DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Rapid Fire » Rapid Fire 01/​27/​06

Rapid Fire 01/​27/​06

* Nasty meals, one-​​third smaller
* “Vomit as a weapon“
* Moscow’s lunar mine
* NSA legal defense falls apart; tech­nol­ogy explained?
* More probes for Q branch
* Saddam’s WMDs in Syria?
* Rummy on Iraq: mis­sion accom­plished
* Waffle iron: $1,781.90
* Space suit = satel­lite
* Malaysia wants Bigfoot

(Big ups: PW, RC, TS, Geek Press, /​.)

Share |

January 27th, 2006 | Rapid Fire | 180419 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/rapid-fire-012706/Rapid+Fire+01%2F27%2F062006-01-27+12%3A22%3A08murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Radio, Radio — Oh, and TV, too! | “What Else You Got?” » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. TrustButVerify says:
    January 27, 2006 at 11:16 am

    It’s cer­tainly taken long enough for some­one in the (Western) MSM to take note of Syria’s appar­ent acqui­si­tion of Iraqi WMD. The story broke some time ago on Strategypage and in sev­eral Middle Eastern chan­nels; see http://​www​.strat​e​gy​page​.com/​h​t​m​w​/​h​t​m​u​r​p​h​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​2​0​0​4​0​1​0​7​.​a​spx
    for instance. I’m glad to see it cov­ered here on DT at last.

    Reply
  2. rutiger says:
    January 27, 2006 at 12:57 pm

    Should read: “Winger Deconstructs NSA’s Legal Defense“
    How is it that all these peo­ple can claim that the NSA has bro­ken the law but cant give an exam­ple? They may have, I’ll admit that, but none of these jabber-​​boxes knows for cer­tain one way or the other. Spare me your action-​​news-​​style spec­u­la­tion. I’ll wait for the facts.

    Reply
  3. Phila says:
    January 27, 2006 at 12:58 pm

    Re: the Syria story, I think it’s non­sense. But if it’s not, I’d say it rep­re­sents Bush’s sin­gle biggest fail­ure in his deal­ings with Iraq. In the run-​​up to the war, we claimed to know where the stock­piles were. Consider this arti­cle from November of 2002: “American spy satel­lites scan­ning key tar­gets through­out Iraq at least once every two hours in a con­cen­trated sur­veil­lance oper­a­tion which can pick out objects as small as six inches across in day­light and two to three feet wide at night.…The giant craft orbit over Iraq at reg­u­lar, pre­dictable inter­vals, snap­ping high-​​resolution dig­i­tal pic­tures of “sites of mil­i­tary inter­est” and pro­vid­ing the Pentagon and the CIA with con­tin­u­ally updated records of major ground and air activ­ity.“
    There are many other arti­cles from the same time period, describ­ing the unprece­dented level of air and ground sur­veil­lance in Iraq (here’s an exam­ple). If I were Bush, I’d much rather have peo­ple think I was mis­led by Chalabi and Co, than to have them believe I let Saddam smug­gle thou­sands of tons of WMD to Syria…especially after Rumsfeld said “We know where they are.”).
    Also, the will­ing­ness to believe for­mer high-​​ranking offi­cials in Saddam’s regime is puz­zling, too. I wouldn’t take any of ‘em at face value, per­son­ally. People who act as toad­ies to dic­ta­tors find it very easy to switch alle­giances when the bal­ance of power shifts.

    Reply
  4. Phila says:
    January 27, 2006 at 1:03 pm

    I had a prob­lem with the cites in my post below. Here they are:
    http://​www​.glob​alse​cu​rity​.org/​o​r​g​/​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​0​3​/​0​3​0​3​1​5​-​s​a​t​e​l​l​i​t​e​s​0​1​.​htm
    http://​archives​.econ​.utah​.edu/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​a​-​l​i​s​t​/​2​0​0​2​w​4​6​/​m​s​g​0​0​0​2​1​.​htm
    http://​www​.tele​graph​.co​.uk/​n​e​w​s​/​m​a​i​n​.​j​h​t​m​l​?​x​m​l​=​/​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​0​3​/​0​4​/​1​1​/​w​s​a​d​d​1​1​.​xml

    Reply
  5. Brad says:
    January 27, 2006 at 5:34 pm

    NSA pro­gram falls to pieces?
    Yeah. Yawn. A still-​​classified pro­gram is ‘decon­structed’ by alawyer dur­ing his lunch-​​break.
    Spare us the Sophistry, focus on defense technology.

    Reply
  6. James says:
    January 27, 2006 at 6:25 pm

    The Helium-​​3 idea has been float­ing around for a while, but from what I remem­ber, it’s eas­ier to acheive D-​​T fusion than He-​​3 fusion. Since they haven’t har­nessed the first, the sec­ond is pretty unlikely. 2020 is a pretty tight time­frame and the Russian space pro­grams are always scroung­ing for cash. Bottom line: it’s a trial bal­loon, look­ing for investors it will not find.
    As for the NSA: I judge them on the facts when they give me some. For now, I’ll sus­pect the worst about secret gov­ern­ment, as the Founding Fathers strongly advised us to do.

    Reply
  7. FirstCav says:
    January 28, 2006 at 4:52 am

    WMDs in Syria? Spare me. My advice to any Iraqi look­ing for a free, all expenses paid trip to Washington, DC, is to head for the near­est U.S. emm­bassy and tell them you know — you really, really know this time — where Saddam’s WMDs are: Liechtenstein.
    Doesn’t mat­ter how loopy your claims are, there’ll be some halfwit GOP/​neocon func­tionary to wine you and dine you at U.S. tax­payer expense while you’re in town, and if youu’re really good/​out there you’ll get to hang out with GWB at the WH (although, “The Preznit does not recall ever meet­ing Mr…”).
    Then the CIA’ll put you on the pay­roll with a gen­er­ous stipend and a cool secret agent name like “Oddball”. It’ll be great! Just tell ‘em what they want to hear.
    After the dust set­tles we’ll leave behind six Marines and a goat to keep the peace (Rumsfeld says that’s plenty, and if the Marines want more goats all they have to do is ask), and to show our grat­i­tude we’ll make sure youre demo­c­ra­t­i­cally elected Minister of Cheese — or what­ever it is they pro­duce there.
    No WMDs in Liechtenstein, either? No prob­lem. Those sneaky lit­tle Liechtensteinies prob­a­bly put them all in a Chevy con­ver­sion van just before we invaded and drove them to… to… ARUBA! Just say your cousin Ahmed (CIA code­name Whifflebat) saw them do it.
    Whatever.

    Reply
  8. Zmeya says:
    January 28, 2006 at 1:04 pm

    About Moscow’s lunar mines:
    One really easy way to spot a scam is to look for “helium-​​3,” “fusion,” and “lunar” in the same sen­tence. Someday, just maybe, the tech­nol­ogy might be avail­able to make it a seri­ous prospect, but that’s many decades away at best.
    So for the moment, remem­ber that another term for “helium-​​3″ is “snake oil.”

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage