<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Shocking Shotgun: Stuns Quail, Too?</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/shocking-shotgun-stuns-quail-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/shocking-shotgun-stuns-quail-too/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: sam</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/shocking-shotgun-stuns-quail-too/comment-page-1/#comment-122674</link> <dc:creator>sam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 08:57:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1856#comment-122674</guid> <description>tazers are currently being tested, especially for crowd control.  Certain ones shoot small wires with hooks at the end which attach to a person, and deliver a 5-second shock to them.  Tazers: weapons of the future </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tazers are currently being tested, especially for crowd control.  Certain ones shoot small wires with hooks at the end which attach to a person, and deliver a 5-second shock to them.  Tazers: weapons of the future</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/shocking-shotgun-stuns-quail-too/comment-page-1/#comment-122673</link> <dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:50:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1856#comment-122673</guid> <description>Chaney drunk at the time of the shooting? Getting your info from Village Voice these days, Byron? I have yet to see a credible report from any source suggesting that he had more than one beer and that was apparently several hours earlier. In fact, the victim himself denied that anybody had been drinking. Furthermore, the sheriff&#039;s Office report makes it clear that while Chaney was not interviewed until the following day, the incident was reported almost immediately. Drinking while shooting obviously isn&#039;t a good idea, but a single beer wouldn&#039;t intoxicate an 8th grade girl and it certainly didn&#039;t constitute a crime in Chaney&#039;s case. Give us a break. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chaney drunk at the time of the shooting? Getting your info from Village Voice these days, Byron? I have yet to see a credible report from any source suggesting that he had more than one beer and that was apparently several hours earlier. In fact, the victim himself denied that anybody had been drinking. Furthermore, the sheriff’s Office report makes it clear that while Chaney was not interviewed until the following day, the incident was reported almost immediately. Drinking while shooting obviously isn’t a good idea, but a single beer wouldn’t intoxicate an 8th grade girl and it certainly didn’t constitute a crime in Chaney’s case. Give us a break.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Byron Skinner</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/shocking-shotgun-stuns-quail-too/comment-page-1/#comment-122672</link> <dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1856#comment-122672</guid> <description>Good Morning Folks,
After yesterdays interview of VP Cheney on FOX we now have some solid information on the event of this past weekend.
1. Dick Cheney was drunk, again. (Thank you Sinclair Lewis)
1a. The Vice President&#039;s interview was a classic AA contrition accept the blame (Step.1) that can be heard at any AA meeting.
2. His Secret Service detail let the Vice President have a loaded shotgun while drunk. Clearly the Secret Service was not doing their job and a full Congressional investigation should be held and people fired.
3. A drunk Vice President shot a man, perhaps also drunk. This behavior is a &quot;Felony&quot;, why did the Secret Service, a law enforcement agency, permit Dick Cheney to leave the scene of the &quot;crime&quot; before the local authority arrived?
4. The inicident was not reported to local law enforecment or the media for at least 14 hours. Time for Dick Cheney to sober up, maybe?
Those are the facts folks. Now some questions that the White House controled &quot;Liberal Media&quot; should be asking.
1. Why was the Vice President allowed by his secret service detail to have a loaded weapon while drunk. Is it not their job to protect the Vice President? Even from himself?
2. How much of a roll has alcohol played in the decisions that the Vice President been involved it? Was he drunk when he stronly advised the president to go to war in Iraq?
3. When the Vice President was moved to an undisclosed, secure location on 9/11 was he sober?  Had the Vice President been drinking during other times when he was relocated to an undesclosed secure location?
The actions of Vice President Dick Cheney this past weekend has made everything he has done as Vice President highly suspecy.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Folks,<br
/> After yesterdays interview of VP Cheney on FOX we now have some solid information on the event of this past weekend.<br
/> 1. Dick Cheney was drunk, again. (Thank you Sinclair Lewis)<br
/> 1a. The Vice President’s interview was a classic AA contrition accept the blame (Step.1) that can be heard at any AA meeting.<br
/> 2. His Secret Service detail let the Vice President have a loaded shotgun while drunk. Clearly the Secret Service was not doing their job and a full Congressional investigation should be held and people fired.<br
/> 3. A drunk Vice President shot a man, perhaps also drunk. This behavior is a “Felony”, why did the Secret Service, a law enforcement agency, permit Dick Cheney to leave the scene of the “crime” before the local authority arrived?<br
/> 4. The inicident was not reported to local law enforecment or the media for at least 14 hours. Time for Dick Cheney to sober up, maybe?<br
/> Those are the facts folks. Now some questions that the White House controled “Liberal Media” should be asking.<br
/> 1. Why was the Vice President allowed by his secret service detail to have a loaded weapon while drunk. Is it not their job to protect the Vice President? Even from himself?<br
/> 2. How much of a roll has alcohol played in the decisions that the Vice President been involved it? Was he drunk when he stronly advised the president to go to war in Iraq?<br
/> 3. When the Vice President was moved to an undisclosed, secure location on 9/11 was he sober?  Had the Vice President been drinking during other times when he was relocated to an undesclosed secure location?<br
/> The actions of Vice President Dick Cheney this past weekend has made everything he has done as Vice President highly suspecy.<br
/> ALLONS,<br
/> Byron Skinner</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charlie</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/shocking-shotgun-stuns-quail-too/comment-page-1/#comment-122671</link> <dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:04:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1856#comment-122671</guid> <description>Phazers on stun, Mr. Scotty,, Kirk out. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phazers on stun, Mr. Scotty„ Kirk out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Hambling</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/shocking-shotgun-stuns-quail-too/comment-page-1/#comment-122670</link> <dc:creator>David Hambling</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:07:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1856#comment-122670</guid> <description>Yes, &#039;liquid tasers&#039; are already in the pipeline, so to speak -
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/stun-gun6.htm
In fact there are a lot of people chasing this particular Holy Grail one way and another. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, ‘liquid tasers’ are already in the pipeline, so to speak -<br
/> <a
href="http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/stun-gun6.htm" rel="nofollow">http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/stun-gun6.htm</a><br
/> In fact there are a lot of people chasing this particular Holy Grail one way and another.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/shocking-shotgun-stuns-quail-too/comment-page-1/#comment-15538</link> <dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:08:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1856#comment-15538</guid> <description>Might want to add some salt to that water..more conductive that way.
Wireless tasers will kick ass. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might want to add some salt to that water..more conductive that way.<br
/> Wireless tasers will kick ass.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: reefdiver</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/shocking-shotgun-stuns-quail-too/comment-page-1/#comment-15537</link> <dc:creator>reefdiver</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:07:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1856#comment-15537</guid> <description>Then you load 20 of the 12gauge shotgun Taser rounds into the AA-12 automatic shotgun and go after elephants... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then you load 20 of the 12gauge shotgun Taser rounds into the AA-12 automatic shotgun and go after elephants…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JSAllison</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/02/15/shocking-shotgun-stuns-quail-too/comment-page-1/#comment-122669</link> <dc:creator>JSAllison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:21:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1856#comment-122669</guid> <description>Hang on....brainstorm in progress...developing...recalling past tales of why you don&#039;t take a leak on an electric fence...New from Ronco, ElectroSquirt!  SuperSoaker on batteries, BIG batteries </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on.…brainstorm in progress…developing…recalling past tales of why you don’t take a leak on an electric fence…New from Ronco, ElectroSquirt!  SuperSoaker on batteries, BIG batteries</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/23 queries in 0.012 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-18 01:45:13 -->