http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/how-att-helped-the-nsa-snoop/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:11:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/how-att-helped-the-nsa-snoop/comment-page-1/#comment-46302 suszen Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:46:55 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3130#comment-46302 ofcourse it was a very good game in people's mind. But many people think that meisha good kill. ======================== suszen california dui ofcourse it was a very good game in people’s mind. But many people think that meisha good kill.
========================
suszen
california dui

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/how-att-helped-the-nsa-snoop/comment-page-1/#comment-127939 buy rupees Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:16:44 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3130#comment-127939 Leave for three years, I have quite repeatedly returned to the Rappelz game. I continue for good equipment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the original is the lack of a person accompanying me. Leave for three years, I have quite repeatedly returned to the Rappelz game. I continue for good equipment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the original is the lack of a person accompanying me.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/how-att-helped-the-nsa-snoop/comment-page-1/#comment-127938 iro zeny Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:08:31 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3130#comment-127938 95 levels, to me this had been a friend of the people around, the new service first hand the hand of a person to manually 95, it is really difficult for my themselves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny. 95 levels, to me this had been a friend of the people around, the new service first hand the hand of a person to manually 95, it is really difficult for my themselves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/how-att-helped-the-nsa-snoop/comment-page-1/#comment-127916 jlbellinger Fri, 21 Apr 2006 01:02:12 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3130#comment-127916 Hmm. Risking lives in exchange for pure entertainment? (pedestrian's comment). There's nothing entertaining about having the government breath down your neck. For decades we've heard of the secret government tapes that turn on if you whisper code words like "kill bush" or "Cheney is a big fat weeny". Now we are told that wire tapping is alive and rampant and backed by one of the biggest phone companies. On one hand, if you're doing nothing wrong, who cares what they're listening to, but on the other hand, why do I have to conduct every conversation with the implicit knowledge that somebody or some robot is listening to my every word, every nuance, and categorizing every number and time of call? They most likely aren't categorizing your grandma's banana bread recipe, but they are recording it in the first place. Maybe they can use the information for marketing purposes: Osama's Baked Banana Bread Surprise. Ohhawhat a funny joke. Hmm. Risking lives in exchange for pure entertainment? (pedestrian’s comment). There’s nothing entertaining about having the government breath down your neck. For decades we’ve heard of the secret government tapes that turn on if you whisper code words like “kill bush” or “Cheney is a big fat weeny”. Now we are told that wire tapping is alive and rampant and backed by one of the biggest phone companies. On one hand, if you’re doing nothing wrong, who cares what they’re listening to, but on the other hand, why do I have to conduct every conversation with the implicit knowledge that somebody or some robot is listening to my every word, every nuance, and categorizing every number and time of call? They most likely aren’t categorizing your grandma’s banana bread recipe, but they are recording it in the first place. Maybe they can use the information for marketing purposes: Osama’s Baked Banana Bread Surprise. Ohhawhat a funny joke.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/how-att-helped-the-nsa-snoop/comment-page-1/#comment-127914 pedestrian Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:30:44 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3130#comment-127914 Everytime these type of articles are published, it is risking American lives in the war on terror in trade for pure entertainment (only few value from such information, more likely the enemy). In other words, Defense Tech staff could be one to indirectly kill people by providing information to the terrorists like this article has done. Yes, you can kill people by information, just like Navsats attempt to send people in to death traps by non-existing phantom routes. Everytime these type of articles are published, it is risking American lives in the war on terror in trade for pure entertainment (only few value from such information, more likely the enemy). In other words, Defense Tech staff could be one to indirectly kill people by providing information to the terrorists like this article has done. Yes, you can kill people by information, just like Navsats attempt to send people in to death traps by non-existing phantom routes.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/how-att-helped-the-nsa-snoop/comment-page-1/#comment-46270 Chris Sun, 09 Apr 2006 04:45:16 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3130#comment-46270 I hope these surveillance programs stay in place long enough for Democrats to regain control of the federal government. "ALL your private thoughts are belong to us. Mwahahahahahaha!!" I hope these surveillance programs stay in place long enough for Democrats to regain control of the federal government. “ALL your private thoughts are belong to us. Mwahahahahahaha!!”

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/how-att-helped-the-nsa-snoop/comment-page-1/#comment-127913 James Sun, 09 Apr 2006 04:39:05 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3130#comment-127913 John: as you say, I'm sure. But this is bad news for America and AT&T. The US handles most of the world's internet traffic because other nations use our networks instead of building their own. The reason they use our network instead of building their own is because of the Bill of Rights, the perceived firewall between the government and private persons. The Founding Fathers never heard of firewalls, but they invented the greatest one, just the same. Now that firewall has been breached and the next decade will see the end of US dominance in telecommunications because our most important comparative advantage has been frittered away. The communications of the future will go through networks that not only cannot be monitored randomly, but which cannot be accessed with US warrants. Feel safer yet? Trust can be built, but not rebuilt. People did business with the US on the assumption of certain rules that were rewritten in secret. They won't get fooled again. It's not trivial. The Soviet Union was very safe inside its crumbling bunker. They were also very poor. John: as you say, I’m sure. But this is bad news for America and AT&T. The US handles most of the world’s internet traffic because other nations use our networks instead of building their own. The reason they use our network instead of building their own is because of the Bill of Rights, the perceived firewall between the government and private persons.
The Founding Fathers never heard of firewalls, but they invented the greatest one, just the same. Now that firewall has been breached and the next decade will see the end of US dominance in telecommunications because our most important comparative advantage has been frittered away. The communications of the future will go through networks that not only cannot be monitored randomly, but which cannot be accessed with US warrants.
Feel safer yet?
Trust can be built, but not rebuilt. People did business with the US on the assumption of certain rules that were rewritten in secret. They won’t get fooled again. It’s not trivial. The Soviet Union was very safe inside its crumbling bunker. They were also very poor.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/how-att-helped-the-nsa-snoop/comment-page-1/#comment-46268 Chris Sun, 09 Apr 2006 04:37:49 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3130#comment-46268 The only way this really qualifies as a scoop is to someone who believes that terrorist have some Constitutional right to plan their dastardly deeds in complete privacy. Sacrificing my Constitutional right to privacy in the process means they've already won. The only way this really qualifies as a scoop is to someone who believes that terrorist have some Constitutional right to plan their dastardly deeds in complete privacy.
Sacrificing my Constitutional right to privacy in the process means they’ve already won.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/how-att-helped-the-nsa-snoop/comment-page-1/#comment-127912 rutty Sat, 08 Apr 2006 22:49:36 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3130#comment-127912 John, dont confuse Lee with facts. It's not fair. John, dont confuse Lee with facts. It’s not fair.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/04/08/how-att-helped-the-nsa-snoop/comment-page-1/#comment-127911 J Sat, 08 Apr 2006 21:53:10 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3130#comment-127911 Hi guys this is the article you should read, now GCHQ is what we have in the UK and it listens to ALL DATA (Phone, Email, Internet, Fax) it's here now and doing it's job. But what you need to ask is who are the real terrorists. http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70619-0.html?tw=wn_index_1 Hi guys this is the article you should read, now GCHQ is what we have in the UK and it listens to ALL DATA (Phone, Email, Internet, Fax) it’s here now and doing it’s job. But what you need to ask is who are the real terrorists.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70619–0.html?tw=wn_index_1

]]>