<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cost Cutting the Super Sub</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:58:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen russell</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128748</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128748</guid>
		<description>CUT NG bureucracy &amp; Navy DC bureaucracy alone would Help.
Borrow from that Russian Hybrid sub:
Diesel Electric &amp; Nuke power plant.
Nice.
Then we can have 48 subs.
Reduce the costs.
Bring in new blood for contracts.
Redesign VA???
If the Russians can, why cant we?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CUT NG bureucracy &amp; Navy DC bureaucracy alone would Help.<br />
Borrow from that Russian Hybrid sub:<br />
Diesel Electric &amp; Nuke power plant.<br />
Nice.<br />
Then we can have 48 subs.<br />
Reduce the costs.<br />
Bring in new blood for contracts.<br />
Redesign VA???<br />
If the Russians can, why cant we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: POD</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128747</link>
		<dc:creator>POD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128747</guid>
		<description>Ther are always the COLLINS Boats @ $800 Million Aust apiece from good Old Oz.
They are the largest conventional boats in the world and a damn fine piece of kit but then I may be biased being Australian.
Cheers,
POD
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ther are always the COLLINS Boats @ $800 Million Aust apiece from good Old Oz.<br />
They are the largest conventional boats in the world and a damn fine piece of kit but then I may be biased being Australian.<br />
Cheers,<br />
POD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idealistic Ideology</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128746</link>
		<dc:creator>Idealistic Ideology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128746</guid>
		<description>I love this... &quot;The best anti-submarine weapon is another sumbarine.&quot; Bron Skinner.
Is there equal truth in the reverse proposal, &quot;The best antidote for a war machine is to eliminate all of them?&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this… “The best anti-submarine weapon is another sumbarine.” Bron Skinner.<br />
Is there equal truth in the reverse proposal, “The best antidote for a war machine is to eliminate all of them?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Strauss</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-47272</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-47272</guid>
		<description>i believe Joe Buff.The only credible non Gov.person that has any credibility.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i believe Joe Buff.The only credible non Gov.person that has any credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Wu</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128744</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128744</guid>
		<description>I thought that one of the original Virginia innovations was supposed to be a modular mission package, ie SEAL vs ASW vs ASuW, to enhance flexibility and save on cost.  Don&#039;t know if that plan has disappeared.
For example, one of the old plans was, to create an SLBM module, so that the Virginia class can serve as a follow-on replacement for the Ohio class.
[Don&#039;t know how to practically implement this idea, just repeating what I read.]
So given this idea, it simply means that the Navy is not buying as many SEAL modules as they planned.  Or that they&#039;ll buy the modules later.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that one of the original Virginia innovations was supposed to be a modular mission package, ie SEAL vs ASW vs ASuW, to enhance flexibility and save on cost.  Don’t know if that plan has disappeared.<br />
For example, one of the old plans was, to create an SLBM module, so that the Virginia class can serve as a follow-on replacement for the Ohio class.<br />
[Don’t know how to practically implement this idea, just repeating what I read.]<br />
So given this idea, it simply means that the Navy is not buying as many SEAL modules as they planned.  Or that they’ll buy the modules later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sglover</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128743</link>
		<dc:creator>sglover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128743</guid>
		<description>Is the submarine force really providing any strategic benefit to the country?  I mean, something beyond employing submariners and shipbuilders?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the submarine force really providing any strategic benefit to the country?  I mean, something beyond employing submariners and shipbuilders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSAllison</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128742</link>
		<dc:creator>JSAllison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128742</guid>
		<description>So, lose the SEAL capability and you pretty much lose the raison d&#039;etre for the thing...Now that&#039;s some cost cutting...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, lose the SEAL capability and you pretty much lose the raison d’etre for the thing…Now that’s some cost cutting…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

