Comments on: Iran’s Kooky, Incendiary Arsenal

By: Jaws7

Jaws7 — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:43:00 +0000

You are right. We are not a democracy. We are a republic ruled by law.
At least that is what I use to think until Clinton, the Bushs’, and know Obama
were elected into office.

By: Jaws7

Jaws7 — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:33:28 +0000

Kooky would be for a general to send a ten million dollar jet up against a
100 million dollar jet. To send 1000 of these kooky aircraft at a total cost of ten
million dollars against the airfield from where that 100 million dollar aircraft
took off from would be brilliant. Sort of like ants attacking a larger creature.
I think Iran’s weapon program makes total sense when you consider who they
will be up against.

By: jhm

jhm — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:41:01 +0000

screw you. If you say Americans kill innocents, Iranians frickin murdered their own students and people. I would rather have Americans running the show then a Persian who denies the Holocaust even existed. If you think americans kill people at their homes all the time, why don’t you complain to Irans funder, Russia. They murdered thousands in their “homes” in Checheyna. Or how about the Chinese, they ran over their students with tanks, and gunned down Tibetens.

By: Bubba Nicholson

Bubba Nicholson — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:01:45 +0000

Just nuke ‘em and be done with it.

By: Uncrazy American

Uncrazy American — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:55:24 +0000

Because China, the U.S., and Japan aren’t crazy.

By: Cliff Vegas

Cliff Vegas — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:46:46 +0000

I would not be so thin skinned. Calling an apparatus kooky (for instance) is indeed editorializing — permitted on blogs by the way — but it says nothing about the inventor nor his/her intentions. As for your observation regarding the deploying of mass munitions — certainly that is an option, but I would then be concerned about long term sustainable engagement. You may bloody your opponent’s nose with a strategy like that, but what have you really accomplished?

By: TheQuestioner

TheQuestioner — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:31:26 +0000

Instead of getting the so called “world” to pressurize the Middle East to give up Nuclear weapons, why don’t you suggest that the major global economies such as China, the U.S, Japan, etc, do that instead? Why should the Middle East give up Weapons programs if countries against, or superior aren’t? So in a future war, the Middle East could get pancaked?

By: John J.

John J. — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:53:26 +0000

Monte Python’s Flying Circus?

By: @Earlydawn

@Earlydawn — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:17:56 +0000

Perhaps because Israel is a U.S. ally, and because Israel has been repeatedly attacked by its neighbors? Get real.

By: L3TRC

L3TRC — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:34:43 +0000

Interesnte ;)