<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Rapid Fire 03/24/06</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/03/24/rapid-fire-032406/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/24/rapid-fire-032406/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: rutty</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/24/rapid-fire-032406/#comment-45368</link> <dc:creator>rutty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:01:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3090#comment-45368</guid> <description>Any other waste-of-time photo-ops masquerading as military operations that we should know about? That bread sure does beat finding some shoulder-fired surface-to-air missles. Please link to that asshat&#039;s next piece (seriously). I want see if the topic comes up again. From http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Lists/Press%20Releases/DispForm.aspx?ID=2821 OPERATION SWARMER CONCLUDES [...] The [confiscated] caches included: - Six shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles - Over 350 mortar rounds and three mortar systems - 26 artillery rounds - A variety of IED-making materials and other military items - Over 120 rockets - Over 3200 rounds of small-arms ammunition - 86 rocket-propelled grenades and 28 launchers - Six landmines - 12 hand grenades and 40 rifle grenades - 34 rifles and machineguns of various types </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any other waste-of-time photo-ops masquerading as military operations that we should know about? That bread sure does beat finding some shoulder-fired surface-to-air missles. Please link to that asshat’s next piece (seriously). I want see if the topic comes up again.<br /> From <a href="http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Lists/Press%20Releases/DispForm.aspx?ID=2821" rel="nofollow">http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Lists/Press%20Releases/DispForm.aspx?ID=2821</a><br /> OPERATION SWARMER CONCLUDES<br /> […]<br /> The [confiscated] caches included:<br /> – Six shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles<br /> – Over 350 mortar rounds and three mortar systems<br /> – 26 artillery rounds<br /> – A variety of IED-making materials and other military items<br /> – Over 120 rockets<br /> – Over 3200 rounds of small-arms ammunition<br /> – 86 rocket-propelled grenades and 28 launchers<br /> – Six landmines<br /> – 12 hand grenades and 40 rifle grenades<br /> – 34 rifles and machineguns of various types</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MD</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/24/rapid-fire-032406/#comment-126999</link> <dc:creator>MD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:05:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3090#comment-126999</guid> <description>RE: Power plants at risk, physically, yes, the gear is subject to physical tampering, any fool with a nice chunk of pipe or a length of steel cable or chain can cause a bit of damage. Internally, depends on who&#039;s power protection gear is inside of it. Pretty much everything that is said in the story is detailed in a book published in the late 70&#039;s called &quot;Technologic Terrorism&quot;... no new news here people. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Power plants at risk, physically, yes, the gear is subject to physical tampering, any fool with a nice chunk of pipe or a length of steel cable or chain can cause a bit of damage. Internally, depends on who’s power protection gear is inside of it. Pretty much everything that is said in the story is detailed in a book published in the late 70’s called “Technologic Terrorism”… no new news here people.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/24/rapid-fire-032406/#comment-126998</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:02:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3090#comment-126998</guid> <description>Duke out of the tourney, G&#039;town in.  Why couldn&#039;t they be good when I went there? Go Hoyas! Georgetown Law, class of &#039;03. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duke out of the tourney, G’town in.  Why couldn’t they be good when I went there?<br /> Go Hoyas!<br /> Georgetown Law, class of ’03.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 666/670 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 01:56:05 -->
