DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ground Vehicles » Truck Makers Eye Next-​​Gen Humvees

Truck Makers Eye Next-​​Gen Humvees

There are no def­i­nite plans, yet. But the Army and the Marines are slowly get­ting ready to replace the Humvee. National Defense mag­a­zine pro­files the “truck man­u­fac­tur­ers large and small, for­eign and domes­tic, [which] are gear­ing up to take on the only maker of the 20-​​year-​​old vehi­cle, AM General.“
MXT_MPV_pop.jpg

Archie Massicotte, pres­i­dent of mil­i­tary and gov­ern­ment busi­ness at International Truck and Engine said, the Humvee has served a great life for the mil­i­tary for 20 some years. I think what theyre find­ing is that were fight­ing bat­tles now in Iraq, and theyre using it as a tac­ti­cal wheeled vehi­cle. And it was never intended to be a tac­ti­cal wheeled vehi­cle, he said…
The ques­tion of armorhow much is needed, when to use it and the trade-​​offs in engine power, weight and car­ry­ing capac­ity it entail­swill be a tech­no­log­i­cal chal­lenge for any pro­posed follow-​​on vehi­cle, experts said…
[Jim] Mills, who worked on the Humvee pro­gram while in the Army… said there will also be a need for wind­shields that can bet­ter accom­mo­date night-​​vision tech­nol­ogy. Lead con­tent in the glass can reduce its effec­tive­ness. Soldiers want to be able to drive at night with head­lights turned off. And in spe­cial oper­a­tions when stealth is nec­es­sary, its manda­tory to go in with night-​​vision tech­nol­ogy. Longer-​​range infrared head­lights, which would allow dri­vers to go 45 to 60 miles per hour, will be needed for any follow-​​on vehi­cle used in such oper­a­tions, he said.
Other improve­ments Mills rec­om­mended include a spare tire, air con­di­tion­ing and elec­tronic sta­bil­ity con­trol. The lat­ter is nec­es­sary to pre­vent rollovers, another lead­ing cause of death and injury in Iraq. Soldiers want to push the Humvee faster to avoid insur­gent attacks. Such a sys­tem could pre­vent dri­vers from hav­ing acci­dents, Mills said, not­ing that the dri­ver is often the youngest and most inex­pe­ri­enced of the three-​​soldier crews…
A spare tire, stur­dier armor and the per­pet­ual demand for increased cargo space all lead to one thing: a larger, heav­ier vehi­cle, Mills said. The term light tac­ti­cal vehi­cle is becom­ing a mis­nomer, he added.
A sol­dier in the mil­i­tary will always find more things to carry inside a vehi­cle, Mills said. The next ques­tion is how much big­ger will the new truck be?

One vehi­cle not men­tioned explic­itly in the story — but get­ting a ton of props from marines in the field — is this Cougar mine-​​protected vehi­cle. This Georgia Tech pro­to­type is turn­ing heads, too.
Next week, the National Automotive Test Center will hold its annual “rodeo” for tac­ti­cal vehi­cles. It fol­lows a big con­fer­ence on the sub­ject, fea­tur­ing the major play­ers from the Army and Marines. I assume those two poten­tial Humvee replace­ments will be there, ready to ride.
UPDATE 10:10 AM: As Inside Defense notes, the Army and Marines are going to start pur­su­ing next-​​gen light tac­ti­cal vehi­cles together, after years of sep­a­rate research.

Share |

February 3rd, 2006 | Ground Vehicles | 18256 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/02/03/truck-makers-eye-next-gen-humvees/Truck+Makers+Eye+Next-Gen+Humvees2006-02-03+12%3A08%3A34murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Drone Seahorse Gets Wet | Bump: China Tops Iraq, Osama in QDR » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Terry Daly says:
    February 8, 2006 at 1:54 am

    Our military’s fail­ure for the last four years to buy South African armored vehi­cle tech­nol­ogy, which was designed for coun­terin­sur­gency and thus to pro­tect against mines, bor­ders on crim­i­nal. They keep hang­ing more stuff on the poor old HMWWV and mean­while our sol­diers and Marines keep get­ting killed and maimed while THE TECHNOLOGY IS AVAILABLE.
    Of course, the whole vehi­cle issue is in a way a phoney one; the real prob­lem is that our mil­i­tary still doesn’t under­stand coun­terin­sur­gency and the neces­sity of using clear and hold to gain con­trol of the pop­u­la­tion liv­ing along the roads.

    Reply
  2. isdale says:
    February 9, 2006 at 3:58 pm

    Looks like International has learned another les­son from the HummV … Consumers Want Em!
    They intro’d the civil­ian MXT at the chicago auto show (and nearly drove it off the stage.)
    http://​www​.auto​blog​.com/​2​0​0​6​/​0​2​/​0​9​/​c​h​i​c​a​g​o​-​a​u​t​o​-​s​h​o​w​-​i​n​t​e​r​n​a​t​i​o​n​a​l​-​n​e​a​r​l​y​-​d​r​o​p​s​-​i​t​s​-​n​e​w​-​m​xt/
    Doesnt say if we can get the IR Headlights.

    Reply
  3. GT says:
    December 12, 2006 at 8:42 am

    What I think we’re for­get­ting is that pro­cure­ment isn’t that sim­ple. We can’t just buy all the vehi­cles we need overnight…even if one man­u­fac­turer could meet our demand, we’d need mil­lions of spares, crew oper­a­tion and main­te­nance train­ing (and the asso­ci­ated equip­ment, some of which might be new), the list goes on. The neces­sity of such a move is widely rec­og­nized. The fea­si­bil­ity of chang­ing horses mid-​​stream less so.

    Reply
  4. Joseph Nichols says:
    December 13, 2006 at 11:56 pm

    Funny you should say that,
    cause the US are buy­ing thrm as fast as the south African sup­pli­ers can make’em, there pro­duc­tion is some­what slowed how­ever do to upgrades made to make them more mod­ern and leathal.
    How do I know this, cause I saw em with my own two eyes, talked to those that drove them, and even rode in one.
    Sorry no evi­dence on CNN or any other news org, they only cover the part of the war that gets the raitings

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage