DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Lasers and Ray Guns » Pain Ray, Sonic Blaster, Laser Dazzler — All in One

Pain Ray, Sonic Blaster, Laser Dazzler — All in One

For a while, now, I’ve been hear­ing about the Defense Department’s plans to out­fit a fight­ing vehi­cle with a pain ray, a sonic blaster, and a laser daz­zler, too. I never fig­ured they’d actu­ally send the thing to Iraq, though. Project Sheriff, I assumed, would just be the mil­i­tary equiv­a­lent of a con­cept car — a chance to see if some whiz-​​bang gear really worked together.
ADS_big.jpgBut the Pentagon may wind up deploy­ing this straight-​​outta-​​sci-​​fi jalopy, after all. The Army just got the OK to spend $31.3 mil­lion on three deploy­able Project Sheriff vehi­cles, Inside Defense is report­ing.
Right now, a “non-​​deployable Spiral 0 pro­to­type” [Sheriff] is “under­go­ing envi­ron­men­tal test­ing,” accord­ing to the newslet­ter — and wait­ing for one of the armed ser­vices to adopt the pro­gram as its own. That looks like it’s hap­pened, now. The “Spiral 1″ Sheriff will equip either a Stryker fight­ing vehi­cle or a Cougar mine-​​fighter with the daz­zler, the blaster, and the like. Oh, and it’ll still have guns, too.

By com­bin­ing the lethal and non­lethal tech­nolo­gies on a vehi­cle, [Marine Corps Col. Wade] Hall said a warfighter would be able to dis­crim­i­nate the non­com­bat­ants from insur­gents by first employ­ing the non­lethal capa­bil­i­ties and then pro­gress­ing to the use of lethal force.
For exam­ple, if a con­voy led by a Project Sheriff vehi­cle was mov­ing through an urban area, a crowd may form to divert the con­voy into an ambush zone, accord­ing to Hall.
If this were to hap­pen, the first thing the crowd would hear is the Long Range Acoustic Device either telling the crowd to move or giv­ing off a noise that would bother their hear­ing. Next, the Lazzer Dazzler would scan the crowd look­ing for a flicker from the scope of a pos­si­ble sniper.
If the crowd was still in place, troops would employ the active denial tech­nol­ogy [AKA the pain ray].
If they try and deflect beams then we will kill them because we know what their inten­tions are, Hall said. Now I know what your intent is. I just told you to move, I just flashed some light in you that said hey get away from me. I just put some effect on you that said please move or its going to get worse and you con­tinue to tell me that you have an ill intent for me and my fel­low Marines. So now I will bring some lethal force to bear if it sat­is­fies my [rules of engage­ment].
In an April 7, 2005, memo, Army Brig. Gen. James Huggings, the chief of staff for the Multi-​​National Corps-​​Iraq, asked the Joint Chiefs of Staff to approve fund­ing for the time crit­i­cal mate­r­ial release, field­ing and sus­tain­ment of the Full-​​Spectrum Effects Weapon Systems, the tech­ni­cal name for Project Sheriff vehi­cles.
This will allow oper­at­ing forces to exploit the psy­cho­log­i­cal dilemma of adver­saries who are faced with advanced pre­ci­sion capa­bil­i­ties hav­ing mul­ti­ple effects mech­a­nism that are col­lec­tively more chal­leng­ing to pro­tect against, Huggins wrote. This will serve to trans­fer the dif­fi­cul­ties of oper­a­tional com­plex­ity to the enemy, help­ing to allow MNC-​​I forces to regain the ini­tia­tive in fourth gen­er­a­tion war­fare.
Huggins pro­poses the Army receive eight vehi­cles — four for the 18th Military Police Brigade and four for the 42nd Military Police Brigade — and the Marines receive six.
In an April 19, 2005, response to Huggins, Marine Corps Maj. Gen. John Castellaw, chief of staff for U.S. Central Command, said the request for 14 Project Sheriff vehi­cles was fully sup­ported by CENTCOM. 

Share |

January 30th, 2006 | Lasers and Ray Guns | 181149 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/01/30/pain-ray-sonic-blaster-laser-dazzler-all-in-one/Pain+Ray%2C+Sonic+Blaster%2C+Laser+Dazzler+-+All+in+One2006-01-30+16%3A51%3A32murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Hercules’ Newest Labor | Airplanes are People, Too » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Mike Wright says:
    January 30, 2006 at 5:48 pm

    So if I’m an inno­cent Iraqi in the mid­dle of a crowd of pro­test­ers com­plain­ing about, say, the lack of reli­able elec­tric­ity, and some jerk on the out­skirts of our protest throws a bot­tle, say, at some Marines, and then those Marines turn on their Death Ray Truck and bom­bard us with sound telling us to leave the area and I try, but I’m hemmed in by the crowd around me and can’t move and then the Marines shine lasers at us and I try to hold up some­thing to deflect those lasers lest I lose my sight… that’s a sign that I’m fair game to be shot and killed? Gosh, I can’t imag­ine why the Iraqis hate us… and why they’re going to hate us even more once these civilian-​​targetting ter­ror machines are deployed upon them. Oh, and I can’t WAIT until the Bush Administration is fin­ished with their field tests of these machines and roll them out for domes­tic use. This tech­nol­ogy is disgusting.

    Reply
  2. C-Low says:
    January 30, 2006 at 6:35 pm

    Thanks for clear­ing that up Mike I actu­ally thought the US was the good guys for a minute try­ing to sep­a­rate the “brave” hos­tiles hid­ing in the crowd from the actual inno­cents and lessen the num­ber of dead inno­cents. And you peo­ple won­der why we ques­tion your patri­o­tism??
    I like the idea of this thing, bet­ter than rub­ber bul­lets, tear gas or worse. I think one at the near by base on call for crowd con­trol, protest escort, or that spe­cial sit­u­a­tion maybe use­ful.
    But is this report really say­ing we are going to use it as a gun truck? That seems rather expen­sive not to men­tion in an ambush we need lots of fast fire­power like a (anti-​​aircraft plat­form pack­ing deuce stacks) not some high-​​powered sun tan­ner and a light machine gun (not shown in picture).

    Reply
  3. KATSESAMA says:
    January 30, 2006 at 8:02 pm

    I guess instead of just warn­ing the beliger­ent
    dog­mat­i­cally brain­washed mobs over there in the
    sand­box to back off we aught to just sweep them
    with a fusilade of machine gun fire,that would be
    a lot more civilized,right?Instead of balk­ing at
    this technology,you moveon​.org types aught to be
    laud­ing it!Here we are tak­ing steps to NOT,i repeat
    NOT,hurt these people,but get them to back off
    before we are forced to uti­lize REAL,lethal force.
    They’ll get an ear ache,they’ll get momen­tar­ily
    blinded,and when that fails,they might get a lit­tle cooked for their trouble.But if they move
    off and go on about their busi­ness peacably,they
    won’t get shot and killed.Thats the whole point
    of this technology.How many times have your’e
    friends,the jihadis given us a warn­ing before
    they set off an I.E.D.(Improvised explo­sive
    muni­tion to you berkely grads,not intel­li­gent,
    excel­lent democrat,which in,and of,itself is an
    oxymoron)near our troops,or their own indi­geo­nous
    population?Really humane that is,but of course,
    in their minds its okay as these are fel­low
    mus­lims who don’t mind being blown up on a whim
    as their going to go to heaven gladly.Now that is
    whats really dis­gust­ing here,not the pain ray.

    Reply
  4. Charles says:
    January 30, 2006 at 10:23 pm

    Getting hit by some­thing, regard­less of microwave beams or a 5.56 is merely a dif­fer­ent of whether America has to pay blood money to the tribe or not.
    The enemy inter­prets non-​​lethal weapons as a sign of weak­ness, the Iraqis inter­pret a pain-​​zapper as some­thing else which doesn’t change the para­me­ters of their rela­tion­ship with the United States Army: if they hate us, it’s just another tool of which “to oppress the dig­nity of the Iraqi peo­ple”. If they like us, it’s a tool that pre­vents “need­less deaths”.Every coin has two sides.
    But as before, there’s more room for error with a non-​​lethal, but it’s off­set by a com­man­der using it too often, until you’re back to square one. This rela­tion­ship is sim­i­lar to overuse of antibi­otics until bac­te­ria develop resis­tance to it.
    If the insur­gents get the equip­ment to tri­an­gu­late on one of these things by emis­sions, then things will get interesting.

    Reply
  5. JSAllison says:
    January 31, 2006 at 9:53 am

    I’m think­ing that that puppy needs a tray/​table attach­ment for the wave­guide, could cook up a lot of java on that thing

    Reply
  6. cunninglinguist says:
    February 1, 2006 at 8:01 am

    I fig­ure they’ll field test it in Iraq, and it’ll be in the hands of U.S. police forces soon after. They could use it on black “loot­ers” the next time the gov­ern­ment screws up dis­ater relief.
    And KATSESAMA, what is the deal, dude? Why is it that peo­ple who use terms like “moveon​.org types” and “…you berkely grads,not intel­li­gent,
    excel­lent democrat,which in,and of,itself is an
    oxy­moron” have such a hard time spelling words cor­rectly? I won’t get into the ques­tion of syn­tax. Could there be a con­nec­tion to how much Fox news you watch, or could it be that it’s because your sis­ter is also your mother?

    Reply
  7. SSs says:
    February 1, 2006 at 8:22 am

    Trouble is, you can just run up behind it no problem..oh well..

    Reply
  8. Jay says:
    February 1, 2006 at 9:35 am

    Welcome to the New World Order. If Adolf would have had one of these babies, He would’nt have had to take a bad rap. Although, microwav­ing and cian­ide gas ends in the same result. Tough call. Maybe if no one tries to take our gov­ern­ment back, they won’t have to use it.

    Reply
  9. A.R. Gonzalez says:
    February 1, 2006 at 1:33 pm

    We should have a broad­cast telling them ” the extreme pain you are in is because allah hates you, and you have angered him. A Tsunami and 2 big earth­quakes were obvi­uos not enough pun­ish­ment for you peo­ple. If allah loved you he would not have given so much power to the infi­del. ” Hell they won’t know the dif­fer­ence, the only mus­lims who under­stand sci­ence are already in the U.S, teach­ing com­puter sci­ence at crappy jr. Colleges and turn­ing a gen­er­a­tion of bong smok­ing, X box play­ing base­ment dwellers against the tit that feeds them.

    Reply
  10. Paul says:
    February 1, 2006 at 9:42 pm

    The sooner we quit try­ing to cod­dle our enemy and the faster we start shoot­ing them and let­ting them know we plan to shoot them the bet­ter.
    We didn’t win WWII with any freak­ing pain ray, now did we? 31 Million buys a lot of lead and enough Arabic posters to send the mes­sage we’re through screw­ing around.

    Reply
  11. KATSESAMA says:
    February 1, 2006 at 9:54 pm

    Can’t help but notice a really nasty trend in some of the posts here.There seems to be a near fanatic
    opin­ion that this tech­nol­ogy would some­how be used
    against u.s. cit­i­zens for anti-​​riot purposes.I can’t
    dis­agree more.The idea that the gov­ern­ment would use
    ADS to quell protest or angry black mobs is just so much lib­eral day­dream­ing and fearmongering.There have been a lot of tech­no­log­i­cal advance­ments that
    have come out in recent his­tory with tac­ti­cal appli­ca­tions that have,as yet,to be turned on the
    cit­i­zens in an unjus­ti­fi­able manner.So…where are
    all these accounts of the fed­eral gov­ern­ments abuse com­ing from?from the very fer­tile sesspool
    of the lib­eral imag­i­na­tion methinks.Oh…while i’m
    on the subject…cunning-lick-fest?…OH! so sorry
    thats cunning-​​linguist was it? Sorry to mis-​​spell
    you obvi­ously well thought out,and clever tag.
    Must be that extra Y-​​Chromosome i inher­ited from
    Sis/Mom.My par­ent­ing aside,its tired,sophmoric,
    com­men­tary like that which is best reserved for
    the realm of late-​​night fps game taunt­ing and smack talk.Its left­ist whin­ing like,and i quote
    from a gram­mat­icly per­fect source“They could use
    it on black“looters“the next time they screw up dis­as­ter relief“that truly reveals a lack of moral
    under­stand­ing and con­spir­acy fan­ta­siza­tion all out
    of pro­por­tion to the real­ity of the sit​u​a​tion​.So
    go ahead and cri­tique my argu­ment all you like.its
    overly emo­tional retorts about “presumed“abuses of
    power that makes your argu­ment about as strong as those levies down there in the big easy.

    Reply
  12. fred says:
    February 1, 2006 at 11:11 pm

    Look up in the dic­tio­nary ‘jihad’ means restraint.
    ’ter­ror­ist’ the mean­ing sounds like the U.S. government.

    Reply
  13. JT says:
    February 2, 2006 at 12:28 am

    Just flip­pin shoot em…
    They’ll quit assem­bling real quick.
    Why do we screw around with these morons?

    Reply
  14. Super Secret Shadow Man says:
    February 2, 2006 at 2:27 am

    I won­der when this thing will be used on US cit­i­zens.
    Its a good idea but too bad it can be so eas­ily spot­ted and the huge antenna makes an easy tar­get to pick off.
    As if the mid­dle east was not hot enough, now we can cook them alive!
    I love it!

    Reply
  15. Septic Shock & Awe says:
    February 2, 2006 at 2:55 am

    Let’s step back and look at the Liberal point of view. let’s see the big lib­eral pic­ture.
    1. its ok to sell missle & nuke tech­nol­ogy to our ene­mies.
    2. its ok for them to put nukes on those missles.
    3. its ok for them to threaten/​blackmail to use them on the U.S. and Europe…to kill your fam­ily, friends, co-​​workers & pets;not to men­tion screw up the envirn­ment and ozone layer.
    ummm.
    but its not ok to defend our­selves or pre­vent this.
    2nd Amendment:
    A well reg­u­lated milita, being NECESSARY to the secu­rity of a free state, the right of the peo­ple to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
    not only that, but read the pre­am­ble of the Constitution…”…insure domes­tic tran­quil­ity, pro­vide for the com­mon defense…“
    these Islamo-​​Empirialists seek to destroy us. they say–any nation that is not Islamic is un-acceptable…how will they achieve that–threw war! just like they have in the past. those islamic believ­ers who will not strap on a bomb belt or pick up a gun will not help us to end this sense­less agres­sion.
    They will never reform.
    i think if George Washington was alive and President, he would roll out the new hard-​​ware as soon as pos­si­ble and he would use them too.
    Islam is well on its way to stand side by side with the defunct reli­gion of Bal & Ra wor­ship. the tragidy is this: Arafat and Bin Laden had the oppor­tu­nity to lead the chil­dren of Ismael into a pros­per­ous happy life, but rather instead, down the road of their even­tual demise as a peo­ple. their spin, their lies, their destruc­tive­ness, will come back onto their heads and their wish of erad­i­ca­tion of Israel, will be their fate instead.

    Reply
  16. Septic Shock & Awe says:
    February 2, 2006 at 2:55 am

    Let’s step back and look at the Liberal point of view. let’s see the big lib­eral pic­ture.
    1. its ok to sell missle & nuke tech­nol­ogy to our ene­mies.
    2. its ok for them to put nukes on those missles.
    3. its ok for them to threaten/​blackmail to use them on the U.S. and Europe…to kill your fam­ily, friends, co-​​workers & pets;not to men­tion screw up the envirn­ment and ozone layer.
    ummm.
    but its not ok to defend our­selves or pre­vent this.
    2nd Amendment:
    A well reg­u­lated milita, being NECESSARY to the secu­rity of a free state, the right of the peo­ple to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
    not only that, but read the pre­am­ble of the Constitution…”…insure domes­tic tran­quil­ity, pro­vide for the com­mon defense…“
    these Islamo-​​Empirialists seek to destroy us. they say–any nation that is not Islamic is un-acceptable…how will they achieve that–threw war! just like they have in the past. those islamic believ­ers who will not strap on a bomb belt or pick up a gun will not help us to end this sense­less agres­sion.
    They will never reform.
    i think if George Washington was alive and President, he would roll out the new hard-​​ware as soon as pos­si­ble and he would use them too.
    Islam is well on its way to stand side by side with the defunct reli­gion of Bal & Ra wor­ship. the tragidy is this: Arafat and Bin Laden had the oppor­tu­nity to lead the chil­dren of Ismael into a pros­per­ous happy life, but rather instead, down the road of their even­tual demise as a peo­ple. their spin, their lies, their destruc­tive­ness, will come back onto their heads and their wish of erad­i­ca­tion of Israel, will be their fate instead.

    Reply
  17. James says:
    February 2, 2006 at 5:28 am

    fred
    get a bet­ter dic­tio­nary…
    1: a holy war waged on behalf of Islam as a reli­gious duty; also : a per­sonal strug­gle in devo­tion to Islam espe­cially involv­ing spir­i­tual dis­ci­pline
    2: a cru­sade for a prin­ci­ple or belief
    When Muslims say jihad, they mean holy war.

    Reply
  18. ThePete says:
    February 2, 2006 at 9:14 am

    Mike Wright = Idiot
    If you don’t like Bush, i’ll help you move to canada… which seams to be what all those lib­er­als are good at, Running away from their prob­lems pout­ing like a baby all the way home to mommy.
    You whine about killing some­one who is try­ing to kill us, then when an alter­na­tive comes about, you whine about that too. Democrats/​Liberals truly are the Political party of Idiots. They don’t even know what they want.

    Reply
  19. Einstein says:
    February 2, 2006 at 1:27 pm

    Dear The Voice of truth,
    why do lib­er­als spend so much time typ­ing urls backwards?

    Reply
  20. erewhon says:
    February 2, 2006 at 2:28 pm

    “I can­not trust a man that lies to the amer­i­can pub­lic, con­gress, the UN, and the entire world..
    breaks the law bla­tantly, tries to cover his own crim­i­nal record,.. i could go on and on but you prob­a­bly already know it all.“
    I’m sorry…were you refer­ring to Clinton or Teddy Kennedy here?

    Reply
  21. A. Gonzalez says:
    February 2, 2006 at 11:20 pm

    The lib­er­als all seem to worry that this will be used on Americans. Funny the last admin­is­tra­tion to used over­whelm­ing deadly force on U.S cit­i­zens on a reg­u­lar basis was the Clinton admin­is­tra­tion. See, too many bong loads will affect your mem­ory.
    The Jackbooted thug attack score­board:
    Clinton/​ Reno: at least 3
    Bush/​Ashcroft/​Gonzalez: 0

    Reply
  22. LaNcE says:
    February 3, 2006 at 2:17 am

    Michael Savage for President!

    Reply
  23. fred says:
    February 3, 2006 at 2:19 am

    I knew you would not know what ‘jihad’ true mean­ing is. You non arab speak­ing, have been lied to. For the real mean­ing of ‘jihad’ go to http://​www​.USE​.edu/​d​e​p​t​/​M​S​A​/​r​e​f​e​r​e​n​c​e​/​g​l​o​s​s​a​r​y​/​t​e​r​m​.​J​I​H​A​D​.​h​tml Your gov­ern­ment is spread­ing propaganda

    Reply
  24. fred says:
    February 3, 2006 at 2:33 am

    sorry the web addy for ‘JIHAD’ is http://​www​.usc​.edu/​d​e​p​t​/​M​S​A​/​r​e​f​e​r​e​n​c​e​/​g​l​o​s​s​a​r​y​/​t​e​r​m​.​J​I​H​A​D​.​h​tml
    this is the uni­ver­sity of south­ern cal­i­for­nia at least they know the true meaning.

    Reply
  25. RA Balke says:
    May 19, 2006 at 4:00 pm

    OH Cool ! The US Military has a new weapon to tor­ture peo­ple with !

    Reply
  26. Bob G says:
    May 19, 2006 at 7:32 pm

    If America doesn’t sort out its bor­der prob­lems with Mexico the U.S will cease to exist as an a nation. What’s the use of hav­ing an army to defend you from an armed inva­sion if any­one (criminal,terrorist or eco­nomic refugee)can walk into your country.

    Reply
  27. Curt says:
    May 20, 2006 at 1:45 am

    Something tells me that this tech­nol­ogy will be used on us some­day. Only a mat­ter of time before Metro area police forces start deploy­ing these things… if they haven’t already.

    Reply
  28. Andrew says:
    May 20, 2006 at 9:15 am

    this is noth­ing com­pared to the mobile fuel cell
    laser that i saw in test operations;that weapon is horrible.

    Reply
  29. donald Orcutt says:
    May 22, 2006 at 10:32 pm

    The ‘final solu­tion’ for the Mexican bor­der is known as the .44 Magnum. A few exam­ples of its results on the bor­der should serve as a deter­rent to future wannabes.

    Reply
  30. Mike says:
    May 23, 2006 at 12:07 am

    haha.. “OH Cool ! The US Military has a new weapon to tor­ture peo­ple with !” (By Balke)
    What a freak­ing moron. The frig­gin pur­pose of such weapons is to pre­vent deaths and dis­perse crowds instead of using a 50cal on them. Do you not real­ize how much eas­ier a 50cal would be? Ahhh, im sure peo­ple such as Balke and other “lib­er­tar­ian” (lol) type folks would pre­fer bullets.

    Reply
  31. skizimus says:
    October 2, 2006 at 4:20 pm

    How soon can we get these on the mex­i­can bor­der to fend off the real threat?

    Reply
  32. dave says:
    October 2, 2006 at 4:25 pm

    Why bother? We are sur­ren­der­ing to mexico.

    Reply
  33. Tito Duarcmich says:
    February 27, 2007 at 5:19 pm

    After hear­ing about this machine, would you not get away before it was turned on?
    What do you think Iraqis are?
    Lower than Monkeys?
    Don’t answer that one.
    Actually, these pro­test­ers you speak of, are more than likely unem­ployed poor males with a 5th grade edu­ca­tion.
    Do they deserve this treat­ment?
    No, it’s their coun­try.
    Would their fel­low coun­try­men respond the same way as us?
    HAHA, Worse.

    Reply
  34. paul says:
    June 23, 2007 at 2:53 am

    hello,
    i have this macaws ready to go to new homes.they are tamed and can speak english.mail back if interested.

    Reply
  35. rev says:
    June 23, 2007 at 2:58 am

    cute African greys for adoption.mail back if interested.

    Reply
  36. Boris says:
    June 14, 2008 at 6:49 am

    I like the idea of this thing, bet­ter than rub­ber bul­lets, tear gas or worse. I think one at the near by base on call for crowd con­trol, protest escort, or that spe­cial sit­u­a­tion maybe use­ful.
    http://​www​.smoth​er​boards​.ru/
    http://​www​.svideo​cards​.ru/

    Reply
  37. dragonlasers says:
    August 8, 2008 at 1:34 am

    Dragon Lasers sup­ply laser daz­zler to mil­i­tay cus­tomers, law enfore­ce­ment cus­tomers. For details please con­tact our sales.
    http://​www​.drag​onlasers​.com

    Reply
  38. Addy Ackerson says:
    August 24, 2008 at 2:55 pm

    I need pric­ing for the sonic blaster?

    Reply
  39. Musones, Godfrey says:
    May 30, 2009 at 9:27 pm

    Attn:
    Seems as this is what it is. Point 2 Point, A to B, or vise versa B to A. We have to get the guy’s and gal’s home now. Could this warn­ing Weapon not run over the ENEMY Fig Tree? The last I have been told we are mash­ing terrorist(anti-US)properties up down left and right. I salute you all, just remem­ber, THEY STARded IT!!! would some­body proof read please„, Thank You.
    May 30th, 2009. 1928hrs West Coast

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage