Comments on: Red Skies at Night, Ray Guns’ Delight?

By: ihcuwltbcwu

ihcuwltbcwu — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:24:38 +0000

By: Linda

Linda — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:22:25 +0000

All I can say is I’m cleelptmoy impressed that, even while out of town, you’ve not only stuck to the diet part of your plan but also the exercise part. I do have to admit that I laughed out loud a little bit hearing your struggles with the spiderman crawl, because I’ve done the same things many times myself (obviously when you’re not around though). I love you, and we can’t wait for you to get home safely. Love Katie

By: noldsoulse

noldsoulse — Sun, 13 May 2007 00:31:19 +0000

how are you
prompt who for you was engaged in a design ? I got to you from a search engine through a site
live cam lesbian to fasts of vstrec
h’ in ether if I to whom both may need or I in icq

By: Charles

Charles — Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:40:29 +0000

On the same note, supporting technologies and systems which lose much of their “competitive advantage” is rather wasteful. Just as nobody builds steam engines for vehicles today, you drop what isn’t so good and support the systems with the most potential.
The simulator is an important step for laser physics; and it’s utility is not limited to the ABL program. It’s possible that ABL would work better at higher altitudes, due to lower gas particle concentrations.

By: Haninah

Haninah — Sun, 09 Apr 2006 16:45:51 +0000

@John:
The point I was making is not that shooting down a missile from Turkmenistan isn’t good enough; it’s that our weapon is as good as useless if Turkmenistan decides not to let us use their airspace, or the Iranians decide to launch from a slightly less covenient position, or our airplane happens to be slightly out of that one sweet spot at the very moment when the missile goes up and the two-minute window is available, or the weather that day happens to be wrong…

By: TrustButVerify

TrustButVerify — Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:06:10 +0000

Could it be that the naval environment isn’t friendly to good DE weapons performance? I’m thinking of spray, fog, storms, all that business. Of course, that’s just an undereducated guess. Seems to me you’d have a good point, otherwise.

By: elizzar

elizzar — Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:31:29 +0000

hi, very interesting. i guess my question would be, regardless of the use of this simulation, is it going to be cost-effective any time soon to implement and deploy such technology? from what i’ve read a better missile defence system would be provided by the naval one (aegis ships / missles etc?), but this isn’t ‘cool’ sound enough, hence tests are cut etc, talk is of airborne lasers and widely distributed gorund-based interceptors. surely the naval system bypasses a lot of these issues (gives mobility, avoids terrotorial complaints etc).