DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Blimps » Giant Blimp, Deflated

Giant Blimp, Deflated

No! Nooooo! Say it ain’t so, Darpa! The Walrus pro­gram — the fringe-​​science agency’s awe­somely, almost insanely, ambi­tious plan to build an air­craft carrier-​​sized blimp — is over, Defense Technology International dis­cov­ers.
walrus_HUGEish.jpgCongress had always been skep­ti­cal about the idea of an air­ship that could schlep 500‑1000 tons halfway around the world. (After all, the Pentagon’s cur­rent go-​​to air­borne hauler, the C-​​130 Hercules cargo plane, holds about 22 tons.) But blimp-​​lovers had pushed the “tri-​​phibian” (air, land, sea) Walrus as a way to make American forces less reliant on deep-​​water ports, for­eign bases, and billion-​​dollar air­ports to wage war.
But it wasn’t meant to be. Darpa took away the fis­cal year 2006 fund­ing for the Walrus. And the agency’s 2007 bud­get request calls for “ter­mi­na­tion of the Walrus effort.“
Now, the Army’s Surface Deployment and Distribution Command had its own plans for a heavy-​​hauling air­ship, too. I’m check­ing to see if they’re still inter­ested. Keep your fin­gers crossed.
UPDATE 9:46 AM: Don’t get too bummed, blimp fans. Darpa’s plan for an all-​​seeing air­ship that tracks an entire bat­tle­field at once is still intact.

Share |

March 28th, 2006 | Blimps | 310047 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/03/28/giant-blimp-deflated/Giant+Blimp%2C+Deflated2006-03-28+14%3A39%3A23david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Arquilla: Big War Toys Make Us Weak | No I.D.? No Sweat! » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C-Low says:
    March 28, 2006 at 12:20 pm

    Dammit Mannn!!!
    I was really look­ing for­ward to a fly over of 50 or so of these mon­sters fully loaded being deployed dark­en­ing the sky as they went over­head.
    Talk about a Battleship deplo­macy potential.

    Reply
  2. James says:
    March 28, 2006 at 3:21 pm

    You know…this has been tried before. The Germans tried to resup­ply their lit­tle force in East Africa in 1916 with a diri­gi­ble. They made it as far as the Sudan before they were mys­te­ri­ously called back. The air­ship was not intended to return and they had plans to can­ni­bal­ize it for mate­r­ial for tents and uni­forms. It had, as I recall, about fif­teen or twenty tons of ammu­ni­tion on board.
    As it turned out, it prob­a­bly wouldn’t have made much dif­fer­ence. The Germans kept on fight­ing in what is now Tanzania right up to the end of the war.

    Reply
  3. Nine Inch Nachos says:
    March 28, 2006 at 4:03 pm

    The Bastards,
    Dont they know that if you turn your back to the blimps, you turn your back to the future! Even so, they’ve prob­a­bly just found a bet­ter idea… like con­vert­ing sunken japan­ese bat­tle­ships for space travel.

    Reply
  4. DS says:
    March 28, 2006 at 4:25 pm

    yeah yeah yeah…it’s prob­a­bly already built and func­tional, so they’re just ter­mi­nat­ing the research/​testing/​building phase of the project. watch that money turn up in another sec­tion of the 2008 bud­get. lol…

    Reply
  5. JSAllison says:
    March 29, 2006 at 9:08 am

    The world needs air­ships on the hori­zon. It’s the right thing to do. Perhaps they’ll appear as an interim solu­tion between Airbus’ cruise liner and the first gen­er­a­tion exoat­mos­pheric pax haulers. They’d be use­ful in dis­as­ter response and bulk cargo, as well.

    Reply
  6. Charles says:
    March 29, 2006 at 11:22 am

    They need the funds for some Iraq-​​related thing, like the JIN or that non-​​lethal PHASR, etc.

    Reply
  7. campbell says:
    March 29, 2006 at 9:14 pm

    Walrus is can­celled because DARPA and largest poten­tial con­trac­tor have been unable to see beyond “enve­lope” “fab­ric” “lam­i­nate” “inflate” and a host of other ARCHAIC airship/​blimp tech­nolo­gies.
    Plus, per­haps after all, they finally recog­nise that their vaunted “hybrid” air­ship still needs a run­way because it is not a true Lighter-​​than-​​Air craft. As such, it is no more than a larger form of air­plane, and yes, any one of a dozen air­planes are already suf­fi­cient.
    Airships will only enter use when the world wakes up to totaly rigid SHELLED craft that are tru­ely Lighter-​​than-​​Air, are solar pow­ered, and elim­i­nate his­toric ground han­dling through AMPHIBIOUS design.
    Proper air­ship devel­op­ment SHOULD be con­tin­ued. Best work is being done by (my com­peti­tor!) at Aeros Worldwide, (although my tur­tle is bet­ter)
    Coming fuel prices will force the issue, belatedly.

    Reply
  8. Joe Katzman says:
    April 3, 2006 at 7:59 pm

    A recent Military​.com arti­cle talked about the USAF chang­ing its mind about want­ing C-​​27 “Baby Hercs” or C-​​295s because the Hercules couldn’t land on enough run­ways in Third World back­wa­ters and it was affect­ing com­bat oper­a­tions. They hoped smaller air­craft that could use these shorter run­ways might help.
    But the 2008 tech­ni­cal demon­stra­tion ver­sion of the Walrus was sup­posed to haul 30 tons. Which means that fund­ing it could give the USAF an answer that could use those shorter run­ways and haul more than the C-​​130s, thus poten­tially solv­ing the prob­lem.
    Even if the 500-​​ton ver­sion later proved impos­si­ble, the value of a suc­cess­ful demo craft alone would appear to jus­tify the invest­ment level of a DARPA project. Now throw in DID’s recent cov­er­age of the ris­ing cost of fuel and the con­cern in the DoD.
    I truly do not under­stand this decision.

    Reply
  9. Daniel Markham says:
    April 26, 2006 at 10:22 am

    This deci­sion truly baf­fles me.
    For a small amount of money (rel­a­tively speak­ing) DoD could val­i­date (or not) a huge cost sav­ings for heavy lift.
    It almost makes you believe that the DoD R&D sys­tem is politi­cized and rigged for the big con­trac­tors.
    Almost.

    Reply
  10. Shinimegami says:
    July 23, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    “and yes, any one of a dozen air­planes are already suf­fi­cient.“
    How so? No exist­ing air­planes can even come close to a 500 ton lift­ing capac­ity. One of the biggest obsta­cles to rapid deploy­ment of our mil­i­tary is that the M1 Abrams weighs so much that even our largest air­craft can only carry a sin­gle tank. If this Walrus were made to work as intended, it could carry 7 such tanks. Even with the vehi­cle fly­ing more slowly than a C-​​5 Galaxy, that would still allow for far more rapid deploy­ment of armored units (which regard­less of Rumsfeld’s inane “Transformation” pipedream remain essen­tial to win­ning against any remotely for­mi­da­ble enemy) than is cur­rently possible.

    Reply
  11. Pathfinder says:
    March 23, 2007 at 4:21 pm

    I say for­get fruity air­ships and blimps. Lets go beyond; lets build a star­ship. Like on star wars episode 2 or 3. It would’nt travel space though. It would orbit the earth much like a giant space air­craft car­rier and come down for inva­sions. Forget the sky, lets go orbital; no one will have the fire­power to go against hun­dreds of tita­nium rods shoot­ing from space that came from an orbital space bat­tle­ship. It would be expen­sive and very dan­ger­ous, i agree but its just a start in a new age of warfare.

    Reply
  12. Edward J. Palumbo says:
    July 29, 2007 at 12:49 am

    Despite the pos­si­bil­ity that such an air­craft may make a some­what vul­ner­a­ble tar­get, it could be a cost-​​effective way to move troops and materiel in an envi­ron­ment in which we have air supe­ri­or­ity. Blimps per­formed reli­ably and well in suit­able roles in WWII but newer air­craft and weapons tech­nol­ogy made them obso­lete. Redesigned for today’s needs, blimps could still be an asset when speed is not a pri­mary con­sid­er­a­tion. This mat­ter has come up before in the civil­ian sec­tor (for freight and pas­sen­gers) but the ini­tial cost of design and pro­duc­tion would be pro­hib­i­tive. Perhaps it isn’t that far-​​fetched a con­cept after all.

    Reply
  13. Dennis says:
    December 20, 2007 at 4:26 pm

    The con­cept has merit due to the new mate­r­ial of car­bon fiber.
    However, large alu­minum cata­ma­rans with jet engine power plants would prob­a­bly be able to get the stuff over­sees quicker and carry just as much.
    This tech­nol­ogy is already in use in many ports as high speed fer­ries.
    Unfortunately the com­pany that makes them is in Australia. So no Congressman will be clam­or­ing for the mil­i­tary to use the tech­nol­ogy.…
    Also, the Navy does not care about mov­ing large quan­ti­ties of stuff for the Army. Imagine that.…
    But a boat can only get the mate­ri­als so far. After that the engi­neers will be build­ing bridges. A Heavy lifter would not have that prob­lem.
    –Dennis

    Reply
  14. cup beans says:
    January 8, 2008 at 5:35 am

    I have read recently about the use of air­ship in the army and linked it here
    http://​www​.myair​bal​loons​bud​dies​.com/​a​i​r​s​h​i​p​s​-​i​n​-​t​h​e​-​a​r​m​y​-​1​6​.​h​tml
    I couldn’t avoid adding the item about the Venezuela polic­ing air­ship, because it is the other side of using the blimp.
    Love to hear your opinion.

    Reply
  15. Peli says:
    May 20, 2008 at 1:35 pm

    Just take a look at this, it

    Reply
  16. Sean says:
    May 23, 2008 at 5:46 pm

    Until they invent a light­weight bul­let proof mate­r­ial there will never be a lighter than air equip­ment deliv­ery sys­tem.
    Reasons?
    1. Slow
    2. Big
    3. 1000 tons of tar­get
    IMHO

    Reply
  17. Aerialproducts says:
    June 2, 2008 at 2:26 am

    We can help you deter­mine the right prod­uct for your needs, by answer­ing the big ques­tions like:- Should I use a blimp at a trade show? How large a blimp do I need to be seen from a half mile away? Should I use a point and shoot style cam­era or a Digital SLR? Do I use dig­i­tal graph­ics on my RC blimp, or ban­ner attach­ments?
    Advertising Balloons Get You Noticed. From Outdoor Blimps to Indoor Spheroids for Trade Shows, Blimps, Balls and Custom Shapes Bring Customers To Your Business.

    Reply
  18. eve isk says:
    August 6, 2008 at 12:46 am

    In order to make a lit­tle bit of hun­dreds of thou­sands of eve isk, I com­manded all of the staff hung up the num­ber on the com­puter, and help me mine the mining.

    Reply
  19. Archlord money says:
    August 6, 2008 at 12:49 am

    In the Beach City is such fear­ful­ness, I am own­ing many Archlord money in my pocket.

    Reply
  20. Silkroad gold says:
    August 9, 2008 at 2:05 am

    A high mag­i­cal but low phys­i­cal defense, 20% higher Silkroad gold move­ment speed, 20% lower mp con­sump­tion, can­not be mixed.

    Reply
  21. Sword of the New World Gold says:
    August 9, 2008 at 2:08 am

    Evocative music com­pletes each unique area of the Sword of the New World Gold game world and makes Sword of the New World noth­ing less than a mas­ter­piece of adventure.

    Reply
  22. fiesta Gold says:
    August 19, 2008 at 11:03 pm

    In fact I think in the game the most impor­tant was not the fiesta Gold or the upgrade, in my mind play with friends and get more friend­ship were the most important.

    Reply
  23. 2moons dil says:
    August 19, 2008 at 11:10 pm

    Every day I was early to get up then sit in front of the com­puter, started to the upgrade or earn the 2moons dil, I was prac­tic­ing shaman, the shaman can good upgrade, quickly I up to the 80 level, than I enter to the P upgrade, in there I under­stand a QS

    Reply
  24. Metin2 gold says:
    August 20, 2008 at 2:37 am

    Of course the Metin2 yang can bring funs. I believed that you will love this Metin2 gold new game.

    Reply
  25. Buy metin2 gold says:
    August 20, 2008 at 2:39 am

    If you want to Buy metin2 gold you can go to the com­pany. I hope that we will become good friends in the Cheap metin2 gold game.

    Reply
  26. Metin2 gold says:
    August 20, 2008 at 2:45 am

    Of course the Metin2 yang can bring funs. I believed that you will love this Metin2 gold new game.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage