DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Less-lethal » Shocking Shotgun: Stuns Quail, Too?

Shocking Shotgun: Stuns Quail, Too?

Don’t tell Dick Cheney; it’ll only make him angrier. But Taser International has just wrapped up tests on a less-​​lethal shot­gun. Even if you nail some­one in the face with this thing, the chances of putting him or her is the ICU are pretty low.
cheney_hunt.jpgToday’s standard-​​issue stun guns work fairly well. But because the Taser uses a pair of teth­ered darts to deliver its elec­tric shock, range is lim­ited to 7 meters or less. Only one per­son can be tar­geted at a time.
This new “Extended Range Electro-​​Muscular Projectile” works out to 30 meters, accord­ing to News​.com. And unlike Cheney’s bird­shot, this ammo fits into a diesel 12-​​gauge, not a wimpy 28. But testers said it could be “pow­er­ful enough for crowd con­trol.“
It’s one of a bunch of long-​​range stun guns that that researchers in America and in Europe are inves­ti­gat­ing, Defense Update observes.

A dif­fer­ent con­cept is the Sticky Shocker, devel­oped by Titan, with DARPA’s sup­port… Sticky Shocker clings to a human tar­get inflict­ing an elec­tri­cal stun. Effective at up to 10 meters, the pro­jec­tile con­tains a bat­tery which excites sev­eral short high volt­age pulses (50KV) per sec­ond… Different method of wire­less stun weapon appli­ca­tion is “laser induced plasma” weapon [kinda like this one], which uses arti­fi­cial light­ning effects to stun and inca­pac­i­tate a tar­get. Initial appli­ca­tions of such tech­nol­ogy include the StunStrike, which [is] cur­rently matur­ing into [an] oper­a­tional system.

A German arms-​​maker is work­ing on a “plasma taser” that squirts out an aerosol spray at the tar­get, cre­at­ing a con­duc­tive chan­nel for a shock cur­rent, David Hambling noted in New Scientist. Meanwhile, Texas-​​based Lynntech, Inc. is using a grant from HSARPA (DARPA’s home­land secu­rity clone) to build a shock grenade. (Here’s Hambling’s take.) And Taser International is toy­ing around with a less-​​lethal land­mine, based on its orig­i­nal stun gun.
There’s no word, yet, on what the weapon does to quail.
(Big ups: RC)
UPDATE 2:04 PM: “Eagle Eye Body Armor sent us a release today not­ing that “Hunting acci­dents can be pre­vented car­ry­ing spe­cial hunt­ing body armor,’” Defense Industry Daily noes. “‘The Eagle Eye hunter’s jacket that allows free move­ment with light weight is spe­cially designed for the pro­tec­tion of indi­vid­u­als dur­ing the hunt.’”

Share |

February 15th, 2006 | Less-lethal | 185611 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/shocking-shotgun-stuns-quail-too/Shocking+Shotgun%3A+Stuns+Quail%2C+Too%3F2006-02-15+13%3A46%3A24murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 02/​14/​06 | Rapid Fire 02/​15/​06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. JSAllison says:
    February 15, 2006 at 9:21 am

    Hang on.…brainstorm in progress…developing…recalling past tales of why you don’t take a leak on an elec­tric fence…New from Ronco, ElectroSquirt! SuperSoaker on bat­ter­ies, BIG batteries

    Reply
  2. reefdiver says:
    February 15, 2006 at 10:07 am

    Then you load 20 of the 12gauge shot­gun Taser rounds into the AA-​​12 auto­matic shot­gun and go after elephants…

    Reply
  3. Charles says:
    February 15, 2006 at 10:08 am

    Might want to add some salt to that water..more con­duc­tive that way.
    Wireless tasers will kick ass.

    Reply
  4. David Hambling says:
    February 15, 2006 at 12:07 pm

    Yes, ‘liq­uid tasers’ are already in the pipeline, so to speak -
    http://​elec​tron​ics​.how​stuff​works​.com/​s​t​u​n​-​g​u​n​6​.​htm
    In fact there are a lot of peo­ple chas­ing this par­tic­u­lar Holy Grail one way and another.

    Reply
  5. Charlie says:
    February 15, 2006 at 7:04 pm

    Phazers on stun, Mr. Scotty„ Kirk out.

    Reply
  6. Byron Skinner says:
    February 16, 2006 at 2:59 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    After yes­ter­days inter­view of VP Cheney on FOX we now have some solid infor­ma­tion on the event of this past week­end.
    1. Dick Cheney was drunk, again. (Thank you Sinclair Lewis)
    1a. The Vice President’s inter­view was a clas­sic AA con­tri­tion accept the blame (Step.1) that can be heard at any AA meet­ing.
    2. His Secret Service detail let the Vice President have a loaded shot­gun while drunk. Clearly the Secret Service was not doing their job and a full Congressional inves­ti­ga­tion should be held and peo­ple fired.
    3. A drunk Vice President shot a man, per­haps also drunk. This behav­ior is a “Felony”, why did the Secret Service, a law enforce­ment agency, per­mit Dick Cheney to leave the scene of the “crime” before the local author­ity arrived?
    4. The ini­ci­dent was not reported to local law enforec­ment or the media for at least 14 hours. Time for Dick Cheney to sober up, maybe?
    Those are the facts folks. Now some ques­tions that the White House con­troled “Liberal Media” should be ask­ing.
    1. Why was the Vice President allowed by his secret ser­vice detail to have a loaded weapon while drunk. Is it not their job to pro­tect the Vice President? Even from him­self?
    2. How much of a roll has alco­hol played in the deci­sions that the Vice President been involved it? Was he drunk when he stronly advised the pres­i­dent to go to war in Iraq?
    3. When the Vice President was moved to an undis­closed, secure loca­tion on 9/​11 was he sober? Had the Vice President been drink­ing dur­ing other times when he was relo­cated to an unde­sclosed secure loca­tion?
    The actions of Vice President Dick Cheney this past week­end has made every­thing he has done as Vice President highly sus­pecy.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  7. Jack says:
    February 16, 2006 at 4:50 pm

    Chaney drunk at the time of the shoot­ing? Getting your info from Village Voice these days, Byron? I have yet to see a cred­i­ble report from any source sug­gest­ing that he had more than one beer and that was appar­ently sev­eral hours ear­lier. In fact, the vic­tim him­self denied that any­body had been drink­ing. Furthermore, the sheriff’s Office report makes it clear that while Chaney was not inter­viewed until the fol­low­ing day, the inci­dent was reported almost imme­di­ately. Drinking while shoot­ing obvi­ously isn’t a good idea, but a sin­gle beer wouldn’t intox­i­cate an 8th grade girl and it cer­tainly didn’t con­sti­tute a crime in Chaney’s case. Give us a break.

    Reply
  8. sam says:
    March 1, 2006 at 3:57 am

    taz­ers are cur­rently being tested, espe­cially for crowd con­trol. Certain ones shoot small wires with hooks at the end which attach to a per­son, and deliver a 5-​​second shock to them. Tazers: weapons of the future

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No, I am not a muslim. And no, the Koran does not say anything about...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You aren't. You're just annoying. Like a paper cut between...
      bdwilcox
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      Zandor, Don't you have to go play in traffic or play...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Welcome to paralysis induced by political correctness.
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It's too bad a brave soul like you wasn't in that room....
      bdwilcox
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage