<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Rapid Fire 03/29/06</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/03/29/rapid-fire-032906/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/29/rapid-fire-032906/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:55:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: S. Bendin</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/29/rapid-fire-032906/comment-page-1/#comment-127181</link> <dc:creator>S. Bendin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:37:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3104#comment-127181</guid> <description>Themes like it lookk at my russianlanguage blog-page of LIVEJOURNAL. Soon I&#039;ll set polemic text about Dynalifter </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Themes like it lookk at my russianlanguage blog-page of LIVEJOURNAL. Soon I’ll set polemic text about Dynalifter</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/29/rapid-fire-032906/comment-page-1/#comment-127178</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:54:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3104#comment-127178</guid> <description>campbell:  they have big dreams, but I don&#039;t think anyone is going to replace trucks with airships.  It would simply be infinitely easier to build more roads than to try to create a massive new infrastructure using an alternate technology.  After all, lots of companies and people know how to build trucks and roads.  They don&#039;t even have their technology off the ground yet and billions would have to be spent ramping up mass-production.  Not likely.  And once the goodies were delivered, they would have to be transferred to trucks anyway unless the airships plan to deliver to every factory and retail outlet.
That&#039;s another cargo transfer in an age where shippers go to great lengths to avoid handling anything more often than they have to. If I had billions to invest in Third World transportation I would build toll roads.  Problem solved. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>campbell:  they have big dreams, but I don’t think anyone is going to replace trucks with airships.  It would simply be infinitely easier to build more roads than to try to create a massive new infrastructure using an alternate technology.  After all, lots of companies and people know how to build trucks and roads.  They don’t even have their technology off the ground yet and billions would have to be spent ramping up mass-production.  Not likely.  And once the goodies were delivered, they would have to be transferred to trucks anyway unless the airships plan to deliver to every factory and retail outlet.<br
/> That’s another cargo transfer in an age where shippers go to great lengths to avoid handling anything more often than they have to. If I had billions to invest in Third World transportation I would build toll roads.  Problem solved.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: campbell</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/29/rapid-fire-032906/comment-page-1/#comment-127177</link> <dc:creator>campbell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:27:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3104#comment-127177</guid> <description>The DynaLifter hybrid airship idea (design) originated with Howard Hughes, moved on through old Lockheed, and now lives in Ohio.
I commend Ohio Airships&#039; efforts.
Their design is damned from the outset by the fact that their craft still needs a runway.   No &quot;airship&quot; should need one, and so called &quot;hybrids&quot; are far to susceptible to winds while on the surface or during take off/landings;  just as airplanes are subject to winds also.  except, airplanes at least have some weight advantages, and NOT the huge amount of &quot;sail&quot; presented to ground level wind effects. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DynaLifter hybrid airship idea (design) originated with Howard Hughes, moved on through old Lockheed, and now lives in Ohio.<br
/> I commend Ohio Airships’ efforts.<br
/> Their design is damned from the outset by the fact that their craft still needs a runway.   No “airship” should need one, and so called “hybrids” are far to susceptible to winds while on the surface or during take off/landings;  just as airplanes are subject to winds also.  except, airplanes at least have some weight advantages, and NOT the huge amount of “sail” presented to ground level wind effects.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/18 queries in 0.008 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-22 01:45:45 -->