<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Rapid Fire 02/02/06</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/02/02/rapid-fire-020206/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/02/rapid-fire-020206/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: max</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/02/rapid-fire-020206/#comment-121773</link> <dc:creator>max</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:21:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1821#comment-121773</guid> <description>&quot;for that matter, the US out of Vietnam&quot; Gee, I dunno-I thought it was the VC and the peace movement. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“for that matter, the US out of Vietnam“<br /> Gee, I dunno-I thought it was the VC and the peace movement.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/02/rapid-fire-020206/#comment-121772</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:17:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1821#comment-121772</guid> <description>re: the WMD story: It&#039;s really sad, isn&#039;t it, when you being to suspect your country&#039;s national defense policy is really just a marketing strategy?  I&#039;ve had that suspicion since the mid-80&#039;s and nothing that&#039;s happened since has convinced me otherwise. As for the IED threat, you can beat up on the military for not seeing it in advance and this is almost fair.  After all, it&#039;s the same tactic that drove Israel out of Lebanon and, for that matter, the US out of Vietnam.  But I don&#039;t think they haven&#039;t been trying hard to neutralize it.  The simple fact is, the tactic works because it&#039;s very hard to counter.  Some people have a touching, almost religious faith in the ability of technology to solve every military problem, but this isn&#039;t true.  They can&#039;t cure the common cold because the virus keeps mutating.  So it is with IEDs.  The human element remains decisive. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: the WMD story:<br /> It’s really sad, isn’t it, when you being to suspect your country’s national defense policy is really just a marketing strategy?  I’ve had that suspicion since the mid-80’s and nothing that’s happened since has convinced me otherwise.<br /> As for the IED threat, you can beat up on the military for not seeing it in advance and this is almost fair.  After all, it’s the same tactic that drove Israel out of Lebanon and, for that matter, the US out of Vietnam.  But I don’t think they haven’t been trying hard to neutralize it.  The simple fact is, the tactic works because it’s very hard to counter.  Some people have a touching, almost religious faith in the ability of technology to solve every military problem, but this isn’t true.  They can’t cure the common cold because the virus keeps mutating.  So it is with IEDs.  The human element remains decisive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 655/659 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 01:45:47 -->
