When fighter pilots get shot down behind enemy lines, they can count on rescue crews to risk their own lives to retrieve them.
That’s the ideal. In reality, the Air Force’s Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) community has failed on a number of occasions in the last 15 years to come to downed fliers’ aid. In the Gulf War, rescue forces were too slow to prevent the Iraqi Army from grabbing several aviators. And in 1995, downed Air Force Capt. Scott O’Grady was retrieved from Bosnia by Marines, of all people.
The result is some deep animosity within the service towards the small CSAR force, which flies around 100 old HH-60G Pave Hawk helicopters and a handful of even older HC-130 Hercules tankers.
The Air Force announced last week that it was transfering responsibility for the CSAR force for the second time in three years. Historically, the rescuers have been administered by the tactical air force, which today means Air Combat Command headquartered at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia. But in 2003,
the Air Force gave CSAR to Special Operations Command in Florida, citing SOC’s expertise in flying helicopters low into enemy territory.
But SOC was never happy with the rescue mission, seeing it as a distraction from its main, non-conventional missions. And when it came time to replace the old Pave Hawks, SOC started leaning towards the large, cumbersome 1960s-era H-47 Chinook helicopter, which SOC’s Army flying battalions use for long-range missions.
So last week, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Michael Moseley announced that ACC would take CSAR back from SOC. This would return rescue to “primary mission” status, according to Moseley, and allow SOC to focus on its core missions.
Inside Defense expounds:
Moseley added that one factor that led him to approve the plan was that the move will make the commanders of ACC and [Pacific Air Force] “an advocate” for the CSAR mission during contingency planning.
Senior Air Force officials decided to make the move after examining lessons gleaned from operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, Moseley said.
…
“[Special Operations] has its own challenges and has its own priorities and often, combat rescue is not at the top of their list,” Moseley said. … “If you’re a guy who’s out hanging in a tree somewhere” after a U.S. military aircraft has been felled, Moseley said, “you’re not amused by that — you want somebody to come get you.”
As a bonus, Defense News reports, the Air Force would gain control of the $8 billion CSAR-X/Personnel Recovery Vehicle program to replace the Pave Hawks, meaning it will choose an airframe it prefers, rather than one SOC favors.
Look for the change to boost the modern, large-cabin Sikorsky H-92’s chances of winning. Its main competition now is the Westland EH.101 that won the recent Presidential Helicopter competition.
– David Axe










{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }
The reason that CSAR forces were unable to retrieve the people Mr. Axe mentions is that we were woefully underfunded and equiped by ACC. If these people needed rescue today, CSAR would be first in line (and most capable) of rescueing them. There were many instances in Afghanistan and Iraq where CSAR was the most capable and successfully completed their mission. Under ACC we were struggled to get approval for unimproved airfild landing qualification, night vision aided landings, modified contour night flying and a whole host of other tactics. All of these proved effective and necessary in Afghanistan and Iraq. All of these are used by AFSOC and not understood by ACC. Mr Axe needs to get all the facts before he throw stones at the people tasked to risk their lives to save others. …That Others May Live.
The Army still doesn’t have a serious answer for CSAR. Army aviation is expected to provide ‘internal’ CSAR capability, and local unit cross training with supported ground forces. The reality is that we have been lucky with Army aviation shootdowns. The Blackhawk down scenario went WELL compared to some of the things that could happen now, with large scale ooperations by conventional (not SOF) aviation operating over Iraqi cities, often without coordination with ground forces.
Anonymous: “Mr Axe needs to get all the facts before he throw stones at the people tasked to risk their lives to save others.”
I don’t think Axe was slamming the individual operators in CSAR for their troubles over the years. Based on his prior blog entries, I believe his loyalties lie first and foremost in the individual soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines in the front lines.
I don’t want to put words into Axe’s mouth, but looking over this article, I get the impression that the message being sent is that lack of strong support from USAF high command has often hampered the mission that you guys are tasked with. From what I’m led to believe, failures to understand and embrace the mission at senior leadership levels (both military and civilian) have plagued specialized and special-ops forces for decades.
On a personal note, to you and all the guys at CSAR: thank you for your service, and I hope you guys stay really, really bored but not because I think you can’t do the job.
I’m a Hog pilot (ex-Sandy) currently at Naval War College…writing my JMO paper on putting the “Joint” into Joint CSAR…would love any pointers or leads on articles covering JCSAR in OIF and/or today.
But, slowly, we are all the reasons more and more distant from the RO, RO to leave the distance we have much more. I am a lot busier than before, not like before, often on the line. Although sometimes he also give me a little cheap zeny, but I l know that there are misunderstandings between us, and increasingly deep.
Angels as we know them soft, cherubic heralds of Valentine’s Day do not exist in Requiem money: Avenging Angel.
I often search which place see the cheap 2moons dil, it also spend me much time.
I spend many money to buy dofus kamas for her.
Now my classmate and my game friend, we often together to play, together to earn the FFXI gold or search the cheap Final Fantasy XI Gold, we all likes this feeling. thank for this game, let us such happy.