Comments on: Air Force Aims for Weather Control

By: tonja

tonja — Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:06:10 +0000

How totally stupid and oh, so American to ignore the Truth, and make jokes. Normally when the Truth is what you don’t want to hear, so you pretend it is not real.….….….….….…..WAKE UP PEOPLE.…YOU TO IRELAND. IT’S SO VERY REAL. THE ILLUMINATI IS ALREADY IN CONTROL. THEY ARE PUTTING THINGS IN PLACE FOR THE TOTAL WORLD DOMINATION. It’s all so very real. Don’t turn away people, join and spread the knowledge.

By: jonny

jonny — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:05:36 +0000

i totally agree with you

By: tmitchell

tmitchell — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:53:35 +0000

This technology was used in Africa by the Russians in 1977, as per Scientific American Magazine article at that time!!! It can probably be verified via the Freedom of Information access netwoks.

By: WakeUpCall

WakeUpCall — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:42:41 +0000

Guys this is another part of the new world order plan, John is right and we are all deeply submersed in a falsely imposed reality.
Take the freakin RED pill before it is too late.
Search google and you tube learn what the masons and illuminati have been manipulating for centuries. How they have controlled our laws, education and more importantly 2/3 of the worlds money. We are all living the existance they choose right now and their greatest strength is our ignorance.
I am neither religious or insane so just spend a few evenings learning. Oh and u gotta google the rothschild family history..i mean this guy “a Jew” pretty much masterminded anti-semticsm as we know it.
Peace out

By: Prabath

Prabath — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:00:31 +0000

How about trying to decrease the global warmth and try to live longer in mother planet?

By: unowen

unowen — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:27:21 +0000

it will be ausome to use

By: OMEGA 19

OMEGA 19 — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 04:26:49 +0000

THE IDEA SOUNDS NERVE RECKING BUT HOW ABOUT BEING ABLE TO CONTROL WATER AS IF IT WAS ALIVE WELL THAT IS ALSO ANOTHER WEAPON IN PROCESS AS WE SPEAK THAT WORKS WITH SOME SORT OF PLASMA.THE ABILITY OF BEING ABLE TO FLOOD A COUNRTY IN MINUTES EMAIL ME AT PRESTOL21@YAHOO.COM WITH NEW FUTURE WEAPON IDEAS

By: nope

nope — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:33:13 +0000

lie! the u. s. government is creating hurricans.
GOD’s judgement is comming soon. so enjoy your fun man because your ruling the earth is cooming to an end soon.

By: phantom63

phantom63 — Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:55:08 +0000

A few comments down, ‘okie boy’ posted a few points, and I will try to add to them.
The HAARP project (High Altitude Atmospheric Research) uses technology invented by Nikola Tesla. Basically, it is the opposite of a radio telescope: it SENDS radio waves to heat the ionosphere. At a higher frequency, these same waves can be bounced off the ionosphere as an Over-Horizon radar antenna. Raise the frequency a lot more and it is an over-horizon radio tower. The radio useage is already done with normal towers at night, known as “sporadic E-skip”…why you can pick up stations 500 miles away.
Also, UN signed a treaty banning nations from using weather as a weapon. If such a device was not already built, why would we need rules to regulate it? This technology has been around for many years. A small derivative is being brought out of secrecy here, just as the Air Force had the F-117 for quite a few years, in secret.
In a book called “Stealth Warplanes” by Doug Richardson, he tells us about a Russian aviation company with a “plasma emitter” that can act as a stealth device. Doesn’t that sound like the article we read? This is known as a Tesla shielding device…used to deflect radar waves, solid objects (our article here), and move around storms.

By: Talion

Talion — Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:17:12 +0000

Wikipedia, (notorious for having the largest collection of laughably erroneous data on the Internet), notwithstanding, perhaps you would do better to peruse some actual scientifically-oriented sites.
As an example, from the “National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration” site noaa.gov:
“Several investigations have shown positive correlations of solar influences on climate change. The hydrological system is a major player in the weather system because 70% of the Earth’s surface is covered by water. Dr. George Reid, senior NOAA scientist, examined the sea surface temperature record for the last 130 years and found an interesting correlation with the 11 year running mean sunspot number (Reid, 1987, 1991). Though not identical, the two time series have several features in common, including a prominent minimum during the early 1900s, a steep rise to maximum in the 1950s, a drop in the 1960s and early 1970s, and then a rise that continues to date. Sea surface temperature data are from the British Meteorological Office, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research. An updated improved version of these data will be provided soon and will reside in our ftp anonymous account under the GLOBAL_CHANGE subdirectory.
Drs. Eigil Friis-Christensen and K. Lassen, Danish Meteorological Institute, studied the length of the solar cycle as an indicator of solar activity closely associated with climate change (Friis-Christensen et al., 1991). They used the Northern Hemisphere land air temperature during the past 130 years and found a good correlation with the length of the solar cycle. While the temperature data do show the enhanced greenhouse effect due to increased CO2 in the atmosphere, it also shows a departure from this trend from 1940 to 1970. This occurs simultaneously with a decrease in solar activity as seen in the solar cycle length database.“
From the “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” site pnas.org:
“Although the processes of climate change are not completely understood, an important causal candidate is variation in total solar output. Reported cycles in various climate-proxy data show a tendency to emulate a fundamental harmonic sequence of a basic solar-cycle length (11 years) multiplied by 2^N (where N equals a positive or negative integer). A simple additive model for total solar-output variations was developed by superimposing a progression of fundamental harmonic cycles with slightly increasing amplitudes. The timeline of the model was calibrated to the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary at 9,000 years before present. The calibrated model was compared with geophysical, archaeological, and historical evidence of warm or cold climates during the Holocene. The evidence of periods of several centuries of cooler climates worldwide called “little ice ages,” similar to the period anno Domini (A.D.) 1280–1860 and reoccurring approximately every 1,300 years, corresponds well with fluctuations in modeled solar output. A more detailed examination of the climate sensitive history of the last 1,000 years further supports the model. Extrapolation of the model into the future suggests a gradual cooling during the next few centuries with intermittent minor warmups and a return to near little-ice-age conditions within the next 500 years. This cool period then may be followed approximately 1,500 years from now by a return to altithermal conditions similar to the previous Holocene Maximum.“
There are many, many, oh so many others.
Frankly–sadly–“human caused global warming” being politically correct, it is easy for any hack to get funding on this issue, (and they do–in droves). Unfortunately, it is also very easy to get snubbed and shouted down if you try to point out any other means of weather variation. It’s psychologically much easier to find deficiencies your own kind than the in sun.
And anyone would be frightfully naive to hand over this “debate”–or should I say, the welfare of mankind–to politicians. Or to Luke and Clem over in the holler. This issue is one purely of science. How tragic if it became one of “Okay, I’ll get my fellow senators to fund your billion-dollar quantum-climatological-discombobulator, but only if it gets built in my district–I don’t give doodly-squat about science.”