucky? Too old? Too fat? Too scared? Put the Cheetos away, get up off the d*mned couch and waddle down to your local recruiting office to sign up.
    They’re always looking for a few good people to (make the ultimate) sacrifice.

    Reply
  5. George says:
    January 26, 2006 at 4:15 pm

    Wouldn’t a 360 degreee IR light or lights be a countermeasure for an IR tripwire trigger?

    Reply
  6. FirstCav says:
    January 26, 2006 at 4:36 pm

    >…We need a wheeled armored patrol vehicle to replace the HUMVEE in Iraq now. All of them. They are just not made for this type of conflict.
    And just how likely do you think that’s going to happen with idiots like Rumsfeld in charge? They didn’t even have enough bullets and had to run to Israel to get more.
    When you get down to it, losing one or two troops a day because their trucks didn’t have enough armor isn’t a big deal to the military. Besides, you put more armor on a truck, they’ll just build bigger IEDs till they defeat the extra armor. Then you start adding more armor and they build bigger IEDs… You see the pattern?
    The only solution is to bring in people who actually know what they’re doing and get rid of incompetents like Rumsfeld. Send in the extra 3-400K troops Gen Shinseki warned us it’d take to do the job right or get everybody the hell out. Get them out and learn to deal with the fact that thanks to GWB the most powerful military in the history of the planet has just been defeated by a bunch of amateurs…
    …Wait, I think I’ve seen this movie before.

    Reply
  7. Enchi says:
    January 26, 2006 at 5:51 pm

    > The only solution is to bring in people who actually know what they’re doing and get rid of incompetents like Rumsfeld. Send in the extra 3-400K troops Gen Shinseki warned us it’d take to do the job right or get everybody the hell out. Get them out and learn to deal with the fact that thanks to GWB the most powerful military in the history of the planet has just been defeated by a bunch of amateurs…
    > No, what we need is cutting defense spending on useless stuff.
    > For 500+ billion a year we cant detect buried explosives.
    Ok since we already know that neither of those is ever going to happen, why don’t we focus on something that is admittedly only slightly more likely to happen…
    Let’s influence our Congressmen and Senators to make the Pentagon acquire one of the several off the shelf armored patrol vehicles that are more survivable then a armored HUMVEE.
    Baby steps…

    Reply
  8. James says:
    January 26, 2006 at 7:17 pm

    Didn’t Hezbollah use mines disguised as rocks in South Lebanon against the Israelis? I think the IR tripwire is a new wrinkle, though. I had this discussion back in December with my dad, standing in his garage. He’s got an automatic garage door opener and all of them are now equipped with a sensor that prevents the door from closing if there’s something in the path of the door (a child or a bicycle or something). I pointed to it and called it “a potential weapons proliferation issue.” He thought I was crazy. I wish I was.
    FirstCav is correct in that the response to more armor is more firepower. In general, it’s easier to increase the punch of the penetration than increase the armor because the armor has to cover everything while the penetrator only has to be strong on a very narrow frontage. This was the vicious circle that sank the battleship and put plate armor into museums. It’s not as if more armor isn’t better, but there’s a practical weight limit to any land vehicle and it is, at best, a partial solution.
    The fact is that this remains a political problem, not a military one. The insurgents are rejecting the new government because they see it as a Quisling government. Vague promises from the US to leave “eventually” are not reassuring them. The insurgents have sufficient support in the population to keep this thing going. Their losses are being replaced by the environment. More armor is not going to stop this. More troops probably won’t help much, either.

    Reply
  9. PMB says:
    January 26, 2006 at 8:19 pm

    Are these IR triggers on IEDs like an interupted light beam? If so you might be able to see the IR with a night scope and a IR filter to block the visable light. I have used ordinary digital cameras to see if IR leds are working. Try http://​www​.maxmax​.com/​a​X​N​i​t​e​F​i​l​t​e​r​s​.​htm for filters.
    Good Luck

    Reply
  10. Stuart says:
    January 26, 2006 at 9:16 pm

    This may sound odd, but would not some sort of remote control vehicle out in front of a convoy trip an IR beam?

    Reply
  11. pedestrian says:
    January 27, 2006 at 8:52 am

    Thanks for the disinformation…
    >We need a wheeled armored patrol vehicle to replace the HUMVEE in Iraq now.
    Tell Pentagon to replace HMMWVs with Guardians.
    >For 500+ billion a year we cant detect buried explosives.
    Oh yeah?
    >Wouldn’t a 360 degreee IR light or lights be a countermeasure for an IR tripwire trigger?
    If you got ideas, don’t post them here. E-mail to Pentagon.
    >Didn’t Hezbollah use mines disguised as rocks in South Lebanon against the Israelis?
    I don’t know about the imitation rocks, but the concept of IR trip wire is thought to be exported to Iraq from Iran by the assistance of Hizbollah.
    >If so you might be able to see the IR with a night scope and a IR filter to block the visable light.
    One idiot from the military mentioned about that technique that public on AP. That was really irritating and risking lives. If you got ideas, don’t post them here. E-mail them to Pentagon.
    >This may sound odd, but would not some sort of remote control vehicle out in front of a convoy trip an IR beam?
    If you are mentioning the “Remote Controlled”, then you might also have to consider the delays of response via wireless communication. There are also risks of jamming to interfere.

    Reply
  12. MUTT says:
    January 31, 2006 at 5:14 pm

    fascinating to learn infra red tripwire HAS to come from Iran, via Hizbolla.…..is that where my garage door safety interruptor came from?
    Ah, yes, the Iranians MUST be behind it! Only Perle, Wolfowitz, & the C-in-C (!) can save us.….….

    Reply
  13. Mel says:
    January 31, 2006 at 5:20 pm

    IR means it is heat activated no? Therefore you can set it off with heat. How about a modified flame thrower with a hot but low volume output.
    A large propane tourch on a long bamboo rod reaching out from the lead vehicle maybe.
    A laser that can be humvee mounted and directed at rocks along the road side in advance of the lead car.
    A wide cheap radio controlled go cart with propane heaters mounted. $1,200 bucks maybe. Much cheaper than death benefits. Insane to trip these bombs with a Humvee filled with troops.

    Reply
  14. Joe Belle-Isle says:
    January 31, 2006 at 5:41 pm

    Films from WWII show heavily armored for the time tanks with spinning devices with chains attached digging up the minefields. In Vietnam besides Agent Orange the Engineers had GIANT pieces of heavy equipment that worked similarly with the driver he was so high in the air he was out of danger but everytime he heard a boom he had his hairs stand on end. I’ll bet I could take a radio control pack out of a toy car and rig it to a military vehicle with minimal hydraulic controls (Basic missile launcher technology of the 50’s) The answers in their hands MI just still hasn’t learned it takes 2 hands to clap. IT HAS TO COST MONEY OR THE GENERALS WON’T GET A GOOD JOB AT RETIREMENT. Joe

    Reply
  15. Chuck Holton says:
    January 31, 2006 at 6:47 pm

    As with most armchair generals, your comments, sir, are clueless. Thank you for not joining the military.

    Reply
  16. Robert L Birt says:
    January 31, 2006 at 7:16 pm

    I dont buy shape charges shaped like rocks. The shape charge is called that because it has explosive shaped like an inverted cone. The explosive energy is focused into a narrow beam like a torch cutting through metal. I dont know where you are getting your reporters from but shaped charges dont look like rocks.
    In addition the position of the charge aginst the armor is important so you dont just prop the charge along side the road.
    The rock shape charge is like the Clip name some reporters give to magazines for magazine fed weapons. The M1 Grand was the last clip fed shoulder held weapon we issued.

    Reply
  17. ed says:
    January 31, 2006 at 9:53 pm

    bombs shaped as rocks were used by the afgani’s against the soviets during their occupation of afganistan, so that part is probably true. shaped charges can be made to have a certain standoff to be most effective. instead of shaped charges it is probably directed explosions ( claymores anyone?)or “platter charges” like we’ve been using in anti tank mines since ww2.

    Reply
  18. Recon3 says:
    January 31, 2006 at 9:58 pm

    I am a ten year 100 % Service connected disabled Veteran. I was appalled and the statements about shape charges that were only used for making craters in roads. I guarantee you that I can make a shape charge explode in any direction I want, to include placing one in the middle of a road upside down, and blow a holle in the bottom of a humvee, that you could drive an 18 wheeler through. That’s exactly why they are called shape charges. I took my EOD traning in Vilseck, GY. I graduated 5th in a class of 85 people.
    One thing you have to remember here is that infra red trippers, must have a beginning at one end, and a reciever at the other end. In order for that device to explode, something has to cross through the beam and break it, before you can have an explosian to occurr. Any fool with common sense can figure out how to start a fire with a laser, but it won’t make a bomb go off unlees like I said earlier something must break that beam of light.

    Reply
  19. ed says:
    January 31, 2006 at 10:13 pm

    just in case anyone out there is wondering i’ve already been there done that in ’91, if some of you can second guess everything going on and think you would have seen it coming, then by all means share your crystal ball with the rest of us. these ” people” we are fighting right now are TERRORISTS, not insurgents, they are attempting to achieve political ends through terror. if everyone here ( polititions, media, ect.) would shut up and stop helping our ENEMIES achieve their political goals, and rendering them aid and comfort. this war would already be OVER! if they think that we do not have the resolve and fortitude to see this through, they will try to outlast us. if our enemies saw us actually united and not sqabbling and trying to make political hash on tv, they would have folded their tents up and tried somewhere else, at another time. and i did go down to the recruiter’s office, they want a medical waiver for me to come back. anybody else wanna put their money where their mouth is?

    Reply
  20. Squidly says:
    February 1, 2006 at 10:21 am

    Shaped charges can be covered by inert material that makes them look like rocks. The whole function of the shaped charge however, is dependant on the stream of fire produced by the Monro effect of the cone shape. Critical to that is the open space in the cone which both focuses the force of the blast and gives it direction. That’s why the standoff distance is critical. The cone can be lined with supporting material, copper works well, but the cone must be hollow to make the charge work. Something shaped on the outside like a rock must be made of stuff that will not deflect the blast of the charge or that will defeat its purpose.
    So.
    Predetonating C4 plastic shaped charges that are fused for command or tripwire is real tough. The best method is to go after the priming cap itself, as C4 is about as stable as any explosive out there to shock or concussion. A physical flail device mounted as in WWII Sherman “Funnies” will probably only work on mines and other pressure sensitive bombs. I would think an EMP device that throws massive energy waves ahead of a convoy will serve to prematurely detonate electronic primers and caps.
    Food for thought.

    Reply
  21. cellblock131 says:
    February 1, 2006 at 2:26 pm

    The IR activated IEDs are a big threat since they are not easy to detect and are now becoming shape-charged. I have not seen these up front, but wouldn’t radar detectors used in vehicles be able to pick up or sense these beams from a mile or so? Its like when you drive downtown…your radar goes off like crazy unless you put it in city mode. Maybe they use a different bandwidth, I don’t know. During the day, Night Vision Goggles (NVG) wouldn’t do much good in picking up the sensors.

    Reply
  22. Max says:
    February 2, 2006 at 9:50 am

    IR detectors use light in the IR range — it doesn’t REQUIRE heat. Also, “IR trippers” can be of the motion detector type bought for a few bucks — these don’t have a reflector (such as ‘Shack Catalog #:49–426 ” http://​www​.radioshack​.com/​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​j​s​p​?​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​I​d​=​2​1​0​2​5​8​4​&​a​m​p​;cp ” Imagine how cheap the required parts are in bulk!
    As for shaped charges — Of course they’re real and real easy! I’ve experienced them going off encased in lime/concrete and still be effective! To be most effective a shell is used like the aerodynamic nosecone on an RPG. The “shape” is actually inverted the “blast” however resembles the protective cone concentrating at the point. The homemade IEDs with the copper projectiles in the plasma are the worst that I’ve seen. They concentrate the blast and cut hole all the way through whatever is in front of them. Imagine a slug of molten copper moving at hypersonic speeds .… Not being in front of it or redirecting the blast works better than any armor.
    For the armchair generals: the procurement/supply system of ANY middle to large sized entity takes time. Even for something as simple as body armor. By the time enough is ordered and before it is made a better kind is available. This is why we don’t all deploy with the top of the line. The line keeps moving!
    Must rest now …

    Reply
  23. tobiascore says:
    February 17, 2006 at 3:08 pm

    I have run into a few EFP’s here in Baghdad. We have a few countermeasures against them…but we are always looking to find out new info.
    The are put in styrofoam containers, painted up like blocks of concrete, and usually laid near barriers here. They are always triggered by PIR sensors. They are coming in from Iran, and Iranians are paying locals ROYALLY to set them out.
    The thing we have on our side, is they can only hit us is there isnt any civilian traffic around us. They dont want to waste them on hitting civilians…because they only get paid if they hit us.
    Anyway, any extra info in PIR would be awesome…

    Reply
  24. Carni says:
    February 18, 2006 at 3:33 am

    Aright people, just so there isn’t any confusion PASSIVE Infrared, you do not need two sensors. Think of a motion detector in a house for a security alarm, or motion activated outside lights. That’s passive infrared. It doesn’t put out any light, instead it has two or more sensors inside that measure infrared light. When there is a change in incoming light, it activates. Depending on the sensor, the change has to be dramatic enough to close the circut. But there is no beam crossing the road or anything like that. Just trying to clarify what we’re actually dealing out here, and we’re still looking for a way to combat these. Peace, from Baghdad

    Reply
  25. Top Cat says:
    March 17, 2006 at 1:40 pm

    If IR detectors on the IEDs,
    Then powerful infrared emitters on the lead vehicle of varying frequencies.
    Can it be that simple?

    Reply
  26. Fighting4U says:
    November 11, 2006 at 3:14 am

    I can’t believe the ignorant comments some of you have made. Armchair Generals as well as current/past soldiers. It’s one thing to try and help our soldiers out, but another to sit back like a coward and ridicule the way things are being run. Most of you read too much into some of the things being said. Yes, there are EFP’s that are disguised as rocks…by saying this, it means that they are painted and or plastered around the shape charge as to hide it’s usual cylindrical shape. That doesn’t have anything to do with hindering it’s ability. TRUST ME! I deal with these things every day as a part of a Route Clearance team in Iraq. We have countermeasures for the IR, but what you have to understand is that the sensors used are passive. Just like mentioned before, similar to the ones in your home. It’s basically a motion detector. If you lazy fatass armchair generals would like to play out your little star wars fantasies as a mercenary over here, then please feel free to contact me, as I would be more than happy to arrange it. Until then, sit back and be happy that there are people in the great U.S. of A. that are willing to fight for a cause much greater than your freedom of speech, or rather nagging.

    Reply
  27. Robert L Bass says:
    November 24, 2006 at 6:40 pm

    A prior poster mentioned using an IR emitter on the lead vehicle to trigger the IED before troops or vehicles enter its kill zone. This is in fact a possible solution.
    You are correct that passive infrared (PIR) detectors don’t require a separate IR source to trigger. However, they can easily be triggered by a moving IR source such as an IR LASER or even a very bright visible light (vehicle headlamps emit quite a lot of IR energy along with the white light).
    I’ve worked with PIR detectors in the security industry for nearly 30 years and I can assure you that most of them will trip if a bright IR beam strikes them.

    Reply
  28. rick says:
    March 20, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    Has the US army heard of having checkpoints at ALL entry roads into Baghdad. No other forces necessary-just block ALL access to Baghdad. Isnt that what you would do in the States. It would free up all kinds of manpower-wasting schemes such as are used now. And why are the highways able to ferry terrorists around like they owned the place.How bout a highway patrol used in America. And use mines where too hairy to put your best.Forget bout opinion,u are at WAR-get it.Time to get heavy & win this before your ousted boys. Do the right thing and kill your enemies. Forget collaterall damage-in long run less will die from mines & more enemy die=VICTORY. Then leave in time. Use your best tools-forget all else. VICTORYto U all.

    Reply
  29. rick says:
    March 20, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    Has the US army heard of having checkpoints at ALL entry roads into Baghdad. No other forces necessary-just block ALL access to Baghdad. Isnt that what you would do in the States. It would free up all kinds of manpower-wasting schemes such as are used now. And why are the highways able to ferry terrorists around like they owned the place.How bout a highway patrol used in America. And use mines where too hairy to put your best.Forget bout opinion,u are at WAR-get it.Time to get heavy & win this before your ousted boys. Do the right thing and kill your enemies. Forget collaterall damage-in long run less will die from mines & more enemy die=VICTORY. Then leave in time. Use your best tools-forget all else. VICTORYto U all.

    Reply
  30. grndpndr says:
    January 22, 2008 at 9:15 am

    deflagrating explosives disguised as coal go back to the civil war when these ‘rock’s were filled with black powder and a threaded cap and painted black.The Idea was to mix the pipe bombs essentially in the coal bin of a steam boat railroad engine.few seconds in that intense heat of the fire box and boom there goes the boiler with its tremendous steam pressure destroying much of the target, the fires resulting did the rest.Nothings new in war.The shaped xcharge i interpret as a HEAT chrge the imp platter charge with a stel platter is a kinetic
    energy weapon useful offroad against inf and armor depending on size/placement of the device.We made a small evice in the military from materials availble on most US garages an 1/2 lb of a med vel exp 6250MPS approx.The target plate of armore stel 1 in thickn was penetratd like it had ben hit by a high velocity
    tank round 1/2 the size of the original platter and it wasnt a penetration from a heat type charge not with obvious spalling present id judge the plate was struck at aproximately 1200MPS and the 50lb penetratd target plate was thrown in the air some 75 ft.Just for what its worth these supposed technical wonders are easily made in any metalshop worth the name.Iran in no way needs supply the copper platters for the EFPs.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The real issue is not what type of plane but trying...
      Bill
    • Paris Hilton: Patriot
      Omg! You can find her pictures and video here...
      WebWarez
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Marine Air Light? Wait…don't they...
      LtCol Ben
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Except its really not that stealthy… The...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Is an F-22 capable of landing even on a big deck carrier,...
      joe
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      From a national security perspective we should do all we can to keep...
      mike
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Please define what is "best". Boeings plane is cheaper and...
      Curt
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      F4 was origionally a Navy Fighter, so coming up with a...
      Curt
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The US Navy was right to bypass congress and develop the...
      Tony C
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The fly-away cost of a F-22 is between 130 and...
      The Norwegian
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage