DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Gadgets and Gear » Marines Ban Under Armour

Marines Ban Under Armour

218_GearStory_sm.jpgI couldn’t even begin to count the number of soldiers and marines I’ve met who wear those wicking, Under Armour t-shirts. Especially in hot weather, the form-fitting, synethic shirts do a nice job of keeping sweat from collecting, so you don’t get too clammy under those cammos.
But now, in one of the hottest places of all — Iraq — marines won’t be able to wear the clothes any more.

Marines conducting operations outside forward operating bases and camps in Iraq can no longer wear synthetic athletic clothing containing polyester and nylon, Marine Corps commanders have ordered.
The ban on popular clothing from companies like Under Armour, CoolMax and Nike comes in the wake of concerns that a substantial burn risk is associated with wearing clothing made with these synthetic materials, officials said.
When exposed to extreme heat and flames, clothing containing some synthetic materials like polyester will melt and can fuse to the skin. This essentially creates a second skin and can lead to horrific, disfiguring burns, said Navy Capt. Lynn E. Welling, the 1st Marine Logistics Group head surgeon.
Whether on foot patrol or conducting a supply convoy while riding in an armored truck, everyone is at risk to such injuries while outside the wire.

Under Armour has been aware of the risk for a while, it seems. As Stars & Stripes notes, there’s a message on the company’s web site which reads:

Do not wear Under Armour products when exposed to extreme radiant heat or open flames. Under Armour products may melt in extreme heat that exceeds 350F. Never use Under Armour products as a substitute for flame-retardant or ballistic protective equipment.

Back in October, the Marines announced a new set of official skivvie shirts that were just “like the Under Armour shirts.”

Share |

April 14th, 2006 | Gadgets and Gear | 314617 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/04/14/marines-ban-under-armour/Marines+Ban+Under+Armour2006-04-14+17%3A18%3A56david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « OpFor, Good for a Click (and More) | Big Payoff for New Scale » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. AndyB says:
    April 14, 2006 at 1:21 pm

    In the USAF they’ve been telling us this for years.
    Same reason.

    Reply
  2. James says:
    April 14, 2006 at 6:43 pm

    It’s been known at least since the Sheffield got hit in the Falklands War. For that matter, I think the US Navy has maintained that cotton is the best material for its sailors since WW2 because it seems to protect against flash burns in an explosion.

    Reply
  3. Kevin says:
    April 14, 2006 at 7:00 pm

    Potomac Field Gear has some interesting products that claim:
    * Fire Resistant. Won’t melt or drip
    * High Performance Wicking
    * Incorporates X-Static for anti-microbial action
    * Four way stretch
    * American Made
    There is a long video at http://​www​.quanticoarms​.com/​m​e​d​i​a​/​p​f​g​/​p​f​g​A​p​f​1​a​.​wmv
    Not sure if anyone has run formal tests on this. It’s also expensive, as $27 per shirt.
    I still don’t see why there isn’t more use of nomex for ground troops uniforms.

    Reply
  4. Emastro says:
    April 17, 2006 at 12:39 pm

    I think children’s clothes have a fire rating and polyester was shied away from because of that–
    Why does the military always have to reinvent the wheel (hammer, ashtray)?
    I have a British Naval shirt that is treated for fire resistance– its made of cotton– again, post Falklands you’d think they knew something–
    I ‘ve never seen a Nomex t-shirt — the overalls I’ve seen were pretty rough– definately not underwear material. I heard there was a global shortage of Nomex– has anyone else heard that?

    Reply
  5. dave says:
    April 17, 2006 at 1:40 pm

    This is the desert. Its hot. Nothing will change that. This is the Marine Corps. Quit crying and do the job. The arabs have lived in the desert w/o “cool shirts” for centuries.

    Reply
  6. hempydave says:
    April 20, 2006 at 3:47 pm

    Hemp shirts are durable, resist rot and mildew,baterial growth ‚absorb/wick sweat well,
    also highly resistant to flame and will char rather than melt, greatly reduceing burn injuriues.

    Reply
  7. John says:
    October 17, 2006 at 9:32 am

    Check out Tac Wear, they have a moisture wicking Nomex t-shirt, long sleeve shirt and long johns. They are at http://​www​.tacwear​.com. These shirts stand up to the Thermoman burn testing.
    Great stuff.

    Reply
  8. Old Navy says:
    October 31, 2006 at 3:36 am

    It comes around again, and again, and again. In the 80’s — the last century USN bann’d syn, poly, material , and plastic (corfam) shoes from all engineering spaces.
    As I remember two sailors were burn when the poly kaki’s and “plastc” shoes melted on them during a emgineering room fire. I guess every generation has to learn.
    Is gortex OK…how about race car drivers — what di they wear?

    Reply
  9. bannery reklamowe says:
    March 31, 2007 at 8:39 am

    Fantastic article! Very useful informations. I really love it, can I recommend it to my friends?

    Reply
  10. gry says:
    April 18, 2007 at 12:10 pm

    Hemp shirts are durable, resist rot and mildew,baterial growth ‚absorb/wick sweat well,
    also highly resistant to flame and will char rather than melt, greatly reduceing burn injuriues.

    Reply
  11. pizza says:
    April 19, 2007 at 7:12 am

    Great article, can I translate it and put on my site?

    Reply
  12. filmiki says:
    May 5, 2007 at 12:27 pm

    Your home page is very friendly and rich with information!

    Reply
  13. Brautmoden says:
    May 28, 2007 at 5:54 pm

    Funny Idea, that someone would wear a shirt like this to avoid bullets ;-) )

    Reply
  14. budowa dom says:
    June 11, 2007 at 4:54 am

    Good article

    Reply
  15. JackHerer.com1938PopularMechanics says:
    March 1, 2008 at 3:11 pm

    Ever watch AND li$ten to ALL 13plu$ minute’z of USDA 1942 WW2 movie “Hemp for Victory” ??? USDA 1916 Bulletin #404 $ay’$ ONE acre of HEMP iz equal to FOUR acre’$ of tree’z over a 20 year rotation period. huh ??? Ayuh. The TRUTH Hurt’z, huh ??? Legal-Tender mean’z “trading cannabi$” …

    Reply
  16. przepisy kulinarne says:
    June 14, 2008 at 12:42 pm

    Very useful advices. I think I will search more about this on the Net, Guys. Many thanks

    Reply
  17. Świadectwa energetyczne says:
    February 26, 2010 at 10:24 am

    I komu to potrzebne?!?! Znowu coś wymyślili! Swoją drogą bardzo fajnie opisane! Przypadkowo znalazlam Cie w google, szukajac cos o oszedzaniu energii. Czekam na kolejne wpisy!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I reckon that the J-10 would be a good bet. Y'all...
      Chimp
    • Raptor Down (58-40)
      This story never gets old. This plane was never meant to be this...
      DeepThinker
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      um… they already have them. Hunters and...
      Buongi
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Interesting, though, from my experience, many...
      Buongi
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Not completely true-remember the Navy can be very picky...
      Chops
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I think by the end of the year some of those flags are...
      Tom
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I am not advocating non use of F22s&F35s in daylight...
      Chops
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Guys this platform is about CAS but not in the...
      ANGRYTACP
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Blaming the contractors for a development system created...
      G Lof
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      'Nor really stealthy'? LOL! – Only in...
      SMSgt Mac
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage