DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ammo and Munitions » New Bomb Drills for Bunkers

New Bomb Drills for Bunkers

deep_digger_slide.JPGWeapons Grade author David Hambling has another fas­ci­nat­ing two-​​part series for Defense Tech, on weapons that drill and scrape their way through tar­gets.
Meet Deep Digger, first of a rev­o­lu­tion­ary new gen­er­a­tion of bunker-​​busting weapons, described in this weeks New Scientist. This is lit­er­ally ground-​​breaking new tech­nol­ogy which uses can­non to tun­nel through solid rock, drilling a chan­nel for the bomb.
Existing weapons for attack­ing hard tar­gets are kinetic, rely­ing on sheer momen­tum to break through rock and con­crete. To get much improve­ment you have to make them much big­ger — like the out­size 30,000 lb Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or much faster — like the pro­posed con­ven­tional ver­sion of the D5 Trident bal­lis­tic mis­sile, or denser — like the heavy BLU-​​109 with its bal­last of dense metal. But you cant get around the laws of physics. As Princeton’s Robert Nelson points out in a very thor­ough analy­sis, even if the pen­e­tra­tor is a hyper­sonic pro­jec­tile made of solid depleted ura­nium:
no Earth Penetrating Weapon can pen­e­trate rein­forced con­crete deeper than four times the length of the mis­sile.
So this approach really isnt going to get you more than a hun­dred feet through rock at best, and the prac­ti­cal limit is much less.
The super­cav­i­tat­ing bunker-​​buster I revealed last year looks neat, but the jury is still out on whether it works. A lot of peo­ple in the indus­try sim­ply dont believe that it can. The Broach is an inter­est­ing idea but lim­ited to a few metres.
Deep Digger is dif­fer­ent. It does not depend on the kinetic energy of the war­head at all in fact, it para­chutes down. Then it stars drilling. The weapon is lim­ited only by how deep the drilling process can go, which is a mat­ter of how deep it can muck (clear debris from the shaft). And although the details are clas­si­fied, that is much, much deeper than any kinetic weapon will ever go. In the tests last year, it demon­strated a tun­neled down ten meters — about 50% more than the BLU-​​113, which is the cur­rent record holder.
deep_digger_hole.JPGIt has numer­ous other advan­tages. One is a thin­ner cas­ing which means more pay­load. Another is that it does not undergo a shat­ter­ing 10,000g impact. Other pen­e­trat­ing bombs need spe­cial insen­si­tive explo­sives; Deep Digger can carry a range of war­heads, as well as sen­sors and com­mu­ni­ca­tions. It can stay in touch with the launch air­craft and report its progress; mul­ti­ple Deep Diggers could be co-​​ordinated to det­o­nate simul­ta­ne­ously pro­duc­ing a com­bined shock­wave.
Part of the secret is the rock-​​breaking pro­jec­tile, devel­oped like the can­non at ARDEC, the US Armys Armament Research Development and Engineering Center at Picatinny. David Burns, the Program Manager, describes it as being a spe­cial .75 cal­i­bre round, a mono­lithic design which is more robust and per­forms bet­ter than ear­lier pro­jec­tiles. In place of the blast­ing gel used ear­lier it now employs a solid high explo­sive called PAX-​​11, one of Picatinnys own spe­cial recipes.
Deep Digger has already moved on from the ver­sion described in this pre­sen­ta­tion. Burns is con­fi­dent that its proven abil­ity to drill con­sis­tently through rock will make Deep Digger the leader in its field.
It doesnt stop with bombs either. There are some other inter­est­ing appli­ca­tions for Deep Digger tech­nol­ogy too, which well be look­ing at in part two of this lit­tle series, start­ing with a breach­ing can­non that cuts through brick walls like a chain­saw through ply­wood.
– David Hambling

Share |

February 17th, 2006 | Ammo and Munitions | 186190 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/02/17/new-bomb-drills-for-bunkers/New+Bomb+Drills+for+Bunkers2006-02-17+05%3A15%3A52 You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 02/​16/​05 | Breaking Rocks — Lots of Rocks » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. BWJones says:
    February 17, 2006 at 1:21 am

    Sounds like great tech­nol­ogy for get­ting under the ice of Europa.

    Reply
  2. pedestrian says:
    February 17, 2006 at 10:40 am

    Somebody is read­ing too many sci­ence fic­tion. Are we going to have drilling tanks to sneak under­neath the ene­mys’ front­line next?

    Reply
  3. Charles says:
    February 17, 2006 at 11:49 pm

    Expulsion of dirt makes it eas­ier for the drill, so it won’t have to “munch” the same mate­r­ial it just drilled a sec­ond time (ie it can munch hard rock instead of the bits of the rock from a few sec­onds ago. Of course, as it gets in real deep it’s abil­ity to launch rock rem­anants all the way out of the hole is severely limited.

    Reply
  4. F.baube says:
    February 18, 2006 at 3:52 pm

    Definitely the stuff of sci-​​fi. When it breaches a bunker, will it first use sar­casm to taunt its tar­gets before it uses chem­i­cal energy to oblit­er­ate them?

    Reply
  5. Charles says:
    February 18, 2006 at 8:24 pm

    I am not averse to a thirty sec­ond bomb.

    Reply
  6. DS says:
    February 19, 2006 at 3:04 pm

    “Why is it crit­i­cal to leave a nice clean clear hole? Maybe I read the arti­cle wrong.“
    If the first war­head doesnt work, they can send a sec­ond down the cleared path of the first. Cruise mis­siles are accu­rate enough to do this. However my con­cern is that it would be way too easy to defeat this. Tanks have devel­oped armor that has a layer of explo­sive to deflect pro­jec­tiles. A sim­i­lar layer of shaped, directed charges could be built on top of a layer of rein­forced con­cre­ate (or what­ever) which would cover the area above the bunker in order to deflect or destroy this drilling war­head. Even a nuclear device wouldnt be able to pen­e­trate the bunker if it was forced to det­o­nate above ground.

    Reply
  7. katsesama says:
    February 19, 2006 at 11:36 pm

    I wouldn’t so much worry as to wether or not a
    reac­tive armour bar­rier would defeat a nuclear
    bonker buster packed in behind the drill.The
    explo­sive yield could eas­ily defeat such a counter
    measure,and pack­ing a shaped charge into the struc­ture of the bunker above ones head would be
    folly as it would only weaken the struc­ture itself
    and enhance a cave in.Seems a tad counter-​​productive
    using such a defen­sive method that would only help
    to achieve the goal of the driller/​buster in the
    first place.

    Reply
  8. DS says:
    February 20, 2006 at 5:19 pm

    That’s just the thing though, this driller/​bunker buster bomb is not planned to carry a nuclear yield…only con­ven­tional explosive…(although there are now cer­tain ‘new’ nitrate-​​based con­ven­tional explo­sives that can approach the explo­sive power of a small nuclear yield). And prop­erly placed lay­ers of SHAPED charges (which direct explo­sive impact UP), on top of lay­ers of rein­forced con­crete WOULD be able to ward off such a device, and pos­si­bly 2–3 follow-​​up attacks. Eventually, with enough blasts, yes, the bunker would be defeated. But that could be said for any struc­ture. I say the most secure way to hide a facil­ity would be to dig a huge pit, maybe 50 sto­ries deep (500 ft), seal the bot­tom of the pit with water­proof mate­ri­als, build the bunker on top of it, then put more water­proof sealer on the top, then cover it with lay­ers of rein­forced con­crete and soil, and finally fill in the remain­ing 100 feet or so of the pit with heavy salt water, like the Dead Sean so noth­ing can float to the bot­tom, and leave it as a man-​​made lake. Entrance tun­nels would lead else­where out­side of the lake.
    A bit expen­sive, and com­pli­cated, but def­i­nitely secure and hid­den.
    : )

    Reply
  9. Wendell says:
    February 21, 2006 at 10:18 am

    As with every­thing else, there is always a counter to any attack; but there is also a law of dimin­ish­ing returns for any defense.
    The best you can hope for is to know what your enemy is using, so you can design some­thing to defeat just that. This is done with full knowl­edge that every other poten­tial enemy will then plan a counter to what you have just created.

    Reply
  10. Charles says:
    February 22, 2006 at 11:58 am

    Cheapest way to defeat these drillers may be to bury anti vehi­cle land­mines on top of your bunker…either on the sur­face or a few feet below. Of course, you’d need a det­o­na­tion sys­tem sen­si­tive to a drill rather than a pres­sure fuze. Perhaps they have some­thing else for that. Hmm.

    Reply
  11. Erik says:
    March 1, 2006 at 12:06 pm

    This is a good start, but clearly the ulti­mate bunker pen­e­tra­tor is a big-​​ass robot that drills down, then wails on every­one in the bunker. Then you can cap­ture the bunker for your­self, earn­ing you more points.

    Reply
  12. Tom says:
    April 18, 2006 at 3:33 pm

    I think the rea­son why they don’t repeat­edly bomb a bunker facil­ity is bea­cause it is either expen­sive or it doesnt look good on cnn when a rich and well to do nation blasts the shit out of a back­wards third world nation.

    Reply
  13. Noah (the other one) says:
    September 15, 2006 at 8:07 pm

    These would have been great in Lebanon, where cit­i­zens and sol­diers are indistinguishable …

    Reply
  14. Joseph A. Belle-Isle says:
    November 3, 2006 at 1:16 pm

    I just saw a clip on the his­tory chan­nel where it took a Brittish engi­neer a long time to con­vince the deci­sion mak­ers that a 22,000lb stream­lined bomb would do more dam­age if it was used with his design to pen­e­trate the earth 100ft and have the blast con­tained by the weight of the earth above it, caus­ing an ear­quake like shock. Even though the bosses under­stood a bomb has more power if made out of steel instead of just loose explo­sive going under­ground escaped their under­stand­ing. This is not new just bet­ter. Drop ‘em.

    Reply
  15. Dennis W says:
    November 3, 2006 at 2:30 pm

    You don’t need bunker busters…kill the sup­port­ing facil­ties top side so the roots wither and die…

    Reply
  16. Toad says:
    November 3, 2006 at 5:00 pm

    The hole has to stay open all the way to the sur­face until and unless you want it to stop. As soon as the debris stops new cut­tings from escap­ing past the side of the vehicle/​bomb, it will just bog down and stop or destroy itself. They might actu­ally design it to “bog itself in” at the end of its decent in order to get the best effect of its explo­sive. It must kick up a pretty impres­sive gyser of dust and rock for a while.

    Reply
  17. chips says:
    November 16, 2006 at 4:35 pm

    Has any­one heard of Barnes Wallis in WWII, who cre­ated a 6-​​ton & 10-​​ton earth­quake bomb? That this went through the Nazi con­crete sub pens like a knife through but­ter, due to it’s aero­dy­namic design (it broke the sound bar­rier on the way down).
    Any mem­o­ries on this?

    Reply
  18. Sinner says:
    December 9, 2006 at 9:21 am

    Have you idiots, that read and advo­cate this Activety of Murder and Destruction con­sid­ered see­ing a pro­fes­sional Shrink to help you with your Pea Brain Sickness?

    Reply
  19. a Golden BB says:
    January 31, 2008 at 7:56 pm

    Ever drilled a deep hole?
    If the flutes get plugged the power required to drill increases expo­nen­tially, until the drill breaks.
    Also chem­i­cal explo­sives require oxy­gen, the more the bet­ter.
    If the hole is filled behind the war­head the only oxy­gen get­ting down the hole will have to travel with the weapon instead of flow­ing in behind it.

    Reply
  20. GuildWars money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 3:34 am

    Virtual net works, vir­tual role of the game, I did not as him what peo­ple. It is only a game; happy is the pur­pose of the game. I chat with him happy. I have an on line he will not be alone to upgrade and earn GuildWars money, but rather for the first time chat with me, in this way we often sit together.

    Reply
  21. rf cp says:
    August 12, 2008 at 3:41 am

    Later, in January of this year, I have entered into this long hoped for world. Following in their pre­vi­ous game, I have some expe­ri­ence, at first I bought some RF cp to arm my num­ber, so I grew up grad­u­ally. Later, I joined the empire of dark­ness, I rec­og­nize some friends. Later matured, I sep­a­rated from the dark­ness; to join a trade union has just estab­lished a new, expand­ing trade union began a jour­ney, and I rec­og­nized a lot of friends.

    Reply
  22. rappelz money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 3:45 am

    Looking back at the past, in those days, we played together; we have no much rap­pelz money, we have no need equip­ment and no senior friends too us, but I am still play­ing very happy. Rappelz left every­where in our laugh­ter. There is only one rea­son is that I have her around, I would meet, every­thing becomes unim­por­tant. One thing I feel very sorry, that is when I mar­ried her, mo gor­geous fire­works, mo friends of bless­ing. Now I have heart, I feel wronged her, I am sorry to her.

    Reply
  23. cheap zeny says:
    August 12, 2008 at 3:48 am

    I always adhere to and keep a dis­tance from every­one. Until now, I did not have a true friend, although I was a lonely, although I did not like the other play­ers that they have many friends send them cheap zeny, I must be rely on myself, at least I will not hurt any­body, and per­haps this is kind of happiness.

    Reply
  24. mark says:
    October 8, 2008 at 3:09 pm

    HAY YOU CAN RUN AND YOU CAN HIDE BUT WE WILL STILL BLOW YOUR ASS UP HA HA HA NOW RUN ALONG LITTLE BINLATIN

    Reply
  25. http://www.linksoflondons.co.uk says:
    May 20, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    Links of London
    Links of London Jewelry
    Links of London Charm
    Links of London Necklace
    Links of London Bracelets
    Links of London Earrings
    Links of London Rings
    Designer from UK
    Diamond
    Gold&Silver
    Links Jewelry
    Links Necklace
    Links Charm
    Links Earrings
    Links Rings

    Reply
  26. http://www.linksoflondons.co.uk says:
    May 20, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    Links of London
    Links of London Jewelry
    Links of London Charm
    Links of London Necklace
    Links of London Bracelets
    Links of London Earrings
    Links of London Rings
    Designer from UK
    Diamond
    Gold&Silver
    Links Jewelry
    Links Necklace
    Links Charm
    Links Earrings
    Links Rings

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I guess camouflaging exposed skin has gone out of...
      Eric daniel
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The US Military should hold annual fashion shows. The Army...
      Zandor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'd also like to point out, that soldier systems has been...
      a1189
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Has to do with traverse speed. If the target is close then the...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Totally forgot about astrogation. Star maps loaded into a...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      freefalling: -The Germans used beam-riding during WW2 and it...
      Charles
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      batvette: A lot of JSF money was spent before the meltdown....
      Charles
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
      Phantom Works is Boeing is it not? I dunno what...
      Charles
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Senator McCain says, “ Sticks and stones may break my bones...
      Alton
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      LOL
      Valcan
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage