<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: “What Else You Got?”</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/what-else-you-got/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/what-else-you-got/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Helga</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/what-else-you-got/#comment-121456</link> <dc:creator>Helga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:38:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1805#comment-121456</guid> <description>Hello, site is a good absolute agency dating http://henson.fizwig.com/dating138.html 8minutedating coupon 8minutedating.com http://henson.fizwig.com/dating18.html 50 dating over 8 minute dating denver abacus dating http://henson.fizwig.com/dating136.html 8minute dating.com http://henson.fizwig.com/dating55.html 8 dating daughter dvd rule simple teenage a pretty woman dating service http://henson.fizwig.com/dating154.html a free phone chat dating line http://henson.fizwig.com/dating78.html 8 minute dating.com 8 simple rules for dating my daughter 8 rule for dating 8 simple rules for dating my teenage daughter script 8 rules to dating my teenage daughter By </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, site is a good<br /> absolute agency dating<br /> <a href="http://henson.fizwig.com/dating138.html" rel="nofollow">http://henson.fizwig.com/dating138.html</a> 8minutedating coupon<br /> 8minutedating.com<br /> <a href="http://henson.fizwig.com/dating18.html" rel="nofollow">http://henson.fizwig.com/dating18.html</a> 50 dating over<br /> 8 minute dating denver<br /> abacus dating<br /> <a href="http://henson.fizwig.com/dating136.html" rel="nofollow">http://henson.fizwig.com/dating136.html</a> 8minute dating.com<br /> <a href="http://henson.fizwig.com/dating55.html" rel="nofollow">http://henson.fizwig.com/dating55.html</a> 8 dating daughter dvd rule simple teenage<br /> a pretty woman dating service<br /> <a href="http://henson.fizwig.com/dating154.html" rel="nofollow">http://henson.fizwig.com/dating154.html</a> a free phone chat dating line<br /> <a href="http://henson.fizwig.com/dating78.html" rel="nofollow">http://henson.fizwig.com/dating78.html</a> 8 minute dating.com<br /> 8 simple rules for dating my daughter<br /> 8 rule for dating<br /> 8 simple rules for dating my teenage daughter script<br /> 8 rules to dating my teenage daughter<br /> By</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/what-else-you-got/#comment-121453</link> <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:44:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1805#comment-121453</guid> <description>Hello, site is a good 100 2006 canada dating free in single 100 dating free international single site 100 dating free married 100 dating free link love .com dating feeling like 100 free dating sites 100 free black dating site 1 dating.com manila one place 10 dating daughter rule 10 dating perfect .com dating interracial 100 black dating free 100 dating free latin 100 dating free personals site web 100 chat dating free single By </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, site is a good<br /> 100 2006 canada dating free in single<br /> 100 dating free international single site<br /> 100 dating free married<br /> 100 dating free link love<br /> .com dating feeling like<br /> 100 free dating sites<br /> 100 free black dating site<br /> 1 dating.com manila one place<br /> 10 dating daughter rule<br /> 10 dating perfect<br /> .com dating interracial<br /> 100 black dating free<br /> 100 dating free latin<br /> 100 dating free personals site web<br /> 100 chat dating free single<br /> By</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James Parker</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/what-else-you-got/#comment-121450</link> <dc:creator>James Parker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:03:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1805#comment-121450</guid> <description>Bring back the OV-10 Bronco! perfect for Iraq, it&#039;s small, quick and lightly armored, and the ordanance options pack a major punch, would be useful for Close Air Support and it&#039;s more maneuverable than any helicopter. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring back the OV-10 Bronco! perfect for Iraq, it’s small, quick and lightly armored, and the ordanance options pack a major punch, would be useful for Close Air Support and it’s more maneuverable than any helicopter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Axe</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/what-else-you-got/#comment-121449</link> <dc:creator>David Axe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 07:29:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1805#comment-121449</guid> <description>Jeez, you guys ... okay, for starters, there wasn&#039;t just ONE insurgent taking on these Marines. There were many, in different positions. As for the accuracy of the aviators&#039; ordnance, who says they didn&#039;t hit where aimed? In fact, they did, all of them, and on that November mission, two jets delivered at least four bombs and two entire loads of 20-millimeter accurately. Cheers. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, you guys … okay, for starters, there wasn’t just ONE insurgent taking on these Marines. There were many, in different positions. As for the accuracy of the aviators’ ordnance, who says they didn’t hit where aimed? In fact, they did, all of them, and on that November mission, two jets delivered at least four bombs and two entire loads of 20-millimeter accurately.<br /> Cheers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jtw</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/what-else-you-got/#comment-121448</link> <dc:creator>jtw</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:19:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1805#comment-121448</guid> <description>GUess that 100 billion + dollars for guided weapons didnt pay off in the accuracy department. I seen on the Military channel a show that told the story of some rangers or marines (or something) on top of a mountain in afghanistan,  and there was a bunker of afghani bad guys on the top of the mountain. 3 planes dropped their entire ordnance and missed the bunker completely.  The soldiers were 100 meters away from the bunker so the planes were trying not ot hit them and try and overshoot the bunker a little bit.  They couldnt get the bunker in the end. The soldiers had to charge the bunker to finally take it(cant remember if they actually did).  Think some of them got hurt. 3cm accuracy for a guided weapon is what they say,  I guess not. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GUess that 100 billion + dollars for guided weapons didnt pay off in the accuracy department.<br /> I seen on the Military channel a show that told the story of some rangers or marines (or something) on top of a mountain in afghanistan,  and there was a bunker of afghani bad guys on the top of the mountain.<br /> 3 planes dropped their entire ordnance and missed the bunker completely.  The soldiers were 100 meters away from the bunker so the planes were trying not ot hit them and try and overshoot the bunker a little bit.  They couldnt get the bunker in the end.<br /> The soldiers had to charge the bunker to finally take it(cant remember if they actually did).  Think some of them got hurt.<br /> 3cm accuracy for a guided weapon is what they say,  I guess not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Edward Liu</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/what-else-you-got/#comment-121447</link> <dc:creator>Edward Liu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:08:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1805#comment-121447</guid> <description>What kind of weirds me about this is the idea that 2 F/A-18&#039;s dumped their entire payload, including 20mm, on a batch of insurgents, but still found it necessary to fly back to base for more bombs and fly back out. This isn&#039;t meant as a criticism of the Marine aviators at all, mind you. I realize that this sort of thing can happen, as it did during the repeated airstrikes in the battle at Roberts&#039; Ridge during Anaconda. But jeez! What were those insurgents made of? Concrete? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of weirds me about this is the idea that 2 F/A-18’s dumped their entire payload, including 20mm, on a batch of insurgents, but still found it necessary to fly back to base for more bombs and fly back out.<br /> This isn’t meant as a criticism of the Marine aviators at all, mind you. I realize that this sort of thing can happen, as it did during the repeated airstrikes in the battle at Roberts’ Ridge during Anaconda. But jeez! What were those insurgents made of? Concrete?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicholas weaver</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/what-else-you-got/#comment-121445</link> <dc:creator>Nicholas weaver</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:48:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1805#comment-121445</guid> <description>AHHH.  Me brain damaged... 200 is a much more reasonable number, but still worryingly high.  How many squadrons are there? If 4/target, thats only 50 incidents. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AHHH.  Me brain damaged…<br /> 200 is a much more reasonable number, but still worryingly high.  How many squadrons are there?<br /> If 4/target, thats only 50 incidents.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Axe</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/01/27/what-else-you-got/#comment-121444</link> <dc:creator>David Axe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:59:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1805#comment-121444</guid> <description>Nicholas, Actually, that&#039;s 200 bombs, not 2,000, and most flights return to Al Asad without expending ordnance. Most flights are dedicated solely to recon. Cheers. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas,<br /> Actually, that’s 200 bombs, not 2,000, and most flights return to Al Asad without expending ordnance. Most flights are dedicated solely to recon.<br /> Cheers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 721/725 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-09 23:42:55 -->
