DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Lasers and Ray Guns » Laser Labs Go Back to the Future

Laser Labs Go Back to the Future

George Neil and Bob Yamamoto don’t remember exactly where they were when they found out that the Pentagon was canceling their laser cannon project. But they remember how they felt.
yamamoto_1.jpgIt was 1988, and Ronald Reagan’s “Star Wars” anti-missile effort was in its death-spiral. Their employer, the defense contractor TRW, was competing against Boeing in an increasingly rococo effort to build a Free Electron Laser, or FEL, that would knock missiles out of the sky. But, after a half-billion dollars of investment, the laser in Neil and Yamamoto’s lab was peaking out at 11 watts a tenth of what a light bulb generates, and a billionth of what the Pentagon would need. That didn’t stop company executives from promising that a weapon was right around the corner. “It was like a game of liar’s poker,” Neil recalls. “We kept hoping some sanity would prevail. It never did.“
So there was a certain amount of relief when the Pentagon finally pulled the plug as well as anger, and regret. Both Neil and Yamamoto believed in the FEL. Given a shot, they thought, the laser really could stop a rogue missile. Along the way, the breakthroughs required in high energy physics and optics and superconductivity would have far-reaching benefits, even if an ICBM never got zapped. Neil especially hated how reckless promises and politicking and killed that chance. As news of the cancellation sank in, the two colleagues and friends each independently made a promise to himself: If I ever get to build a laser weapon again, next time, it’s going to be done right.
My article in the upcoming issue of Popular Science is about Neil and Yamamoto’s attempts to stick to that promise, and build lasers that could actually be used for battle.
Ironically, both men have reached back into energy weapons’ history to accomplish their goals. In the vineyards of northern California, Bob Yamamoto is constructing a solid state laser with enormous crystals at its core the same way the very first lasers did, back the 1960s. 2,700 miles away, in the forests of southern Virginia, George Neil is putting together a modern-day FEL. It doesnt need any sort of material whatsoever to kickstart its reaction. Instead, the machine relies on a stream of electrons just like the laser he and Yamamoto worked on nearly a quarter-century ago.
UPDATE 11:27 AM: Here’s a video of Neil’s FEL at work, coring a hole in a plexiglass brick.
UPDATE 11:42 AM: For years, chemical-powered lasers were seen as the only viable alternative for weapons-strength ray guns. The most promising of those systems, the Tactical High Energy Laser, successfully shot down dozens of rockets and mortars. (this video shows it in action.) But generating the THEL’s megawatts of laser power required hundreds of gallons of toxic chemicals ethylene, nitrogen trifluoride. The weapons grew bulky (the small-scale version was only supposed to be kept in a mere right cargo containers, each 40 feet long). Worse, after a few shots, the lasers would have to be resupplied with a fresh batch of reactants. The logistics of hauling those toxins either through the air or across a battlefield made generals shiver. So, ultimately, interest swung back to solid state systems, like Yamamoto’s, and, to a lesser extent, free electron lasers.
UDPATE 04/14/06 11:33 AM: I know some folks were having trouble checking out those videos. PopSci now has ‘em posted in a more watchable format.

Share |

April 12th, 2006 | Lasers and Ray Guns | 31419 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/04/12/laser-labs-go-back-to-the-future/Laser+Labs+Go+Back+to+the+Future2006-04-12+16%3A11%3A16david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Laser Jet’s Toxic Interior | Urban Combat Skateboard » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. rutty says:
    April 12, 2006 at 1:25 pm

    Anybody else having trouble downloading the *.avi files and, if they are downloaded, getting them to play?

    Reply
  2. Dan says:
    April 12, 2006 at 1:33 pm

    No problem for me.
    Nice laser for the plexiglass video. We’ve got a new yag that I’m testing at about 8 watts, and it’s just about buring through the zapit paper.

    Reply
  3. C-Low says:
    April 12, 2006 at 1:51 pm

    Yeah I cant get the video to play either tried WinAmp/Realplayer/WindowMedia/Explorer nothing works?
    Short that I am with Dan if the Airborne Laser can shoot down incoming ICBM’s in the boost phase over enemy territory with a short range of 200+miles at the expense of being dangerous and guys having to wear hazmat suites. Thats OK with me and I would imagine with the guy in the suite to.
    The first Nuclear powered Subs were not the safest operating things either. The west has become so accustomed to the cushy life we often forget the dangerous and high-risk things we used to do to get we are today. Think of the first Explorers they traveled across the big pond often having to eat leather getting scurvy and just out right accepting certain percentage of losses (human that is). Can you imagine the West of today even considering such conditions for unknown gain?
    Simple fact is I can see the draw back to having all those chemicals to shoot down a mortar or rocket in the field but to stop a ICBM inbound possibly full of Chem/Bio to X population center. Ohhh yeah its worth it hell I will put on the suite and go into the back if necessary.

    Reply
  4. JB says:
    April 12, 2006 at 4:19 pm

    Try the VLC player to play the videos; it worked for me!
    http://​www​.videolan​.org/​v​l​c​/​d​o​w​n​l​o​a​d​-​w​i​n​d​o​w​s​.​h​tml

    Reply
  5. John says:
    April 14, 2006 at 12:37 am

    »>Ironically, both men have reached back into energy weapons’ history to accomplish their goals.
    Actually, there’s nothing ironic about it. The seeds of all modern and future technological wonders have their roots in the basic scientific efforts of past attempts. If we had pundits pooh-poohing the feeble attempts of researchers to connect university computers back in the seventies, the internet wouldn’t exist today.
    Someday, shooting down ballistic missiles will be a reality, despite the naysaying of today’s nattering nabobs of negativism.

    Reply
  6. Dave Minear says:
    April 21, 2006 at 1:19 pm

    The firstvideo was to close to see any depth the second wont play. I guess it a undiscosed video.
    Good info just not visable

    Reply
  7. warnlaser says:
    January 12, 2008 at 9:26 am

    A green laser pointer from Warnlaser has the best centralized light dot and the most beautiful green beam which can be seen, like a green sword elongated by David Copperfield, in the midst of the firmament in the night. Comparing to the yellow, blue, red and purple laser, with noblest emerald-like color and approximately 80 times brighter than the red laser, a Green Laser Pointer is a diamond comparing to a stone crystal. If you have any question, please contact Warnlaser team without any hesitation(Our email address: master@warnlaser.com).

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I think the approach would be a two-fold benefit for...
      ed!
    • Was the Gates Counter-USAF Sortie Fair?
      criticism of f-22 : http://www.google.com/searc...
      google
    • Was the Gates Counter-USAF Sortie Fair?
      f-22 articles with comments and replies :...
      freepublic
    • Was the Gates Counter-USAF Sortie Fair?
      criticism of f-22 :...
      criticism of f-22
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      "The US retired the ideal littoral combat...
      Matthew S.
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Lockheed did put out the Surface Combat...
      Camp
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      That's an awesome deal! Did not realize that Lockheed...
      Sarcasmotron
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      So let's get off out fat butts...
      Ranger-12
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      Does petraeus think he is...
      landouzy
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      The General Dynamics LCS was...
      Dark_Sentry
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage