<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Big Payoff for New Scale</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/04/17/big-payoff-for-new-scale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/17/big-payoff-for-new-scale/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: passivhaus preis</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/17/big-payoff-for-new-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-47206</link> <dc:creator>passivhaus preis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:14:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3147#comment-47206</guid> <description>Great truck. Looks like Goliat from Knight Rider :-) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great truck. Looks like Goliat from Knight Rider <img
src='http://defensetech.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/17/big-payoff-for-new-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-128678</link> <dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 22:12:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3147#comment-128678</guid> <description>Improvements in logistics efficiency should make life rather interesting, though this probably won&#039;t change things at dirt-side airstrips more than at a &quot;enduring&quot; base, FOB, or state-side. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Improvements in logistics efficiency should make life rather interesting, though this probably won’t change things at dirt-side airstrips more than at a “enduring” base, FOB, or state-side.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/17/big-payoff-for-new-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-128677</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:35:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3147#comment-128677</guid> <description>That&#039;s actually very interesting.  It&#039;s fun to look behind the curtain and see how these things work.  It&#039;s also interesting that &quot;in-motion&quot; weighing has been the civilian standard for over a decade.  I realize it has to be portable and so on, but I&#039;m surprised even so that it has taken them so long to field it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s actually very interesting.  It’s fun to look behind the curtain and see how these things work.  It’s also interesting that “in-motion” weighing has been the civilian standard for over a decade.  I realize it has to be portable and so on, but I’m surprised even so that it has taken them so long to field it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/18 queries in 0.012 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-21 20:37:36 -->