DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Armor » Army’s About Face on Soldier-​​Bought Armor

Army’s About Face on Soldier-​​Bought Armor

sov-2-front.jpgAP: “Just six months after the Pentagon agreed to reim­burse sol­diers who bought their own pro­tec­tive gear, the Army has banned the use of any body armor that is not issued by the mil­i­tary.”

In a new direc­tive, effec­tive imme­di­ately, the Army said it can­not guar­an­tee the qual­ity of com­mer­cially bought armor, and any sol­dier wear­ing it will have to turn it in and have it replaced with autho­rized gear.
Army offi­cials told The Associated Press on Thursday the order was prompted by con­cerns that sol­diers or their fam­i­lies were buy­ing inad­e­quate or untested com­mer­cial armor from pri­vate com­pa­nies — includ­ing the pop­u­lar Dragon Skin gear made by California-​​based Pinnacle Armor.

The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, which is usu­ally mega-​​critical of the Pentagon’s higher-​​ups, agrees with the Army this time. “The Army has to ensure some level of qual­ity… They don’t want sol­diers rely­ing on equip­ment that is weak or sub­stan­dard,” exec­u­tive direc­tor Paul Rieckhoff tells the AP.
But Soldiers for the Truth con­tends that, “Despite all the evi­dence to the con­trary, includ­ing [Army Program Executive Office] Soldier’s own bal­lis­tic tests con­ducted at two Army research lab­o­ra­to­ries that irrefutably proved Dragon Skin was a supe­rior prod­uct, the offi­cers charged with pro­vid­ing America’s war­riors with the best pro­tec­tion pos­si­ble con­tinue to main­tain that the Army’s home-​​grown Interceptor OTV body armor is supe­rior.” The site also has the inter­nal Army e-​​mail telling com­man­ders to diss the Dragon Skin.

A. There may be Soldiers deployed in OIF/​OEF who are wear­ing a com­mer­cial body armor called “Dragon Skin,” made by Pinnacle Armor, in lieu of their issued Interceptor Body Armor (IBA). Media releases and related adver­tis­ing imply that Dragon Skin is supe­rior in per­for­mance to IBA. The Army has been unable to deter­mine the verac­ity of these claims.
B. The Army has been involved in the devel­op­ment of Dragon Skin and the dif­fer­ent tech­nol­ogy it employs. In its cur­rent state of devel­op­ment, Dragon Skin’s capa­bil­i­ties do not meet Army require­ments. In fact, Dragon Skin has not been cer­ti­fied by the Army for pro­tec­tion against sev­eral small arms threats being encoun­tered in Iraq and Afghanistan today.

Share |

March 31st, 2006 | Armor | 31118 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/03/31/armys-about-face-on-soldier-bought-armor/Army%27s+About+Face+on+Soldier-Bought+Armor2006-03-31+13%3A38%3A58david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « The Naked Cartridge | “A Mushroom Cloud over Las Vegas…” » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. JSAllison says:
    March 31, 2006 at 9:14 am

    A loud, messy law­suit over some­one get­ting killed that was wear­ing non-​​issue armor is prob­a­bly some­thing that the army’d like to avoid now that there are suf­fi­cient stocks of equip­ment to hand.
    Now if some­one would get up on their hind legs and demon­strate some of the moral courage that such a high store is set by and actu­ally say so instead of the con­stant passive-​​aggressive back stage maneu­ver­ing that seems to be the way things are done…

    Reply
  2. oldrailroadcop says:
    April 2, 2006 at 12:38 am

    Let me see…1 — We’re out of armor. 2 — You or fam­ily buys it for you and we reim­burse you (maybe). 3 — Now, you can only wear armor that we pro­vide, but we may revert to step 1.
    Hellova way to fight a war!
    If I was king for a day, I’d say keep the armor you or your fam­ily already paid for, until Uncle Sam issues you some­thing that is approved. Once approved armor is issued, wear it and use per­sonal armor to sit on, or for some addi­tional pro­tec­tion not oth­er­wise pro­vided for. Soldier wears approved armor, addi­tional per­sonal armor does not go to waste and sol­dier derives any added pro­tec­tion afforded by extra armor.

    Reply
  3. Kevin Chung says:
    April 20, 2007 at 2:44 pm

    Been a secu­rity con­trac­tor in Iraq since 2003 work­ing secu­rity details
    wore dragon skin on present con­tract becaus it was issued the prob­lems i have with Dragons skin are as follows,if you have to go up stairs or run any dis­tance it restricts your breath­ing mak­ing you short of breath, the scales also start to set­tle so u have to turn it upside down to reset the armor and last of all, too heavy​.In my opin­ion the best armor on the mar­ket and best qual­ity is Paraclete which I have been wear­ing for the past 2 years in Iraq.

    Reply
  4. al says:
    September 29, 2007 at 9:35 pm

    Dear Sirs,
    We have not only made our Skalaar Exo-​​Skin mod­u­lar, but we are now using B4C tiles made to a spec­i­fi­ca­tion that far exceeds the cur­rent Cercom or Ceradyne B4C per­for­mance (13% higher V-​​50 results against the APM2. They have also been designed to address the flaws in Dragon Skin. The Paraclete ver­sion is one of our choice car­ri­ers, but we are also work­ing with spe­cial forces to design a new Molle car­rier in con­junc­tion with sev­eral ten­ders and units we are involved with.
    The tiles are now being man­u­fac­tured, and we are pro­duc­ing. Interested par­ties can email us at info@​evolutionarmor.​com. for pur­chase arrange­ments. deliv­ery is 8 — 10 weeks, and only qual­i­fied mil­i­tary, spe­cial forces, and law enforce­ment enti­ties can but this armor.
    Regards,
    Allan D. Bain

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Keep it Simple
      Dear Big Daddy; Your last post is a laugh. You carried 100 lbs for 20 miles?...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      All the Muslims in the USA should be immediately rounded up and shot. We...
      Zandor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
      Yeah, and every president since Reagan has proposed a Mars...
      jmatt
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
      Awesome. Now to be a *real* military contract we have to spend $40...
      jmatt
    • Keep it Simple
      Anybody who went to basic training will never forget about weight. Like...
      Big Daddy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      It had been a while since I came by the site- and now I...
      Mod
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      In DTI this article is credited to Sharon...
      Wembley
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Jews wasn't a threat for anyone, that's why this was a tragedie
      A.g.
    • Quick-Deploy 120mm Mortar
      The 120 is mounted in the back of a mortar track and...
      SSG Knapp 11C3O
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I am a New Yorker, and have seen the holes in the ground where...
      Sam
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage