Comments on: Federal Bureau of Luddites

By: Jaye

Jaye — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:39:36 +0000

The ultimate G. Man AKA FBI agent was J. Edgar Hoover! Sure he was gay and wore female clothes but he was the best! Modern day Feds are always politically correct, insecure at work, fearful of losing their jobs, have higher then normal alcohol, drug and marriage problems because they can’t reveal their true feeling and can’t talk about their jobs. They are take charge, intelligent, perfectionists but are suspicious and distrustful of outsiders and inflexible! These people need help! Especially after they missed the Fla. 9–11 pilots who did not want to learn to take off or land! Think J. Edgar people! Peace. Jaye

By: Vincente

Vincente — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:40:15 +0000

Tom DeLay’s cronies wasted no time painting his Democratic opponent as “out of step” with his Houston area district.
As an example, they highlighted his vote against the creation of the Department of Homeland Security.
This article, as well as looking at the TSA debacle, leads me to wonder why that seems so ‘out of step.’ I don’t think wasting money on ineptitude is so crazy.
This information has given me a fantastic idea: find congresscreatures who voted against the creation of DHS and send them boxes of money.
On second thought, I don’t think I’ll take that big of a hit to my wallet as a result of this doctrine.

By: AF

AF — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:34:46 +0000

This is just one more example of why we need small government. We need to let the private sector handle as much as possible.
Take the TSA at airports for example. I cannot possibly believe that creating this huge bureaucracy has improved airport security. The airport security should have been left in the hands of private contractors…and economic bonuses or sanctions should have been imposed if they do not meet security criteria.
Profit will motivate private firms to achieve greatness. NOTHING motivates government agencies to achieve greatness. They naturally all descent into death traps of bureaucracy.

By: jumb

jumb — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 16:02:09 +0000

For over 20 years I have worked with all the major federal law enforcement agencies and their agents, and have been decorated for my work with and service to the FBI. I have seen first hand how the FBI works. Because of that experience I can say unequivocally that the FBI is incredibly, unbelievably backward in its day-to-day IT and data handling.
While the FBI claims its technological modernization is made problematical because of concerns over national security, those federal agencies which deal exclusively with national security don’t seem to have apprehended or experienced the insurmountable obtsacles which the FBI’s keepers of the flame say they see. Rather, the major source of the backwardness is almost entirely the “Bu’s” Vaticanical culture of internal intrigue and bureaucratic feudalism.
Couple that with a thorough indoctrination in arrogance and condescension toward its peers, unmatched in any hierarchical organization outside of the United States Marine Corps, and you have an agency which is, and will remain, technlogically incompetent and moribund. And oerhaps most surprisingly, 742876because of that supreme confidence in its own perfection, the FBI has no real grasp of what the hullaballo is all about.

By: pdquig

pdquig — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:09:45 +0000

Having led numerous process / systems implementations in complex, change-resistant organizations, it is certain that programmers have nothing to do with the FBI’s issues. My guess is that the troubles begin with the first step on the road: the lack of an accepted Problem Statement. If the FBI doesn’t really think it has a problem, cannot articulate it clearly, or cannot achieve buy-in from the key participants/stakeholders, then no amount of process modeling and system design is going to succeed.

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:02:02 +0000

I truely think that this Country will be ovetaken by Private Interest Groups and the US Govt. so corrupted now and inadequate is going to be a figure Head like the King and Queen of England.…The mismanagement and utter imcompetance is astrnomical!!!When these Beaurcrats leave office it is truely amazing that they are so peaceful and go making Huge dollars for Consulting–Who knows maybe Delay will consult other Congressmen on avoiding the
legal things he is going through now.

By: TimR

TimR — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:51:05 +0000

Yes, the last attempt was made by SAIC. The problem was probably that they had special agents as the government reps. Special agents aren’t always the best fit for overseeing a project like this. But, at the FBI you have two types of people. You have Special Agents and ignorant peasants, or at least that is how they view it. Furthermore, the FBI went through like 11 changes of government rep. in 3 years. Basically, they dropped the ball on 911 as well.
Fumbling
Bumbling
Incompetent

By: David Foster

David Foster — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:38:32 +0000

I don’t think the question of what kind of programmers the government should hire is directly relevant. Major gov’t computer projects are generally developed by contractors: the previous attempt at an FBI case management system was done by SAIC.

By: MikeT

MikeT — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:35:48 +0000

kg2v,
There are no such programmer unions, especially not in contractor circles. Second, contracting jobs for the DoJ and DoD tend to pay significantly better in most areas than regular jobs because of the security clearances that are involved. All of that is basic public knowledge for those going to college for CS degrees near or working near/in areas with big contracting work. I’m not trying to be snarky, but I just don’t have any idea where you’re getting this information from because these agencies don’t really do any internal work. 95% of it is outsourced to defense and other contractors ranging from CGI-AMS to Lockheed Martin. Yes, Lockheed has a major IT sector to it, especially in Northern Virginia.

By: Edward Liu

Edward Liu — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:34:05 +0000

kg2v: Are the FBI or the programmers for them even unionized? Not that a union wouldn't make things harder, but after about 12 years in the business, I've found that it isn't any easier to get fire rotten programmers in non-unionized environments. I think the spectre of unlawful termination lawsuits means a programmer has got to screw up regally and provably to be fired for cause. In almost every case, it's easier to get a bad programmer to leave by giving them a poor performance review and no raise. I think every programmer who's been in the biz for any length of time knows the rule about how much better a good programmer is than a bad one, and even how the truly bad programmers act as NEGATIVE headcount (meaning that their programming is so bad that other programmers waste time fixing all their SNAFUs). However, upper management and the bean counters have never seemed to be aware of how skill in programming makes one worker more valuable than another. In my time in the biz, I've seen the pendulum swing between "let's send all the programming to India" and "let's fire all our veterans and hire a bunch of college kids," both of which are founded on the principle that 3 or 4 cheap programmers must be better than 1 expensive one. And, in any event, it really sounds like the FBI's problems aren't even getting THAT far.