<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Cost Cutting the Super Sub</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: stephen russell</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128748</link> <dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:09:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128748</guid> <description>CUT NG bureucracy &amp; Navy DC bureaucracy alone would Help. Borrow from that Russian Hybrid sub: Diesel Electric &amp; Nuke power plant. Nice. Then we can have 48 subs. Reduce the costs. Bring in new blood for contracts. Redesign VA??? If the Russians can, why cant we? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CUT NG bureucracy &amp; Navy DC bureaucracy alone would Help.<br /> Borrow from that Russian Hybrid sub:<br /> Diesel Electric &amp; Nuke power plant.<br /> Nice.<br /> Then we can have 48 subs.<br /> Reduce the costs.<br /> Bring in new blood for contracts.<br /> Redesign VA???<br /> If the Russians can, why cant we?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: POD</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128747</link> <dc:creator>POD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:06:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128747</guid> <description>Ther are always the COLLINS Boats @ $800 Million Aust apiece from good Old Oz. They are the largest conventional boats in the world and a damn fine piece of kit but then I may be biased being Australian. Cheers, POD </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ther are always the COLLINS Boats @ $800 Million Aust apiece from good Old Oz.<br /> They are the largest conventional boats in the world and a damn fine piece of kit but then I may be biased being Australian.<br /> Cheers,<br /> POD</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Idealistic Ideology</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128746</link> <dc:creator>Idealistic Ideology</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:23:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128746</guid> <description>I love this... &quot;The best anti-submarine weapon is another sumbarine.&quot; Bron Skinner. Is there equal truth in the reverse proposal, &quot;The best antidote for a war machine is to eliminate all of them?&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this… “The best anti-submarine weapon is another sumbarine.” Bron Skinner.<br /> Is there equal truth in the reverse proposal, “The best antidote for a war machine is to eliminate all of them?”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay Strauss</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-47272</link> <dc:creator>Jay Strauss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:46:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-47272</guid> <description>i believe Joe Buff.The only credible non Gov.person that has any credibility. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i believe Joe Buff.The only credible non Gov.person that has any credibility.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmy Wu</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128744</link> <dc:creator>Jimmy Wu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:45:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128744</guid> <description>I thought that one of the original Virginia innovations was supposed to be a modular mission package, ie SEAL vs ASW vs ASuW, to enhance flexibility and save on cost.  Don&#039;t know if that plan has disappeared. For example, one of the old plans was, to create an SLBM module, so that the Virginia class can serve as a follow-on replacement for the Ohio class. [Don&#039;t know how to practically implement this idea, just repeating what I read.] So given this idea, it simply means that the Navy is not buying as many SEAL modules as they planned.  Or that they&#039;ll buy the modules later. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that one of the original Virginia innovations was supposed to be a modular mission package, ie SEAL vs ASW vs ASuW, to enhance flexibility and save on cost.  Don’t know if that plan has disappeared.<br /> For example, one of the old plans was, to create an SLBM module, so that the Virginia class can serve as a follow-on replacement for the Ohio class.<br /> [Don’t know how to practically implement this idea, just repeating what I read.]<br /> So given this idea, it simply means that the Navy is not buying as many SEAL modules as they planned.  Or that they’ll buy the modules later.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sglover</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128743</link> <dc:creator>sglover</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:59:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128743</guid> <description>Is the submarine force really providing any strategic benefit to the country?  I mean, something beyond employing submariners and shipbuilders? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the submarine force really providing any strategic benefit to the country?  I mean, something beyond employing submariners and shipbuilders?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JSAllison</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/04/19/cost-cutting-the-super-sub/#comment-128742</link> <dc:creator>JSAllison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:23:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3155#comment-128742</guid> <description>So, lose the SEAL capability and you pretty much lose the raison d&#039;etre for the thing...Now that&#039;s some cost cutting... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, lose the SEAL capability and you pretty much lose the raison d’etre for the thing…Now that’s some cost cutting…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.005 seconds using apc
Object Caching 710/714 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 02:51:01 -->
