DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ships and Subs » SEAL Ship: Silent But Deadly

SEAL Ship: Silent But Deadly

CIMG0311.jpgEvery ship­builder in the Navy these days talks about how his hulk­ing destroyer or Cold War sub is now going to sneak SEALs onto shore. A cou­ple of weeks back, Military​.com over­lord Chris Michel was down in San Diego, and saw a pretty cool new pro­to­type ship that’s been designed from scratch to han­dle the mis­sion.
The 89-​​foot, 60-​​ton Stiletto will be one of the quick­est ships in the fleet, using four Caterpillar C32 engines to cruise at 50 knots or more. It’ll also be one of the sneaki­est, accord­ing to New Scientist.

Stiletto’s hull has a double-​​M shape that chan­nels the wake under the craft. There it mixes with oncom­ing air to pro­duce froth that lifts the ship part-​​way out of the water, reduc­ing drag and increas­ing sta­bil­ity, says Greg Glaros, the programme’s leader at the defence department’s Office of Force Transformation.

While a crew of three runs the Stiletto, a dozen SEALs can slip off the back of the ship, in an 11-​​meter rigid inflat­able boat — or they can send a set of fly­ing drones out on spy mis­sions from the upper deck. The ship can stay on sta­tion for eight hours while the robots or the spe­cial forces are out on their oper­a­tions. And the Stiletto can keep an even keel while it waits; it’s cleared to oper­ate in Sea State 5 — waves twelve feet high and 157 feet long.
wolf_overview_4.gifIf the Stiletto works out as planned, it’ll be good news for spe­cial forces. Because while every ship-​​maker says they’ve come up with the ideal commando-​​delivery sys­tem, sev­eral of the options haven’t worked out as planned.
Take the Advanced SEAL Delivery System. “The subs were orig­i­nally expected to cost $80 mil­lion each; the first one alone has cost $446 mil­lion,” notes the Times-​​Dispatch. “The ves­sel was nois­ier than planned — bad news for a sub­ma­rine. Designs were changed to muf­fle the sound, and now the mini-​​sub vibrates too much.” Which is defnitely not how com­man­dos like to travel.
UPDATE 1:28 PM: Of course, Inside Defense had details on the ship months ago. A few:

* One rea­son for the unique shape is the ship was designed like an air­craft… OFTs first direc­tor, Arthur Cebrowski, who died last month, was very firm that were going to build an air­craft on the sea”… The hull has four dis­tinct arches, which look like wings, that uti­lize air pres­sure to fun­nel water and glide along the sur­face.
* Through its mar­itime data bus, or on-​​board com­puter, the ves­sel will have the abil­ity to plug and play with dif­fer­ent sen­sors, link­ing with unmanned vehi­cles and other crafts of vary­ing sizes, he said. With only one panel of win­dows for look­ing ahead, Stiletto will use deck cam­eras to give the crew a sense of what is hap­pen­ing around the ship.
* Production of the Stiletto pro­to­type began in October 2004, cost­ing $6 mil­lion in funds from OFT. Nearly the same amount has been ear­marked by OFT and SOCOM com­bined for exper­i­men­ta­tion and testing.

UPDATE 2:37 pm: As C-​​Low notes in the com­ments, the lat­est issue of Defense Technology International has the Stiletto on the cover.

Share |

January 26th, 2006 | Ships and Subs | 179967 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/26/seal-ship-silent-but-deadly/SEAL+Ship%3A+Silent+But+Deadly2006-01-26+16%3A07%3A31murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Japan’s Robo-​​Copter Bust | Laugh Off Those Bombs » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Bud Orcutt says:
    February 4, 2006 at 1:09 pm

    The very lim­it­ing 8 hours endurance will prove oper­a­tionally unwork­able unless this ves­sel can be launched from a “big deck” amphib with an accom­mo­dat­ing well deck. The new LCS will prove more oper­a­tionally accept­able and less of a bur­den to the fleet. Yet another great idea not well thought out?
    – DD(X) Systems Engineer

    Reply
  2. shantrice says:
    February 4, 2006 at 4:00 pm

    Hello Guys,
    I am fond that I am a mem­ber of this site, I am active duty on recruit­ing duty and now this clar­i­fies why it is imper­a­tive and such a high demand for seals, the pres­sure for us to sign a qual­i­fied seal is so high pri­or­ity at this time but I see the big pic­ture and why there is a rush to find and sign them.
    Thanx

    Reply
  3. Wayne Salmon says:
    February 5, 2006 at 10:51 am

    The con­cept is solid, BUT, what will the ship do when old man ocean decides to go to sea state 6 or above? Such a sea state lim­i­ta­tion would limit its use. Is this ship a calm waters ship only?

    Reply
  4. Sea Serpent says:
    February 6, 2006 at 6:42 pm

    This is a remark­able con­cept — BUT — On Station Time is remark­ably low. With the adver­tised size para­me­ters it would appear that the three man crew should be able to remain on sta­tion for a week or more!

    Reply
  5. barry says:
    February 10, 2006 at 7:41 am

    Seal mis­sions typ­i­cally need stealth at every step. If the new “sur­face vehi­cle” is deliv­ered by a large deck amphib the mis­sion is flawed from the start. An SDV or ADSV deliv­ered by a sub would seem to have bet­ter covert­ness from start to fin­ish and pro­vide bet­ter pro­tec­tion for the Seals.

    Reply
  6. capt dave says:
    February 13, 2006 at 1:04 pm

    But how do you get a ship this big to the other side of the world in a hurry? With only a 500 mile range (250 miles each way) it would need refu­el­ing very close to any action. It seems more intel­li­gent to find a design that can be airlifted.

    Reply
  7. paul says:
    February 17, 2006 at 1:30 pm

    It’s an awe­some design,and has two excel­lent
    features,it must be the cor­rect eye sore cor­rec­tion for NSW Community.

    Reply
  8. Jerome Little says:
    March 2, 2006 at 12:57 pm

    Is this yet another Congressional Plus-​​up pro­gram just to feed the needy? This boat was not built for NSW nor is it a SOCOM pro­gram of record. It is only a tech­nol­ogy demon­stra­tor. However, the Navy and NSW had the Norwegian ship KNM SKJOLD (www​.knm​skjold​.org) for a year from 2001–2002 but chose to learn noth­ing from it. Stealth design, Composite hull etc; Shame on us for not pur­su­ing it.…

    Reply
  9. Zach P. Cotronis says:
    March 29, 2006 at 6:06 pm

    Well, it sounds like a pretty good project. It still needs lots of fin­ish­ing touches though, like :
    a) Range is quite short.
    b) Diesel is not THE fuel for such ops.
    c) vibs to be dealt with.
    d) Sharp edges to be taken care of.
    Let draughts­men think of “KNOX type destroy­ers” first before they start plan­ning on some­thing new. Take care

    Reply
  10. Johnathan Swart says:
    January 23, 2007 at 5:32 pm

    Do they need more car­bon fiber? We have 1000s of yards available!

    Reply
  11. Godfrey says:
    October 3, 2007 at 8:29 am

    AHOY…THERE, I hear Zolatone makes for a great color vari­able. And catip­il­lar geno­ra­tors are pow­er­ful even when used for tugs. Batteries heavy but depend­able. Finally dou­ble up on cable for those cat’s, .… you all feel me. SOUND stream amps with JBL SUBS?? got to have some tunes. Solong you pri­va­teer and good work always. 0629hrs Oct. 03,2007 West Coast

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The US Military should hold annual fashion shows. The Army...
      Zandor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'd also like to point out, that soldier systems has been...
      a1189
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Has to do with traverse speed. If the target is close then the...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Totally forgot about astrogation. Star maps loaded into a...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      freefalling: -The Germans used beam-riding during WW2 and it...
      Charles
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      batvette: A lot of JSF money was spent before the meltdown....
      Charles
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
      Phantom Works is Boeing is it not? I dunno what...
      Charles
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Senator McCain says, “ Sticks and stones may break my bones...
      Alton
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Jimbo thats pretty much all the british government...
      Valcan
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      I hope so; flexible armor may save lives because...
      Marcase
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage