DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Armor » Facial Armor Rears Its Ugly Head

Facial Armor Rears Its Ugly Head

FAST G16.jpgNo matter how many times soldiers and marines say they’re not interested, there’s always someone trying to wrap them up in heavier, hotter, more uncomfortable armor.
Reader AS points to the latest culprit: MTek Weapon Systems, which is pushing Stormtrooper-esque “facial armor” for our troops.
The mask weighs 1.3 pounds, is compatible with ballistic eyewear, and will stop a bullet from a .44 magnum. So far, there seems to be one marine corporal using the thing in Iraq. We’ll see if more emerge.

Share |

February 6th, 2006 | Armor | 1833118 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/02/06/facial-armor-rears-its-ugly-head/Facial+Armor+Rears+Its+Ugly+Head2006-02-06+14%3A43%3A09murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 02/06/06 | Army’s Blogger PR Push: Lame » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Musey says:
    February 9, 2006 at 12:57 pm

    I think that he looks like a teenage mutant ninja turtle. I guess this could be the product of millions of children wishing to grow up to be one, but who knows, does the great god of the universe really listen to those kinds of prayers?

    Reply
  2. Owen says:
    February 9, 2006 at 3:47 pm

    I think they look sweet, I can imagine they’d need the mask to be bullet proof. If someone came into my house wearing one of those I’d try and take em out.
    Its a pity they don’t come in more colours.
    Owen — Dublin — Ireland

    Reply
  3. ThE-LyNX says:
    February 11, 2006 at 7:53 pm

    A Major Pain In The Neck

    Reply
  4. Nick says:
    February 13, 2006 at 1:54 am

    Is it just me, or does it seem like a one piece helmet might work better? Instead of trying to build on an old design, why not start from scratch and build something with better peripheral clearance and better ventilation? Maybe design a full helmet similar to a motorcycle helmet that has a removable face area?
    That mask just looks clumsy.

    Reply
  5. Matt Schrank says:
    February 15, 2006 at 5:27 am

    I like the look. I especially like the fact that we look like stormtroopers. We are the imperators after all, and I don’t mean that in a bad way. The strong rule, and the weak take it.

    Reply
  6. Magic guy says:
    February 16, 2006 at 10:17 am

    I was an infantryman for a long time. Master military parachutist, honor grad from Ranger Scool, even did a tour in a Ranger battalion, not to mention some serious special ops time. Ground pounders walk a lot and carry all their gear, so they expend a lot of effort trying to lighten their loads. All this armor looks like it would do more harm than good — even with the bullets flying. I can see how it would be useful for people who ride in vehicles all day, but try a 25-mile road march with that artificial exoskeleton plus your weapons, packs, and communications gear — and I think a bunch of it would wind up in the ditches. This particular mask looks like a great way to heat up the already-sizzling desert air — as well as impede your communications with your fellow soldiers.

    Reply
  7. not important says:
    June 6, 2006 at 4:02 am

    i dont pretend to be an expert on the subject or even have any direct experience with body armor but it seems to me that we are relearning the same lessons the armor makers learned in the middle ages. the face guard seems the wrong way to go. is it possible to have cat III coller the comes up from the vest to cover the cheek, leaving only the eyes and the side of the face need to sight a weapon? has anyone seen anything like this?

    Reply
  8. B310 says:
    August 1, 2006 at 8:58 pm

    Door kicker? Sure…
    I can see this being yet another way to get heat stroke, and yet another piece of gear that worthless brass and SNCOs will make the troops wear because of liability issues. They won’t want to be held accountable to some idiot officer who’ll come down on them, and s*** will roll downhill to the Pvt. Schmuckatellis who have to wear this nonsensical crap.
    Having cooked in the sandbox twice, and having tried to ditch all useless crap that useless lifers made us wear — I think the owner of this company and the developers should be forced to put this crap on and made to doubletime in a sauna, while wearing all the other gear that doesn’t work together. Goggles and Wiley-Xes that don’t fit with the helmet straps, throat protectors that stab you in the trachea, collars so tight you can feel blood in your neck stopping up, SAPI plates that make it so you can’t even lean forward, long-sleeved shirts always to protect from sunburn — even at night and if you’re black — can’t change the rules! Add all this crap with temperatures that reach 120–130 on a regular basis, and operations that last for days and days and days — the sweat the grime the sores from being wet and chafing on gear you can’t drop, every breath of air being another choking oven blast — yeah — sure.
    Did I mention the SALLE packs that have great hiking belts that fit so well, until you strap them on over a flak jacket? Or the LBV/FLC you wear underneath that, with canteens that sit where the SALLE belt maladjusts? Or the tan suede boots — great for lazy office pogues who don’t want to polish their boots, but are instantly ruined and rendered “unserviceable” by oil and dark mud, because they’re too dirty to be worn — so you have to go spend $95 for new ones?
    This whole thing is just the stupidity of those in the office telling those in the field what to do.

    Reply
  9. w says:
    October 12, 2006 at 9:42 am

    How the hell are you supposed to fire an M4 w/ this thing?

    Reply
  10. brainplay says:
    November 14, 2006 at 1:23 am

    Take a look in their gallery. The faceguard is uniform in thickness all the way around. When the .44 magnum hits it puts a big dent in a secondary layer which sticks through in the video. Thats not beefed up armor.
    The facemask like the shoulder guards are great if you’re a gunner but I wouldn’t try it for dismounted troops. Gunners and weapon mounted vehicles make for bullet magnets when the shooting starts so anyone in the turret could use as much protection as possible. Ground pounders and door kickers wouldn’t benefit by this that much. Periphriel vision would be severly hurt and hearing would be cut down more than it already is which is crucial for ground ops.

    Reply
  11. Cpl Petross says:
    December 12, 2006 at 5:25 pm

    omg this thing looks cool but come one man some one is going to be pissed walking up to a iraqin and saying luke i am your father come on i apreciate the extra amor but not the extra weight

    Reply
  12. Z says:
    March 7, 2007 at 4:50 pm

    If the mask looks too intimidating — perhaps a bright “smiley” face painted on it would soothe them Iraqi terrorist bastardz.

    Reply
  13. Just a Soldier says:
    April 24, 2007 at 11:31 am

    The interesting thing is that all these brainiacs making this stuff, arnt looking at the well rounded picture.
    Weight, sure its heavy but if it provided more than just a pain in the neck would it be worth it.
    Heat, Prehaps a simple device integrated into the armor to keep the soldiers head and face “temrature control” nothing major but like a small water cooler type aparatus.
    Comunication, Giving comands to a unit or to possible prisoners must sound muffled with that hunk of plastic on, but its big enough to place a small mike and speaker set that you may even be able to plug into a patrol radio.
    Enviroment, Can you say gas mask.
    Look I’m not saying that I agree with the armor that they show but if your going to make a face covering for protection what good is it when you have to take it off to talk, drink, or use your NBC gear.
    On a side note: the Storm trooper thing might not be to far from a good idea. Sound/sight enhancement; enviromental stability; head protection protection; comunications; and more. Not sure bout the look of them but it was still a better idea than that peice of plastic

    Reply
  14. Alex C says:
    June 14, 2007 at 12:42 pm

    I actually contacted the inventor of that ballistic mask. It has a very specific design goal. He wanted to give fragmentation protection to vehicular gunners who have mostly there head exposed.
    Whats important here is options. A person should have the option for better facial protection if the job requires it.
    A mechanic has hundreds of tools but can only use one at a time, the best one for the task at hand.

    Reply
  15. a gunner says:
    June 19, 2007 at 2:54 pm

    well its designed for a gunner most gunners get frag to the face and neck. they also have a mount system to quickly disconect the shield if need be.

    Reply
  16. TK-421 says:
    July 18, 2007 at 11:32 pm

    There’s one! Set for stun!

    Reply
  17. Jesica says:
    September 6, 2007 at 6:51 pm

    Maybe I’m a little bit bias here, but I know the guy. He’s a marine. He has done his tour in Iraq. He’s not some government official that doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He’s been there. As a matter of fact, he’s spent the last two years trying to get enough money around just to make these masks for soldiers overseas. Look around, it’s the only decent facial protection out there. Everything else is far heavier. He

    Reply
  18. Chernobyl says:
    January 6, 2008 at 12:35 am

    So sad our Army has to resort to this.
    In the past, the Army went in, whooped ass, blew up everything and now they’re just glorified police.

    Reply
  19. Hellgate London Palladium says:
    August 2, 2008 at 1:55 am

    Look at everything everyone has a different attitude, I treat this game has its own state of mind.
    Other players to me how, I will to them how. They send me Hellgate London Palladium, I will send them too. Also played for a long time was not just playing games to one point as a trivial matter to angry. What I will take the short view, too many games like the reality of right and wrong as the real and practical. You can be too concerned about the injury and will be bogged down in these, only see weak, you can keep playing their first game mentality, the game itself is in order to play.

    Reply
  20. sro gold says:
    August 9, 2008 at 2:36 am

    The following is about European equipment. Some people like playing Silkroad or Silkroad money novices can all come here to reference my article.

    Reply
  21. cheap snw vis says:
    August 9, 2008 at 2:37 am

    Sword of the New World gives players more options, variety, entertainment and challenges than any other MMORPG can by virtue of its unique cheap snw vis design features. With multi-character control (MCC), players are able to command up to three characters simultaneously.

    Reply
  22. 2moons gold says:
    August 19, 2008 at 11:21 pm

    I like chatted with the people, and he has quietly the upgrade or earn the 2moons gold, the only other people said to him he will answered, his such this action let me attention him, and add he become friend, from the on, we often together to upgrade and chat.

    Reply
  23. cabal alz says:
    August 19, 2008 at 11:36 pm

    I think you already forget the days we together to buy the cabal alz, you told me that I do not understand you, Perhaps, I love you the wrong way, so I will lose you. I can not sorrow, sadness also can not let you stop leave my footsteps.

    Reply
  24. dofus kamas says:
    August 19, 2008 at 11:39 pm

    We all know that in the game the dofus kamas is very important, but we all did not had enough money to bought

    Reply
  25. eve isk says:
    August 20, 2008 at 12:12 am

    At the first, in the Europe server played this game, because my English level was not very well only can understand some, so I only can rely on the two hours of the Chinese language tutorial, I understand some, but the English was still poor and did not have money to pay the eve isk, so I was very look forward the EVE appear in the China.

    Reply
  26. Jesica says:
    September 16, 2008 at 7:54 pm

    MTek Weapons systems. Marine, not Army. I respect both, but there is a big difference.

    Reply
  27. gerrit says:
    January 20, 2009 at 7:34 am

    The concept is good, as for the design, I personally think that it will demorilise enemy soldiers very well.
    If I have to go into war and I have a bunch of .20 — .44 cal rifles aiming at my head i’d rather wear one of those.

    Reply
  28. asder says:
    March 10, 2009 at 4:43 am

    buy 2moons dil
    flyff penya
    buy flyff penya
    fly for fun penya

    Reply
  29. Anonymous says:
    July 2, 2009 at 1:23 am
    Reply
  30. ????? says:
    July 2, 2009 at 1:23 am

    ?????????

    Reply
  31. beo4 says:
    September 18, 2009 at 9:50 pm

    ????????
    ???????
    ???????
    ???????
    ???????
    ???????
    ???????
    ???????
    ????????
    ???????
    ???????
    ???????
    ???????
    ????????
    ???????
    ???????
    ???????
    ????????
    ???????

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I think the approach would be a two-fold benefit for...
      ed!
    • Was the Gates Counter-USAF Sortie Fair?
      criticism of f-22 : http://www.google.com/searc...
      google
    • Was the Gates Counter-USAF Sortie Fair?
      f-22 articles with comments and replies :...
      freepublic
    • Was the Gates Counter-USAF Sortie Fair?
      criticism of f-22 :...
      criticism of f-22
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      "The US retired the ideal littoral combat...
      Matthew S.
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Lockheed did put out the Surface Combat...
      Camp
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      That's an awesome deal! Did not realize that Lockheed...
      Sarcasmotron
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      So let's get off out fat butts...
      Ranger-12
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      Does petraeus think he is...
      landouzy
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      The General Dynamics LCS was...
      Dark_Sentry
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage