DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Rapid Fire » Rapid Fire 01/27/06

Rapid Fire 01/27/06

* Nasty meals, one-third smaller
* “Vomit as a weapon“
* Moscow’s lunar mine
* NSA legal defense falls apart; technology explained?
* More probes for Q branch
* Saddam’s WMDs in Syria?
* Rummy on Iraq: mission accomplished
* Waffle iron: $1,781.90
* Space suit = satellite
* Malaysia wants Bigfoot

(Big ups: PW, RC, TS, Geek Press, /.)

Share |

January 27th, 2006 | Rapid Fire | 180419 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/rapid-fire-012706/Rapid+Fire+01%2F27%2F062006-01-27+12%3A22%3A08murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Radio, Radio — Oh, and TV, too! | “What Else You Got?” » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. TrustButVerify says:
    January 27, 2006 at 11:16 am

    It’s certainly taken long enough for someone in the (Western) MSM to take note of Syria’s apparent acquisition of Iraqi WMD. The story broke some time ago on Strategypage and in several Middle Eastern channels; see http://​www​.strategypage​.com/​h​t​m​w​/​h​t​m​u​r​p​h​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​2​0​0​4​0​1​0​7​.​a​spx
    for instance. I’m glad to see it covered here on DT at last.

    Reply
  2. rutiger says:
    January 27, 2006 at 12:57 pm

    Should read: “Winger Deconstructs NSA’s Legal Defense“
    How is it that all these people can claim that the NSA has broken the law but cant give an example? They may have, I’ll admit that, but none of these jabber-boxes knows for certain one way or the other. Spare me your action-news-style speculation. I’ll wait for the facts.

    Reply
  3. Phila says:
    January 27, 2006 at 12:58 pm

    Re: the Syria story, I think it’s nonsense. But if it’s not, I’d say it represents Bush’s single biggest failure in his dealings with Iraq. In the run-up to the war, we claimed to know where the stockpiles were. Consider this article from November of 2002: “American spy satellites scanning key targets throughout Iraq at least once every two hours in a concentrated surveillance operation which can pick out objects as small as six inches across in daylight and two to three feet wide at night.…The giant craft orbit over Iraq at regular, predictable intervals, snapping high-resolution digital pictures of “sites of military interest” and providing the Pentagon and the CIA with continually updated records of major ground and air activity.“
    There are many other articles from the same time period, describing the unprecedented level of air and ground surveillance in Iraq (here’s an example). If I were Bush, I’d much rather have people think I was misled by Chalabi and Co, than to have them believe I let Saddam smuggle thousands of tons of WMD to Syria…especially after Rumsfeld said “We know where they are.”).
    Also, the willingness to believe former high-ranking officials in Saddam’s regime is puzzling, too. I wouldn’t take any of ‘em at face value, personally. People who act as toadies to dictators find it very easy to switch allegiances when the balance of power shifts.

    Reply
  4. Phila says:
    January 27, 2006 at 1:03 pm

    I had a problem with the cites in my post below. Here they are:
    http://​www​.globalsecurity​.org/​o​r​g​/​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​0​3​/​0​3​0​3​1​5​-​s​a​t​e​l​l​i​t​e​s​0​1​.​htm
    http://​archives​.econ​.utah​.edu/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​a​-​l​i​s​t​/​2​0​0​2​w​4​6​/​m​s​g​0​0​0​2​1​.​htm
    http://​www​.telegraph​.co​.uk/​n​e​w​s​/​m​a​i​n​.​j​h​t​m​l​?​x​m​l​=​/​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​0​3​/​0​4​/​1​1​/​w​s​a​d​d​1​1​.​xml

    Reply
  5. Brad says:
    January 27, 2006 at 5:34 pm

    NSA program falls to pieces?
    Yeah. Yawn. A still-classified program is ‘deconstructed’ by alawyer during his lunch-break.
    Spare us the Sophistry, focus on defense technology.

    Reply
  6. James says:
    January 27, 2006 at 6:25 pm

    The Helium-3 idea has been floating around for a while, but from what I remember, it’s easier to acheive D-T fusion than He-3 fusion. Since they haven’t harnessed the first, the second is pretty unlikely. 2020 is a pretty tight timeframe and the Russian space programs are always scrounging for cash. Bottom line: it’s a trial balloon, looking for investors it will not find.
    As for the NSA: I judge them on the facts when they give me some. For now, I’ll suspect the worst about secret government, as the Founding Fathers strongly advised us to do.

    Reply
  7. FirstCav says:
    January 28, 2006 at 4:52 am

    WMDs in Syria? Spare me. My advice to any Iraqi looking for a free, all expenses paid trip to Washington, DC, is to head for the nearest U.S. emmbassy and tell them you know — you really, really know this time — where Saddam’s WMDs are: Liechtenstein.
    Doesn’t matter how loopy your claims are, there’ll be some halfwit GOP/neocon functionary to wine you and dine you at U.S. taxpayer expense while you’re in town, and if youu’re really good/out there you’ll get to hang out with GWB at the WH (although, “The Preznit does not recall ever meeting Mr…”).
    Then the CIA’ll put you on the payroll with a generous stipend and a cool secret agent name like “Oddball”. It’ll be great! Just tell ‘em what they want to hear.
    After the dust settles we’ll leave behind six Marines and a goat to keep the peace (Rumsfeld says that’s plenty, and if the Marines want more goats all they have to do is ask), and to show our gratitude we’ll make sure youre democratically elected Minister of Cheese — or whatever it is they produce there.
    No WMDs in Liechtenstein, either? No problem. Those sneaky little Liechtensteinies probably put them all in a Chevy conversion van just before we invaded and drove them to… to… ARUBA! Just say your cousin Ahmed (CIA codename Whifflebat) saw them do it.
    Whatever.

    Reply
  8. Zmeya says:
    January 28, 2006 at 1:04 pm

    About Moscow’s lunar mines:
    One really easy way to spot a scam is to look for “helium-3,” “fusion,” and “lunar” in the same sentence. Someday, just maybe, the technology might be available to make it a serious prospect, but that’s many decades away at best.
    So for the moment, remember that another term for “helium-3″ is “snake oil.”

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      I have a good idea—when the cost per unit is first disclosed...
      BILL D
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      The men can only do so much, we need to stop...
      albert delaunay
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      Not to hijack this thread and turn it into a...
      Kole
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      That first sentence should read...
      Moose
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      You could park an MLRS or HiMars on the...
      Moose
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Can the MLRS or HiMars system be...
      Robjack01
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Was not this PAM seeker the technology for...
      ripr
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      "Health Care bill would destroy what we can...
      JZizka
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      The Pentagon has acknowledged that climate change...
      JZizka
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      Yes, let's ignore a thing that 90% of...
      gmanaz
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage