DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Rapid Fire » Rapid Fire 02/15/06

Rapid Fire 02/15/06

* Skiers get body armor
* Killer drone, tres chic
* 325,000 watch list names
* Whistleblower: NSA scandal only the start
* Awful new Abu Ghraib pics emerge
* Next “grand challenge”: California traffic
* Dems spooked by wiretaps
* Iraq bases here to stay
* We’re all spies
* Airstrikes on Baghdad

(Big ups: RN, JQP, Sploid, Giz, Umansky)

Share |

February 15th, 2006 | Rapid Fire | 18577 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/rapid-fire-021506/Rapid+Fire+02%2F15%2F062006-02-15+19%3A10%3A04murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Shocking Shotgun: Stuns Quail, Too? | Laser Jet Demoted » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Joe Katzman says:
    February 15, 2006 at 2:44 pm

    Thanks Noah, but gotta be careful about that “continue reading” link vs. the permalink. The nEUROn UCAV project permalink is just:
    http://​www​.defenseindustrydaily​.com/​2​0​0​6​/​0​2​/​n​e​u​r​o​n​-​u​c​a​v​-​p​r​o​j​e​c​t​-​r​o​l​l​i​n​g​-​d​o​w​n​-​t​h​e​-​r​u​n​w​a​y​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​php

    Reply
  2. Noah Shachtman says:
    February 15, 2006 at 2:58 pm

    Fixed.

    Reply
  3. NotAlawyer says:
    February 15, 2006 at 7:14 pm

    “Tice said he believes it violates the Constitution’s protection against unlawful search and seizures but has no way of sharing the information without breaking classification laws. He is not even allowed to tell the congressional intelligence committees — members or their staff — because they lack high enough clearance.“
    Tice’s concern is correct concerning staff members, but members of congress, the POTUS and VPOTS and the Supremes do not have clearances as a consequence of their office. They have access to classified information as a consequence of their office, subject to some vaguely stated and untested “need to know.” Presumably members of the intelligence oversight committees have a need to know about intelligence activities.
    So Mr. Tice would be perfectly within the law if he were to ask for a members-only hearing and Tell All. Or go to any subset of the committees’ members and Tell All.
    Of course, he’d never get a clearance again and be blacklisted from intelligence jobs.

    Reply
  4. Daskro says:
    February 16, 2006 at 2:59 am

    I’m just curious, is it pretty typical for defensetech​.org to post links to progressive blogs such as nationinstitute​.org?

    Reply
  5. TrustButVerify says:
    February 16, 2006 at 9:58 am

    The article about a long-term presence in Iraq shouldn’t come as a surprise after all this time. Two condition probably need to be met for a major U.S. withdrawl: A strong and self-sufficient Iraqi military in trustworthy hands able to defend against major external threats (read: Iran), and major idealogical changes in the Middle East as a whole away from the current brand of homocidal mania we’re accustomed to today. I can tell you which one I won’t be holding my breath for, too.
    Unfortunately this is also subject to continued support from the White House and Congress. The next eight to twelve years may just give us a President with a cut-and-run philosophy.

    Reply
  6. Joe says:
    February 16, 2006 at 5:06 pm

    “I’m just curious, is it pretty typical for defensetech​.org to post links to progressive blogs such as nationinstitute​.org?“
    It’s pretty clear defensetech​.org is a closet lefty platform. Why not say new Abu Ghraib pics, instead of “awful”? Those pics are pretty damned tame compared to what ‘ole Saddam did to folks. Big whoop.

    Reply
  7. daskro says:
    February 17, 2006 at 10:01 am

    “It’s pretty clear defensetech​.org is a closet lefty platform. Why not say new Abu Ghraib pics, instead of “awful”? Those pics are pretty damned tame compared to what ‘ole Saddam did to folks. Big whoop.“
    That’s sad then it has to through punditry into the mix.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Every person posting here has made good points,...
      eyes_up
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Re: LAAR–just expand the UAV programs
      bjackson
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      As an European living in Germany I would have love to see...
      fightingirish
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Even if you reduced the buy to zero you’d still be...
      Blight
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gees the price is on the roof already. Maybe we just...
      roland
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was the driver for BoB Gaygos, B Co 6/31st Commander....
      Ricky houltzhouser
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      Luis, I was Captain Gaydos, driver Sgt. Houltzhouser in...
      Ricky Houltzhouser
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      whats a good way to physically cover my laptop webcam?...
      Curious
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage