<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Sticky Foam Gets Serious</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:27:57 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: mike</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-190381</link> <dc:creator>mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:54:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3048#comment-190381</guid> <description>i read about micro-organisims that glow when they come into contact with explosive ingerdients.
They are developing it so you can spread it on  a mine field to locate the mines. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read about micro-organisims that glow when they come into contact with explosive ingerdients.<br
/> They are developing it so you can spread it on  a mine field to locate the mines.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: intentsly</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-126431</link> <dc:creator>intentsly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:37:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3048#comment-126431</guid> <description>If its sticky and expands I guess that would work, just so long as it isn&#039;t too easy to remove.  If it&#039;s flammable that would make for quite an &gt; (napalm anyone?).
Lets just hope these devices remain in the hands of the forces of good and not twisted some how by the bad ones.
I didn&#039;t see the minefield reference, but anyway.. The armed forces do have anti-mine field devices that are shot over a field and then remotely detonated. They&#039;re quite effective. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If its sticky and expands I guess that would work, just so long as it isn’t too easy to remove.  If it’s flammable that would make for quite an &gt; (napalm anyone?).<br
/> Lets just hope these devices remain in the hands of the forces of good and not twisted some how by the bad ones.<br
/> I didn’t see the minefield reference, but anyway.. The armed forces do have anti-mine field devices that are shot over a field and then remotely detonated. They’re quite effective.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-44867</link> <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:21:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3048#comment-44867</guid> <description>This stuff looks to work out just great!
Puts a whole new spin on &quot;Getting stuck in&quot;! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This stuff looks to work out just great!<br
/> Puts a whole new spin on “Getting stuck in”!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen Furlani</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-126426</link> <dc:creator>Stephen Furlani</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:30:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3048#comment-126426</guid> <description>Mine fields aren&#039;t cleared by &quot;sandbags&quot; mainly because most of the devices are more sophisticated than that.
Second, because detonating them pollutes the landscape.  Want your kids eating shrapnel?  Howabout planting a garden in an area polluted by the reactants inside a mine? mmm poison </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mine fields aren’t cleared by “sandbags” mainly because most of the devices are more sophisticated than that.<br
/> Second, because detonating them pollutes the landscape.  Want your kids eating shrapnel?  Howabout planting a garden in an area polluted by the reactants inside a mine? mmm poison</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EE</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-44862</link> <dc:creator>EE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:18:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3048#comment-44862</guid> <description>Where can we get sticky foam? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where can we get sticky foam?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wembley</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-126425</link> <dc:creator>Wembley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:38:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3048#comment-126425</guid> <description>Setting off landmines - or any device likely to throw out shrapnel - is not a good idea if you&#039;re within 100 feet of them. You could get away with it a few times, but it&#039;s risky.
As for the pig blood idea, it sounds like a great way to boost al-Qaeda recruiting and turn everyone in the world against the US. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting off landmines — or any device likely to throw out shrapnel — is not a good idea if you’re within 100 feet of them. You could get away with it a few times, but it’s risky.<br
/> As for the pig blood idea, it sounds like a great way to boost al-Qaeda recruiting and turn everyone in the world against the US.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ron</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-126424</link> <dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:24:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3048#comment-126424</guid> <description>You know how the sound of fingernails on a blackboard makes you feel? Or the sound of a fork dragged, tines down, across a stainless steel pan?
Couldn&#039;t those particular sound frequencies be amped up and used for crowd control? Wearing protective ear coverings wouldn&#039;t work for the bad guys, &#039;cuz they wouldn&#039;t be able to hear what their leaders were saying.
And while I&#039;m here, I have a couple more thoughts along this general line of discussion:
1. I&#039;ve heard that touching pig blood, or any part of a pig for that matter, is like a deadly sin to those madmen killing our GIs. Why isn&#039;t that fact, if it is a fact, used as a weapon? An explosive device that sprays pig blood instead of shrapnel, for example.
How about using squirt guns filled with pig blood for interrogations of terrorists?
2. &quot;Humanitarian de-mining&quot; is a big deal in many countries around the world. All the research I&#039;ve seen focusses on mechanical, electrical and chemical devices and methods for finding buried anti-personnel mines. One method even tries to exploit the chemical sensitivity of bees to locate mines.
By all the accounts I&#039;ve read, clearing an area of mines, once they&#039;re located, is a slow, dangerous and costly process. Extracting the mines seems to rely on variations of mechanical robots and a-brave-guy-with-a-bayonet poking around in the dirt.
My question: Once a minefield is located, why don&#039;t they just loft sandbags, old water-filled inner tubes, tires, sections of tree trunks or other round, heavy objects into the field and detonate the mines? There seems to be a definite reason for extracting the mines intact, but it&#039;s never stated.
Can anyone here shed some light on this? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know how the sound of fingernails on a blackboard makes you feel? Or the sound of a fork dragged, tines down, across a stainless steel pan?<br
/> Couldn’t those particular sound frequencies be amped up and used for crowd control? Wearing protective ear coverings wouldn’t work for the bad guys, ‘cuz they wouldn’t be able to hear what their leaders were saying.<br
/> And while I’m here, I have a couple more thoughts along this general line of discussion:<br
/> 1. I’ve heard that touching pig blood, or any part of a pig for that matter, is like a deadly sin to those madmen killing our GIs. Why isn’t that fact, if it is a fact, used as a weapon? An explosive device that sprays pig blood instead of shrapnel, for example.<br
/> How about using squirt guns filled with pig blood for interrogations of terrorists?<br
/> 2. “Humanitarian de-mining” is a big deal in many countries around the world. All the research I’ve seen focusses on mechanical, electrical and chemical devices and methods for finding buried anti-personnel mines. One method even tries to exploit the chemical sensitivity of bees to locate mines.<br
/> By all the accounts I’ve read, clearing an area of mines, once they’re located, is a slow, dangerous and costly process. Extracting the mines seems to rely on variations of mechanical robots and a-brave-guy-with-a-bayonet poking around in the dirt.<br
/> My question: Once a minefield is located, why don’t they just loft sandbags, old water-filled inner tubes, tires, sections of tree trunks or other round, heavy objects into the field and detonate the mines? There seems to be a definite reason for extracting the mines intact, but it’s never stated.<br
/> Can anyone here shed some light on this?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wesley hansen</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-126423</link> <dc:creator>wesley hansen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:13:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3048#comment-126423</guid> <description>baby oil or mineral oil takes sticky foam right off, it
works quite well. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>baby oil or mineral oil takes sticky foam right off, it<br
/> works quite well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Terrain</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-44857</link> <dc:creator>Terrain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 22:11:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3048#comment-44857</guid> <description>How would you get it off? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you get it off?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zzzzzzzzzzzzrp</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-126421</link> <dc:creator>zzzzzzzzzzzzrp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:46:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3048#comment-126421</guid> <description>If I was a screenwriter, I would have the bad guys show up with truck loaded with 1000 goats to eat the foam </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was a screenwriter, I would have the bad guys show up with truck loaded with 1000 goats to eat the foam</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/25 queries in 0.015 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-21 06:59:43 -->