DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Lasers and Ray Guns » Laser Planes’ Pains

Laser Planes’ Pains

Jane’s has a good overview of the ray gun world’s state of play. The bits about the prob­lems fac­ing the beam-​​firing 747, the Airborne Laser, and the blaster-​​equipped cargo plane, the Advanced Tactical Laser, are par­tic­u­larly juicy.
atl.jpgFull-​​on flight tests of the Airborne Laser, or ABL, have been pushed back to 2008. But “some aspects of the sys­tem can­not be demon­strated on the ground,” Jane’s notes. “Laser per­for­mance in real high-​​altitude con­di­tions and the per­for­mance of the entire sys­tem at high alti­tudes. As in a rocket, the chem­i­cal sys­tems in the COIL [chem­i­cal oxy­gen iodine laser, the ABL’s weapon] are affected by atmos­pheric pres­sure at the exhaust out­let, which cre­ates back pres­sure in the flow path.”

Another issue is logis­tics: hydro­gen per­ox­ide is cor­ro­sive and a pow­er­ful sol­vent of organic mate­ri­als (includ­ing peo­ple) and potas­sium hydrox­ide is a toxic mate­r­ial used as a drain cleaner and (by Norwegians) to pre­serve cod­fish. Neither is used by any other mil­i­tary sys­tem, so the chem­i­cals require new stor­age and trans­port facil­i­ties and spe­cial train­ing and han­dling pro­ce­dures…
The USAF’s other air­borne COIL project is the ATL [Advanced Tactical Laser], which has a bud­get of $200 mil­lion [and] is due for high-​​power flight tests in mid-​​2007, aboard an C-​​130H plat­form.
ATL has a much lower power goal than the ABL — in the tens of kilo­watts rather than megawatts — and is intended to dis­able rather than kill its tar­gets, demon­strat­ing the abil­ity of lasers to achieve spe­cific, ultra-​​precise effects. The design ref­er­ence mis­sions for ATL are to stop a mov­ing vehi­cle and dis­able a com­mu­ni­ca­tions node from 10,000 ft.
Stopping a vehi­cle does not nec­es­sar­ily mean destroy­ing it or killing its occu­pants. If the laser can pen­e­trate the engine cover, for exam­ple, the tem­per­a­ture within the engine com­part­ment is likely to get higher than is mechan­i­cally opti­mal. The laser could pen­e­trate the fuel tank and start a fire. In the case of a com­mu­ni­ca­tions tar­get, cables and anten­nas could be the weak spots.
Delivery of hard­ware for the ATL… started dur­ing 2005 and the C-​​130 plat­form was deliv­ered to Boeing in January this year… Unlike the ABL, the ATL does not vent harm­ful gases into the atmos­phere: the exhaust is ducted into a con­tainer of acti­vated car­bon, which absorbs and neu­tralises it.
While ATL presents less risk than ABL, it is more likely to be over­taken by other devel­op­ments: pri­mar­ily, the devel­op­ment of more pow­er­ful solid-​​state lasers. The attrac­tions of a solid-​​state laser — which uses a solid trans­mis­sive mate­r­ial as the las­ing medium — are clear, notes AFRL’s Hamil: the ‘mag­a­zine’ can be as deep as the aircraft’s fuel tanks (which can be replen­ished in flight) and there are no exotic fuels to han­dle and no chem­i­cal exhaust. The dis­ad­van­tage is that solid-​​state lasers today do not have the power to do any­thing other than illu­mi­nate. At high pow­ers, ‘ther­mal lens­ing’ — the change in opti­cal qual­i­ties with heat — becomes what Hamil calls “hor­rific”, mak­ing it dif­fi­cult to pro­duce a high-​​quality beam.

(Big ups: Eric)

Share |

February 28th, 2006 | Lasers and Ray Guns | 479019 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/02/28/laser-planes-pains/Laser+Planes%27+Pains2006-02-28+16%3A47%3A10noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Stop Training Iraqi Troops? | Rapid Fire 02/​28/​06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Big D says:
    March 1, 2006 at 12:04 am

    The faster than expected devel­op­ment of solid state lasers is prob­a­bly a big rea­son why the ABL has been nerfed to a tech­nol­ogy demon­stra­tor. The sen­sors, optics, and bat­tle man­age­ment soft­ware are all reusable, but the laser will prob­a­bly be com­pletely replaced by a solid state model within 10 years.

    Reply
  2. Matt says:
    January 15, 2007 at 10:12 am

    Megawatt Solid state lasers are well over 10 years away. The advan­tages of a IR solid state laser may be attrac­tive, but aren’t cur­rently fea­si­ble com­pared to chem­i­cal lasers at this point…there are seri­ous effi­ciency issues as well as cool­ing issues with solid state devices cur­rently in kW sized tac­ti­cal solid state lasers–it just ain’t gonna happen…unless some­one cre­ates a sig­nif­i­cant break­through in cool­ing or efficiency…

    Reply
  3. buy rupees says:
    August 2, 2008 at 1:20 am

    When I was on the uni­ver­sity, I played the Rappelz game under my class­mates intro­duced. At first, I heard Rappelz from my class­mate; I did not feel the game is fun. Until one day, I went on the line, because I had noth­ing to do, so I think I can look at the Rappelz game. When I looked the screen, I was attracted. Then I applied an account and I spent a lit­tle to buy rupees. And I began my Rappelz trip.

    Reply
  4. rappelz money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 1:24 am

    Looking back at the past, in those days, we played together; we have no much rap­pelz money, we have no need equip­ment and no senior friends too us, but I am still play­ing very happy. Rappelz left every­where in our laugh­ter. There is only one rea­son is that I have her around, I would meet, every­thing becomes unim­por­tant. One thing I feel very sorry, that is when I mar­ried her, mo gor­geous fire­works, mo friends of bless­ing. Now I have heart, I feel wronged her, I am sorry to her.

    Reply
  5. rf cp says:
    August 12, 2008 at 1:31 am

    Later, in January of this year, I have entered into this long hoped for world. Following in their pre­vi­ous game, I have some expe­ri­ence, at first I bought some RF cp to arm my num­ber, so I grew up grad­u­ally. Later, I joined the empire of dark­ness, I rec­og­nize some friends. Later matured, I sep­a­rated from the dark­ness; to join a trade union has just estab­lished a new, expand­ing trade union began a jour­ney, and I rec­og­nized a lot of friends.

    Reply
  6. GuildWars money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 1:38 am

    Virtual net works, vir­tual role of the game, I did not as him what peo­ple. It is only a game; happy is the pur­pose of the game. I chat with him happy. I have an on line he will not be alone to upgrade and earn GuildWars money, but rather for the first time chat with me, in this way we often sit together.

    Reply
  7. Lisa P says:
    November 15, 2008 at 3:03 am

    Engadget reports (via the con­sumer and retail research com­pany NPD Group) that Apple

    Reply
  8. Yo. says:
    May 16, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL
    LOL

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Dear Designer; It is somewhat strange that the German Armed forces...
      Zandor
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I've seen them to. Believe me, I hate those 19 just as much as...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You are funny.
      Zandor
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Wow after reading these varied comments, I am surprised and educated. I...
      John
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage