DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Money Money Money » Boeing: We Screwed Up, Give us $500 Mil

Boeing: We Screwed Up, Give us $500 Mil

“When a child who is on trial for mur­der­ing his par­ents pleads for leniency on grounds that he is an orphan, we call that chutz­pah,” says Space News’ Washington Aerospace Briefing. “When a U.S. defense con­trac­tor botches a pro­gram demands a huge ter­mi­na­tion fee when the con­tract is can­celled, we call that… stan­dard oper­at­ing pro­ce­dure.“
SBR.jpg

So no, we weren’t com­pletely shocked to hear that Boeing is seek­ing about $500 mil­lion from the National Reconnaissance Office in ter­mi­na­tion fees asso­ci­ated with the Future Imagery Architecture spy satel­lite pro­gram. The NRO can­celled the opti­cal por­tion of Boeing’s multi-​​billion dol­lar FIA con­tract last year after becom­ing fed up with the company’s tech­ni­cal strug­gles and that lead to innu­mer­able delays and soar­ing costs.

FIA was sup­posed to be a con­stel­la­tion of satel­lites that would gather clearer and more-​​frequent images — even at night and when there is a cloud cover — of enemy mil­i­tary activ­ity than cur­rent satel­lites can, the Los Angeles Times notes. Originally sched­uled to launch in 2005, at one point, FIA looked like it might become the most expen­sive pro­gram in the his­tory of the intel­li­gence com­mu­nity, accord­ing to Globalsecurity​.org.
When Boeing won the FIA con­tract, back in 1999, it was some­thing of a coup. As the Times observes, Much of Boeing’s space exper­tise was in mak­ing rock­ets to launch satel­lites and devel­op­ing com­mer­cial telecom­mu­ni­ca­tion satel­lites. It had lit­tle expe­ri­ence man­u­fac­tur­ing satel­lites with opti­cal lenses that can take close-​​up pic­tures from space of objects on the ground. That was Lockheed Martins area of exper­tise. Boeing bid very aggres­sively even though it didn’t under­stand the tech­nol­ogy as well as Lockheed,” the ubiq­ui­tous Loren Thompson told the LAT.
So its no sur­prise that Boeing started burn­ing through cash and drop­ping dead­li­nesa, once FIA got under­way. As early as 2002, the gov­ern­ment had to repro­gram­ming of about $625 mil­lion [and pos­si­bly as much as $900 mil­lion] from other intel­li­gence pro­grams to get the pro­gram back on sched­ule, Globalsecurity​.org says. By the end of 2004 the House Intelligence Committee remained con­cerned about the via­bil­ity and effec­tive­ness of a future over­head archi­tec­ture, given the appar­ent lack of a com­pre­hen­sive archi­tec­tural plan for the over­head sys­tem of sys­tems, specif­i­cally in the area of imagery.
By 2005 after $10 bil­lion on FIA, includ­ing about $4 or $5 bil­lion in cost over­runs the gov­ern­ment finally had enough, tak­ing the project away from Boeing, and giv­ing it to Lockheed.
Boeing’s request for a half a B to make up for the lost work is big. But it’s not totally unprece­dented, Washington Aerospace Briefing says. The com­pany is still argu­ing with the Pentagon over $2.3 bil­lion for the A-​​12 stealth car­rier air­craft pro­gram, can­celled in 1991.
(Big ups: AT, JS)
UPDATE 2:28 PM: AT points out that there were some inter­est­ing names asso­ci­ated with Boeing’s con­tro­ver­sial FIA win. In Boeing’s ’99 press release, we read:

Ed Nowinski, Boeing FIA Program Manager, stated, ‘This was a very hard-​​fought com­pe­ti­tion and the win is the result of the total com­mit­ment of our team.’

Who is Ed Nowinski? Check out this press release, from 1996:

MELBOURNE, Florida, August 5, 1996Harris Corporation has named Ed Nowinski as vice pres­i­dent of Strategic Planning and Business Development for the company’s Electronic Systems Sector.
Mr. Nowinski most recently was the direc­tor of imagery intel­li­gence for the U.S. government’s National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) and direc­tor of devel­op­ment and engi­neer­ing for the Central Intelligence Agency.
Mr. Nowinski joined the CIA in 1967 and rose rapidly to posi­tions of increas­ing respon­si­bil­ity dur­ing his career with the CIA and NRO, includ­ing direc­tor of the Data Communications Group, deputy direc­tor of devel­op­ment and engi­neer­ing, and direc­tor of sys­tems engi­neer­ing. During his gov­ern­ment career, he was instru­men­tal in estab­lish­ing sev­eral of the country’s pre­mier intel­li­gence col­lec­tion systems.

Share |

February 2nd, 2006 | Money Money Money, Space | 182321 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/02/02/boeing-we-screwed-up-give-us-500-mil/Boeing%3A+We+Screwed+Up%2C+Give+us+%24500+Mil2006-02-02+17%3A26%3A22murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 02/​02/​06 | Drone Seahorse Gets Wet » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. TrustButVerify says:
    February 2, 2006 at 2:11 pm

    Isn’t this the same pack of weasels who tried to bilk another (insert the lat­est fig­ure here) out of the DoD with the tanker lease deal?

    Reply
  2. Joe Katzman says:
    February 2, 2006 at 2:54 pm

    Read the A-​​12 pro­file you linked. It seems the DoD was quite aggres­sive in going after the con­trac­tors, but the courts made what I can only describe as a puz­zling series of rulings.

    Reply
  3. Joe says:
    February 2, 2006 at 8:35 pm

    Lesseee ‚how much do we owe Boeing for win­ning WW2 ?

    Reply
  4. Knightraptor says:
    February 2, 2006 at 11:34 pm

    Well I say if they want a half a bil­lion “ter­mi­na­tion fee” we should slap them with a one bil­lion dol­lar “fail­ure fee.”

    Reply
  5. iro zeny says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:44 pm

    95 lev­els, to me this had been a friend of the peo­ple around, the new ser­vice first hand the hand of a per­son to man­u­ally 95, it is really dif­fi­cult for my them­selves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny.

    Reply
  6. buy rupees says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:46 pm

    Leave for three years, I have quite repeat­edly returned to the Rappelz game. I con­tinue for good equip­ment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the orig­i­nal is the lack of a per­son accom­pa­ny­ing me.

    Reply
  7. rf money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:54 pm

    So I know my par­adise Nana, and some friends. Bu then, I added AQQI. And a vari­ety of rea­sons, and the sum­mer of cake, magic rab­bit, blue shocks, such as sev­eral friends built a new coun­cil: Return of the King. And I rec­og­nized the beier­tuo broth­er­hood. As the help of this friends and will help in grow­ing, and this time sheikhs left the group B, the new pres­i­dent rose, lead us to defend the B group. We Society of Friends also actively par­tic­i­pated in the mine war­fare, win­ning glory for the fam­ily. Later, because a num­ber of rea­sons I left the RF. And I took my all RF money send my friends.

    Reply
  8. cheap gaia gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:56 pm

    Later, we often played together, we always upgrade and earned cheap Gaia gold together. We are very happy in the Gaia game. I really fell in love with the girl, and I also like the Gaia game.

    Reply
  9. buy goonzu gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:59 pm

    It is wind out­side the win­dow, and I numb­ness under the key­board, watch­ing the com­puter screen in a daze, rem­i­nis­cent of the past acid sweet, think of all peo­ple cry. In this long Goonzu road, who join me through? The game the same as real­ity, it also need friends, need a pater­nity can go with own peo­ple. I spent some money to buy goonzu gold, so I can find to find together with in the other half Goonzu down and even­tu­ally found noth­ing, I despair, I gave up, I sad, and I cry.

    Reply
  10. Guild Wars Gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 9:03 pm

    One day, I was killed by other peo­ple, I told my brother, and I was dead. My brother said he come to help me. I said that peo­ple were very ter­ri­ble, he had a lot of equip­ment, and I think he must be hav­ing much Guild Wars Gold. Mt brother said, no mat­ter, he find friends come to help me. In this way, I rec­og­nized him.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      Zandor, Don't you have to go play in traffic or play...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Welcome to paralysis induced by political correctness.
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It's too bad a brave soul like you wasn't in that room....
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Zandor, You're obviously and expert on religion and religious...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Cannon, please stop bringing relevant facts and arguments into this. The...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      News reports have said that this guy has openly stated his...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      Headphones and earplugs are effective, but...
      JustAGuy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage