DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » The Search and Rescue Shuffle

The Search and Rescue Shuffle

When fighter pilots get shot down behind enemy lines, they can count on rescue crews to risk their own lives to retrieve them.
That’s the ideal. In reality, the Air Force’s Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) community has failed on a number of occasions in the last 15 years to come to downed fliers’ aid. In the Gulf War, rescue forces were too slow to prevent the Iraqi Army from grabbing several aviators. And in 1995, downed Air Force Capt. Scott O’Grady was retrieved from Bosnia by Marines, of all people.
The result is some deep animosity within the service towards the small CSAR force, which flies around 100 old HH-60G Pave Hawk helicopters and a handful of even older HC-130 Hercules tankers.
The Air Force announced last week that it was transfering responsibility for the CSAR force for the second time in three years. Historically, the rescuers have been administered by the tactical air force, which today means Air Combat Command headquartered at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia. But in 2003, smallH92.jpgthe Air Force gave CSAR to Special Operations Command in Florida, citing SOC’s expertise in flying helicopters low into enemy territory.
But SOC was never happy with the rescue mission, seeing it as a distraction from its main, non-conventional missions. And when it came time to replace the old Pave Hawks, SOC started leaning towards the large, cumbersome 1960s-era H-47 Chinook helicopter, which SOC’s Army flying battalions use for long-range missions.
So last week, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Michael Moseley announced that ACC would take CSAR back from SOC. This would return rescue to “primary mission” status, according to Moseley, and allow SOC to focus on its core missions.
Inside Defense expounds:

Moseley added that one factor that led him to approve the plan was that the move will make the commanders of ACC and [Pacific Air Force] “an advocate” for the CSAR mission during contingency planning.
Senior Air Force officials decided to make the move after examining lessons gleaned from operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, Moseley said.
…
“[Special Operations] has its own challenges and has its own priorities and often, combat rescue is not at the top of their list,” Moseley said. … “If you’re a guy who’s out hanging in a tree somewhere” after a U.S. military aircraft has been felled, Moseley said, “you’re not amused by that — you want somebody to come get you.”

As a bonus, Defense News reports, the Air Force would gain control of the $8 billion CSAR-X/Personnel Recovery Vehicle program to replace the Pave Hawks, meaning it will choose an airframe it prefers, rather than one SOC favors.
Look for the change to boost the modern, large-cabin Sikorsky H-92’s chances of winning. Its main competition now is the Westland EH.101 that won the recent Presidential Helicopter competition.
– David Axe

Share |

March 2nd, 2006 | Planes, Copters, Blimps, Strategery | 304023 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/03/02/the-search-and-rescue-shuffle/The+Search+and+Rescue+Shuffle2006-03-02+18%3A49%3A22hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 03/02/06 | Guns-B-Gone » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Anonymous says:
    March 2, 2006 at 10:56 pm

    The reason that CSAR forces were unable to retrieve the people Mr. Axe mentions is that we were woefully underfunded and equiped by ACC. If these people needed rescue today, CSAR would be first in line (and most capable) of rescueing them. There were many instances in Afghanistan and Iraq where CSAR was the most capable and successfully completed their mission. Under ACC we were struggled to get approval for unimproved airfild landing qualification, night vision aided landings, modified contour night flying and a whole host of other tactics. All of these proved effective and necessary in Afghanistan and Iraq. All of these are used by AFSOC and not understood by ACC. Mr Axe needs to get all the facts before he throw stones at the people tasked to risk their lives to save others. …That Others May Live.

    Reply
  2. Mike says:
    March 3, 2006 at 9:27 am

    The Army still doesn’t have a serious answer for CSAR. Army aviation is expected to provide ‘internal’ CSAR capability, and local unit cross training with supported ground forces. The reality is that we have been lucky with Army aviation shootdowns. The Blackhawk down scenario went WELL compared to some of the things that could happen now, with large scale ooperations by conventional (not SOF) aviation operating over Iraqi cities, often without coordination with ground forces.

    Reply
  3. Edward Liu says:
    March 3, 2006 at 10:17 am

    Anonymous: “Mr Axe needs to get all the facts before he throw stones at the people tasked to risk their lives to save others.“
    I don’t think Axe was slamming the individual operators in CSAR for their troubles over the years. Based on his prior blog entries, I believe his loyalties lie first and foremost in the individual soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines in the front lines.
    I don’t want to put words into Axe’s mouth, but looking over this article, I get the impression that the message being sent is that lack of strong support from USAF high command has often hampered the mission that you guys are tasked with. From what I’m led to believe, failures to understand and embrace the mission at senior leadership levels (both military and civilian) have plagued specialized and special-ops forces for decades.
    On a personal note, to you and all the guys at CSAR: thank you for your service, and I hope you guys stay really, really bored but not because I think you can’t do the job.

    Reply
  4. Cliff says:
    March 14, 2006 at 2:28 pm

    I’m a Hog pilot (ex-Sandy) currently at Naval War College…writing my JMO paper on putting the “Joint” into Joint CSAR…would love any pointers or leads on articles covering JCSAR in OIF and/or today.

    Reply
  5. cheap zeny says:
    August 2, 2008 at 12:48 am

    But, slowly, we are all the reasons more and more distant from the RO, RO to leave the distance we have much more. I am a lot busier than before, not like before, often on the line. Although sometimes he also give me a little cheap zeny, but I l know that there are misunderstandings between us, and increasingly deep.

    Reply
  6. Requiem money says:
    August 8, 2008 at 10:28 pm

    Angels as we know them soft, cherubic heralds of Valentine’s Day do not exist in Requiem money: Avenging Angel.

    Reply
  7. cheap 2moons dil says:
    August 16, 2008 at 1:10 am

    I often search which place see the cheap 2moons dil, it also spend me much time.

    Reply
  8. buy dofus kamas says:
    August 16, 2008 at 1:32 am

    I spend many money to buy dofus kamas for her.

    Reply
  9. FFXI gold says:
    September 2, 2008 at 4:04 am

    Now my classmate and my game friend, we often together to play, together to earn the FFXI gold or search the cheap Final Fantasy XI Gold, we all likes this feeling. thank for this game, let us such happy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      The PT boats were specifically designed for littoral...
      PolicyWonk
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Blah, Blah, Blah They've been talking about this...
      Tim
    • Life Can Go On — JLTV Protest Denied
      are any of yall even in the army or marines...
      ARMY SPC
    • Russia’s Sneaky Missile: Details Here
      russia hydrofoil-carrier :...
      hydrofoil
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      No problem if US with Obama...
      landouzy
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Unfortunately its only a Tucano trainer :-( Our CGS...
      wstr
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      alabama a&p's need that contract, keep fightin'
      buck
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Have'nt we built thousands of this in WWI and...
      roland
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      I'm enlisting in the Navy in July. We need more...
      Curtis
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The PA 48 Enforcer modernized version of the...
      GI Joe
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage