DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ammo and Munitions » Bunker-​​Busters Readied; Iran Attack Near?

Bunker-​​Busters Readied; Iran Attack Near?

As you’ve prob­a­bly heard by now, Sy Hersh has a new scoop: that plan­ning for an attack on Iran is fur­ther along than you think, and that nukes might be involved.
B61-11.jpg

One of the mil­i­tarys ini­tial option plans, as pre­sented to the White House by the Pentagon this win­ter, calls for the use of a bunker-​​buster tac­ti­cal nuclear weapon, such as the B61-​​11, against under­ground nuclear sites. One tar­get is Irans main cen­trifuge plant, at Natanz, nearly two hun­dred miles south of Tehran. Natanz… report­edly has under­ground floor space to hold fifty thou­sand cen­trifuges, and lab­o­ra­to­ries and work­spaces buried approx­i­mately seventy-​​five feet beneath the sur­face. That num­ber of cen­trifuges could pro­vide enough enriched ura­nium for about twenty nuclear war­heads a year… The elim­i­na­tion of Natanz would be a major set­back for Irans nuclear ambi­tions, but the con­ven­tional weapons in the American arse­nal could not insure the destruc­tion of facil­i­ties under seventy-​​five feet of earth and rock, espe­cially if they are rein­forced with concrete.

Based on a 1950’s design, the B61-​​11 bunker-​​buster has been around in its cur­rent form since 1997. That Divine Strake test — the one that’s gonna pro­duce the “mush­room cloud over Las Vegas” on June 2? Probably a B61 sim­u­la­tion, the Arms Control Wonk says.
The Pentagon and the Energy Department have been push­ing for an update for sev­eral years, now — some­thing that can pen­e­trate deeper, and rely on a lower nuclear yield. That pro­gram, the “Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator,” is offi­cially can­celled. But there’s wide­spread spec­u­la­tion that money for this project is just hid­den else­where.
Meanwhile, Lockheed is look­ing into the “Kinetic Energy Cavity Penetrator Weapon” — a bunker-​​buster that sur­rounds the bomb with a gas bub­ble, so it can plow into the ground ten times fur­ther than sim­i­lar weapons. Testing con­tin­ues for the Army’s “Deep Digger,” the bunker-​​buster that uses can­non to tun­nel through solid rock, drilling a chan­nel for the bomb. It’s the cur­rent record-​​holder for non-​​nuclear pen­e­tra­tors, going down twice as deep as the near­est com­peti­tor. But still, that’s only 30 feet. The Natanz bunker is down another 45. Which is why we’re get­ting ready to see that mas­sive explo­sion out­side of Vegas.
UPDATE 04/​09/​06 10:56 AM: “The Air Force is propos­ing to build a new ‘prompt global strike’” mis­sile, Inside Defense notes. “Land-​​based boost­ers tra­di­tion­ally used for nuclear weapons would be recon­fig­ured and fit­ted with con­ven­tional war­heads, accord­ing to Air Force Space Command.“
UPDATE 04/​10/​06 9:02 AM: “The White House, sen­si­tive to President Bush’s image as a war hawk, is try­ing to play down the pos­si­bil­ity of a mil­i­tary strike,” the AP notes.
Meanwhile, the Wonk says that “we are not going to nuke Iran.“
How deep down the Natanz facil­ity is less impor­tant than what’s cov­er­ing it, the Wonk notes. In Natanz’ case, we’re talk­ing about a lot of rock and soil. Which means that 5,000-pound con­ven­tional bunker-​​busters, like the GBU-​​28, ought to do the job of knock­ing out Natanz rather nicely.

Share |

April 8th, 2006 | Ammo and Munitions, Nukes | 3132131 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/bunker-busters-readied-iran-attack-near/Bunker-Busters+Readied%3B+Iran+Attack+Near%3F2006-04-09+03%3A25%3A37david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Picture This: Military Flicks | NASA, China in Space Link? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Stefan says:
    April 9, 2006 at 12:12 am

    This makes it sound like war plans are a new thing. We have plans to invade, attack, and dis­rupt nearly every hotspot in the world, they’re just stashed away in a drawer some­where. No need to rein­vent the wheel every time a cri­sis comes around.

    Reply
  2. owlbear1 says:
    April 9, 2006 at 7:24 am

    “…another story full to the brim of un-​​named sources, ex-​​employees and to top it off peo­ple who con­sid­ered resign­ing (again un-​​named). Yep a story with­out even one named source,…“
    ============
    Not unlike all the “Senior Administration Officials” who warned of Iraq’s Nukes and how dan­ger­ous they were to America.

    Reply
  3. mister z says:
    April 9, 2006 at 7:38 am

    Gee ShepUK, except Hersh knows who the sources are; Hersh’s edi­tor at the New Yorker would know who the sources are in order to ensure the arti­cle has verac­ity; and unlike the Bush admin­is­tra­tion, Hersh has far more cred­i­bil­ity and far less to gain from deceiv­ing us.

    Reply
  4. ShepUK says:
    April 9, 2006 at 9:34 am

    com­mon guys Hersh is a left wing pro­pa­ganda mon­ger, about as belie­ve­able as George Gallaway.

    Reply
  5. Buddy says:
    April 9, 2006 at 10:10 am

    SO there is a plan to use nuclear weapons to pre­vent another state from aquire­ing nuclear weapons.… Yeah the NPT is really at work here. The plan might sound tac­ti­cally feasable, but strate­gi­cally, its FUBAR.

    Reply
  6. darth vader says:
    April 9, 2006 at 11:44 am

    Hersh was 100% cor­rect about the vice pres­i­dents office
    going around the usual vet­ting and infor­ma­tion cor­rob­o­rat­ing
    experts at the cia in order to get raw, unchecked intel­li­gence,
    that turned out to be wrong and pur­pose­fully dis­torted,
    in order to set the stage, and make the unsup­ported case, for
    the Iraq inva­sion. And the Vice Presidents office made the CIA fall on the sword and take respon­si­bil­ity for the bad intel that
    the Veep’s office wouldn’t let them check thor­oughly in the first place. This is the oppo­site of the CIA’s usual course of plau­si­ble deniability…in this case they were made to assume the oppo­site of that pos­ture and Take the blame for what The Veeps office was respon­si­ble for. My main point, how­ever you feel about hit­ting Iran, with or with­out tac­ti­cal nukes, is that Hersh was Right in that other case and the rest of the world was slow in wak­ing up to that point even though he explic­itly laid out the whole story in the New Yorker sev­eral years ago and in his book later.

    Reply
  7. renato says:
    April 9, 2006 at 3:08 pm

    Hersh is usu­ally right. Just because rightwing gas­bags scream and whine doesn’t mean he’s wrong.

    Reply
  8. Harry Toor says:
    April 9, 2006 at 4:25 pm

    What peo­ple don’t seem to under­stand when they sur­mise this arti­cle is that we are talk­ing about President George W. Bush. It will be his judge­ment to drop any bomb, any where.
    This being a President who has stated that he acts on “insit­inct” I can only imag­ine what his “instinct?” about drop­ping bombs on Iran is.
    Besides that, drop­ping any bombs on Iran would have huge geo-​​political ram­i­fi­ca­tions. I mean HUGE. Russia and China would be pissed, as well as Iran itself, a coun­try that bor­der two of America’s warzones…I mean HUGE…heh.

    Reply
  9. Phoenician in a time of Romans says:
    April 9, 2006 at 9:48 pm

    In other words use one deep pena­tra­tor weapon to start a whole, another droped into the same crater to make a deeper hole and finally the biggest one of all to smash thru the remain­ing con­cret and destroy the tar­get?
    Yeah, all you’d need would be a mis­sile capa­ble of fly­ing into the heart of a nuclear explo­sion with­out going off course…

    Reply
  10. Moose says:
    April 10, 2006 at 12:09 pm

    It would take more than you think, davis. Each time you made a hole debris and soil would col­lapse into it, which would have to be blasted out again. You have to wait for the debris/​concussion to set­tle down after each bomb; which means either loi­ter­ing over the tar­get or mak­ing mut­li­ple passes, nei­ther of which is some­thing any pilot would want to do.
    Jeff, share what you’re smok­ing or get out. We’re never gonna get rid of the Neocons if peo­ple like you keep run­ning your mouth off with such non­sense. There is no doubt that the US could ulti­mately attack Iran’s nuclear infra­struc­ture and destroy it. The US mil­i­tary capa­bil­ity far exceeds that of Iran, and noth­ing they have can stand up in a pitched bat­tle. Sure, if we invaded they could bog down nation-​​building with insur­gency Iraq-​​Style, but their nuclear pro­gram would still be gone.
    The debate here is not whether we COULD do this, its whether we SHOULD, and HOW.

    Reply
  11. Will says:
    April 10, 2006 at 12:21 pm

    Jaye,
    Since you seem to be against “prof­i­teers” why in the world are you sup­port­ing AOL? They are one of the biggest “prof­i­teers” in the world.
    Just seems like your activisim stops when you have to make a change in your own life. You like to tell other peo­ple how to act, but God for­bid you have to change your daily routine.

    Reply
  12. Jaye says:
    April 10, 2006 at 5:25 pm

    God for­bid, we attack another sov­er­eign nation because I think the Iranians will bring down the Spirits on their Illegal mis­sions with their Russian radar’s, bal­loons with mines, ele­phant guns, Tomcats, Phantoms and Mirages. Russian/​Chinese satel­lites and old guys sit­ting on lawn chairs will notify the Iranians the Spirits are com­ing and the Revolutionary Guard will do the rest! Stop the Madness before it starts! Lets leave a world our grand­kids can enjoy. Will; aol is a joke but I like to laugh! Peace! Jaye

    Reply
  13. Jaye says:
    April 11, 2006 at 6:16 pm

    Balloons mines? http://​www​.world​wideschool​.org/​l​i​b​r​a​r​y​/​b​o​o​k​s​/​t​e​c​h​/​e​n​g​i​n​e​e​r​i​n​g​/​A​e​r​o​p​l​a​n​e​s​a​n​d​D​i​r​i​g​i​b​l​e​s​o​f​W​a​r​/​c​h​a​p​1​6​.​h​tml . The Army was also look­ing at a way to use Balloons to stop Helicopters Too. I guess I am just a Zeppelin fan, Peace and Rock on!!! Jaye

    Reply
  14. Skyler says:
    April 12, 2006 at 1:38 pm

    Jaye,
    You are a com­plete and utterly igno­rant moron. Your posts deserve no other respect or response.

    Reply
  15. Jaye says:
    April 12, 2006 at 5:20 pm

    lit­tle Skyler; lighten up sweet­heart! History will prove me right and by the way Spirits have no radars and could run into a high alti­tude sta­tion­ary gas bag weapon just like our chop­pers ran into power lines in the GW1. Peace!
    love Jaye

    Reply
  16. Anton says:
    April 12, 2006 at 5:45 pm

    As much as I would NOT like to see Iran attacked, let alone nuked. I WOULD LIKE NOTHING MORE THAN TO SEE ISRAEL DESTROYED WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS!!!!!!!!The world and the mid­dle east would be a MUCH bet­ter place with­out it. The Jews can damn well go to Antarctica if they want an exclu­sive enclave!I’m also hop­ing that CHINA will get involved on Irans behalf if the US attempts an inva­sion and “regime change” in Iran.

    Reply
  17. leroidavid says:
    April 13, 2006 at 2:13 am

    Do we have a micro-​​nuke to get rid of this stu­pid neo-​​nazi Anton ?

    Reply
  18. Alan Frize says:
    August 13, 2006 at 11:06 am

    Dubya seems to want to nuke other coun­tries to stop them hav­ing the bomb, wont be any­thing to do with all the oil that iran holds in the wells, looks like usa want to get all the oil for them­selves instead of devlop­ing alternatives

    Reply
  19. TIM HENSLEY says:
    April 4, 2007 at 4:41 pm

    THESE BUNKERS ARE DEEP UNDERGROUND HARD TO GET INTO. ITS GOT TO BE A LOT HARDER TO GET OUT IF THE FRONT AND BACK DOORS ARE BLASTED SHUT AND COVERED W/​ TONS OF ROCK. I SAY LETS SEAL THEM IN, THEN POUND THEM WITH BUSTERS UNLL THEY PENETRATE, TAKE OUT TIME.

    Reply
  20. freshwater pearl says:
    July 20, 2008 at 10:24 pm

    oh..dear…that sound very great..COOL..

    Reply
  21. video indir says:
    July 26, 2008 at 4:15 pm

    video indir
    komik vide­o­lar
    izle
    video izle

    Reply
  22. mabinogi gold says:
    August 4, 2008 at 9:32 pm

    Even this pathetic phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal divi­sion, pro­duced the drug have to give, make a paste of money, I would like to be a sol­dier diverted?As I will get more mabinogi gold and mabinogi money.

    Reply
  23. ??? says:
    August 7, 2008 at 4:26 am

    This makes it sound like war plans are a new thing. We have plans to invade, attack, and dis­rupt nearly every hotspot in the world, they’re just stashed away in a drawer some­where. No need to rein­vent the wheel every time a cri­sis comes around.

    Reply
  24. Tibia Gold says:
    August 7, 2008 at 8:57 pm

    You will find that as a pre­mium player there is sim­ply more Tibia Gold to see and more to do.

    Reply
  25. Requiem Lant says:
    August 7, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    Requiem is Cyclone Studios’ sec­ond game, after Uprising, and is a dark peek into a far-​​flung world where the war between right­eous and mis­guided angels has spilled onto the doorstep of cheap Requiem Lant humanity.

    Reply
  26. cheap 2moons dil says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:52 pm

    I only want to say that, we are play­ing the game is not the game play­ing us, game only used for the enter­tain­ment, do not let our­selves feel so tried, do not because some cheap 2moons dil then affect the feel­ing. Sincere treat­ment of oth­ers, you will get many of my friends.

    Reply
  27. dofus gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:56 pm

    you are very impor­tant, but now say any­thing was later, you already left, although now I have enough dofus gold, but all things were changed, if in the game only have myself, then I think I will leave too.

    Reply
  28. cheap penya says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:01 am

    in order to play flyff I can spend all money to buy the cheap penya, in my mind this is a worth pride things.

    Reply
  29. cheap cronous cro says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:44 am

    I hope that they can for­give me. Please wait for me a moment I will return the Cronous, because I really can not for­get you, with my regret and the cheap cro­nous cro, I will come back.

    Reply
  30. Archlord cheap says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:49 am

    Do not because Archlord cheap than ignore your favorite, If you ignore your favorite, you will regret a life­time. In the end I hope that we will not hurt the parents

    Reply
  31. Anonymous says:
    August 24, 2008 at 10:56 pm

    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? web

    Reply
  32. ????? says:
    August 24, 2008 at 10:56 pm

    ?????????????????????????????????????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ??? ?? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??????????? ?????????? ?? ???????? ?? web??????

    Reply
  33. Aypearlcom says:
    August 27, 2008 at 3:19 am

    whole­sale jew­elry in China sup­ply­ing wide vari­eties of high qual­ity jew­elry ‚includ­ing pearl jew­elry ‚crys­tal jewelry,fashion jewelry,bead jewelry,jewelry material,pearl loose beads ‚dis­count jewelry,handmade jewelry,coral jewelry,shell jewelry,Chinese fresh­wa­ter pearl ‚loose bead.Manufacturer direct­ing selling,we guar­an­tees the prestige.

    Reply
  34. nnnas says:
    August 31, 2008 at 4:59 am

    –
    12
    –
    345
    12
    ?
    1
    ? Lexus
    Honda
    Land Rover
    Jaguar
    Volkswagen
    ? ? Mercedes-​​Benz
    Maybach
    BMW
    ? Audi
    ? Mercury
    Jeep
    Hummer
    GMC
    ? Ford
    Dodge
    ? Cadillac
    ? Chrysler
    ? Chevrolet
    Toyota
    Nissan
    Infiniti
     

    Reply
  35. nas says:
    August 31, 2008 at 5:01 am

    –
    12
    –
    345
    12
    ?
    1
    ? Lexus
    Honda
    Land Rover
    Jaguar
    Volkswagen
    ? ? Mercedes-​​Benz
    Maybach
    BMW
    ? Audi
    ? Mercury
    Jeep
    Hummer
    GMC
    ? Ford
    Dodge
    ? Cadillac
    ? Chrysler
    ? Chevrolet
    Toyota
    Nissan
    Infiniti
     

    Reply
  36. China wholesale says:
    September 1, 2008 at 2:27 am

    Beltal​.com is a lead­ing whole­sale resource for elec­tron­ics ‚apparel, hand­bag, shoes, clothing,sunglasses and more in China.

    Reply
  37. wholesale jewelry says:
    September 10, 2008 at 2:14 am

    http://​www​.aypearl​.net engaged in whole­sale jewelry,fashion jewelry,wholesale fash­ion
    jewelry,handmade jewelry,pearljewelry,jewelry wholesale,discount jewelry,wholesale crys­tal
    jewelry,gemstone jewelry

    Reply
  38. handmade jewelry says:
    September 10, 2008 at 3:10 am

    http://​www​.bjbead​.com engaged in whole­sale jewelry,handmade jewelry,fashion
    jewelry,handcrafted Jewelry,wholesale fash­ion jewelry,jewelry wholesale,fashion jew­elry
    wholesale

    Reply
  39. wholesale jewelry says:
    September 10, 2008 at 7:47 pm

    aypearl engaged in whole­sale jewelry,fashion jewelry,wholesale fash­ion jewelry,handmade jewelry,pearl jewelry,jewelry wholesale,discount jewelry,wholesale crys­tal jewelry,gemstone jewelry

    Reply
  40. microsoft office training says:
    December 15, 2008 at 1:40 am

    Will i just hope that Iran is hon­est to its rea­son why they are enreach­ing Uranium, only for their Electrical needs. I hope instead of spend­ing money to make war heads, why not just spend it to the wel­fare of its peo­ple.
    ’cheers’
    Amy
    microsoft office training

    Reply
  41. magike says:
    July 21, 2009 at 10:26 am

    Find Great Deals, Bargain Prices, Rebates and Discounts at http://​www​.Bargains​-Shopping​.com

    Reply
  42. sterling silver jewelry says:
    August 29, 2009 at 1:04 am

    whole­sale Costume Jewelry
    china fash­ion jew­elry whole­sale
    925 sil­ver jew­elry wholesale

    Reply
  43. sterling silver jewelry says:
    September 2, 2009 at 12:26 am

    whole­sale Costume Jewelry
    china fash­ion jew­elry whole­sale
    925 sil­ver jew­elry wholesale

    Reply
  44. sterling silver jewelry says:
    September 2, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    Costume Jewelry
    whole­sale Costume Jewelry
    china fash­ion jew­elry whole­sale
    925 sil­ver jew­elry whole­sale
    cheaper fash­ion jew­elry
    korea jew­elry
    ster­ling sil­ver jewelry

    Reply
  45. binh1 says:
    September 14, 2009 at 8:24 pm

    ??
    ????
    ??
    ???? ??
    ????
    ??????
    ?? ??????
    ???
    ???
    ????
    ???? ?????
    ?
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ??? ??????
    ?? ??????
    sod
    ???
    ???? ???
    ?? ????? ?????
    ????
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?DVD
    ?DVD
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????

    Reply
  46. GHD Straighteners says:
    September 20, 2009 at 5:04 am

    buy cheap nokia n95 expe­ri­ence with­out nokia mobile learn­ing is bet­ter than learn­ing with­out excperi-​​ence. I have nokia 6300 but one lamp wait which my feet are guided; and that bose head­phones is the lamp of expe­ri­ence. I know of no way of judg­ing of the future but by the apple touch past. http://​www​.lead​soft​store​.com/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      In DTI this article is credited to Sharon...
      Wembley
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Jews wasn't a threat for anyone, that's why this was a tragedie
      A.g.
    • Quick-Deploy 120mm Mortar
      The 120 is mounted in the back of a mortar track and...
      SSG Knapp 11C3O
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I am a New Yorker, and have seen the holes in the ground where...
      Sam
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "This is not the first Muslim soldier to commit treason against his...
      Sam
    • Time to Pull the Plug
      4. The Iraqi Rebels went underground to penetrate OUR and...
      Osher Doctorow
    • Time to Pull the Plug
      Some questions about the Gen. Petraeus Iraqi "Surge"...
      Osher Doctorow
    • The Non-lethal Claymore
      There is a non lethat weapon put out by laser energitics name daser...
      red
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      These guys seem to have had the right idea for a while,...
      TheBoogyMan
    • Airbag Defense
      Hey jack ass (fart) at any time durring that triade did you watch the video?...
      Valcan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage