DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ammo and Munitions » Bunker-Busters Readied; Iran Attack Near?

Bunker-Busters Readied; Iran Attack Near?

As you’ve probably heard by now, Sy Hersh has a new scoop: that planning for an attack on Iran is further along than you think, and that nukes might be involved.
B61-11.jpg

One of the militarys initial option plans, as presented to the White House by the Pentagon this winter, calls for the use of a bunker-buster tactical nuclear weapon, such as the B61-11, against underground nuclear sites. One target is Irans main centrifuge plant, at Natanz, nearly two hundred miles south of Tehran. Natanz… reportedly has underground floor space to hold fifty thousand centrifuges, and laboratories and workspaces buried approximately seventy-five feet beneath the surface. That number of centrifuges could provide enough enriched uranium for about twenty nuclear warheads a year… The elimination of Natanz would be a major setback for Irans nuclear ambitions, but the conventional weapons in the American arsenal could not insure the destruction of facilities under seventy-five feet of earth and rock, especially if they are reinforced with concrete.

Based on a 1950’s design, the B61-11 bunker-buster has been around in its current form since 1997. That Divine Strake test — the one that’s gonna produce the “mushroom cloud over Las Vegas” on June 2? Probably a B61 simulation, the Arms Control Wonk says.
The Pentagon and the Energy Department have been pushing for an update for several years, now — something that can penetrate deeper, and rely on a lower nuclear yield. That program, the “Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator,” is officially cancelled. But there’s widespread speculation that money for this project is just hidden elsewhere.
Meanwhile, Lockheed is looking into the “Kinetic Energy Cavity Penetrator Weapon” — a bunker-buster that surrounds the bomb with a gas bubble, so it can plow into the ground ten times further than similar weapons. Testing continues for the Army’s “Deep Digger,” the bunker-buster that uses cannon to tunnel through solid rock, drilling a channel for the bomb. It’s the current record-holder for non-nuclear penetrators, going down twice as deep as the nearest competitor. But still, that’s only 30 feet. The Natanz bunker is down another 45. Which is why we’re getting ready to see that massive explosion outside of Vegas.
UPDATE 04/09/06 10:56 AM: “The Air Force is proposing to build a new ‘prompt global strike’” missile, Inside Defense notes. “Land-based boosters traditionally used for nuclear weapons would be reconfigured and fitted with conventional warheads, according to Air Force Space Command.“
UPDATE 04/10/06 9:02 AM: “The White House, sensitive to President Bush’s image as a war hawk, is trying to play down the possibility of a military strike,” the AP notes.
Meanwhile, the Wonk says that “we are not going to nuke Iran.“
How deep down the Natanz facility is less important than what’s covering it, the Wonk notes. In Natanz’ case, we’re talking about a lot of rock and soil. Which means that 5,000-pound conventional bunker-busters, like the GBU-28, ought to do the job of knocking out Natanz rather nicely.

Share |

April 8th, 2006 | Ammo and Munitions, Nukes | 3132131 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/bunker-busters-readied-iran-attack-near/Bunker-Busters+Readied%3B+Iran+Attack+Near%3F2006-04-09+03%3A25%3A37david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Picture This: Military Flicks | NASA, China in Space Link? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Stefan says:
    April 9, 2006 at 12:12 am

    This makes it sound like war plans are a new thing. We have plans to invade, attack, and disrupt nearly every hotspot in the world, they’re just stashed away in a drawer somewhere. No need to reinvent the wheel every time a crisis comes around.

    Reply
  2. owlbear1 says:
    April 9, 2006 at 7:24 am

    “…another story full to the brim of un-named sources, ex-employees and to top it off people who considered resigning (again un-named). Yep a story without even one named source,…“
    ============
    Not unlike all the “Senior Administration Officials” who warned of Iraq’s Nukes and how dangerous they were to America.

    Reply
  3. mister z says:
    April 9, 2006 at 7:38 am

    Gee ShepUK, except Hersh knows who the sources are; Hersh’s editor at the New Yorker would know who the sources are in order to ensure the article has veracity; and unlike the Bush administration, Hersh has far more credibility and far less to gain from deceiving us.

    Reply
  4. ShepUK says:
    April 9, 2006 at 9:34 am

    common guys Hersh is a left wing propaganda monger, about as believeable as George Gallaway.

    Reply
  5. Buddy says:
    April 9, 2006 at 10:10 am

    SO there is a plan to use nuclear weapons to prevent another state from aquireing nuclear weapons.… Yeah the NPT is really at work here. The plan might sound tactically feasable, but strategically, its FUBAR.

    Reply
  6. darth vader says:
    April 9, 2006 at 11:44 am

    Hersh was 100% correct about the vice presidents office
    going around the usual vetting and information corroborating
    experts at the cia in order to get raw, unchecked intelligence,
    that turned out to be wrong and purposefully distorted,
    in order to set the stage, and make the unsupported case, for
    the Iraq invasion. And the Vice Presidents office made the CIA fall on the sword and take responsibility for the bad intel that
    the Veep’s office wouldn’t let them check thoroughly in the first place. This is the opposite of the CIA’s usual course of plausible deniability…in this case they were made to assume the opposite of that posture and Take the blame for what The Veeps office was responsible for. My main point, however you feel about hitting Iran, with or without tactical nukes, is that Hersh was Right in that other case and the rest of the world was slow in waking up to that point even though he explicitly laid out the whole story in the New Yorker several years ago and in his book later.

    Reply
  7. renato says:
    April 9, 2006 at 3:08 pm

    Hersh is usually right. Just because rightwing gasbags scream and whine doesn’t mean he’s wrong.

    Reply
  8. Harry Toor says:
    April 9, 2006 at 4:25 pm

    What people don’t seem to understand when they surmise this article is that we are talking about President George W. Bush. It will be his judgement to drop any bomb, any where.
    This being a President who has stated that he acts on “insitinct” I can only imagine what his “instinct?” about dropping bombs on Iran is.
    Besides that, dropping any bombs on Iran would have huge geo-political ramifications. I mean HUGE. Russia and China would be pissed, as well as Iran itself, a country that border two of America’s warzones…I mean HUGE…heh.

    Reply
  9. Phoenician in a time of Romans says:
    April 9, 2006 at 9:48 pm

    In other words use one deep penatrator weapon to start a whole, another droped into the same crater to make a deeper hole and finally the biggest one of all to smash thru the remaining concret and destroy the target?
    Yeah, all you’d need would be a missile capable of flying into the heart of a nuclear explosion without going off course…

    Reply
  10. Moose says:
    April 10, 2006 at 12:09 pm

    It would take more than you think, davis. Each time you made a hole debris and soil would collapse into it, which would have to be blasted out again. You have to wait for the debris/concussion to settle down after each bomb; which means either loitering over the target or making mutliple passes, neither of which is something any pilot would want to do.
    Jeff, share what you’re smoking or get out. We’re never gonna get rid of the Neocons if people like you keep running your mouth off with such nonsense. There is no doubt that the US could ultimately attack Iran’s nuclear infrastructure and destroy it. The US military capability far exceeds that of Iran, and nothing they have can stand up in a pitched battle. Sure, if we invaded they could bog down nation-building with insurgency Iraq-Style, but their nuclear program would still be gone.
    The debate here is not whether we COULD do this, its whether we SHOULD, and HOW.

    Reply
  11. Will says:
    April 10, 2006 at 12:21 pm

    Jaye,
    Since you seem to be against “profiteers” why in the world are you supporting AOL? They are one of the biggest “profiteers” in the world.
    Just seems like your activisim stops when you have to make a change in your own life. You like to tell other people how to act, but God forbid you have to change your daily routine.

    Reply
  12. Jaye says:
    April 10, 2006 at 5:25 pm

    God forbid, we attack another sovereign nation because I think the Iranians will bring down the Spirits on their Illegal missions with their Russian radar’s, balloons with mines, elephant guns, Tomcats, Phantoms and Mirages. Russian/Chinese satellites and old guys sitting on lawn chairs will notify the Iranians the Spirits are coming and the Revolutionary Guard will do the rest! Stop the Madness before it starts! Lets leave a world our grandkids can enjoy. Will; aol is a joke but I like to laugh! Peace! Jaye

    Reply
  13. Jaye says:
    April 11, 2006 at 6:16 pm

    Balloons mines? http://​www​.worldwideschool​.org/​l​i​b​r​a​r​y​/​b​o​o​k​s​/​t​e​c​h​/​e​n​g​i​n​e​e​r​i​n​g​/​A​e​r​o​p​l​a​n​e​s​a​n​d​D​i​r​i​g​i​b​l​e​s​o​f​W​a​r​/​c​h​a​p​1​6​.​h​tml . The Army was also looking at a way to use Balloons to stop Helicopters Too. I guess I am just a Zeppelin fan, Peace and Rock on!!! Jaye

    Reply
  14. Skyler says:
    April 12, 2006 at 1:38 pm

    Jaye,
    You are a complete and utterly ignorant moron. Your posts deserve no other respect or response.

    Reply
  15. Jaye says:
    April 12, 2006 at 5:20 pm

    little Skyler; lighten up sweetheart! History will prove me right and by the way Spirits have no radars and could run into a high altitude stationary gas bag weapon just like our choppers ran into power lines in the GW1. Peace!
    love Jaye

    Reply
  16. Anton says:
    April 12, 2006 at 5:45 pm

    As much as I would NOT like to see Iran attacked, let alone nuked. I WOULD LIKE NOTHING MORE THAN TO SEE ISRAEL DESTROYED WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS!!!!!!!!The world and the middle east would be a MUCH better place without it. The Jews can damn well go to Antarctica if they want an exclusive enclave!I’m also hoping that CHINA will get involved on Irans behalf if the US attempts an invasion and “regime change” in Iran.

    Reply
  17. leroidavid says:
    April 13, 2006 at 2:13 am

    Do we have a micro-nuke to get rid of this stupid neo-nazi Anton ?

    Reply
  18. Alan Frize says:
    August 13, 2006 at 11:06 am

    Dubya seems to want to nuke other countries to stop them having the bomb, wont be anything to do with all the oil that iran holds in the wells, looks like usa want to get all the oil for themselves instead of devloping alternatives

    Reply
  19. TIM HENSLEY says:
    April 4, 2007 at 4:41 pm

    THESE BUNKERS ARE DEEP UNDERGROUND HARD TO GET INTO. ITS GOT TO BE A LOT HARDER TO GET OUT IF THE FRONT AND BACK DOORS ARE BLASTED SHUT AND COVERED W/ TONS OF ROCK. I SAY LETS SEAL THEM IN, THEN POUND THEM WITH BUSTERS UNLL THEY PENETRATE, TAKE OUT TIME.

    Reply
  20. freshwater pearl says:
    July 20, 2008 at 10:24 pm

    oh..dear…that sound very great..COOL..

    Reply
  21. video indir says:
    July 26, 2008 at 4:15 pm

    video indir
    komik videolar
    izle
    video izle

    Reply
  22. mabinogi gold says:
    August 4, 2008 at 9:32 pm

    Even this pathetic pharmaceutical division, produced the drug have to give, make a paste of money, I would like to be a soldier diverted?As I will get more mabinogi gold and mabinogi money.

    Reply
  23. ??? says:
    August 7, 2008 at 4:26 am

    This makes it sound like war plans are a new thing. We have plans to invade, attack, and disrupt nearly every hotspot in the world, they’re just stashed away in a drawer somewhere. No need to reinvent the wheel every time a crisis comes around.

    Reply
  24. Tibia Gold says:
    August 7, 2008 at 8:57 pm

    You will find that as a premium player there is simply more Tibia Gold to see and more to do.

    Reply
  25. Requiem Lant says:
    August 7, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    Requiem is Cyclone Studios’ second game, after Uprising, and is a dark peek into a far-flung world where the war between righteous and misguided angels has spilled onto the doorstep of cheap Requiem Lant humanity.

    Reply
  26. cheap 2moons dil says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:52 pm

    I only want to say that, we are playing the game is not the game playing us, game only used for the entertainment, do not let ourselves feel so tried, do not because some cheap 2moons dil then affect the feeling. Sincere treatment of others, you will get many of my friends.

    Reply
  27. dofus gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:56 pm

    you are very important, but now say anything was later, you already left, although now I have enough dofus gold, but all things were changed, if in the game only have myself, then I think I will leave too.

    Reply
  28. cheap penya says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:01 am

    in order to play flyff I can spend all money to buy the cheap penya, in my mind this is a worth pride things.

    Reply
  29. cheap cronous cro says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:44 am

    I hope that they can forgive me. Please wait for me a moment I will return the Cronous, because I really can not forget you, with my regret and the cheap cronous cro, I will come back.

    Reply
  30. Archlord cheap says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:49 am

    Do not because Archlord cheap than ignore your favorite, If you ignore your favorite, you will regret a lifetime. In the end I hope that we will not hurt the parents

    Reply
  31. Anonymous says:
    August 24, 2008 at 10:56 pm

    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? web

    Reply
  32. ????? says:
    August 24, 2008 at 10:56 pm

    ?????????????????????????????????????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ??? ?? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??????????? ?????????? ?? ???????? ?? web??????

    Reply
  33. Aypearlcom says:
    August 27, 2008 at 3:19 am

    wholesale jewelry in China supplying wide varieties of high quality jewelry ‚including pearl jewelry ‚crystal jewelry,fashion jewelry,bead jewelry,jewelry material,pearl loose beads ‚discount jewelry,handmade jewelry,coral jewelry,shell jewelry,Chinese freshwater pearl ‚loose bead.Manufacturer directing selling,we guarantees the prestige.

    Reply
  34. nnnas says:
    August 31, 2008 at 4:59 am

    –
    12
    –
    345
    12
    ?
    1
    ? Lexus
    Honda
    Land Rover
    Jaguar
    Volkswagen
    ? ? Mercedes-Benz
    Maybach
    BMW
    ? Audi
    ? Mercury
    Jeep
    Hummer
    GMC
    ? Ford
    Dodge
    ? Cadillac
    ? Chrysler
    ? Chevrolet
    Toyota
    Nissan
    Infiniti
     

    Reply
  35. nas says:
    August 31, 2008 at 5:01 am

    –
    12
    –
    345
    12
    ?
    1
    ? Lexus
    Honda
    Land Rover
    Jaguar
    Volkswagen
    ? ? Mercedes-Benz
    Maybach
    BMW
    ? Audi
    ? Mercury
    Jeep
    Hummer
    GMC
    ? Ford
    Dodge
    ? Cadillac
    ? Chrysler
    ? Chevrolet
    Toyota
    Nissan
    Infiniti
     

    Reply
  36. China wholesale says:
    September 1, 2008 at 2:27 am

    Beltal​.com is a leading wholesale resource for electronics ‚apparel, handbag, shoes, clothing,sunglasses and more in China.

    Reply
  37. wholesale jewelry says:
    September 10, 2008 at 2:14 am

    http://​www​.aypearl​.net engaged in wholesale jewelry,fashion jewelry,wholesale fashion
    jewelry,handmade jewelry,pearljewelry,jewelry wholesale,discount jewelry,wholesale crystal
    jewelry,gemstone jewelry

    Reply
  38. handmade jewelry says:
    September 10, 2008 at 3:10 am

    http://​www​.bjbead​.com engaged in wholesale jewelry,handmade jewelry,fashion
    jewelry,handcrafted Jewelry,wholesale fashion jewelry,jewelry wholesale,fashion jewelry
    wholesale

    Reply
  39. wholesale jewelry says:
    September 10, 2008 at 7:47 pm

    aypearl engaged in wholesale jewelry,fashion jewelry,wholesale fashion jewelry,handmade jewelry,pearl jewelry,jewelry wholesale,discount jewelry,wholesale crystal jewelry,gemstone jewelry

    Reply
  40. microsoft office training says:
    December 15, 2008 at 1:40 am

    Will i just hope that Iran is honest to its reason why they are enreaching Uranium, only for their Electrical needs. I hope instead of spending money to make war heads, why not just spend it to the welfare of its people.
    ’cheers’
    Amy
    microsoft office training

    Reply
  41. magike says:
    July 21, 2009 at 10:26 am

    Find Great Deals, Bargain Prices, Rebates and Discounts at http://​www​.Bargains​-Shopping​.com

    Reply
  42. sterling silver jewelry says:
    August 29, 2009 at 1:04 am

    wholesale Costume Jewelry
    china fashion jewelry wholesale
    925 silver jewelry wholesale

    Reply
  43. sterling silver jewelry says:
    September 2, 2009 at 12:26 am

    wholesale Costume Jewelry
    china fashion jewelry wholesale
    925 silver jewelry wholesale

    Reply
  44. sterling silver jewelry says:
    September 2, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    Costume Jewelry
    wholesale Costume Jewelry
    china fashion jewelry wholesale
    925 silver jewelry wholesale
    cheaper fashion jewelry
    korea jewelry
    sterling silver jewelry

    Reply
  45. binh1 says:
    September 14, 2009 at 8:24 pm

    ??
    ????
    ??
    ???? ??
    ????
    ??????
    ?? ??????
    ???
    ???
    ????
    ???? ?????
    ?
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ??? ??????
    ?? ??????
    sod
    ???
    ???? ???
    ?? ????? ?????
    ????
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?DVD
    ?DVD
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????

    Reply
  46. GHD Straighteners says:
    September 20, 2009 at 5:04 am

    buy cheap nokia n95 experience without nokia mobile learning is better than learning without excperi-ence. I have nokia 6300 but one lamp wait which my feet are guided; and that bose headphones is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the apple touch past. http://​www​.leadsoftstore​.com/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      'Nor really stealthy'? LOL! – Only in...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      That is not a 120mm mortar please check it out. My was 11C...
      Jim
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      With the exception of his Boeing Tanker blindspot ;-) ...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      i heard recently that rules of engagement in...
      mad mike
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Would I be correct in assuming that means a noise or...
      bduff509
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: But their advantage is reduced by daytime...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And to get back on topic…Don’t think...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: "shown your contempt for every service...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      135,000,000 $ each for a fighter aircraft that's...
      Joseph
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Dumb and dumber………. The F35 is a...
      blackbull
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage