DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Space » Secret Spaceplane’s Final Flight?

Secret Spaceplane’s Final Flight?

030606p1.jpgFor 16 years, Aviation Week & Space Technology says, it has been investigating a hush-hush Pentagon program to put a “small military spaceplane in orbit. Considerable evidence supports the existence of such a highly classified system, and top Pentagon officials have hinted that it’s ‘out there,’ but iron-clad confirmation that meets AW&ST standards has remained elusive. Now facing the possibility that this innovative ‘Blackstar’ system may have been shelved, we elected to share what we’ve learned about it with our readers, rather than let an intriguing technological breakthrough vanish into ‘black world’ history, known to only a few insiders.”

After the shuttle Challenger disaster in January 1986, and a subsequent string of expendable-booster failures, Pentagon leaders were stunned to learn they no longer had “assured access to space.” Suddenly, the U.S. needed a means to orbit satellites necessary to keep tabs on its Cold War adversaries.

The answer: a high-flying, hypersonic jet that would launch a small orbiter into space.

A large “mothership,” closely resembling the U.S. Air Force’s historic XB-70 supersonic bomber, carries the orbital component conformally under its fuselage, accelerating to supersonic speeds at high altitude before dropping the spaceplane. The orbiter’s engines fire and boost the vehicle into space. If mission requirements dictate, the spaceplane can either reach low Earth orbit or remain suborbital.
The manned orbiter’s primary military advantage would be surprise overflight. There would be no forewarning of its presence, prior to the first orbit, allowing ground targets to be imaged before they could be hidden. In contrast, satellite orbits are predictable enough that activities having intelligence value can be scheduled to avoid overflights…
Once a Blackstar orbiter reenters the atmosphere, it can land horizontally at almost any location having a sufficiently long runway. So far, observed spaceplane landings have been reported at Hurlburt AFB, Fla.; Kadena AB, Okinawa; and Holloman AFB, N.M.
The spaceplane is capable of carrying an advanced imaging suite that features 1-meter-aperture adaptive optics with an integral sodium-ion-sensing laser. By compensating in real-time for atmospheric turbulence-caused aberrations sensed by the laser, the system is capable of acquiring very detailed images of ground targets or in-space objects, according to industry officials familiar with the package.

One anonymous tipster asks, “Is it possible to design, build and operate such a complex and expensive system and still keep it secret for so long?“
UPDATE 03/06/06 10:15 AM: “Aerospace experts [are] question[ing] a number of claims made for the Blackstar concept,” MSNBC’s Jim Oberg reports.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, sources told MSNBC​.com that they believed the concept was unworkable, based on principles of rocket design. One source said the mothership would be flying much too slow and too low for a space plane to reach orbital speed after release. When the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency sought proposals for an unmanned RASCAL satellite launcher five years ago, the specifications called for the carrier aircraft to go much higher, and the submitted designs still needed two stages to reach orbital speed.

Share |

March 5th, 2006 | Space | 304427 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/03/05/secret-spaceplanes-final-flight/Secret+Spaceplane%27s+Final+Flight%3F2006-03-06+03%3A20%3A28david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « PM’s “Lessons of Katrina” | “Stealing Al-Qa’ida’s Playbook” » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. pedestrian says:
    March 5, 2006 at 11:18 pm

    >One anonymous tipster asks, “Is it possible to design,
    >build and operate such a complex and expensive system and still keep it secret for so long?“
    Nope, not with Pentagon officials having a bad habbit unable to keep and zip their mouth shut, tipping to Noah Shachtman and others about sensitive military information so often.

    Reply
  2. Sarge says:
    March 5, 2006 at 11:34 pm

    They make this sound like it’s a DIFFERENT aircraft than aurora.

    Reply
  3. Mycroft says:
    March 6, 2006 at 12:13 am

    On the contrary, I think it’d be quite easy to keep such a project relatively quiet, as long as it doesn’t reach a certain stage. If it’s well-funded but not extravagant, there’s no need to advertise. The people working on the project won’t talk.
    Reporters and the like aren’t exactly watching where academic experts and particular types of engineers are going. Sure, rumors will float inside the classified community (which reporters may hear), but those are rumors — and more than one rumor has been started by somebody who read too much science fiction and wanted to mess with somebody’s head. At least, until the project comes near to fruition, needs a budget upgrade, or runs into trouble, at which point the number of people who need to be briefed in grows by quite a bit.
    It was quite a few years before people believed we had a stealth plane, and that was a humongous investment. Even then, a lot of what was going around was sheer speculation, and not that much removed from talk of Area 51, aliens, and flying saucers.

    Reply
  4. Murc says:
    March 6, 2006 at 1:51 am

    It sounds to me like the craft they are talking about is the SR-75, is has many names like Penatrator, Brilliant Buzzard, and Mothership. Which was the successor to the XB-70.
    The craft the was attached to the SR-75 was the SR-74 Scramp. (much like how the SR-71 is with the D-21).
    But its good to here some more info coming out about this.

    Reply
  5. C-Low says:
    March 6, 2006 at 10:18 am

    Im with Murc on this one. Sounds like SR-71s little buddy attachment.
    The best place to keep a secret is in plain site with false understated capabilities.
    Can the gov keep a lid on such a project? Tip of the ice burg did you notice they said that they have been researching these rumors for 16yrs. There is a 20yr or so disclosure release curve on mill tech.
    I still believe todays UFOs are just tomorrows front line forces. The stealth halve blue was first flown in the late 60s and we had operational entire air wings pre-public disclosure.

    Reply
  6. hughns says:
    March 6, 2006 at 11:18 am

    A lot of the details soudns pretty dubious, particularly the exotic Boron-based fuel (I believe this was researched previously, without success largely due to environmental concerns), as well as the fundamental structural problems of a craft similar to the XB-70 reaching speed and altitude with such a substantial payload.

    Reply
  7. PresidenToor says:
    March 6, 2006 at 1:13 pm

    Well let’s see here:
    1)It’s Big
    2)Expensive
    3)On the verge of useless/inefficient
    Yep the Pentagon would have it…
    On a side note from what I have heard out of Northrop Grumman, I wouldn’t be surprised if they had a hand in this.

    Reply
  8. DS says:
    March 6, 2006 at 6:00 pm

    I’m thinking Black Horse/Black Colt = Black Star system. Yeah, I know the Black Horse/Colt aircraft were described as SSTO in nature, but I have a feeling that was disinfo.

    Reply
  9. Phil Fraering says:
    March 6, 2006 at 7:25 pm

    AFAIK Black Horse/Black Colt were Mitchell Burnside Clapp’s ideas for a system of similar capability but operating by in-flight refuelling of the oxidizer after takeoff.
    He seems to have been serious about wanting to build one way back when…

    Reply
  10. campbell says:
    March 6, 2006 at 8:04 pm

    I know if I say “airship”…that the first thought to come to mind is “blimp”. This instead: a very large, RIGID, framed in carbon fiber Lighter-than-Air craft.…can indeed reach extremely high altitude, just as stratospheric weather balloons are able to.…the only hinderment really is payload. So, launch Pegasus-like from this “mothership”.…orbit on demand, more or less.
    When DARPA Walrus was first being touted, wording in the solicitation indicated that Pentagon was interested in development of “electrokinetic propulsion” for the airship. Doable, if the craft is big enough for unusual power source. (Like the “Aurora” slip of years back…this wording has been deleted from later writings from DARPA related to Walrus.)
    NIDS has postulated on this possible craft. While a lot of that may be dismissed as typical “UFO” hype.….so was stealth technology some years ago.
    I vote for this airship. Why? because it is relatively simple, has built in “UFO” deniability, and because it allows the first stage of an orbit on demand system to be somewhat passive.…let the actual missile/launch vehicle be the one with the most bugs to work out.…
    Just a thought.…

    Reply
  11. 10th says:
    March 7, 2006 at 9:04 pm

    I actually don’t see why this is such an exotic idea. It’s already been recently done on a smaller scale, and in the privately funded civilian world at that.…..think Spaceship One (remember the winner of the X-prize).

    Reply
  12. starman2006 says:
    April 28, 2006 at 3:30 pm

    Hello, I’m a habitual reader of DefenseTech from Spain and first of all I want to congratulate you for your excellent job. Well, I write you beacause of the recent issue of the Blackstar and the whole lot of reactions it has provoked. I want to send you the direction of a web page you might found interesting (many critics have been directed towards the hypothetical propulsion system of blackstar and the gel-like boron fuel, and this page shows a possible alternative for a two-stage-to-orbit vehicle).The direction is http://​www​.andrews​-space​.com/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​-​m​a​i​n​.​p​h​p​?​s​u​b​s​e​c​t​i​o​n​=​M​TA5 Thanks for your attention.

    Reply
  13. imayberight8 says:
    January 31, 2008 at 9:47 am

    There is buzz floating around that the US has top secret orbital bases (more than one) and black space planes fly to and from them regularly. Of course, UFO believers and unreliable sources perpetuate such
    rumors, which would be great for deniability issues.
    Is it impossible for such hugely expensive black projects to exist? Probably, but.…
    Does the name Millenium Twain mean anything to anyone? He is probably spreading these rumors to bring web attention to himself and his own “out there” pet projects.
    But, with the recent sightings of black silent triangles flying over Texas by dozens of eyewitnesses and the Air Forces tardy public explanations, who really knows what highly advanced top secret “toys” we have, right now?
    Besides, a slow silent dark craft could just be a blimp with electric fans to move and steer with, and primarily be a distraction to throw the public off the trail of something much more secret.
    We aren’t meant to know, then are we, so speculation is all we’ll ever have. National Security would always prevent disclosure of any such projects, even if they DON’T exist.

    Reply
  14. loan modification says:
    March 7, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    I think this site is horrible man!

    Reply
  15. B says:
    May 2, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    please i am connected us secret satellite systems us bdefence of deparment goverman.n73-1 nokia mob.phones imei code355506018010393 code 0541044 adress country hungary city gyula budrio lpt.3.1.4.a 5700 controlling i am informations.thank you!my name

    Reply
  16. B says:
    May 2, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    please i am connected us secret satellite systems us bdefence of deparment goverman.n73-1 nokia mob.phones imei code355506018010393 code 0541044 adress country hungary city gyula budrio lpt.3.1.4.a 5700 controlling i am informations.thank you!my name

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      'Nor really stealthy'? LOL! – Only in...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      That is not a 120mm mortar please check it out. My was 11C...
      Jim
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      With the exception of his Boeing Tanker blindspot ;-) ...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      i heard recently that rules of engagement in...
      mad mike
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Would I be correct in assuming that means a noise or...
      bduff509
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: But their advantage is reduced by daytime...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And to get back on topic…Don’t think...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: "shown your contempt for every service...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      135,000,000 $ each for a fighter aircraft that's...
      Joseph
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Dumb and dumber………. The F35 is a...
      blackbull
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage