DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » Morphing Planes Moving Towards Reality

Morphing Planes Moving Towards Reality

The idea has been around for ages — since before the Wright Brothers. But, lately, the mil­i­tary has got­ten seri­ous about try­ing to build air­planes that change shape in flight. The rea­son? To get “air­craft that loi­ter for a long time and that also fly very fast,” a Darpa pro­gram man­ager told New Scientist in ’03. “The type of wings that you design for each of those things are dif­fer­ent… loi­ter­ing wings are gen­er­ally high span and a large sur­face area, whereas fast wings have a low wing span and a low area. We want to gen­er­ate wings that dras­ti­cally change their sur­face area and shape, mean­ing more than 150 per cent change in sur­face area.“
morphing-vehicles-2.jpgSounds cool. But pulling it off has been really tough. Some Pentagon-​​funded engi­neers are try­ing to design wing super­struc­tures that slide or fold. Another group, also with Defense Department back­ing is aim­ing for an even further-​​out solu­tion: mate­ri­als that actu­ally bend and twist into new shapes.
Nature has already fig­ured out how to do this, Darpa pro­gram man­agers noted, with plants. A plant bends toward the light, quickly furls its leaves when touched, or pushes a con­crete side­walk aloft with its roots is essen­tially mov­ing flu­ids between cells.
MIT pro­fes­sor Yet-​​Ming Chiang “real­ized that the solid com­pounds used to store elec­tri­cal energy in lithium recharge­able bat­ter­ies could be made to work in a sim­i­lar way. The move­ment of ions to and from these mate­ri­als dur­ing charg­ing and recharg­ing, he thought, was anal­o­gous to the mov­ing flu­ids in plants,” an MIT press release notes. “Could this be a syn­thetic coun­ter­part to nature’s solu­tion?”

To find out, Chiang and Hall began test­ing com­mer­cially avail­able recharge­able bat­ter­ies of a pris­matic form, then designed their own devices com­posed of graphite posts sur­rounded by a lithium source. The results were promis­ing.
Among other things, they found that the bat­ter­ies con­tin­ued to expand and con­tract under tremen­dous stresses, a must for devices that will be chang­ing the shape of, say, a stiff heli­copter rotor that’s also exposed to aero­dy­namic forces…
The researchers have already demon­strated basic battery-​​based actu­a­tors that can pull and push with large force. Later this year, they hope to demon­strate the shape-​​morphing of a heli­copter rotor blade. The mor­ph­ing capa­bil­ity should allow for a more effi­cient design, ulti­mately mak­ing it pos­si­ble for a vehi­cle to carry heav­ier loads.

Share |

March 23rd, 2006 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 308826 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/03/23/morphing-planes-moving-towards-reality/Morphing+Planes+Moving+Towards+Reality2006-03-23+14%3A04%3A36david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 03/​22/​06 | Pentagon’s Animal Kingdom » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Charlie says:
    March 23, 2006 at 12:50 pm

    The author Dale Brown has had the idea of mor­ph­ing aero­dy­namic sur­faces in his book series for ages. Basically, the idea is that you use hydraulic actu­a­tors (Don’t think flaps, think sec­tions of the air­frame push­ing out) beneath a flex­i­ble skin to sub­tly change the shape of the plane.

    Reply
  2. pedestrian says:
    March 23, 2006 at 1:16 pm

    I don’t think this will ever be inte­grated into a mil­i­tary air­craft, since it is likely for com­pli­cated struc­ture and com­po­nents that would add onto its weight, cost, also requir­ing del­i­cate main­te­nance, mak­ing it an expen­sive plat­form. I also imag­ine that a high pow­ered com­puter would need to be used for cal­cu­la­tions to con­trol the actu­a­tors com­po­nents to main­tain and change the frame, adding onto cost.

    Reply
  3. Greg says:
    March 23, 2006 at 2:59 pm

    Although this sci­ence is a gen­er­a­tion or two away it is very likely to become com­mon place. Though to the extent of turn­ing a delta wing into a large sur­face straight wing might not be hap­pen­ing tomor­row, the abil­ity for a plane to change its wing sur­face to increase maneu­ver­abil­ity, con­trol, speed, and effiency is very likely to be imple­mented into some form of mil­i­tary air­craft within the next gen­er­a­tion or two. I see the abil­ity to do away with the cur­rent maneu­ver­ing sur­faces such as flaps and mov­ing more towards a wing that adjust its shape to achive this result. Think more like bird wing than mechanical.

    Reply
  4. James says:
    March 23, 2006 at 3:26 pm

    It’s not con­cep­tu­ally dif­fer­ent from a “swept wing.” But the swept wing, while ele­gant on the draft­ing table, never worked out that well in prac­tice. There was a weight penalty; the mech­a­nisms required a lot of main­tainance and some­times failed; the wings ended up cre­at­ing more drag than antic­i­pated when folded back; the inte­rior of the wing was given over to the mech­a­nism while other bombers could carry fuel there. I think Greg is right in his esti­mate of two gen­er­a­tions.
    Incidentally, Goodyear pro­posed an inflat­able wing back in the six­ties for vehi­cles reen­ter­ing from space. Even built lab mod­els. They were made out of steel-​​reinforced rub­ber. Could a com­bi­na­tion of inter­nal pres­sure and exter­nal drag be used to shape the wing? I don’t think com­puter power is a lim­it­ing fac­tor, BTW. I think mate­ri­als sci­ence is.

    Reply
  5. Walter Huffman says:
    August 6, 2006 at 11:12 am

    why coldn’t ya use A rolled up film exter­nal skin attached to the lead­ing edge and the trail­ing edge.the con­ture made adjustable using sty­ro­foam mov­able pan­nels to con­troll the con­ture of wing the rolled skin tak­ing care of width prob­lems phunumat­ics built into reien­forced foam units pro­vide all adjust­ments at light weight to strength ratio. Voids could be agmented with inflat­able bags where needed. Hay have youall ever thought of helium filled bages insde of wings and other voids in plane to give added lift.

    Reply
  6. rappelz gold says:
    August 2, 2008 at 12:52 am

    Now I have been work­ing. Rappelz unwit­tingly with the growth of the past few years, Rappelz has been updat­ing, I also busy, but I have not for­got­ten the game. Work and is insep­a­ra­ble from the game, I like Rappelz, even if the equip­ment is not good, even if I have no much rap­pelz gold. I also very happy, because I have many friends in the game, so what can be said, does not, as long as you said to.

    Reply
  7. Sword of the New World money says:
    August 8, 2008 at 10:36 pm

    Sword of the New World money: Granado Espada, boasts a num­ber of inter­est­ing fea­tures I was dying to check out. The first is that you are in con­trol of not one avatar, but three.

    Reply
  8. flyff gold says:
    August 16, 2008 at 2:05 am

    since in the large account I already had more than 1 mil­lion flyff gold, this sim­ple idea has attracted her

    Reply
  9. 2moon dil says:
    August 16, 2008 at 2:14 am

    I spend my pin money to bought the 2moon dil, maybe some peo­ple said that I was very foolish

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Dear Designer; It is somewhat strange that the German Armed forces...
      Zandor
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage